@bms48 @benroyce @YurkshireLad @Vivaldi tbh I'd say let whoever do whatever makes them happy/feeling useful/whatever else

@bms48 @benroyce @YurkshireLad @Vivaldi some AV providers already using LLMs fot the mentioned usecase for a while now, same applies for pentest, redteaming, etc etc.
While it's useful, that's imo more pattern recognition rather than intelligence in pure sens of the word.

@benroyce @YurkshireLad @Vivaldi just ignore lol
The most pathetic are the ones requiring finished product but wouldn't contribute. "I'm not a coder" is not an excuse: join beta programs, support alpha builds, etc etc
Anyways..

@bms48 @benroyce @YurkshireLad @Vivaldi Off thread topic, but referencing the above link, I agree on most points ; notably the not-really intelligent AI - LLM is explicit imo: advanced code that can easily eat LARGE inputs then puke less output while requiring massive compute capacity
The more you scale, the less LLMs are relevant. Exponentialy inflating token consumption as context grows:
https://thenextweb.com/news/microsoft-claude-code-retreat-ai-cost

But yeah one day, it would be faithful to the "AI" terminology

@benroyce @YurkshireLad @Vivaldi just be grateful and flexible..
I appreciate Vivaldi's philosophy and efforts, even though I'm using Mullvad Browser as primary