Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. You noticed how google search became unusably shit a few years ago

You noticed how google search became unusably shit a few years ago

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
217 Indlæg 177 Posters 0 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • ocean@raru.reO ocean@raru.re

    You noticed how google search became unusably shit a few years ago?
    Turns out that was on purpose

    peterbrown@mastodon.scotP This user is from outside of this forum
    peterbrown@mastodon.scotP This user is from outside of this forum
    peterbrown@mastodon.scot
    wrote on sidst redigeret af
    #38

    @ocean “The study suggests that poor organic search results actually benefit Google's bottom line in two ways: they make paid advertisements more valuable to users seeking accurate information, and they force users to refine their searches multiple times, exposing them to more advertising in the process.”

    Aaargh!!

    (glad I’ve stopped using Google as a search engine)

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • ocean@raru.reO ocean@raru.re

      You noticed how google search became unusably shit a few years ago?
      Turns out that was on purpose

      alpha1beta@libretweet.comA This user is from outside of this forum
      alpha1beta@libretweet.comA This user is from outside of this forum
      alpha1beta@libretweet.com
      wrote on sidst redigeret af
      #39

      @ocean is there a source on this?

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • paradox@raru.reP paradox@raru.re

        @ocean I need to understand what people are searching for and why the first page doesn't help them.
        Cuz the only time I can't find something is because I don't really expect to find anything. Either cuz it's a very niche question or earlier when I tried to get a pdf/ebook of Harold and the Purple Crayon (still copyrighted I think, no straightforward download).

        Like I believe people are having a hard time. I just can't tell from my experience.

        heptasean@social.tchncs.deH This user is from outside of this forum
        heptasean@social.tchncs.deH This user is from outside of this forum
        heptasean@social.tchncs.de
        wrote on sidst redigeret af
        #40

        @Paradox By the way: Never heard of “Harold and the Purple Crayon” before, but https://www.google.com/search?q=%22Harold+and+the+Purple+Crayon%22+PDF results in a PDF with a Hindi translation (including the English original, but black and white without purple) and a PDF with a version with additional graphic explanations for people with disabilities on the first search result page. … which probably is as good as it gets for a work still under copyright.

        paradox@raru.reP 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • lispi314@udongein.xyzL lispi314@udongein.xyz
          @Paradox It seriously covers multiple pages at this point on the worst search-engines.

          Any topic that /isn't/ particularly niche suffers from it more.
          heptasean@social.tchncs.deH This user is from outside of this forum
          heptasean@social.tchncs.deH This user is from outside of this forum
          heptasean@social.tchncs.de
          wrote on sidst redigeret af
          #41

          @lispi314 You are not only talking about the snippet from *Google's* LLM at the top of the search results, but also about the other results? Haven't had *that* many obviously LLM-generated, but perhaps my interests are just niche enough. @Paradox

          lispi314@udongein.xyzL 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • ocean@raru.reO ocean@raru.re

            You noticed how google search became unusably shit a few years ago?
            Turns out that was on purpose

            gcvsa@mstdn.plusG This user is from outside of this forum
            gcvsa@mstdn.plusG This user is from outside of this forum
            gcvsa@mstdn.plus
            wrote on sidst redigeret af
            #42

            @ocean that's...actually diabolical.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • heptasean@social.tchncs.deH heptasean@social.tchncs.de

              @Paradox By the way: Never heard of “Harold and the Purple Crayon” before, but https://www.google.com/search?q=%22Harold+and+the+Purple+Crayon%22+PDF results in a PDF with a Hindi translation (including the English original, but black and white without purple) and a PDF with a version with additional graphic explanations for people with disabilities on the first search result page. … which probably is as good as it gets for a work still under copyright.

              paradox@raru.reP This user is from outside of this forum
              paradox@raru.reP This user is from outside of this forum
              paradox@raru.re
              wrote on sidst redigeret af
              #43

              @HeptaSean
              It's an old kid's book about a boy that explores the world while drawing it all with his crayon.

              Thanks. ^_^

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • ocean@raru.reO ocean@raru.re

                You noticed how google search became unusably shit a few years ago?
                Turns out that was on purpose

                dorothywillson@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
                dorothywillson@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
                dorothywillson@mastodon.social
                wrote on sidst redigeret af
                #44

                @ocean right

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • ocean@raru.reO ocean@raru.re

                  You noticed how google search became unusably shit a few years ago?
                  Turns out that was on purpose

                  cassolotl@toot.walesC This user is from outside of this forum
                  cassolotl@toot.walesC This user is from outside of this forum
                  cassolotl@toot.wales
                  wrote on sidst redigeret af
                  #45

                  @ocean Source: https://journalrecord.com/2025/02/20/is-google-making-search-worse-to-sell-more-ads/

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • heptasean@social.tchncs.deH heptasean@social.tchncs.de

                    @lispi314 You are not only talking about the snippet from *Google's* LLM at the top of the search results, but also about the other results? Haven't had *that* many obviously LLM-generated, but perhaps my interests are just niche enough. @Paradox

                    lispi314@udongein.xyzL This user is from outside of this forum
                    lispi314@udongein.xyzL This user is from outside of this forum
                    lispi314@udongein.xyz
                    wrote on sidst redigeret af
                    #46
                    @HeptaSean @Paradox Not the snippet, no. Pages on other domains linked by the search engine results.

                    There's a certain... meandering meaninglessness to the text with a bunch of huge empty spaces on those sites (thanks adblockers) that's typical.

                    Oh sure, the meaningless nonsense also used to get written-up by humans before but I don't consider spam to be worth more when written by humans instead of autogenerated.
                    heptasean@social.tchncs.deH 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • ocean@raru.reO ocean@raru.re

                      You noticed how google search became unusably shit a few years ago?
                      Turns out that was on purpose

                      mdione@en.osm.townM This user is from outside of this forum
                      mdione@en.osm.townM This user is from outside of this forum
                      mdione@en.osm.town
                      wrote on sidst redigeret af
                      #47

                      @ocean where is this coming from? What's the source?

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • mikal@sfba.socialM mikal@sfba.social

                        @ocean
                        Ha! Knew it!
                        Not long ago I pointed out to someone that in a way, worse search results meant more time scrolling and ergo more ad impressions, so it wouldn't at all surprise me if they quit bothering to improve.

                        Fuckers. I'd assumed a sort of passive acceptance and laziness had led to degraded quality, but the fact that it was actually designed that way means there should be a "recall" of their product and they need to compensate me for all the wasted time before I finally gave up and went to DDG (which, IMO, has dropped significantly in quality since I started using it 🤔 ).

                        Thing is, look at ANY online business that makes money off of ad impressions and there is an immediately obvious incentive to find ways to increase your scrolling time on the site. Not all are scummy grifters, of course, but when the incentive is there, someone is going to take advantage of it.

                        anne_delong@musician.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                        anne_delong@musician.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                        anne_delong@musician.social
                        wrote on sidst redigeret af
                        #48

                        @Mikal @ocean

                        Well, as with other companies, competition and product reviews are needed to link good service to profits. So maybe consumers should change up their search engines.

                        Here's an article from PC Magazine that compares them:

                        https://www.pcmag.com/picks/go-beyond-google-best-alternative-search-engines

                        #searchengines

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • ocean@raru.reO ocean@raru.re

                          You noticed how google search became unusably shit a few years ago?
                          Turns out that was on purpose

                          cosmocatalano@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                          cosmocatalano@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                          cosmocatalano@mastodon.social
                          wrote on sidst redigeret af
                          #49

                          @ocean this big issue here is that everyone else's search is still worse

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • ocean@raru.reO ocean@raru.re

                            You noticed how google search became unusably shit a few years ago?
                            Turns out that was on purpose

                            jesterchen@social.tchncs.deJ This user is from outside of this forum
                            jesterchen@social.tchncs.deJ This user is from outside of this forum
                            jesterchen@social.tchncs.de
                            wrote on sidst redigeret af
                            #50

                            @ocean Nein!

                            Doch.

                            Oh...

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • ocean@raru.reO ocean@raru.re

                              You noticed how google search became unusably shit a few years ago?
                              Turns out that was on purpose

                              amazing_helenab@mastodon.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                              amazing_helenab@mastodon.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                              amazing_helenab@mastodon.social
                              wrote on sidst redigeret af
                              #51

                              @ocean 😡

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • itamarst@hachyderm.ioI itamarst@hachyderm.io

                                @ocean As predicted by Brin and Page: "we expect that advertising funded search engines will be inherently biased towards the advertisers and away from the needs of the consumers." (The Anatomy of a Large-Scale Hypertextual Web Search Engine, 1998 - http://infolab.stanford.edu/~backrub/google.html)

                                khleedril@cyberplace.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
                                khleedril@cyberplace.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
                                khleedril@cyberplace.social
                                wrote on sidst redigeret af
                                #52

                                @itamarst @ocean That was back when Google pledged, and did, no evil. Since then they've told us they are going to be evil.

                                itamarst@hachyderm.ioI 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • ocean@raru.reO ocean@raru.re

                                  You noticed how google search became unusably shit a few years ago?
                                  Turns out that was on purpose

                                  peteriskrisjanis@toot.lvP This user is from outside of this forum
                                  peteriskrisjanis@toot.lvP This user is from outside of this forum
                                  peteriskrisjanis@toot.lv
                                  wrote on sidst redigeret af
                                  #53

                                  @ocean this is why they have heavily invested in trump 2.0. It just makes cynical business sense.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • ocean@raru.reO ocean@raru.re

                                    You noticed how google search became unusably shit a few years ago?
                                    Turns out that was on purpose

                                    m0xee@nosh0b10.m0xee.netM This user is from outside of this forum
                                    m0xee@nosh0b10.m0xee.netM This user is from outside of this forum
                                    m0xee@nosh0b10.m0xee.net
                                    wrote on sidst redigeret af
                                    #54
                                    @ocean@raru.re
                                    I wonder if they utilised the same strategy for Google Translate? Because it's equally unusable now — I recall early machine-assisted translation systems from the nineties doing much better job that what Google Translate does now. At times it's hard to figure out what is the meaning of the resulting text even if you speak both languages and know what the usual pitfalls are.
                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • ocean@raru.reO ocean@raru.re

                                      You noticed how google search became unusably shit a few years ago?
                                      Turns out that was on purpose

                                      punishmenthurts@autistics.lifeP This user is from outside of this forum
                                      punishmenthurts@autistics.lifeP This user is from outside of this forum
                                      punishmenthurts@autistics.life
                                      wrote on sidst redigeret af
                                      #55

                                      @ocean
                                      .
                                      what about when we don't need, "competition," for a pile of crap and just stop using it since it doesn't work?
                                      .
                                      Is "market share," a joke here? Everybody turns their computers off, because they're fucking useless but they're still winning, "market share?"

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • ocean@raru.reO ocean@raru.re

                                        You noticed how google search became unusably shit a few years ago?
                                        Turns out that was on purpose

                                        nom@mk.spook.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                                        nom@mk.spook.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                                        nom@mk.spook.social
                                        wrote on sidst redigeret af
                                        #56

                                        @ocean@raru.re Can you believe "Buick" was once an innovative company. Then GM bought them. Oh well.

                                        Not that I care much about network software, coz nearly all of it pretty much sucks. But anywayz think of all the companies Google has ruined. If there was a great idea in there- it'd likely get lost.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • ocean@raru.reO ocean@raru.re

                                          You noticed how google search became unusably shit a few years ago?
                                          Turns out that was on purpose

                                          elsactivitypub@goto.freakstic.frE This user is from outside of this forum
                                          elsactivitypub@goto.freakstic.frE This user is from outside of this forum
                                          elsactivitypub@goto.freakstic.fr
                                          wrote on sidst redigeret af
                                          #57

                                          @ocean so Google search results are bad intentionally

                                          ok, annoying but why not

                                          but then how is DDG even worse 😭

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Svar
                                          • Svar som emne
                                          Login for at svare
                                          • Ældste til nyeste
                                          • Nyeste til ældste
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Log ind

                                          • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          Graciously hosted by data.coop
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Hjem
                                          • Seneste
                                          • Etiketter
                                          • Populære
                                          • Verden
                                          • Bruger
                                          • Grupper