Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. Because a LOT of people are missing the point:

Because a LOT of people are missing the point:

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
107 Indlæg 78 Posters 0 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • cstross@wandering.shopC cstross@wandering.shop

    Because a LOT of people are missing the point:

    No, Elon Musk is NOT serious about putting a million data centres into orbit. It can't work: laws of physics say "nope".

    But SpaceX is expected to go public this year.

    Elon is talking up his company's future prospects in front of gullible investors because he needs a growth narrative beyond Starlink, which is already priced in. Something to justify the Starship proram beyond NASA's lunar ambitions.

    So it's salesman's bullshit, lies for fools.

    knud@mastodon.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
    knud@mastodon.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
    knud@mastodon.social
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #20

    @cstross

    Lying worked for Tesla, so he wants to pull the same thing again.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • tony@toot.hoyle.me.ukT tony@toot.hoyle.me.uk

      @cstross And the announcement timed after he appeared in the epstein files.

      Now we're talking about this BS instead..

      gbargoud@masto.nycG This user is from outside of this forum
      gbargoud@masto.nycG This user is from outside of this forum
      gbargoud@masto.nyc
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #21

      @cstross @tony

      Don't know about you but I have not stopped talking about him begging to go to pedo Island (and it seems being rejected the majority of the time)

      fazalmajid@social.vivaldi.netF 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • cstross@wandering.shopC cstross@wandering.shop

        Because a LOT of people are missing the point:

        No, Elon Musk is NOT serious about putting a million data centres into orbit. It can't work: laws of physics say "nope".

        But SpaceX is expected to go public this year.

        Elon is talking up his company's future prospects in front of gullible investors because he needs a growth narrative beyond Starlink, which is already priced in. Something to justify the Starship proram beyond NASA's lunar ambitions.

        So it's salesman's bullshit, lies for fools.

        knowprose@mastodon.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
        knowprose@mastodon.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
        knowprose@mastodon.social
        wrote sidst redigeret af
        #22

        @cstross it's the 'put it in a box and sell it' paradigm, where neither the box nor what goes in it can exist.

        He, like the 🍊, depend on the masses who lack learning. Not education: learning.

        In the most Twainish of ways.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • asprinkleofsage@mastodon.socialA asprinkleofsage@mastodon.social

          @cstross Elon, bullshit? Sir! I request you consider retracting that statement!

          cadbury_moose@wandering.shopC This user is from outside of this forum
          cadbury_moose@wandering.shopC This user is from outside of this forum
          cadbury_moose@wandering.shop
          wrote sidst redigeret af
          #23

          @ASprinkleofSage @cstross

          Ratshit, then.

          asprinkleofsage@mastodon.socialA 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • cstross@wandering.shopC cstross@wandering.shop

            Because a LOT of people are missing the point:

            No, Elon Musk is NOT serious about putting a million data centres into orbit. It can't work: laws of physics say "nope".

            But SpaceX is expected to go public this year.

            Elon is talking up his company's future prospects in front of gullible investors because he needs a growth narrative beyond Starlink, which is already priced in. Something to justify the Starship proram beyond NASA's lunar ambitions.

            So it's salesman's bullshit, lies for fools.

            nmba@mstdn.caN This user is from outside of this forum
            nmba@mstdn.caN This user is from outside of this forum
            nmba@mstdn.ca
            wrote sidst redigeret af
            #24

            @cstross
            I'm so excited that pedo musk is finally heading to Mars this year. He can use the epstein list as his exclusive passenger list.

            "SpaceX will start launching Starships to Mars in 2026, Elon Musk says"

            elasticsoul@mastodon.socialE 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • cstross@wandering.shopC cstross@wandering.shop

              Because a LOT of people are missing the point:

              No, Elon Musk is NOT serious about putting a million data centres into orbit. It can't work: laws of physics say "nope".

              But SpaceX is expected to go public this year.

              Elon is talking up his company's future prospects in front of gullible investors because he needs a growth narrative beyond Starlink, which is already priced in. Something to justify the Starship proram beyond NASA's lunar ambitions.

              So it's salesman's bullshit, lies for fools.

              fredrict@mastodon.opportunis.meF This user is from outside of this forum
              fredrict@mastodon.opportunis.meF This user is from outside of this forum
              fredrict@mastodon.opportunis.me
              wrote sidst redigeret af
              #25

              @cstross Investors don’t need to be gullible to buy SpaceX shares. They only need to believe that some gullible fools down the line will buy their shares at a higher price.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • cstross@wandering.shopC cstross@wandering.shop

                Because a LOT of people are missing the point:

                No, Elon Musk is NOT serious about putting a million data centres into orbit. It can't work: laws of physics say "nope".

                But SpaceX is expected to go public this year.

                Elon is talking up his company's future prospects in front of gullible investors because he needs a growth narrative beyond Starlink, which is already priced in. Something to justify the Starship proram beyond NASA's lunar ambitions.

                So it's salesman's bullshit, lies for fools.

                harkonnen2@kolektiva.socialH This user is from outside of this forum
                harkonnen2@kolektiva.socialH This user is from outside of this forum
                harkonnen2@kolektiva.social
                wrote sidst redigeret af
                #26

                The problem here is that both Elon and investors (as whole financial sector) is currently trapped in the myth of Eternal Growth. They are so trapped in this world where everything must grow, even growth must grow, that they don't see when they cross the barrier of telling themselves fairytales and having ideas that are physically impossible to realize. I'm not sure if this is gullibilty or if they really believe that the growth will never stop or maybe even fear because if they stop doing this, the REAL wold says "I call" and their world will fall apart...

                @cstross

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • uilebheist@polyglot.cityU uilebheist@polyglot.city

                  @cstross I wouldn't put it past him to actually believe his own bullshit though.
                  He'd be "Yes, it breaks a law, big deal, we have lots of lawyers", without actually knowing that no, lawyers can't argue against physics.

                  cadbury_moose@wandering.shopC This user is from outside of this forum
                  cadbury_moose@wandering.shopC This user is from outside of this forum
                  cadbury_moose@wandering.shop
                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                  #27

                  @Uilebheist @cstross

                  (Some) lawyers can (and will, if paid enough) argue against physics, but their chance of winning (other than the money you're paying them) is less than infinitesimal. (They're hoping they will be paid more than they get sanctioned for.)

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • cadbury_moose@wandering.shopC cadbury_moose@wandering.shop

                    @ASprinkleofSage @cstross

                    Ratshit, then.

                    asprinkleofsage@mastodon.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                    asprinkleofsage@mastodon.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                    asprinkleofsage@mastodon.social
                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                    #28

                    @Cadbury_Moose @cstross I mean, once it's rotted down, bullshit is actually useful. Not so sure about ratshit but possibly so. Maybe radioactive waste is more appropriate? it does ruin a good idiom though.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • cstross@wandering.shopC cstross@wandering.shop

                      @dubiousblur Remember he owns massive battery factories. However, China more or less has a monopoly on PV panel manufacturing.

                      fedops@fosstodon.orgF This user is from outside of this forum
                      fedops@fosstodon.orgF This user is from outside of this forum
                      fedops@fosstodon.org
                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                      #29

                      @cstross with outdated technology because they failed on the 4680 cells, and with now canceled supply contracts:

                      https://electrek.co/2025/12/29/tesla-4680-battery-supply-chain-collapses-partner-writes-down-dea/

                      Apparently they are using up surplus 4680s in model ys now:

                      https://www.autoevolution.com/news/tesla-quietly-starts-building-model-y-with-its-controversial-4680-cells-again-264844.html

                      @dubiousblur

                      bashstkid@mastodon.onlineB 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • cstross@wandering.shopC cstross@wandering.shop

                        Because a LOT of people are missing the point:

                        No, Elon Musk is NOT serious about putting a million data centres into orbit. It can't work: laws of physics say "nope".

                        But SpaceX is expected to go public this year.

                        Elon is talking up his company's future prospects in front of gullible investors because he needs a growth narrative beyond Starlink, which is already priced in. Something to justify the Starship proram beyond NASA's lunar ambitions.

                        So it's salesman's bullshit, lies for fools.

                        patweber@mastodon.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                        patweber@mastodon.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                        patweber@mastodon.social
                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                        #30

                        @cstross Wild ideas ≠ prospectus

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • gbargoud@masto.nycG gbargoud@masto.nyc

                          @cstross @tony

                          Don't know about you but I have not stopped talking about him begging to go to pedo Island (and it seems being rejected the majority of the time)

                          fazalmajid@social.vivaldi.netF This user is from outside of this forum
                          fazalmajid@social.vivaldi.netF This user is from outside of this forum
                          fazalmajid@social.vivaldi.net
                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                          #31

                          @gbargoud @cstross @tony it takes a special kind of creepy to weird even Epstein out.

                          graydon@canada.masto.hostG 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • mkoek@mastodon.nlM mkoek@mastodon.nl

                            @kthy @cstross and that, infuriating as it is, works

                            clintruin@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                            clintruin@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                            clintruin@mastodon.social
                            wrote sidst redigeret af
                            #32

                            @mkoek @kthy @cstross
                            Yep.

                            He fucks with Tesla investors the same way.

                            "Robo-taxis" anyone?
                            He first brought them up in 2016.

                            kthy@helvede.netK 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • cstross@wandering.shopC cstross@wandering.shop

                              Because a LOT of people are missing the point:

                              No, Elon Musk is NOT serious about putting a million data centres into orbit. It can't work: laws of physics say "nope".

                              But SpaceX is expected to go public this year.

                              Elon is talking up his company's future prospects in front of gullible investors because he needs a growth narrative beyond Starlink, which is already priced in. Something to justify the Starship proram beyond NASA's lunar ambitions.

                              So it's salesman's bullshit, lies for fools.

                              fazalmajid@social.vivaldi.netF This user is from outside of this forum
                              fazalmajid@social.vivaldi.netF This user is from outside of this forum
                              fazalmajid@social.vivaldi.net
                              wrote sidst redigeret af
                              #33

                              @cstross won't Kessler Syndrome make space launch dead as a business long before that?

                              cstross@wandering.shopC 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • fedops@fosstodon.orgF fedops@fosstodon.org

                                @cstross with outdated technology because they failed on the 4680 cells, and with now canceled supply contracts:

                                https://electrek.co/2025/12/29/tesla-4680-battery-supply-chain-collapses-partner-writes-down-dea/

                                Apparently they are using up surplus 4680s in model ys now:

                                https://www.autoevolution.com/news/tesla-quietly-starts-building-model-y-with-its-controversial-4680-cells-again-264844.html

                                @dubiousblur

                                bashstkid@mastodon.onlineB This user is from outside of this forum
                                bashstkid@mastodon.onlineB This user is from outside of this forum
                                bashstkid@mastodon.online
                                wrote sidst redigeret af
                                #34

                                @fedops @cstross @dubiousblur That is interesting.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • cstross@wandering.shopC cstross@wandering.shop

                                  Because a LOT of people are missing the point:

                                  No, Elon Musk is NOT serious about putting a million data centres into orbit. It can't work: laws of physics say "nope".

                                  But SpaceX is expected to go public this year.

                                  Elon is talking up his company's future prospects in front of gullible investors because he needs a growth narrative beyond Starlink, which is already priced in. Something to justify the Starship proram beyond NASA's lunar ambitions.

                                  So it's salesman's bullshit, lies for fools.

                                  hermlon@yuustan.spaceH This user is from outside of this forum
                                  hermlon@yuustan.spaceH This user is from outside of this forum
                                  hermlon@yuustan.space
                                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                                  #35

                                  @cstross thanks for pointing it out that clearly. I went through several articles yesterday to find out why the hell someone would think putting a data center in space would be beneficial.

                                  And the only argument every journalist was citing besides "Sam Altman said it in a podcast" was 24/7 solar power, independent of weather. Which is not true for most lower orbits (earth's shadow), and still doesn't solve cooling, too little power, limited up/down link and maintenance problems.

                                  So that it's just bullshit to sound futuristic to the dumbest of the dumbest makes a lot of sense.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • cstross@wandering.shopC cstross@wandering.shop

                                    Because a LOT of people are missing the point:

                                    No, Elon Musk is NOT serious about putting a million data centres into orbit. It can't work: laws of physics say "nope".

                                    But SpaceX is expected to go public this year.

                                    Elon is talking up his company's future prospects in front of gullible investors because he needs a growth narrative beyond Starlink, which is already priced in. Something to justify the Starship proram beyond NASA's lunar ambitions.

                                    So it's salesman's bullshit, lies for fools.

                                    D This user is from outside of this forum
                                    D This user is from outside of this forum
                                    didthat1957@mastodon.social
                                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                                    #36

                                    @cstross
                                    Elon is a nazi want a be his ties with trump and epstien is why these ppl are not to be supported

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • clintruin@mastodon.socialC clintruin@mastodon.social

                                      @mkoek @kthy @cstross
                                      Yep.

                                      He fucks with Tesla investors the same way.

                                      "Robo-taxis" anyone?
                                      He first brought them up in 2016.

                                      kthy@helvede.netK This user is from outside of this forum
                                      kthy@helvede.netK This user is from outside of this forum
                                      kthy@helvede.net
                                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                                      #37

                                      @clintruin @mkoek @cstross here's one of my favourite Wikipedia pages: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_predictions_for_autonomous_Tesla_vehicles_by_Elon_Musk

                                      clintruin@mastodon.socialC mkoek@mastodon.nlM 2 Replies Last reply
                                      0
                                      • kthy@helvede.netK kthy@helvede.net

                                        @clintruin @mkoek @cstross here's one of my favourite Wikipedia pages: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_predictions_for_autonomous_Tesla_vehicles_by_Elon_Musk

                                        clintruin@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                                        clintruin@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                                        clintruin@mastodon.social
                                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                                        #38

                                        @kthy @mkoek @cstross
                                        😂
                                        Ex-act-ly.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • cstross@wandering.shopC cstross@wandering.shop

                                          Because a LOT of people are missing the point:

                                          No, Elon Musk is NOT serious about putting a million data centres into orbit. It can't work: laws of physics say "nope".

                                          But SpaceX is expected to go public this year.

                                          Elon is talking up his company's future prospects in front of gullible investors because he needs a growth narrative beyond Starlink, which is already priced in. Something to justify the Starship proram beyond NASA's lunar ambitions.

                                          So it's salesman's bullshit, lies for fools.

                                          lucien@toot.communityL This user is from outside of this forum
                                          lucien@toot.communityL This user is from outside of this forum
                                          lucien@toot.community
                                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                                          #39

                                          @cstross Starlink might be the only thing one of his companies got right. I've been using one for a while now and it's a game changer when living somewhere remote. I wish we had a suitable EU competitor and not have to contribute to this man's lunacy...

                                          oldgeek@masto.yttrx.comO donaldball@triangletoot.partyD 2 Replies Last reply
                                          0
                                          Svar
                                          • Svar som emne
                                          Login for at svare
                                          • Ældste til nyeste
                                          • Nyeste til ældste
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Log ind

                                          • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          Graciously hosted by data.coop
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Hjem
                                          • Seneste
                                          • Etiketter
                                          • Populære
                                          • Verden
                                          • Bruger
                                          • Grupper