When you post things on Instagram, Facebook, and X, this is what they look like to people who don’t use those platforms.
-
@elettrona @aral @_elena @vicfroh I fully agree that independent journalism requires financing that is independent from state or corporations.
However, in my country for example, press codex states the duty of informing the public fully and truthful. Imho, the public includes such individuals that are less fortunate and not able to afford a subscription.
50 years back, before digital publishing, printed newspapers could be evaluated without financial obligation... head articles at the least.
@Amorpheus @aral @_elena @vicfroh I agree. And, talking about digital newspapers, I'm blind. There are tons of digital newspapers which, if I pay them, I them find out they're IMAGES. Just PDF images not readable by assistive tech. What does it mean? Throw money down the toilet drain.
There are many blind-related associations which provide newspapers, but they decide which agreements to sign, according to political positions or whatever else, the result is that we can access what others want us to. -
When you post things on Instagram, Facebook, and X, this is what they look like to people who don’t use those platforms.
-
When you post things on Instagram, Facebook, and X, this is what they look like to people who don’t use those platforms.
@aral
Agreed, but as a workaround use the alternative frontend. -
When you post things on Instagram, Facebook, and X, this is what they look like to people who don’t use those platforms.
@aral Tbh, I just use it as an excuse to not go any further, which usually ends up helping my blood pressure.
-
When you post things on Instagram, Facebook, and X, this is what they look like to people who don’t use those platforms.
@aral beautiful
-
When you post things on Instagram, Facebook, and X, this is what they look like to people who don’t use those platforms.
@aral At least for Twitter, this is not true. Yeah, the page exhorts you to create an account - but it *does* show the post. At least on desktop; maybe it's different on mobile.
-
When you post things on Instagram, Facebook, and X, this is what they look like to people who don’t use those platforms.
@aral Shit like this make me wonder why this alone hasn’t lead to a giant user revolt and exodus years ago. Like, this should be completely disqualifying.
The whole point of "social media" goes out of the window if ALL posts are locked away (usually against the user’s wishes btw).These terrible private billionaire playgrounds cannot crumble fast enough.
-
When you post things on Instagram, Facebook, and X, this is what they look like to people who don’t use those platforms.
@aral malware
-
@aral At least for Twitter, this is not true. Yeah, the page exhorts you to create an account - but it *does* show the post. At least on desktop; maybe it's different on mobile.
-
@aral At least for Twitter, this is not true. Yeah, the page exhorts you to create an account - but it *does* show the post. At least on desktop; maybe it's different on mobile.
-
@aral At least for Twitter, this is not true. Yeah, the page exhorts you to create an account - but it *does* show the post. At least on desktop; maybe it's different on mobile.
-
@aral malware
-
When you post things on Instagram, Facebook, and X, this is what they look like to people who don’t use those platforms.
@aral perfect example of why public agencies should not be using those as their primary press release forum.
-
@aral @_elena @vicfroh This is why I firmly condemn people relying to these platforms only. You have no way to follow their content, despite using RSS like civil people, but platforms deny the access to public, to force you joining.
This should be illegal, at least because when you publicly post on those platforms and you choose "public post", they say "it's available inside and outside the platform".
And, well, automated scanners can access those contents indexing them, while humans can't!
And no, it's not the same thing of blogs' member-only contents. That's a different matter.@elettrona @aral @_elena @vicfroh and it's even worse when governments do it. Or public announcement services with important info, like natural disasters.
-
When you post things on Instagram, Facebook, and X, this is what they look like to people who don’t use those platforms.
@aral I don't listen to some podcasts I like anymore because they only use this platforms to stay in contact with listeners. So if you can not comment without account why should you listen to it - it must be an extraordinary high quality podcast with very important content where no comment is needed at all.
-
@aral perfect example of why public agencies should not be using those as their primary press release forum.
@dresstokilt @aral THIS. Why I cannot fave it more than once???
-
When you post things on Instagram, Facebook, and X, this is what they look like to people who don’t use those platforms.
@aral I’ll go a step further. When you post a link to X, Facebook or Instagram (1) I won’t bother even trying to click the link and (2) I’m one step closer to unfollowing, or muting the account that posted it. Sorry not sorry.
-
-
When you post things on Instagram, Facebook, and X, this is what they look like to people who don’t use those platforms.
I tried X again a few months ago and got a warning because I was posting about the Genocide in Gaza.
I kind of took it as a badge of honour, cos it's a horrendous place. So much racism!
I was shocked how over it was. -
When you post things on Instagram, Facebook, and X, this is what they look like to people who don’t use those platforms.
@aral I understand where you're coming from, but since I regularly follow links and end up reading posts on X, Instagram and FB (though I might have to dismiss a popup), I know you have half a point. Sensitive content might be hidden, but I've never run in to an example. Admittedly I use this old thing called a laptop. YMMV on a smartphone.
