Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. Just had to deal with a bunch of wind turbine conspiracy theories at #StateOfEU, this polite political event I’m at in Brussels.

Just had to deal with a bunch of wind turbine conspiracy theories at #StateOfEU, this polite political event I’m at in Brussels.

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
stateofeu
137 Indlæg 74 Posters 1 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • jon@gruene.socialJ jon@gruene.social

    @jackofalltrades something that’s wrong is wrong, however many people believe it

    jackofalltrades@mas.toJ This user is from outside of this forum
    jackofalltrades@mas.toJ This user is from outside of this forum
    jackofalltrades@mas.to
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #88

    @jon Indeed. However, it is the will of the many, not ethics of the few, that ultimately decide what route humanity will take.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • ednl@mastodon.socialE ednl@mastodon.social

      @DukeDuke @jon Best not to give him any more publicity, at the very least.

      https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/azeenghorayshi/neil-degrasse-tyson-sexual-allegations-four-women

      https://slate.com/technology/2018/12/neil-degrasse-tyson-sexual-harassment-allegations-response.html

      jon@gruene.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
      jon@gruene.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
      jon@gruene.social
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #89

      @ednl @DukeDuke oh sod 🤦‍♂️ Un-boosted.

      ednl@mastodon.socialE 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • jon@gruene.socialJ jon@gruene.social

        This is the ethical point here: NOTHING is more important than combatting climate change. Nothing. Without a liveable planet nothing else works. I’ll have a debate about the numbers, and how to decarbonise. But I’ve no time for whataboutism, nimbyism or conspiracy theories. #StateOfEU

        elba013@muenchen.socialE This user is from outside of this forum
        elba013@muenchen.socialE This user is from outside of this forum
        elba013@muenchen.social
        wrote sidst redigeret af
        #90

        @jon Yes, climate change is a singularity. But I think, war is still the greater devil. It kills people much faster, causes great misery closer to the present day. It comes along with other devils like genocide and mass murder. And it will stop the work against climate change.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • jon@gruene.socialJ jon@gruene.social

          @ednl @DukeDuke oh sod 🤦‍♂️ Un-boosted.

          ednl@mastodon.socialE This user is from outside of this forum
          ednl@mastodon.socialE This user is from outside of this forum
          ednl@mastodon.social
          wrote sidst redigeret af
          #91

          @jon @DukeDuke Yeah I only learned the other day too.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • jon@gruene.socialJ jon@gruene.social

            Just had to deal with a bunch of wind turbine conspiracy theories at #StateOfEU, this polite political event I’m at in Brussels. Damn we‘re fucked. Fucked. Our notional political elite is believing in utter complete garbage.

            numodular@c.imN This user is from outside of this forum
            numodular@c.imN This user is from outside of this forum
            numodular@c.im
            wrote sidst redigeret af
            #92

            @jon Worse: graduating fossil fuels as baseload power, is actually going in the opposite direction.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • jon@gruene.socialJ jon@gruene.social

              This is the ethical point here: NOTHING is more important than combatting climate change. Nothing. Without a liveable planet nothing else works. I’ll have a debate about the numbers, and how to decarbonise. But I’ve no time for whataboutism, nimbyism or conspiracy theories. #StateOfEU

              jon@gruene.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
              jon@gruene.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
              jon@gruene.social
              wrote sidst redigeret af
              #93

              And I just told this story in the full plenary here. Predictably it went down like a bucket of sick. #StateOfEU

              jon@gruene.socialJ 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • jon@gruene.socialJ jon@gruene.social

                And I just told this story in the full plenary here. Predictably it went down like a bucket of sick. #StateOfEU

                jon@gruene.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                jon@gruene.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                jon@gruene.social
                wrote sidst redigeret af
                #94

                And the moderator used the typical fossil fuels talking point that dependence on fossil fuels is just as problematic as dependence on Chinese solar panels. These are NOT equivalent! Once you’ve got your solar panel it is yours. #StateOfEU

                rainerzufall_le@mastodon.socialR moss_the_texie@rheinneckar.socialM jon@gruene.socialJ ignaloidas@not.acu.ltI 4 Replies Last reply
                0
                • jon@gruene.socialJ jon@gruene.social

                  And the moderator used the typical fossil fuels talking point that dependence on fossil fuels is just as problematic as dependence on Chinese solar panels. These are NOT equivalent! Once you’ve got your solar panel it is yours. #StateOfEU

                  rainerzufall_le@mastodon.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
                  rainerzufall_le@mastodon.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
                  rainerzufall_le@mastodon.social
                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                  #95

                  @jon Curiously, no one asks where the uranium for your nuclear power plant is coming from

                  jon@gruene.socialJ 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • jon@gruene.socialJ jon@gruene.social

                    And the moderator used the typical fossil fuels talking point that dependence on fossil fuels is just as problematic as dependence on Chinese solar panels. These are NOT equivalent! Once you’ve got your solar panel it is yours. #StateOfEU

                    moss_the_texie@rheinneckar.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                    moss_the_texie@rheinneckar.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                    moss_the_texie@rheinneckar.social
                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                    #96

                    @jon
                    „Social panel“ is nice. 🤗

                    jon@gruene.socialJ 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • rainerzufall_le@mastodon.socialR rainerzufall_le@mastodon.social

                      @jon Curiously, no one asks where the uranium for your nuclear power plant is coming from

                      jon@gruene.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                      jon@gruene.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                      jon@gruene.social
                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                      #97

                      @rainerzufall_le not in your back garden. So ok. Or something. (I’m not being serious of course)

                      rainerzufall_le@mastodon.socialR 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • moss_the_texie@rheinneckar.socialM moss_the_texie@rheinneckar.social

                        @jon
                        „Social panel“ is nice. 🤗

                        jon@gruene.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                        jon@gruene.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                        jon@gruene.social
                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                        #98

                        @Moss_the_TeXie oops. Editing!

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • jon@gruene.socialJ jon@gruene.social

                          And the moderator used the typical fossil fuels talking point that dependence on fossil fuels is just as problematic as dependence on Chinese solar panels. These are NOT equivalent! Once you’ve got your solar panel it is yours. #StateOfEU

                          jon@gruene.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                          jon@gruene.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                          jon@gruene.social
                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                          #99

                          And the moderator then “there are two ways to see it” about my complaint about conspiracy theories about wind. No there aren’t. Wind turbines aren’t a serious danger to birds, compared to other dangers. #StateOfEU

                          giggls@karlsruhe-social.deG jon@gruene.socialJ andibarth@muenchen.socialA 3 Replies Last reply
                          0
                          • jon@gruene.socialJ jon@gruene.social

                            @rainerzufall_le not in your back garden. So ok. Or something. (I’m not being serious of course)

                            rainerzufall_le@mastodon.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
                            rainerzufall_le@mastodon.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
                            rainerzufall_le@mastodon.social
                            wrote sidst redigeret af
                            #100

                            @jon If Russia is involved, that's also fine
                            https://www.ndr.de/nachrichten/niedersachsen/osnabrueck_emsland/lingen-bund-haelt-an-atom-kooperation-mit-russland-fest,rosatom-114.html

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • jon@gruene.socialJ jon@gruene.social

                              And the moderator then “there are two ways to see it” about my complaint about conspiracy theories about wind. No there aren’t. Wind turbines aren’t a serious danger to birds, compared to other dangers. #StateOfEU

                              giggls@karlsruhe-social.deG This user is from outside of this forum
                              giggls@karlsruhe-social.deG This user is from outside of this forum
                              giggls@karlsruhe-social.de
                              wrote sidst redigeret af
                              #101

                              @jon False balance at work.

                              jon@gruene.socialJ 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • giggls@karlsruhe-social.deG giggls@karlsruhe-social.de

                                @jon False balance at work.

                                jon@gruene.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                jon@gruene.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                jon@gruene.social
                                wrote sidst redigeret af
                                #102

                                @giggls exactly. And a complete inability to see this! Aaaagghhhhhhh. I hate it.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • jon@gruene.socialJ jon@gruene.social

                                  And there was another line. “It’s rich landowners in Brandenburg taking the subsidies from the state to build wind turbines”. This is an equality / distribution issue, not an energy issue! Think of the opposite: “we shouldn’t build turbines there because the land owners are rich!” Errrr… #StateOfEU

                                  annasdtc@sciences.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                                  annasdtc@sciences.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                                  annasdtc@sciences.social
                                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                                  #103

                                  @jon Actually rigorous academic paper from researcher at UCLA (presented while I was there and now I can't remember the author's name, sorry) found that transition to renewable energies had consequences for land ownership equity — bunch of plots of small landowners in the area had been purchased by few large energy companies, so ownership was concentrating. Guess what? Didn't recommend stopping the transition!! just taking that equity side into account when planning and setting public policy.

                                  jon@gruene.socialJ 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • jon@gruene.socialJ jon@gruene.social

                                    And the moderator then “there are two ways to see it” about my complaint about conspiracy theories about wind. No there aren’t. Wind turbines aren’t a serious danger to birds, compared to other dangers. #StateOfEU

                                    jon@gruene.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                    jon@gruene.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                    jon@gruene.social
                                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                                    #104

                                    This panel is so dreadful. A business “I know how to fix it!” dude. A “everything is complex” politics lady. A “we’re doing our best” national civil servant dude. #StateOfEU

                                    jon@gruene.socialJ 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • annasdtc@sciences.socialA annasdtc@sciences.social

                                      @jon Actually rigorous academic paper from researcher at UCLA (presented while I was there and now I can't remember the author's name, sorry) found that transition to renewable energies had consequences for land ownership equity — bunch of plots of small landowners in the area had been purchased by few large energy companies, so ownership was concentrating. Guess what? Didn't recommend stopping the transition!! just taking that equity side into account when planning and setting public policy.

                                      jon@gruene.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                      jon@gruene.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                      jon@gruene.social
                                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                                      #105

                                      @annasdtc totally. Of course!

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • jon@gruene.socialJ jon@gruene.social

                                        @mike this isn’t personal survival. It’s species survival. I’ll survive personally.

                                        jt_rebelo@ciberlandia.ptJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                        jt_rebelo@ciberlandia.ptJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                        jt_rebelo@ciberlandia.pt
                                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                                        #106

                                        @jon and probably better than many that don't have that option.

                                        @mike We, collectively, as Humanity (even including the ones that are fighting against climate change) are facing extinction by our own hands and can either do something to solve it (not soften the blow), or start whistling as if it isn't for us to solve and end up with the biggest case of FAFO ever (what we've seen up until now is nothing, it's going to get much much worse, and faster, and maybe only obscene amounts of money will save some of us, sometimes, and just for some time) until there's no single human left on Earth.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • mikaeleiman@mastodon.sdf.orgM mikaeleiman@mastodon.sdf.org

                                          @jon They did an experiment where they painted (one of?) the blades in black to make it more visible, which reduced the number of dead birds by 70%.

                                          https://www.intelligentliving.co/norway-bird-deaths-black-turbine-blades/

                                          billiglarper@rollenspiel.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                                          billiglarper@rollenspiel.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                                          billiglarper@rollenspiel.social
                                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                                          #107

                                          @mikaeleiman @jon

                                          I'm still not sure how they reached that conclusion.

                                          They monitored two groups of 4 turbines each, from 2006-2016. In 2013 they painted blades of one turbine group.

                                          The numbers of dead birds found at these turbines (excluding Willow ptarmigan):

                                          Before:
                                          control group: 7
                                          impact group: 11

                                          After:
                                          control group: 18
                                          impact group: 6

                                          (plus 40 Willow ptarmigan)

                                          https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ece3.6592

                                          And yes, that's 82 dead birds in 80 turbine years.

                                          billiglarper@rollenspiel.socialB david_chisnall@infosec.exchangeD 2 Replies Last reply
                                          0
                                          Svar
                                          • Svar som emne
                                          Login for at svare
                                          • Ældste til nyeste
                                          • Nyeste til ældste
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Log ind

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          Graciously hosted by data.coop
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Hjem
                                          • Seneste
                                          • Etiketter
                                          • Populære
                                          • Verden
                                          • Bruger
                                          • Grupper