Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. If your website doesn’t load in under 3 seconds* on an expensive phone in The Software Town, you did it wrong.

If your website doesn’t load in under 3 seconds* on an expensive phone in The Software Town, you did it wrong.

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
27 Indlæg 15 Posters 1 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • fugueish@wandering.shopF fugueish@wandering.shop

    If your website doesn’t load in under 3 seconds* on an expensive phone in The Software Town, you did it wrong. Yes, this means every social media company and every newspaper are doing it wrong. I said what I said

    *The true quality bar is 0.5 seconds, but I’m feeling unreasonably generous today

    owlor@meow.socialO This user is from outside of this forum
    owlor@meow.socialO This user is from outside of this forum
    owlor@meow.social
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #6

    @fugueish That really is like, the most generous standard you could possibly set. A website that could clear that still wouldn't feel that great on my shitty-ass phone in the middle of nowhere, but y'know, at least it'd be reasonable.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • ben@mastodon.lubar.meB ben@mastodon.lubar.me

      @fugueish hovering over stuff on https://stats.reactivedrop.com/id/benlubar and being jump scared by how responsive my own UI code is

      robinsyl@meow.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
      robinsyl@meow.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
      robinsyl@meow.social
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #7

      @ben I'm assuming we're not counting the cloudflare bot check in the loading times

      dalias@hachyderm.ioD 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • emma@orbital.horseE emma@orbital.horse

        @fugueish if one needs 100mb of JavaScript to load a static website, I need one's organization to go tools down and have a long, uncomfortable talk.

        dalias@hachyderm.ioD This user is from outside of this forum
        dalias@hachyderm.ioD This user is from outside of this forum
        dalias@hachyderm.io
        wrote sidst redigeret af
        #8

        @emma @fugueish We need to be talking about the *reason* it "needs" 100 MB of js, and that reason is deeply ideological:

        The industry has decided that it's not just their entitlement but their job to do what's essentially implementing thier own version of what a browser should be, using its own proprietary document formats built around an RPC API with their server, that runs within your browser, rather than delivering a semantic document in a standardized format for your browser to let you interact with.

        dalias@hachyderm.ioD 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • robinsyl@meow.socialR robinsyl@meow.social

          @ben I'm assuming we're not counting the cloudflare bot check in the loading times

          dalias@hachyderm.ioD This user is from outside of this forum
          dalias@hachyderm.ioD This user is from outside of this forum
          dalias@hachyderm.io
          wrote sidst redigeret af
          #9

          @robinsyl @ben If you weren't serving 100 MB of js, you wouldn't need a bot check. Serving the redirect to the bot check would cost more than just serving the requested document.

          ben@mastodon.lubar.meB 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • dalias@hachyderm.ioD dalias@hachyderm.io

            @robinsyl @ben If you weren't serving 100 MB of js, you wouldn't need a bot check. Serving the redirect to the bot check would cost more than just serving the requested document.

            ben@mastodon.lubar.meB This user is from outside of this forum
            ben@mastodon.lubar.meB This user is from outside of this forum
            ben@mastodon.lubar.me
            wrote sidst redigeret af
            #10

            @dalias @robinsyl it makes several requests to another company's servers in order to produce that page

            serving a page on almost any website is significantly more expensive than the bandwidth used to transfer the data

            most websites are not 100% static, and even for websites that are, disk cache is not infinite

            dalias@hachyderm.ioD 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • ben@mastodon.lubar.meB ben@mastodon.lubar.me

              @dalias @robinsyl it makes several requests to another company's servers in order to produce that page

              serving a page on almost any website is significantly more expensive than the bandwidth used to transfer the data

              most websites are not 100% static, and even for websites that are, disk cache is not infinite

              dalias@hachyderm.ioD This user is from outside of this forum
              dalias@hachyderm.ioD This user is from outside of this forum
              dalias@hachyderm.io
              wrote sidst redigeret af
              #11

              @ben @robinsyl I'm not sure what you're trying to say, but the badness you're describing is why this is a problem.

              There is never any excuse for making any requests to another company's servers to produce or serve a page.

              snailerotica@chitter.xyzS 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • dalias@hachyderm.ioD dalias@hachyderm.io

                @emma @fugueish We need to be talking about the *reason* it "needs" 100 MB of js, and that reason is deeply ideological:

                The industry has decided that it's not just their entitlement but their job to do what's essentially implementing thier own version of what a browser should be, using its own proprietary document formats built around an RPC API with their server, that runs within your browser, rather than delivering a semantic document in a standardized format for your browser to let you interact with.

                dalias@hachyderm.ioD This user is from outside of this forum
                dalias@hachyderm.ioD This user is from outside of this forum
                dalias@hachyderm.io
                wrote sidst redigeret af
                #12

                @emma @fugueish It's the metastasized version of "HTML isn't coding" plus "code is a good thing, the more code the better!" brainrot.

                You need a justification for telling clients they're paying 💸 for "website development" and not just writing and graphic design.

                emma@orbital.horseE 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • fugueish@wandering.shopF fugueish@wandering.shop

                  If your website doesn’t load in under 3 seconds* on an expensive phone in The Software Town, you did it wrong. Yes, this means every social media company and every newspaper are doing it wrong. I said what I said

                  *The true quality bar is 0.5 seconds, but I’m feeling unreasonably generous today

                  jessienab@wetdry.worldJ This user is from outside of this forum
                  jessienab@wetdry.worldJ This user is from outside of this forum
                  jessienab@wetdry.world
                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                  #13

                  @fugueish https://jessie.nabein.me is about 1.5-2s with DOH DNS 🙂

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • dalias@hachyderm.ioD dalias@hachyderm.io

                    @ben @robinsyl I'm not sure what you're trying to say, but the badness you're describing is why this is a problem.

                    There is never any excuse for making any requests to another company's servers to produce or serve a page.

                    snailerotica@chitter.xyzS This user is from outside of this forum
                    snailerotica@chitter.xyzS This user is from outside of this forum
                    snailerotica@chitter.xyz
                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                    #14

                    @dalias @ben sorry to butt in like this, but i'm really curious as to what the correct way to get e.g. a profile picture off of steam would be without making a request to steam's servers, unless it's "don't use steam for user accounts", which would be rather odd for a mod based off of steam's ip. maybe there's been some miscommunication here?

                    dalias@hachyderm.ioD 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • snailerotica@chitter.xyzS snailerotica@chitter.xyz

                      @dalias @ben sorry to butt in like this, but i'm really curious as to what the correct way to get e.g. a profile picture off of steam would be without making a request to steam's servers, unless it's "don't use steam for user accounts", which would be rather odd for a mod based off of steam's ip. maybe there's been some miscommunication here?

                      dalias@hachyderm.ioD This user is from outside of this forum
                      dalias@hachyderm.ioD This user is from outside of this forum
                      dalias@hachyderm.io
                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                      #15

                      @snailerotica @ben I don't know the big picture you have in mind, but I assume what you'd do to do this right is pulling the picture when you first process something to do with the account in question, then keeping it cached, and doing some sort of async staleness check (or better, push-based update, if their API gave you that option) if it's accessed in the future and the age is beyond some threshold to check for changes.

                      For an example of this all being done very well, see how fediverse works. I'm able to see and interact with posts from any instance that's not blocked by mine, but looking at a post by someone on another instance doesn't make a request to their servers. It's either already federated to mine via push due to follow relationships or boost, etc., or it's just pulled on the first access then cached. Either way there are no expensive requests to 3p servers that take place as part of each request.

                      ben@mastodon.lubar.meB 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • dalias@hachyderm.ioD dalias@hachyderm.io

                        @snailerotica @ben I don't know the big picture you have in mind, but I assume what you'd do to do this right is pulling the picture when you first process something to do with the account in question, then keeping it cached, and doing some sort of async staleness check (or better, push-based update, if their API gave you that option) if it's accessed in the future and the age is beyond some threshold to check for changes.

                        For an example of this all being done very well, see how fediverse works. I'm able to see and interact with posts from any instance that's not blocked by mine, but looking at a post by someone on another instance doesn't make a request to their servers. It's either already federated to mine via push due to follow relationships or boost, etc., or it's just pulled on the first access then cached. Either way there are no expensive requests to 3p servers that take place as part of each request.

                        ben@mastodon.lubar.meB This user is from outside of this forum
                        ben@mastodon.lubar.meB This user is from outside of this forum
                        ben@mastodon.lubar.me
                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                        #16

                        @dalias @snailerotica what's happening here is that the stats website displays stats and profile data that are stored on someone's Steam account. it caches them for 5 minutes, but LLM scrapers don't follow any kind of human-like pattern when browsing; they just flood the server with requests for random pages

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • fugueish@wandering.shopF fugueish@wandering.shop

                          If your website doesn’t load in under 3 seconds* on an expensive phone in The Software Town, you did it wrong. Yes, this means every social media company and every newspaper are doing it wrong. I said what I said

                          *The true quality bar is 0.5 seconds, but I’m feeling unreasonably generous today

                          nonnihil@hachyderm.ioN This user is from outside of this forum
                          nonnihil@hachyderm.ioN This user is from outside of this forum
                          nonnihil@hachyderm.io
                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                          #17

                          @fugueish
                          When I worked on storefront navigation software, even fucking _BassPro_ SLA'd 83 milliseconds at the 90th percentile.
                          Giving people three digits of milliseconds is already surrender.

                          nh@mastodon.gamedev.placeN 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • fugueish@wandering.shopF fugueish@wandering.shop

                            If your website doesn’t load in under 3 seconds* on an expensive phone in The Software Town, you did it wrong. Yes, this means every social media company and every newspaper are doing it wrong. I said what I said

                            *The true quality bar is 0.5 seconds, but I’m feeling unreasonably generous today

                            mathew@universeodon.comM This user is from outside of this forum
                            mathew@universeodon.comM This user is from outside of this forum
                            mathew@universeodon.com
                            wrote sidst redigeret af
                            #18

                            @fugueish I went to a meetup of local web developers. At some point I told them my web site URL, and a couple of them pulled it up on their phones, and asked how on earth I got it to load so quickly and what hosting I was using to get that kind of performance. ($4 a month VPS, Debian and caddy.)

                            fugueish@wandering.shopF 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • nonnihil@hachyderm.ioN nonnihil@hachyderm.io

                              @fugueish
                              When I worked on storefront navigation software, even fucking _BassPro_ SLA'd 83 milliseconds at the 90th percentile.
                              Giving people three digits of milliseconds is already surrender.

                              nh@mastodon.gamedev.placeN This user is from outside of this forum
                              nh@mastodon.gamedev.placeN This user is from outside of this forum
                              nh@mastodon.gamedev.place
                              wrote sidst redigeret af
                              #19

                              @nonnihil @fugueish Hear, hear. If the raw network latency is under 20ms, you should be able to do <100ms navigation overall.

                              nh@mastodon.gamedev.placeN 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • nh@mastodon.gamedev.placeN nh@mastodon.gamedev.place

                                @nonnihil @fugueish Hear, hear. If the raw network latency is under 20ms, you should be able to do <100ms navigation overall.

                                nh@mastodon.gamedev.placeN This user is from outside of this forum
                                nh@mastodon.gamedev.placeN This user is from outside of this forum
                                nh@mastodon.gamedev.place
                                wrote sidst redigeret af
                                #20

                                @nonnihil @fugueish And quite frankly, if your site is genuinely an "app" (as in, something that you expect people to work productively in for an extended amount of time), the quality bar should be offline first to the point where virtually all tasks respond within one or two frames (~30ms).

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • dalias@hachyderm.ioD dalias@hachyderm.io

                                  @emma @fugueish It's the metastasized version of "HTML isn't coding" plus "code is a good thing, the more code the better!" brainrot.

                                  You need a justification for telling clients they're paying 💸 for "website development" and not just writing and graphic design.

                                  emma@orbital.horseE This user is from outside of this forum
                                  emma@orbital.horseE This user is from outside of this forum
                                  emma@orbital.horse
                                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                                  #21

                                  @dalias @fugueish this is where I say that React is a full employment scheme for men graduating from CSE programs at elite schools.

                                  netzblockierer@tech.lgbtN 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • mathew@universeodon.comM mathew@universeodon.com

                                    @fugueish I went to a meetup of local web developers. At some point I told them my web site URL, and a couple of them pulled it up on their phones, and asked how on earth I got it to load so quickly and what hosting I was using to get that kind of performance. ($4 a month VPS, Debian and caddy.)

                                    fugueish@wandering.shopF This user is from outside of this forum
                                    fugueish@wandering.shopF This user is from outside of this forum
                                    fugueish@wandering.shop
                                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                                    #22

                                    @mathew Yep 🙂 “How did I get it so fast? I did way less work”

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • fugueish@wandering.shopF fugueish@wandering.shop

                                      If your website doesn’t load in under 3 seconds* on an expensive phone in The Software Town, you did it wrong. Yes, this means every social media company and every newspaper are doing it wrong. I said what I said

                                      *The true quality bar is 0.5 seconds, but I’m feeling unreasonably generous today

                                      synlogic4242@social.vivaldi.netS This user is from outside of this forum
                                      synlogic4242@social.vivaldi.netS This user is from outside of this forum
                                      synlogic4242@social.vivaldi.net
                                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                                      #23

                                      @fugueish yep I want the WWW of 1997 with the ISP uplinks of 2026

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • fugueish@wandering.shopF fugueish@wandering.shop

                                        If your website doesn’t load in under 3 seconds* on an expensive phone in The Software Town, you did it wrong. Yes, this means every social media company and every newspaper are doing it wrong. I said what I said

                                        *The true quality bar is 0.5 seconds, but I’m feeling unreasonably generous today

                                        netzblockierer@tech.lgbtN This user is from outside of this forum
                                        netzblockierer@tech.lgbtN This user is from outside of this forum
                                        netzblockierer@tech.lgbt
                                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                                        #24

                                        @fugueish I'd say every website that doesn't work on Lynx Browser over Iridium or Tor Browser with disabled JavaScript over 2G should be banned from existing it's developers forced to fix it!

                                        • Anything else is too much lenience for Enshittification…
                                          • Seriously, stuff like FrogFind should be unnecessary to begin with!!!

                                        #Sarcasm #Commentary #LynxBrowser #TorBrowser #2G #Tor #Iridium #Narrowband #FrogFind #JS #JavaScript #AntiJS #AntiJavascriptAction #Malware #Bloatware #Enshittification

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • emma@orbital.horseE emma@orbital.horse

                                          @dalias @fugueish this is where I say that React is a full employment scheme for men graduating from CSE programs at elite schools.

                                          netzblockierer@tech.lgbtN This user is from outside of this forum
                                          netzblockierer@tech.lgbtN This user is from outside of this forum
                                          netzblockierer@tech.lgbt
                                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                                          #25

                                          @emma @dalias @fugueish and I'm sick and tired of this shit!

                                          I'd want Bloatware and Malware like that outlawed for being Wasteful Computing…

                                          https://tech.lgbt/@Netzblockierer/116700073951828009

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Svar
                                          • Svar som emne
                                          Login for at svare
                                          • Ældste til nyeste
                                          • Nyeste til ældste
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Log ind

                                          • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          Graciously hosted by data.coop
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Hjem
                                          • Seneste
                                          • Etiketter
                                          • Populære
                                          • Verden
                                          • Bruger
                                          • Grupper