Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. For anyone surprised at Moxie Marlinspike pushing an 'AI' thing, remember that the last big thing he pushed was a cryptocurrency integrated in Signal.

For anyone surprised at Moxie Marlinspike pushing an 'AI' thing, remember that the last big thing he pushed was a cryptocurrency integrated in Signal.

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
29 Indlæg 16 Posters 0 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • david_chisnall@infosec.exchangeD david_chisnall@infosec.exchange

    For anyone surprised at Moxie Marlinspike pushing an 'AI' thing, remember that the last big thing he pushed was a cryptocurrency integrated in Signal.

    erikjonker@mastodon.socialE This user is from outside of this forum
    erikjonker@mastodon.socialE This user is from outside of this forum
    erikjonker@mastodon.social
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #11

    @david_chisnall is AI inherently bad? 🤔

    gytisrepecka@social.gyt.isG 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • david_chisnall@infosec.exchangeD david_chisnall@infosec.exchange

      For anyone surprised at Moxie Marlinspike pushing an 'AI' thing, remember that the last big thing he pushed was a cryptocurrency integrated in Signal.

      jplebreton@mastodon.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
      jplebreton@mastodon.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
      jplebreton@mastodon.social
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #12

      @david_chisnall MobileCoin still the most profoundly trust-damaging thing Signal has done. I hope they remove it from the app someday.

      1 Reply Last reply
      1
      0
      • jackemled@furry.engineerJ jackemled@furry.engineer

        @knud @pettter @david_chisnall Always being worth zero is technically stable lmao

        knud@mastodon.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
        knud@mastodon.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
        knud@mastodon.social
        wrote sidst redigeret af
        #13

        @jackemled @pettter @david_chisnall

        Exactly!

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • david_chisnall@infosec.exchangeD david_chisnall@infosec.exchange

          For anyone surprised at Moxie Marlinspike pushing an 'AI' thing, remember that the last big thing he pushed was a cryptocurrency integrated in Signal.

          magnetic_tape@infosec.exchangeM This user is from outside of this forum
          magnetic_tape@infosec.exchangeM This user is from outside of this forum
          magnetic_tape@infosec.exchange
          wrote sidst redigeret af
          #14

          @david_chisnall
          I love how he has considered only one of the externalities of LLM (the privacy part, which should be granted, not optional) and didn't touch any of the other ones like the ecological footprint of its LLM's training and the ethical one (dataset used for the training)

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • erikjonker@mastodon.socialE erikjonker@mastodon.social

            @david_chisnall is AI inherently bad? 🤔

            gytisrepecka@social.gyt.isG This user is from outside of this forum
            gytisrepecka@social.gyt.isG This user is from outside of this forum
            gytisrepecka@social.gyt.is
            wrote sidst redigeret af
            #15

            @ErikJonker LLMs - yes.

            @david_chisnall

            erikjonker@mastodon.socialE 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • gytisrepecka@social.gyt.isG gytisrepecka@social.gyt.is

              @ErikJonker LLMs - yes.

              @david_chisnall

              erikjonker@mastodon.socialE This user is from outside of this forum
              erikjonker@mastodon.socialE This user is from outside of this forum
              erikjonker@mastodon.social
              wrote sidst redigeret af
              #16

              @gytisrepecka @david_chisnall ...then you kill all normal discussion about a widely used technology (and that will not go away) , also many uses are not "plain" LLMs but with additional scaffolding etc

              david_chisnall@infosec.exchangeD rey@toot.catR atax1a@infosec.exchangeA gytisrepecka@social.gyt.isG 4 Replies Last reply
              0
              • jackemled@furry.engineerJ jackemled@furry.engineer

                @pettter @david_chisnall holy shit world's first actually stable cryptocurrency

                snowfox@tech.lgbtS This user is from outside of this forum
                snowfox@tech.lgbtS This user is from outside of this forum
                snowfox@tech.lgbt
                wrote sidst redigeret af
                #17

                @jackemled @pettter @david_chisnall Not that stable on a log graph! (Surprisingly stable for most of 2025, I'm not sure why, and note that the grid lines are a factor of 100 apart.)

                pettter@social.accum.seP jackemled@furry.engineerJ 2 Replies Last reply
                0
                • erikjonker@mastodon.socialE erikjonker@mastodon.social

                  @gytisrepecka @david_chisnall ...then you kill all normal discussion about a widely used technology (and that will not go away) , also many uses are not "plain" LLMs but with additional scaffolding etc

                  david_chisnall@infosec.exchangeD This user is from outside of this forum
                  david_chisnall@infosec.exchangeD This user is from outside of this forum
                  david_chisnall@infosec.exchange
                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                  #18

                  @ErikJonker @gytisrepecka

                  It's a pretty good rule of thumb that any technology that calls itself AI has hidden externalities that make it a net negative for society.

                  Anything that's a net benefit doesn't use such a tainted term in its marketing.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • erikjonker@mastodon.socialE erikjonker@mastodon.social

                    @gytisrepecka @david_chisnall ...then you kill all normal discussion about a widely used technology (and that will not go away) , also many uses are not "plain" LLMs but with additional scaffolding etc

                    rey@toot.catR This user is from outside of this forum
                    rey@toot.catR This user is from outside of this forum
                    rey@toot.cat
                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                    #19

                    @ErikJonker @gytisrepecka @david_chisnall did you write that or did you have your CSAM machine crank it out for you

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • erikjonker@mastodon.socialE erikjonker@mastodon.social

                      @gytisrepecka @david_chisnall ...then you kill all normal discussion about a widely used technology (and that will not go away) , also many uses are not "plain" LLMs but with additional scaffolding etc

                      atax1a@infosec.exchangeA This user is from outside of this forum
                      atax1a@infosec.exchangeA This user is from outside of this forum
                      atax1a@infosec.exchange
                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                      #20

                      @ErikJonker @gytisrepecka @david_chisnall good.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • snowfox@tech.lgbtS snowfox@tech.lgbt

                        @jackemled @pettter @david_chisnall Not that stable on a log graph! (Surprisingly stable for most of 2025, I'm not sure why, and note that the grid lines are a factor of 100 apart.)

                        pettter@social.accum.seP This user is from outside of this forum
                        pettter@social.accum.seP This user is from outside of this forum
                        pettter@social.accum.se
                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                        #21

                        @snowfox @jackemled @david_chisnall No trades

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • snowfox@tech.lgbtS snowfox@tech.lgbt

                          @jackemled @pettter @david_chisnall Not that stable on a log graph! (Surprisingly stable for most of 2025, I'm not sure why, and note that the grid lines are a factor of 100 apart.)

                          jackemled@furry.engineerJ This user is from outside of this forum
                          jackemled@furry.engineerJ This user is from outside of this forum
                          jackemled@furry.engineer
                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                          #22

                          @snowfox @pettter @david_chisnall Logarithmic scaling exaggerates small deviations to make them easier to see. The instability you see here is an illusion, it's just showing you that it is changing slightly.

                          Despite that, the enormous drop at the beginning of 2025 is still funny.

                          jackemled@furry.engineerJ 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • jackemled@furry.engineerJ jackemled@furry.engineer

                            @snowfox @pettter @david_chisnall Logarithmic scaling exaggerates small deviations to make them easier to see. The instability you see here is an illusion, it's just showing you that it is changing slightly.

                            Despite that, the enormous drop at the beginning of 2025 is still funny.

                            jackemled@furry.engineerJ This user is from outside of this forum
                            jackemled@furry.engineerJ This user is from outside of this forum
                            jackemled@furry.engineer
                            wrote sidst redigeret af
                            #23

                            @snowfox @pettter @david_chisnall But if you really think about it, because of how cryptocurrencies depend almost entirely on investor speculation, any perceived stability is the real illusion.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • david_chisnall@infosec.exchangeD david_chisnall@infosec.exchange

                              For anyone surprised at Moxie Marlinspike pushing an 'AI' thing, remember that the last big thing he pushed was a cryptocurrency integrated in Signal.

                              zauberlaus@chaos.socialZ This user is from outside of this forum
                              zauberlaus@chaos.socialZ This user is from outside of this forum
                              zauberlaus@chaos.social
                              wrote sidst redigeret af
                              #24

                              @david_chisnall 😐

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • david_chisnall@infosec.exchangeD david_chisnall@infosec.exchange

                                For anyone surprised at Moxie Marlinspike pushing an 'AI' thing, remember that the last big thing he pushed was a cryptocurrency integrated in Signal.

                                neilk@xoxo.zoneN This user is from outside of this forum
                                neilk@xoxo.zoneN This user is from outside of this forum
                                neilk@xoxo.zone
                                wrote sidst redigeret af
                                #25

                                @david_chisnall I think the common theme there is privacy.

                                And we can disagree with those choices, and critique them.

                                I’m not sure what a post like this is trying to say. Are you arguing that he’s secretly always been a bad person, there’s no difference between him and a tech oligarch, and we know this because of the technologies he has found interesting? I mean he worked on quieter leaf blowers too, how does this fit into your thesis

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • erikjonker@mastodon.socialE erikjonker@mastodon.social

                                  @gytisrepecka @david_chisnall ...then you kill all normal discussion about a widely used technology (and that will not go away) , also many uses are not "plain" LLMs but with additional scaffolding etc

                                  gytisrepecka@social.gyt.isG This user is from outside of this forum
                                  gytisrepecka@social.gyt.isG This user is from outside of this forum
                                  gytisrepecka@social.gyt.is
                                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                                  #26

                                  @ErikJonker Widely used does not automatically mean it is useful. Also "AI" is completely wrong term here since there is no scientifically accepted test to determine machine intelligence

                                  LLMs is just a subset of supervised Machine Learning. It has nothing to do with intelligence, yet beautifully marketed and therefore rather popular

                                  @david_chisnall

                                  erikjonker@mastodon.socialE 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • gytisrepecka@social.gyt.isG gytisrepecka@social.gyt.is

                                    @ErikJonker Widely used does not automatically mean it is useful. Also "AI" is completely wrong term here since there is no scientifically accepted test to determine machine intelligence

                                    LLMs is just a subset of supervised Machine Learning. It has nothing to do with intelligence, yet beautifully marketed and therefore rather popular

                                    @david_chisnall

                                    erikjonker@mastodon.socialE This user is from outside of this forum
                                    erikjonker@mastodon.socialE This user is from outside of this forum
                                    erikjonker@mastodon.social
                                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                                    #27

                                    @gytisrepecka @david_chisnall the term maybe wrong but there are, in my view , useful applications and many people agree, transcribing audio is a good example, translating, image editing etc. Ofcourse it has it's problems and limitations for sure. I am fully aware of those, as a daily user.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • david_chisnall@infosec.exchangeD david_chisnall@infosec.exchange

                                      For anyone surprised at Moxie Marlinspike pushing an 'AI' thing, remember that the last big thing he pushed was a cryptocurrency integrated in Signal.

                                      kitsunevixi@sakurajima.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
                                      kitsunevixi@sakurajima.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
                                      kitsunevixi@sakurajima.social
                                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                                      #28

                                      @david_chisnall@infosec.exchange XMPP > Signal

                                      david_chisnall@infosec.exchangeD 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • kitsunevixi@sakurajima.socialK kitsunevixi@sakurajima.social

                                        @david_chisnall@infosec.exchange XMPP > Signal

                                        david_chisnall@infosec.exchangeD This user is from outside of this forum
                                        david_chisnall@infosec.exchangeD This user is from outside of this forum
                                        david_chisnall@infosec.exchange
                                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                                        #29

                                        @KitsuneVixi

                                        I cannot be bothered to repeat why I block people who repeat that nonsense, so I’m just going to mute you and you can go and search previous messages.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        Svar
                                        • Svar som emne
                                        Login for at svare
                                        • Ældste til nyeste
                                        • Nyeste til ældste
                                        • Most Votes


                                        • Log ind

                                        • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

                                        • Login or register to search.
                                        Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                        Graciously hosted by data.coop
                                        • First post
                                          Last post
                                        0
                                        • Hjem
                                        • Seneste
                                        • Etiketter
                                        • Populære
                                        • Verden
                                        • Bruger
                                        • Grupper