Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. Sometimes you can really tell a Wikipedia article is gonna be good from the table of contents.

Sometimes you can really tell a Wikipedia article is gonna be good from the table of contents.

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
18 Indlæg 15 Posters 27 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • ozzelot@mstdn.socialO ozzelot@mstdn.social

    @StarkRG
    ai-powered killer drone swarms

    the more things change...
    @dan

    starkrg@myside-yourside.netS This user is from outside of this forum
    starkrg@myside-yourside.netS This user is from outside of this forum
    starkrg@myside-yourside.net
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #9

    @ozzelot @dan Yeah, nah, AI-controlled killer drones are absurd, but nuclear land mines are significantly worse. Land mines are already some of the worst weapons humans have ever invented, and then let's make them nuclear?

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • dan@discuss.systemsD dan@discuss.systems

      Sometimes you can really tell a Wikipedia article is gonna be good from the table of contents.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blue_Peacock

      guillotine_jones@beige.partyG This user is from outside of this forum
      guillotine_jones@beige.partyG This user is from outside of this forum
      guillotine_jones@beige.party
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #10

      @dan
      NOW you've done it, Dan.
      This post just prompted a follow from me.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • gracelesshippo@mastodon.ieG gracelesshippo@mastodon.ie

        @dan

        That's a click through and full read 😳 🐔 💣

        modernmaslow@techhub.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
        modernmaslow@techhub.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
        modernmaslow@techhub.social
        wrote sidst redigeret af
        #11

        @GracelessHippo @dan A must cluck through!

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • dan@discuss.systemsD dan@discuss.systems

          Sometimes you can really tell a Wikipedia article is gonna be good from the table of contents.

          https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blue_Peacock

          mdione@en.osm.townM This user is from outside of this forum
          mdione@en.osm.townM This user is from outside of this forum
          mdione@en.osm.town
          wrote sidst redigeret af
          #12

          @dan sounds like material for Alexander The OK.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • garland@social.seattle.wa.usG garland@social.seattle.wa.us

            @dan Nuclear land mines??

            jalefkowit@vmst.ioJ This user is from outside of this forum
            jalefkowit@vmst.ioJ This user is from outside of this forum
            jalefkowit@vmst.io
            wrote sidst redigeret af
            #13

            @garland @dan They were a real thing for a while. In the early Cold War the solution to every problem was a nuclear weapon

            https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atomic_demolition_munition

            apbblue@thepit.socialA dan@discuss.systemsD 2 Replies Last reply
            0
            • jalefkowit@vmst.ioJ jalefkowit@vmst.io

              @garland @dan They were a real thing for a while. In the early Cold War the solution to every problem was a nuclear weapon

              https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atomic_demolition_munition

              apbblue@thepit.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
              apbblue@thepit.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
              apbblue@thepit.social
              wrote sidst redigeret af
              #14

              @jalefkowit @garland @dan mother clucker

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • dan@discuss.systemsD dan@discuss.systems

                Sometimes you can really tell a Wikipedia article is gonna be good from the table of contents.

                https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blue_Peacock

                georgebaily@mastodon.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
                georgebaily@mastodon.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
                georgebaily@mastodon.social
                wrote sidst redigeret af
                #15

                @dan this exceeded my expectations

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • jalefkowit@vmst.ioJ jalefkowit@vmst.io

                  @garland @dan They were a real thing for a while. In the early Cold War the solution to every problem was a nuclear weapon

                  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atomic_demolition_munition

                  dan@discuss.systemsD This user is from outside of this forum
                  dan@discuss.systemsD This user is from outside of this forum
                  dan@discuss.systems
                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                  #16

                  @jalefkowit @garland the 1950s and 1960s must have been a great time to be an evil mad scientist

                  jalefkowit@vmst.ioJ 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • dan@discuss.systemsD dan@discuss.systems

                    @jalefkowit @garland the 1950s and 1960s must have been a great time to be an evil mad scientist

                    jalefkowit@vmst.ioJ This user is from outside of this forum
                    jalefkowit@vmst.ioJ This user is from outside of this forum
                    jalefkowit@vmst.io
                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                    #17

                    @dan @garland It totally was

                    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Plowshare

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • dan@discuss.systemsD dan@discuss.systems

                      Sometimes you can really tell a Wikipedia article is gonna be good from the table of contents.

                      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blue_Peacock

                      sborrill@justfollow.me.ukS This user is from outside of this forum
                      sborrill@justfollow.me.ukS This user is from outside of this forum
                      sborrill@justfollow.me.uk
                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                      #18

                      @dan "It does seem like an April Fool but it most certainly is not. The Civil Service does not do jokes"

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • jwcph@helvede.netJ jwcph@helvede.net shared this topic
                      Svar
                      • Svar som emne
                      Login for at svare
                      • Ældste til nyeste
                      • Nyeste til ældste
                      • Most Votes


                      • Log ind

                      • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

                      • Login or register to search.
                      Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                      Graciously hosted by data.coop
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • Hjem
                      • Seneste
                      • Etiketter
                      • Populære
                      • Verden
                      • Bruger
                      • Grupper