Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. Sometimes you can really tell a Wikipedia article is gonna be good from the table of contents.

Sometimes you can really tell a Wikipedia article is gonna be good from the table of contents.

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
18 Indlæg 15 Posters 27 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • dan@discuss.systemsD dan@discuss.systems

    Sometimes you can really tell a Wikipedia article is gonna be good from the table of contents.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blue_Peacock

    gracelesshippo@mastodon.ieG This user is from outside of this forum
    gracelesshippo@mastodon.ieG This user is from outside of this forum
    gracelesshippo@mastodon.ie
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #5

    @dan

    That's a click through and full read 😳 🐔 💣

    modernmaslow@techhub.socialM 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • dan@discuss.systemsD dan@discuss.systems

      Sometimes you can really tell a Wikipedia article is gonna be good from the table of contents.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blue_Peacock

      felcryn@mastodon.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
      felcryn@mastodon.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
      felcryn@mastodon.social
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #6

      @dan "The Civil Service does not do jokes." is a good line

      Thanks for sharing!

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • starkrg@myside-yourside.netS starkrg@myside-yourside.net

        @dan
        "nuclear land mines" Holy shit. Folks in the 1950s must have been literally insane to think up ideas like that.

        ozzelot@mstdn.socialO This user is from outside of this forum
        ozzelot@mstdn.socialO This user is from outside of this forum
        ozzelot@mstdn.social
        wrote sidst redigeret af
        #7

        @StarkRG
        ai-powered killer drone swarms

        the more things change...
        @dan

        starkrg@myside-yourside.netS 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • dan@discuss.systemsD dan@discuss.systems

          Sometimes you can really tell a Wikipedia article is gonna be good from the table of contents.

          https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blue_Peacock

          garland@social.seattle.wa.usG This user is from outside of this forum
          garland@social.seattle.wa.usG This user is from outside of this forum
          garland@social.seattle.wa.us
          wrote sidst redigeret af
          #8

          @dan Nuclear land mines??

          jalefkowit@vmst.ioJ 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • ozzelot@mstdn.socialO ozzelot@mstdn.social

            @StarkRG
            ai-powered killer drone swarms

            the more things change...
            @dan

            starkrg@myside-yourside.netS This user is from outside of this forum
            starkrg@myside-yourside.netS This user is from outside of this forum
            starkrg@myside-yourside.net
            wrote sidst redigeret af
            #9

            @ozzelot @dan Yeah, nah, AI-controlled killer drones are absurd, but nuclear land mines are significantly worse. Land mines are already some of the worst weapons humans have ever invented, and then let's make them nuclear?

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • dan@discuss.systemsD dan@discuss.systems

              Sometimes you can really tell a Wikipedia article is gonna be good from the table of contents.

              https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blue_Peacock

              guillotine_jones@beige.partyG This user is from outside of this forum
              guillotine_jones@beige.partyG This user is from outside of this forum
              guillotine_jones@beige.party
              wrote sidst redigeret af
              #10

              @dan
              NOW you've done it, Dan.
              This post just prompted a follow from me.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • gracelesshippo@mastodon.ieG gracelesshippo@mastodon.ie

                @dan

                That's a click through and full read 😳 🐔 💣

                modernmaslow@techhub.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                modernmaslow@techhub.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                modernmaslow@techhub.social
                wrote sidst redigeret af
                #11

                @GracelessHippo @dan A must cluck through!

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • dan@discuss.systemsD dan@discuss.systems

                  Sometimes you can really tell a Wikipedia article is gonna be good from the table of contents.

                  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blue_Peacock

                  mdione@en.osm.townM This user is from outside of this forum
                  mdione@en.osm.townM This user is from outside of this forum
                  mdione@en.osm.town
                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                  #12

                  @dan sounds like material for Alexander The OK.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • garland@social.seattle.wa.usG garland@social.seattle.wa.us

                    @dan Nuclear land mines??

                    jalefkowit@vmst.ioJ This user is from outside of this forum
                    jalefkowit@vmst.ioJ This user is from outside of this forum
                    jalefkowit@vmst.io
                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                    #13

                    @garland @dan They were a real thing for a while. In the early Cold War the solution to every problem was a nuclear weapon

                    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atomic_demolition_munition

                    apbblue@thepit.socialA dan@discuss.systemsD 2 Replies Last reply
                    0
                    • jalefkowit@vmst.ioJ jalefkowit@vmst.io

                      @garland @dan They were a real thing for a while. In the early Cold War the solution to every problem was a nuclear weapon

                      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atomic_demolition_munition

                      apbblue@thepit.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                      apbblue@thepit.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                      apbblue@thepit.social
                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                      #14

                      @jalefkowit @garland @dan mother clucker

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • dan@discuss.systemsD dan@discuss.systems

                        Sometimes you can really tell a Wikipedia article is gonna be good from the table of contents.

                        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blue_Peacock

                        georgebaily@mastodon.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
                        georgebaily@mastodon.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
                        georgebaily@mastodon.social
                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                        #15

                        @dan this exceeded my expectations

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • jalefkowit@vmst.ioJ jalefkowit@vmst.io

                          @garland @dan They were a real thing for a while. In the early Cold War the solution to every problem was a nuclear weapon

                          https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atomic_demolition_munition

                          dan@discuss.systemsD This user is from outside of this forum
                          dan@discuss.systemsD This user is from outside of this forum
                          dan@discuss.systems
                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                          #16

                          @jalefkowit @garland the 1950s and 1960s must have been a great time to be an evil mad scientist

                          jalefkowit@vmst.ioJ 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • dan@discuss.systemsD dan@discuss.systems

                            @jalefkowit @garland the 1950s and 1960s must have been a great time to be an evil mad scientist

                            jalefkowit@vmst.ioJ This user is from outside of this forum
                            jalefkowit@vmst.ioJ This user is from outside of this forum
                            jalefkowit@vmst.io
                            wrote sidst redigeret af
                            #17

                            @dan @garland It totally was

                            https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Plowshare

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • dan@discuss.systemsD dan@discuss.systems

                              Sometimes you can really tell a Wikipedia article is gonna be good from the table of contents.

                              https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blue_Peacock

                              sborrill@justfollow.me.ukS This user is from outside of this forum
                              sborrill@justfollow.me.ukS This user is from outside of this forum
                              sborrill@justfollow.me.uk
                              wrote sidst redigeret af
                              #18

                              @dan "It does seem like an April Fool but it most certainly is not. The Civil Service does not do jokes"

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • jwcph@helvede.netJ jwcph@helvede.net shared this topic
                              Svar
                              • Svar som emne
                              Login for at svare
                              • Ældste til nyeste
                              • Nyeste til ældste
                              • Most Votes


                              • Log ind

                              • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

                              • Login or register to search.
                              Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                              Graciously hosted by data.coop
                              • First post
                                Last post
                              0
                              • Hjem
                              • Seneste
                              • Etiketter
                              • Populære
                              • Verden
                              • Bruger
                              • Grupper