Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. Sometimes you can really tell a Wikipedia article is gonna be good from the table of contents.

Sometimes you can really tell a Wikipedia article is gonna be good from the table of contents.

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
18 Indlæg 15 Posters 27 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • dan@discuss.systemsD dan@discuss.systems

    Sometimes you can really tell a Wikipedia article is gonna be good from the table of contents.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blue_Peacock

    xssfox@cloudisland.nzX This user is from outside of this forum
    xssfox@cloudisland.nzX This user is from outside of this forum
    xssfox@cloudisland.nz
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #2

    @dan how concerning is it that I know this one?

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • dan@discuss.systemsD dan@discuss.systems

      Sometimes you can really tell a Wikipedia article is gonna be good from the table of contents.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blue_Peacock

      sortius@beige.partyS This user is from outside of this forum
      sortius@beige.partyS This user is from outside of this forum
      sortius@beige.party
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #3

      @dan funny thing is, I knew exactly what it was from that TOC

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • dan@discuss.systemsD dan@discuss.systems

        Sometimes you can really tell a Wikipedia article is gonna be good from the table of contents.

        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blue_Peacock

        starkrg@myside-yourside.netS This user is from outside of this forum
        starkrg@myside-yourside.netS This user is from outside of this forum
        starkrg@myside-yourside.net
        wrote sidst redigeret af
        #4

        @dan
        "nuclear land mines" Holy shit. Folks in the 1950s must have been literally insane to think up ideas like that.

        ozzelot@mstdn.socialO 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • dan@discuss.systemsD dan@discuss.systems

          Sometimes you can really tell a Wikipedia article is gonna be good from the table of contents.

          https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blue_Peacock

          gracelesshippo@mastodon.ieG This user is from outside of this forum
          gracelesshippo@mastodon.ieG This user is from outside of this forum
          gracelesshippo@mastodon.ie
          wrote sidst redigeret af
          #5

          @dan

          That's a click through and full read 😳 🐔 💣

          modernmaslow@techhub.socialM 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • dan@discuss.systemsD dan@discuss.systems

            Sometimes you can really tell a Wikipedia article is gonna be good from the table of contents.

            https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blue_Peacock

            felcryn@mastodon.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
            felcryn@mastodon.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
            felcryn@mastodon.social
            wrote sidst redigeret af
            #6

            @dan "The Civil Service does not do jokes." is a good line

            Thanks for sharing!

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • starkrg@myside-yourside.netS starkrg@myside-yourside.net

              @dan
              "nuclear land mines" Holy shit. Folks in the 1950s must have been literally insane to think up ideas like that.

              ozzelot@mstdn.socialO This user is from outside of this forum
              ozzelot@mstdn.socialO This user is from outside of this forum
              ozzelot@mstdn.social
              wrote sidst redigeret af
              #7

              @StarkRG
              ai-powered killer drone swarms

              the more things change...
              @dan

              starkrg@myside-yourside.netS 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • dan@discuss.systemsD dan@discuss.systems

                Sometimes you can really tell a Wikipedia article is gonna be good from the table of contents.

                https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blue_Peacock

                garland@social.seattle.wa.usG This user is from outside of this forum
                garland@social.seattle.wa.usG This user is from outside of this forum
                garland@social.seattle.wa.us
                wrote sidst redigeret af
                #8

                @dan Nuclear land mines??

                jalefkowit@vmst.ioJ 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • ozzelot@mstdn.socialO ozzelot@mstdn.social

                  @StarkRG
                  ai-powered killer drone swarms

                  the more things change...
                  @dan

                  starkrg@myside-yourside.netS This user is from outside of this forum
                  starkrg@myside-yourside.netS This user is from outside of this forum
                  starkrg@myside-yourside.net
                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                  #9

                  @ozzelot @dan Yeah, nah, AI-controlled killer drones are absurd, but nuclear land mines are significantly worse. Land mines are already some of the worst weapons humans have ever invented, and then let's make them nuclear?

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • dan@discuss.systemsD dan@discuss.systems

                    Sometimes you can really tell a Wikipedia article is gonna be good from the table of contents.

                    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blue_Peacock

                    guillotine_jones@beige.partyG This user is from outside of this forum
                    guillotine_jones@beige.partyG This user is from outside of this forum
                    guillotine_jones@beige.party
                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                    #10

                    @dan
                    NOW you've done it, Dan.
                    This post just prompted a follow from me.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • gracelesshippo@mastodon.ieG gracelesshippo@mastodon.ie

                      @dan

                      That's a click through and full read 😳 🐔 💣

                      modernmaslow@techhub.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                      modernmaslow@techhub.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                      modernmaslow@techhub.social
                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                      #11

                      @GracelessHippo @dan A must cluck through!

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • dan@discuss.systemsD dan@discuss.systems

                        Sometimes you can really tell a Wikipedia article is gonna be good from the table of contents.

                        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blue_Peacock

                        mdione@en.osm.townM This user is from outside of this forum
                        mdione@en.osm.townM This user is from outside of this forum
                        mdione@en.osm.town
                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                        #12

                        @dan sounds like material for Alexander The OK.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • garland@social.seattle.wa.usG garland@social.seattle.wa.us

                          @dan Nuclear land mines??

                          jalefkowit@vmst.ioJ This user is from outside of this forum
                          jalefkowit@vmst.ioJ This user is from outside of this forum
                          jalefkowit@vmst.io
                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                          #13

                          @garland @dan They were a real thing for a while. In the early Cold War the solution to every problem was a nuclear weapon

                          https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atomic_demolition_munition

                          apbblue@thepit.socialA dan@discuss.systemsD 2 Replies Last reply
                          0
                          • jalefkowit@vmst.ioJ jalefkowit@vmst.io

                            @garland @dan They were a real thing for a while. In the early Cold War the solution to every problem was a nuclear weapon

                            https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atomic_demolition_munition

                            apbblue@thepit.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                            apbblue@thepit.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                            apbblue@thepit.social
                            wrote sidst redigeret af
                            #14

                            @jalefkowit @garland @dan mother clucker

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • dan@discuss.systemsD dan@discuss.systems

                              Sometimes you can really tell a Wikipedia article is gonna be good from the table of contents.

                              https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blue_Peacock

                              georgebaily@mastodon.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
                              georgebaily@mastodon.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
                              georgebaily@mastodon.social
                              wrote sidst redigeret af
                              #15

                              @dan this exceeded my expectations

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • jalefkowit@vmst.ioJ jalefkowit@vmst.io

                                @garland @dan They were a real thing for a while. In the early Cold War the solution to every problem was a nuclear weapon

                                https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atomic_demolition_munition

                                dan@discuss.systemsD This user is from outside of this forum
                                dan@discuss.systemsD This user is from outside of this forum
                                dan@discuss.systems
                                wrote sidst redigeret af
                                #16

                                @jalefkowit @garland the 1950s and 1960s must have been a great time to be an evil mad scientist

                                jalefkowit@vmst.ioJ 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • dan@discuss.systemsD dan@discuss.systems

                                  @jalefkowit @garland the 1950s and 1960s must have been a great time to be an evil mad scientist

                                  jalefkowit@vmst.ioJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                  jalefkowit@vmst.ioJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                  jalefkowit@vmst.io
                                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                                  #17

                                  @dan @garland It totally was

                                  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Plowshare

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • dan@discuss.systemsD dan@discuss.systems

                                    Sometimes you can really tell a Wikipedia article is gonna be good from the table of contents.

                                    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blue_Peacock

                                    sborrill@justfollow.me.ukS This user is from outside of this forum
                                    sborrill@justfollow.me.ukS This user is from outside of this forum
                                    sborrill@justfollow.me.uk
                                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                                    #18

                                    @dan "It does seem like an April Fool but it most certainly is not. The Civil Service does not do jokes"

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • jwcph@helvede.netJ jwcph@helvede.net shared this topic
                                    Svar
                                    • Svar som emne
                                    Login for at svare
                                    • Ældste til nyeste
                                    • Nyeste til ældste
                                    • Most Votes


                                    • Log ind

                                    • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

                                    • Login or register to search.
                                    Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                    Graciously hosted by data.coop
                                    • First post
                                      Last post
                                    0
                                    • Hjem
                                    • Seneste
                                    • Etiketter
                                    • Populære
                                    • Verden
                                    • Bruger
                                    • Grupper