things this post does:1.

[xenophora@mastodon.art]

@Byte @joepie91 @Yuvalne

Dems handed it over, really.

[byte@rage.love]

@joepie91 @Yuvalne huh. So in that context, January 6th was like a less well planned and less successful version of that?

[byte@rage.love]

@xenophora seems they’ve always been like this

[yuvalne@433.world]

@Byte @joepie91 well January 6th was less close, a 0.6% margin in the tipping-point state, compared to 0.0092% in the count that ended up certified in 2000, so the overturning then was easier. but it's also true it was less well planned, and thankfully it didn't succeed.

[thufie@social.pixie.town]

@Yuvalne don't forget that this shitstorm brought out explicit antisemitism from the AI supporters (pro-holocaust rhetoric!!) which has yet to be addressed.

[yuvalne@433.world]

@thufie wait, in addition to svin, the Nazi who tried for arguing for AI ethics? because to my knowledge that guy was banned

[thufie@social.pixie.town]

@Yuvalne was he? Was there a statement about it?

[yuvalne@433.world]

@thufie yes, Nate even mentions it in the post i'm quoting (point 18 in the "chain of events").

[unn0wn@mastodon.social]

@Yuvalne @mkyral Almost all community led projects are actually just dev led project. Shit ton of GNOME users for example complain about GNOME design decisions and yet they never listen to them. What the GNOME team decide is what matters. Same for Wayland and countless other examples.

[mkyral@mamutovo.cz]

@Unn0wn @Yuvalne

Again. There are many, many users and each of them has some idea how should Gnome/KDE or other SW look and how should work. So devs and their preferences and vision are important there.

Personally I don't like Gnome philosophy, so I don't use it.

[li@tech.lgbt]

@Yuvalne why does it seem like "brigrading" seems to equate to giving any sort of criticism of anything ever.