Google's antonymous taxi company says it won't obey traffic safety laws because its customers want convenience, so screw those bicyclists who don't want to be injured or killed.
-
@cascheranno @dangillmor The «code is law» bros from the crypto scene have moved over to the autonomous industry?
@toriver @cascheranno @dangillmor
They were always there
-
Google's antonymous taxi company says it won't obey traffic safety laws because its customers want convenience, so screw those bicyclists who don't want to be injured or killed.
https://road.cc/news/driverless-taxis-veering-into-cycle-lanes-normal-practice-says-waymo
@dangillmor antonymous? are they meaning the opposite of what they say?
-
Google's antonymous taxi company says it won't obey traffic safety laws because its customers want convenience, so screw those bicyclists who don't want to be injured or killed.
https://road.cc/news/driverless-taxis-veering-into-cycle-lanes-normal-practice-says-waymo
They just keep leaning into the "be evil" don't they?
-
@dangillmor antonymous? are they meaning the opposite of what they say?
waymo - noun from the verb "to waymow", coined from "to lawn-mow", but applied to road usage. Ex.: "His ride then waymowed across the bike lane to take a legal turn on red, cannoning directly into two crossing pedestrians."
-
Google's antonymous taxi company says it won't obey traffic safety laws because its customers want convenience, so screw those bicyclists who don't want to be injured or killed.
https://road.cc/news/driverless-taxis-veering-into-cycle-lanes-normal-practice-says-waymo
@dangillmor I guess society is no longer bound to laws either, then? “What a nice autonomous taxi you have there. Would be a shame if anything happened to it…”
-
Google's antonymous taxi company says it won't obey traffic safety laws because its customers want convenience, so screw those bicyclists who don't want to be injured or killed.
https://road.cc/news/driverless-taxis-veering-into-cycle-lanes-normal-practice-says-waymo
Why we don’t build autonomous walking Robots by our own? They may not be able to respect these self-driving cars. They may not know that a hammer hand has another primary function. But who cares!
-
Google's antonymous taxi company says it won't obey traffic safety laws because its customers want convenience, so screw those bicyclists who don't want to be injured or killed.
https://road.cc/news/driverless-taxis-veering-into-cycle-lanes-normal-practice-says-waymo
If I understand correctly, this is just for picking people up and dropping them off. Every normal taxi would also do that.
-
Google's antonymous taxi company says it won't obey traffic safety laws because its customers want convenience, so screw those bicyclists who don't want to be injured or killed.
https://road.cc/news/driverless-taxis-veering-into-cycle-lanes-normal-practice-says-waymo
@dangillmor Google shouldn’t put it like that; otherwise, their cars will end up being flipped upside down by an angry member of the public wielding a shovel.
-
@dangillmor Google shouldn’t put it like that; otherwise, their cars will end up being flipped upside down by an angry member of the public wielding a shovel.
@dangillmor The tires, it is always the tires, the weakest point of a car.
-
@dangillmor antonymous? are they meaning the opposite of what they say?
@yetzt @dangillmor Hah. I was looking at it and trying to figure it out. I got as far as "of the other name" or "of the opposing name".
Ans then I decided to stop because I was afraid of generating a mild conspiracy theory.

-
Google's antonymous taxi company says it won't obey traffic safety laws because its customers want convenience, so screw those bicyclists who don't want to be injured or killed.
https://road.cc/news/driverless-taxis-veering-into-cycle-lanes-normal-practice-says-waymo
@dangillmor I did not know Waymo was Google. I keep seeing their propaganda pushed by YouTube, with the remarkably implausible woman saying something like, "Because I have kids and I worry about their safety on the roads I'm really looking forward to autonomous vehicles driving around in Britain".
If the 'Sure, Jan' meme was made for anything, it's those 'ads'.
-
Google's antonymous taxi company says it won't obey traffic safety laws because its customers want convenience, so screw those bicyclists who don't want to be injured or killed.
https://road.cc/news/driverless-taxis-veering-into-cycle-lanes-normal-practice-says-waymo
@dangillmor @paulk Grief! These things are going to be so unpredictable that they will be lethal and should just be banned.
-
@dangillmor The tires, it is always the tires, the weakest point of a car.
@fenixmaster @dangillmor Or just some chalk (or salt) ...
-
Google's antonymous taxi company says it won't obey traffic safety laws because its customers want convenience, so screw those bicyclists who don't want to be injured or killed.
https://road.cc/news/driverless-taxis-veering-into-cycle-lanes-normal-practice-says-waymo
@dangillmor Which problem do these self-driving vehicles solve, which issue is so pressing, that we have to dedicate development time and sacrifice existing infrastructure? We don’t need flying taxis and self driving cars. We need separate bicycle lanes, affordable and reliable public transport, clean air, etc. which benefit all, not just some tech companies.
-
Google's antonymous taxi company says it won't obey traffic safety laws because its customers want convenience, so screw those bicyclists who don't want to be injured or killed.
https://road.cc/news/driverless-taxis-veering-into-cycle-lanes-normal-practice-says-waymo
@dangillmor finally. A robot takes care of them. Where can I buy the anti cyclist feature
-
Google's antonymous taxi company says it won't obey traffic safety laws because its customers want convenience, so screw those bicyclists who don't want to be injured or killed.
https://road.cc/news/driverless-taxis-veering-into-cycle-lanes-normal-practice-says-waymo
@dangillmor I'm not surprised about this seeing where they trained...
-
@dangillmor @paulk Grief! These things are going to be so unpredictable that they will be lethal and should just be banned.
@nakedgerry People don't matter, clearly.
-
Google's antonymous taxi company says it won't obey traffic safety laws because its customers want convenience, so screw those bicyclists who don't want to be injured or killed.
https://road.cc/news/driverless-taxis-veering-into-cycle-lanes-normal-practice-says-waymo
@dangillmor "Terminator". It just looks different, but it's coming.
-
@dangillmor @paulk Grief! These things are going to be so unpredictable that they will be lethal and should just be banned.
@nakedgerry It's "Terminator". It just looks different.
-
@dangillmor Which problem do these self-driving vehicles solve, which issue is so pressing, that we have to dedicate development time and sacrifice existing infrastructure? We don’t need flying taxis and self driving cars. We need separate bicycle lanes, affordable and reliable public transport, clean air, etc. which benefit all, not just some tech companies.
@newint @dangillmor The "problem" is that humans need to eat and therefore don't act as drivers for free, which means their pay reduces the profits of the broligarchs.