Google's antonymous taxi company says it won't obey traffic safety laws because its customers want convenience, so screw those bicyclists who don't want to be injured or killed.
-
@dangillmor antonymous? are they meaning the opposite of what they say?
@yetzt @dangillmor Hah. I was looking at it and trying to figure it out. I got as far as "of the other name" or "of the opposing name".
Ans then I decided to stop because I was afraid of generating a mild conspiracy theory.

-
Google's antonymous taxi company says it won't obey traffic safety laws because its customers want convenience, so screw those bicyclists who don't want to be injured or killed.
https://road.cc/news/driverless-taxis-veering-into-cycle-lanes-normal-practice-says-waymo
@dangillmor I did not know Waymo was Google. I keep seeing their propaganda pushed by YouTube, with the remarkably implausible woman saying something like, "Because I have kids and I worry about their safety on the roads I'm really looking forward to autonomous vehicles driving around in Britain".
If the 'Sure, Jan' meme was made for anything, it's those 'ads'.
-
Google's antonymous taxi company says it won't obey traffic safety laws because its customers want convenience, so screw those bicyclists who don't want to be injured or killed.
https://road.cc/news/driverless-taxis-veering-into-cycle-lanes-normal-practice-says-waymo
@dangillmor @paulk Grief! These things are going to be so unpredictable that they will be lethal and should just be banned.
-
@dangillmor The tires, it is always the tires, the weakest point of a car.
@fenixmaster @dangillmor Or just some chalk (or salt) ...
-
Google's antonymous taxi company says it won't obey traffic safety laws because its customers want convenience, so screw those bicyclists who don't want to be injured or killed.
https://road.cc/news/driverless-taxis-veering-into-cycle-lanes-normal-practice-says-waymo
@dangillmor Which problem do these self-driving vehicles solve, which issue is so pressing, that we have to dedicate development time and sacrifice existing infrastructure? We don’t need flying taxis and self driving cars. We need separate bicycle lanes, affordable and reliable public transport, clean air, etc. which benefit all, not just some tech companies.
-
Google's antonymous taxi company says it won't obey traffic safety laws because its customers want convenience, so screw those bicyclists who don't want to be injured or killed.
https://road.cc/news/driverless-taxis-veering-into-cycle-lanes-normal-practice-says-waymo
@dangillmor finally. A robot takes care of them. Where can I buy the anti cyclist feature
-
Google's antonymous taxi company says it won't obey traffic safety laws because its customers want convenience, so screw those bicyclists who don't want to be injured or killed.
https://road.cc/news/driverless-taxis-veering-into-cycle-lanes-normal-practice-says-waymo
@dangillmor I'm not surprised about this seeing where they trained...
-
@dangillmor @paulk Grief! These things are going to be so unpredictable that they will be lethal and should just be banned.
@nakedgerry People don't matter, clearly.
-
Google's antonymous taxi company says it won't obey traffic safety laws because its customers want convenience, so screw those bicyclists who don't want to be injured or killed.
https://road.cc/news/driverless-taxis-veering-into-cycle-lanes-normal-practice-says-waymo
@dangillmor "Terminator". It just looks different, but it's coming.
-
@dangillmor @paulk Grief! These things are going to be so unpredictable that they will be lethal and should just be banned.
@nakedgerry It's "Terminator". It just looks different.
-
@dangillmor Which problem do these self-driving vehicles solve, which issue is so pressing, that we have to dedicate development time and sacrifice existing infrastructure? We don’t need flying taxis and self driving cars. We need separate bicycle lanes, affordable and reliable public transport, clean air, etc. which benefit all, not just some tech companies.
@newint @dangillmor The "problem" is that humans need to eat and therefore don't act as drivers for free, which means their pay reduces the profits of the broligarchs.
-
Google's antonymous taxi company says it won't obey traffic safety laws because its customers want convenience, so screw those bicyclists who don't want to be injured or killed.
https://road.cc/news/driverless-taxis-veering-into-cycle-lanes-normal-practice-says-waymo
@dangillmor TBH, I'd consider any Cyclist poppin' 9x19mm +P+ SJHP (regular 9mm.won't go through tires) into any of those shit vehicles' tires an act of "self & mutual defense" against murder by car…
- Or just place Calthrops on the markings if not sprinkle them before said cars.
#Sarcasm #Commentary #NotLegalAdvice #Waymo #CarBrain #CarCentrism #cycling #safety #RoadSafety
-
Google's antonymous taxi company says it won't obey traffic safety laws because its customers want convenience, so screw those bicyclists who don't want to be injured or killed.
https://road.cc/news/driverless-taxis-veering-into-cycle-lanes-normal-practice-says-waymo
@dangillmor if this is the future count me out.
But also... this makes a stronger argument for separate zones and bike lanes protected by some kind of barrier. I'm also strongly in favour of less space to be given to cars altogether - the emphasis for future planning should be more pedestrian / cycle and public transport.
-
J jwcph@helvede.net shared this topic