Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. Google's antonymous taxi company says it won't obey traffic safety laws because its customers want convenience, so screw those bicyclists who don't want to be injured or killed.

Google's antonymous taxi company says it won't obey traffic safety laws because its customers want convenience, so screw those bicyclists who don't want to be injured or killed.

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
30 Indlæg 26 Posters 0 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • dangillmor@mastodon.socialD dangillmor@mastodon.social

    Google's antonymous taxi company says it won't obey traffic safety laws because its customers want convenience, so screw those bicyclists who don't want to be injured or killed.

    https://road.cc/news/driverless-taxis-veering-into-cycle-lanes-normal-practice-says-waymo

    yetzt@social.yetzt.meY This user is from outside of this forum
    yetzt@social.yetzt.meY This user is from outside of this forum
    yetzt@social.yetzt.me
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #10

    @dangillmor antonymous? are they meaning the opposite of what they say?

    jerrej@mastodon.socialJ sgail@mastodon.scotS 2 Replies Last reply
    0
    • dangillmor@mastodon.socialD dangillmor@mastodon.social

      Google's antonymous taxi company says it won't obey traffic safety laws because its customers want convenience, so screw those bicyclists who don't want to be injured or killed.

      https://road.cc/news/driverless-taxis-veering-into-cycle-lanes-normal-practice-says-waymo

      mastodonmigration@mastodon.onlineM This user is from outside of this forum
      mastodonmigration@mastodon.onlineM This user is from outside of this forum
      mastodonmigration@mastodon.online
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #11

      @dangillmor

      They just keep leaning into the "be evil" don't they?

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • yetzt@social.yetzt.meY yetzt@social.yetzt.me

        @dangillmor antonymous? are they meaning the opposite of what they say?

        jerrej@mastodon.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
        jerrej@mastodon.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
        jerrej@mastodon.social
        wrote sidst redigeret af
        #12

        @yetzt @dangillmor

        waymo - noun from the verb "to waymow", coined from "to lawn-mow", but applied to road usage. Ex.: "His ride then waymowed across the bike lane to take a legal turn on red, cannoning directly into two crossing pedestrians."

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • dangillmor@mastodon.socialD dangillmor@mastodon.social

          Google's antonymous taxi company says it won't obey traffic safety laws because its customers want convenience, so screw those bicyclists who don't want to be injured or killed.

          https://road.cc/news/driverless-taxis-veering-into-cycle-lanes-normal-practice-says-waymo

          cgudrian@social.tchncs.deC This user is from outside of this forum
          cgudrian@social.tchncs.deC This user is from outside of this forum
          cgudrian@social.tchncs.de
          wrote sidst redigeret af
          #13

          @dangillmor I guess society is no longer bound to laws either, then? “What a nice autonomous taxi you have there. Would be a shame if anything happened to it…”

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • dangillmor@mastodon.socialD dangillmor@mastodon.social

            Google's antonymous taxi company says it won't obey traffic safety laws because its customers want convenience, so screw those bicyclists who don't want to be injured or killed.

            https://road.cc/news/driverless-taxis-veering-into-cycle-lanes-normal-practice-says-waymo

            kowalski@chaos.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
            kowalski@chaos.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
            kowalski@chaos.social
            wrote sidst redigeret af
            #14

            Why we don’t build autonomous walking Robots by our own? They may not be able to respect these self-driving cars. They may not know that a hammer hand has another primary function. But who cares!

            @dangillmor

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • dangillmor@mastodon.socialD dangillmor@mastodon.social

              Google's antonymous taxi company says it won't obey traffic safety laws because its customers want convenience, so screw those bicyclists who don't want to be injured or killed.

              https://road.cc/news/driverless-taxis-veering-into-cycle-lanes-normal-practice-says-waymo

              ovoao@mastodon.socialO This user is from outside of this forum
              ovoao@mastodon.socialO This user is from outside of this forum
              ovoao@mastodon.social
              wrote sidst redigeret af
              #15

              @dangillmor

              If I understand correctly, this is just for picking people up and dropping them off. Every normal taxi would also do that.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • dangillmor@mastodon.socialD dangillmor@mastodon.social

                Google's antonymous taxi company says it won't obey traffic safety laws because its customers want convenience, so screw those bicyclists who don't want to be injured or killed.

                https://road.cc/news/driverless-taxis-veering-into-cycle-lanes-normal-practice-says-waymo

                fenixmaster@mastodon.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
                fenixmaster@mastodon.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
                fenixmaster@mastodon.social
                wrote sidst redigeret af
                #16

                @dangillmor Google shouldn’t put it like that; otherwise, their cars will end up being flipped upside down by an angry member of the public wielding a shovel.

                fenixmaster@mastodon.socialF 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • fenixmaster@mastodon.socialF fenixmaster@mastodon.social

                  @dangillmor Google shouldn’t put it like that; otherwise, their cars will end up being flipped upside down by an angry member of the public wielding a shovel.

                  fenixmaster@mastodon.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
                  fenixmaster@mastodon.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
                  fenixmaster@mastodon.social
                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                  #17

                  @dangillmor The tires, it is always the tires, the weakest point of a car.

                  peter_slwk@mastodon.socialP 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • yetzt@social.yetzt.meY yetzt@social.yetzt.me

                    @dangillmor antonymous? are they meaning the opposite of what they say?

                    sgail@mastodon.scotS This user is from outside of this forum
                    sgail@mastodon.scotS This user is from outside of this forum
                    sgail@mastodon.scot
                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                    #18

                    @yetzt @dangillmor Hah. I was looking at it and trying to figure it out. I got as far as "of the other name" or "of the opposing name".

                    Ans then I decided to stop because I was afraid of generating a mild conspiracy theory. 😁

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • dangillmor@mastodon.socialD dangillmor@mastodon.social

                      Google's antonymous taxi company says it won't obey traffic safety laws because its customers want convenience, so screw those bicyclists who don't want to be injured or killed.

                      https://road.cc/news/driverless-taxis-veering-into-cycle-lanes-normal-practice-says-waymo

                      sgail@mastodon.scotS This user is from outside of this forum
                      sgail@mastodon.scotS This user is from outside of this forum
                      sgail@mastodon.scot
                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                      #19

                      @dangillmor I did not know Waymo was Google. I keep seeing their propaganda pushed by YouTube, with the remarkably implausible woman saying something like, "Because I have kids and I worry about their safety on the roads I'm really looking forward to autonomous vehicles driving around in Britain".

                      If the 'Sure, Jan' meme was made for anything, it's those 'ads'.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • dangillmor@mastodon.socialD dangillmor@mastodon.social

                        Google's antonymous taxi company says it won't obey traffic safety laws because its customers want convenience, so screw those bicyclists who don't want to be injured or killed.

                        https://road.cc/news/driverless-taxis-veering-into-cycle-lanes-normal-practice-says-waymo

                        nakedgerry@mastodon.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                        nakedgerry@mastodon.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                        nakedgerry@mastodon.social
                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                        #20

                        @dangillmor @paulk Grief! These things are going to be so unpredictable that they will be lethal and should just be banned.

                        paulk@writing.exchangeP 2 Replies Last reply
                        0
                        • fenixmaster@mastodon.socialF fenixmaster@mastodon.social

                          @dangillmor The tires, it is always the tires, the weakest point of a car.

                          peter_slwk@mastodon.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                          peter_slwk@mastodon.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                          peter_slwk@mastodon.social
                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                          #21

                          @fenixmaster @dangillmor Or just some chalk (or salt) ...

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • dangillmor@mastodon.socialD dangillmor@mastodon.social

                            Google's antonymous taxi company says it won't obey traffic safety laws because its customers want convenience, so screw those bicyclists who don't want to be injured or killed.

                            https://road.cc/news/driverless-taxis-veering-into-cycle-lanes-normal-practice-says-waymo

                            newint@todon.nlN This user is from outside of this forum
                            newint@todon.nlN This user is from outside of this forum
                            newint@todon.nl
                            wrote sidst redigeret af
                            #22

                            @dangillmor Which problem do these self-driving vehicles solve, which issue is so pressing, that we have to dedicate development time and sacrifice existing infrastructure? We don’t need flying taxis and self driving cars. We need separate bicycle lanes, affordable and reliable public transport, clean air, etc. which benefit all, not just some tech companies.

                            T 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • dangillmor@mastodon.socialD dangillmor@mastodon.social

                              Google's antonymous taxi company says it won't obey traffic safety laws because its customers want convenience, so screw those bicyclists who don't want to be injured or killed.

                              https://road.cc/news/driverless-taxis-veering-into-cycle-lanes-normal-practice-says-waymo

                              windsheep@infosec.exchangeW This user is from outside of this forum
                              windsheep@infosec.exchangeW This user is from outside of this forum
                              windsheep@infosec.exchange
                              wrote sidst redigeret af
                              #23

                              @dangillmor finally. A robot takes care of them. Where can I buy the anti cyclist feature

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • dangillmor@mastodon.socialD dangillmor@mastodon.social

                                Google's antonymous taxi company says it won't obey traffic safety laws because its customers want convenience, so screw those bicyclists who don't want to be injured or killed.

                                https://road.cc/news/driverless-taxis-veering-into-cycle-lanes-normal-practice-says-waymo

                                leberschnitzel@existiert.chL This user is from outside of this forum
                                leberschnitzel@existiert.chL This user is from outside of this forum
                                leberschnitzel@existiert.ch
                                wrote sidst redigeret af
                                #24

                                @dangillmor I'm not surprised about this seeing where they trained...

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • nakedgerry@mastodon.socialN nakedgerry@mastodon.social

                                  @dangillmor @paulk Grief! These things are going to be so unpredictable that they will be lethal and should just be banned.

                                  paulk@writing.exchangeP This user is from outside of this forum
                                  paulk@writing.exchangeP This user is from outside of this forum
                                  paulk@writing.exchange
                                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                                  #25

                                  @nakedgerry People don't matter, clearly.

                                  @dangillmor

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • dangillmor@mastodon.socialD dangillmor@mastodon.social

                                    Google's antonymous taxi company says it won't obey traffic safety laws because its customers want convenience, so screw those bicyclists who don't want to be injured or killed.

                                    https://road.cc/news/driverless-taxis-veering-into-cycle-lanes-normal-practice-says-waymo

                                    paulk@writing.exchangeP This user is from outside of this forum
                                    paulk@writing.exchangeP This user is from outside of this forum
                                    paulk@writing.exchange
                                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                                    #26

                                    @dangillmor "Terminator". It just looks different, but it's coming.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • nakedgerry@mastodon.socialN nakedgerry@mastodon.social

                                      @dangillmor @paulk Grief! These things are going to be so unpredictable that they will be lethal and should just be banned.

                                      paulk@writing.exchangeP This user is from outside of this forum
                                      paulk@writing.exchangeP This user is from outside of this forum
                                      paulk@writing.exchange
                                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                                      #27

                                      @nakedgerry It's "Terminator". It just looks different.

                                      @dangillmor

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • newint@todon.nlN newint@todon.nl

                                        @dangillmor Which problem do these self-driving vehicles solve, which issue is so pressing, that we have to dedicate development time and sacrifice existing infrastructure? We don’t need flying taxis and self driving cars. We need separate bicycle lanes, affordable and reliable public transport, clean air, etc. which benefit all, not just some tech companies.

                                        T This user is from outside of this forum
                                        T This user is from outside of this forum
                                        tkissing@mastodon.social
                                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                                        #28

                                        @newint @dangillmor The "problem" is that humans need to eat and therefore don't act as drivers for free, which means their pay reduces the profits of the broligarchs.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • dangillmor@mastodon.socialD dangillmor@mastodon.social

                                          Google's antonymous taxi company says it won't obey traffic safety laws because its customers want convenience, so screw those bicyclists who don't want to be injured or killed.

                                          https://road.cc/news/driverless-taxis-veering-into-cycle-lanes-normal-practice-says-waymo

                                          kkarhan@jorts.horseK This user is from outside of this forum
                                          kkarhan@jorts.horseK This user is from outside of this forum
                                          kkarhan@jorts.horse
                                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                                          #29

                                          @dangillmor TBH, I'd consider any Cyclist poppin' 9x19mm +P+ SJHP (regular 9mm.won't go through tires) into any of those shit vehicles' tires an act of "self & mutual defense" against murder by car…

                                          • Or just place Calthrops on the markings if not sprinkle them before said cars.

                                          #Sarcasm #Commentary #NotLegalAdvice #Waymo #CarBrain #CarCentrism #cycling #safety #RoadSafety

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Svar
                                          • Svar som emne
                                          Login for at svare
                                          • Ældste til nyeste
                                          • Nyeste til ældste
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Log ind

                                          • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          Graciously hosted by data.coop
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Hjem
                                          • Seneste
                                          • Etiketter
                                          • Populære
                                          • Verden
                                          • Bruger
                                          • Grupper