Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. finally, Wendell Berry's standards for technological innovation--truly as relevant now as they were in 1987 #othernetworks

finally, Wendell Berry's standards for technological innovation--truly as relevant now as they were in 1987 #othernetworks

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
othernetworks
75 Indlæg 50 Posters 0 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • loriemerson@post.lurk.orgL loriemerson@post.lurk.org

    @mossyfoot I don't even know if they could even get such a business started in the first place! we are slowly heading toward an anti-capitalist revolution of some kind...I just hope it doesn't take too many more global catastrophes to happen

    mossyfoot@pdx.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
    mossyfoot@pdx.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
    mossyfoot@pdx.social
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #7

    @loriemerson agreed.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • redoak@social.coopR redoak@social.coop

      @aakoskin @loriemerson hey, this reply sucks

      ricardoharvin@mstdn.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
      ricardoharvin@mstdn.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
      ricardoharvin@mstdn.social
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #8

      @redoak @aakoskin

      Ironically, and unsurprisingly, this clownish troll posts images without alt text.

      I really hate people.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • loriemerson@post.lurk.orgL loriemerson@post.lurk.org

        finally, Wendell Berry's standards for technological innovation--truly as relevant now as they were in 1987 #othernetworks

        pterry@fnordon.deP This user is from outside of this forum
        pterry@fnordon.deP This user is from outside of this forum
        pterry@fnordon.de
        wrote sidst redigeret af
        #9

        @loriemerson funny thing, this resembles in part the requirements for new drugs

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • loriemerson@post.lurk.orgL loriemerson@post.lurk.org

          finally, Wendell Berry's standards for technological innovation--truly as relevant now as they were in 1987 #othernetworks

          pavelasamsonov@mastodon.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
          pavelasamsonov@mastodon.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
          pavelasamsonov@mastodon.social
          wrote sidst redigeret af
          #10

          @loriemerson I love the idea of the body's energy being solar energy

          msbellows@c.imM 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • loriemerson@post.lurk.orgL loriemerson@post.lurk.org

            finally, Wendell Berry's standards for technological innovation--truly as relevant now as they were in 1987 #othernetworks

            earthshine@masto.hackers.townE This user is from outside of this forum
            earthshine@masto.hackers.townE This user is from outside of this forum
            earthshine@masto.hackers.town
            wrote sidst redigeret af
            #11

            @loriemerson Yes 100% to all of this. Though I'm not entirely sure what they mean by "some form of solar energy" in that context... it sounds like they mean generally renewable or naturally abundant in the local environment?

            radicalabacus@hachyderm.ioR admin@mastodon.slightlycyberpunk.comA 2 Replies Last reply
            0
            • loriemerson@post.lurk.orgL loriemerson@post.lurk.org

              finally, Wendell Berry's standards for technological innovation--truly as relevant now as they were in 1987 #othernetworks

              zenheathen@beige.partyZ This user is from outside of this forum
              zenheathen@beige.partyZ This user is from outside of this forum
              zenheathen@beige.party
              wrote sidst redigeret af
              #12

              @loriemerson Based on this brilliant wisdom, I should look this person up.

              msbellows@c.imM 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • loriemerson@post.lurk.orgL loriemerson@post.lurk.org

                finally, Wendell Berry's standards for technological innovation--truly as relevant now as they were in 1987 #othernetworks

                ah_99@mastodonapp.ukA This user is from outside of this forum
                ah_99@mastodonapp.ukA This user is from outside of this forum
                ah_99@mastodonapp.uk
                wrote sidst redigeret af
                #13

                @loriemerson
                So EVs are out then? 😉

                zombiecide@polyglot.cityZ 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • loriemerson@post.lurk.orgL loriemerson@post.lurk.org

                  finally, Wendell Berry's standards for technological innovation--truly as relevant now as they were in 1987 #othernetworks

                  kolev@babka.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
                  kolev@babka.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
                  kolev@babka.social
                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                  #14

                  @loriemerson I'd like to see some examples of good and bad tech based on these principles. I assume a solar-powered calculator is a good tech.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • earthshine@masto.hackers.townE earthshine@masto.hackers.town

                    @loriemerson Yes 100% to all of this. Though I'm not entirely sure what they mean by "some form of solar energy" in that context... it sounds like they mean generally renewable or naturally abundant in the local environment?

                    radicalabacus@hachyderm.ioR This user is from outside of this forum
                    radicalabacus@hachyderm.ioR This user is from outside of this forum
                    radicalabacus@hachyderm.io
                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                    #15

                    @earthshine @loriemerson I think they mean it quite literally. The energy in us comes from our food, which gets it from the sun. Wind energy is also from the sun since it's the heat differences that drive the wind. If you take that idea to extremes fossil fuels are also solar but I don't think that's what they meant 🙂

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • loriemerson@post.lurk.orgL loriemerson@post.lurk.org

                      finally, Wendell Berry's standards for technological innovation--truly as relevant now as they were in 1987 #othernetworks

                      publius@mastodon.sdf.orgP This user is from outside of this forum
                      publius@mastodon.sdf.orgP This user is from outside of this forum
                      publius@mastodon.sdf.org
                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                      #16

                      @loriemerson

                      How far back do you have to go, to find a time when many people would have agreed that slavery fell in the category of "family and community relationships", and was even among the most important? Technological innovation disrupted that, by separating the processing of chemical energy into mechanical work from the human body. I for one have no desire to go back.

                      #atomicpowertothepeople

                      dalias@hachyderm.ioD 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • loriemerson@post.lurk.orgL loriemerson@post.lurk.org

                        finally, Wendell Berry's standards for technological innovation--truly as relevant now as they were in 1987 #othernetworks

                        stairjoke@indieweb.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                        stairjoke@indieweb.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                        stairjoke@indieweb.social
                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                        #17

                        @loriemerson wonderful! Is there a website with more information and some context? Or a book?

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • ah_99@mastodonapp.ukA ah_99@mastodonapp.uk

                          @loriemerson
                          So EVs are out then? 😉

                          zombiecide@polyglot.cityZ This user is from outside of this forum
                          zombiecide@polyglot.cityZ This user is from outside of this forum
                          zombiecide@polyglot.city
                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                          #18

                          @AH_99 e-SUVs are out, e-bikes very much in

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • publius@mastodon.sdf.orgP publius@mastodon.sdf.org

                            @loriemerson

                            How far back do you have to go, to find a time when many people would have agreed that slavery fell in the category of "family and community relationships", and was even among the most important? Technological innovation disrupted that, by separating the processing of chemical energy into mechanical work from the human body. I for one have no desire to go back.

                            #atomicpowertothepeople

                            dalias@hachyderm.ioD This user is from outside of this forum
                            dalias@hachyderm.ioD This user is from outside of this forum
                            dalias@hachyderm.io
                            wrote sidst redigeret af
                            #19

                            @publius Slavery was recognized at the time it was practiced as an abomination by all decent people.

                            History classes just teach the awful people of their times as though they were the only ones whose opinions counted.

                            alexandermars@mastodon.socialA 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • earthshine@masto.hackers.townE earthshine@masto.hackers.town

                              @loriemerson Yes 100% to all of this. Though I'm not entirely sure what they mean by "some form of solar energy" in that context... it sounds like they mean generally renewable or naturally abundant in the local environment?

                              admin@mastodon.slightlycyberpunk.comA This user is from outside of this forum
                              admin@mastodon.slightlycyberpunk.comA This user is from outside of this forum
                              admin@mastodon.slightlycyberpunk.com
                              wrote sidst redigeret af
                              #20

                              @earthshine @loriemerson Yeah, powered by burning wood or vegetation, or a combustion engine running pure ethanol..maybe even incinerating mountains of bioplastics... 🙂

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • loriemerson@post.lurk.orgL loriemerson@post.lurk.org

                                finally, Wendell Berry's standards for technological innovation--truly as relevant now as they were in 1987 #othernetworks

                                ai6yr@m.ai6yr.orgA This user is from outside of this forum
                                ai6yr@m.ai6yr.orgA This user is from outside of this forum
                                ai6yr@m.ai6yr.org
                                wrote sidst redigeret af
                                #21

                                @loriemerson This is a great list!!

                                dogfox@kpop.socialD 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • ai6yr@m.ai6yr.orgA ai6yr@m.ai6yr.org

                                  @loriemerson This is a great list!!

                                  dogfox@kpop.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
                                  dogfox@kpop.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
                                  dogfox@kpop.social
                                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                                  #22

                                  Wendell Berry rocks.

                                  @ai6yr @loriemerson

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • loriemerson@post.lurk.orgL loriemerson@post.lurk.org

                                    finally, Wendell Berry's standards for technological innovation--truly as relevant now as they were in 1987 #othernetworks

                                    libroraptor@mastodon.nzL This user is from outside of this forum
                                    libroraptor@mastodon.nzL This user is from outside of this forum
                                    libroraptor@mastodon.nz
                                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                                    #23

                                    @loriemerson I'm not keen on rule 2: often the current tool's problems include being too small to operate well.

                                    isocat@tiggi.esI 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • dalias@hachyderm.ioD dalias@hachyderm.io

                                      @publius Slavery was recognized at the time it was practiced as an abomination by all decent people.

                                      History classes just teach the awful people of their times as though they were the only ones whose opinions counted.

                                      alexandermars@mastodon.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                                      alexandermars@mastodon.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                                      alexandermars@mastodon.social
                                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                                      #24

                                      @dalias that's just a sad little troll, making a pathetic attempt to shit on someone else's post.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • loriemerson@post.lurk.orgL loriemerson@post.lurk.org

                                        finally, Wendell Berry's standards for technological innovation--truly as relevant now as they were in 1987 #othernetworks

                                        isocat@tiggi.esI This user is from outside of this forum
                                        isocat@tiggi.esI This user is from outside of this forum
                                        isocat@tiggi.es
                                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                                        #25

                                        @loriemerson Nothing about durability. Point 6 only gets partway there.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • libroraptor@mastodon.nzL libroraptor@mastodon.nz

                                          @loriemerson I'm not keen on rule 2: often the current tool's problems include being too small to operate well.

                                          isocat@tiggi.esI This user is from outside of this forum
                                          isocat@tiggi.esI This user is from outside of this forum
                                          isocat@tiggi.es
                                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                                          #26

                                          @libroraptor @loriemerson Yeah, smaller isn't necessarily better.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Svar
                                          • Svar som emne
                                          Login for at svare
                                          • Ældste til nyeste
                                          • Nyeste til ældste
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Log ind

                                          • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          Graciously hosted by data.coop
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Hjem
                                          • Seneste
                                          • Etiketter
                                          • Populære
                                          • Verden
                                          • Bruger
                                          • Grupper