Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. finally, Wendell Berry's standards for technological innovation--truly as relevant now as they were in 1987 #othernetworks

finally, Wendell Berry's standards for technological innovation--truly as relevant now as they were in 1987 #othernetworks

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
othernetworks
75 Indlæg 50 Posters 0 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • loriemerson@post.lurk.orgL loriemerson@post.lurk.org

    finally, Wendell Berry's standards for technological innovation--truly as relevant now as they were in 1987 #othernetworks

    ah_99@mastodonapp.ukA This user is from outside of this forum
    ah_99@mastodonapp.ukA This user is from outside of this forum
    ah_99@mastodonapp.uk
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #13

    @loriemerson
    So EVs are out then? 😉

    zombiecide@polyglot.cityZ 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • loriemerson@post.lurk.orgL loriemerson@post.lurk.org

      finally, Wendell Berry's standards for technological innovation--truly as relevant now as they were in 1987 #othernetworks

      kolev@babka.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
      kolev@babka.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
      kolev@babka.social
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #14

      @loriemerson I'd like to see some examples of good and bad tech based on these principles. I assume a solar-powered calculator is a good tech.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • earthshine@masto.hackers.townE earthshine@masto.hackers.town

        @loriemerson Yes 100% to all of this. Though I'm not entirely sure what they mean by "some form of solar energy" in that context... it sounds like they mean generally renewable or naturally abundant in the local environment?

        radicalabacus@hachyderm.ioR This user is from outside of this forum
        radicalabacus@hachyderm.ioR This user is from outside of this forum
        radicalabacus@hachyderm.io
        wrote sidst redigeret af
        #15

        @earthshine @loriemerson I think they mean it quite literally. The energy in us comes from our food, which gets it from the sun. Wind energy is also from the sun since it's the heat differences that drive the wind. If you take that idea to extremes fossil fuels are also solar but I don't think that's what they meant 🙂

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • loriemerson@post.lurk.orgL loriemerson@post.lurk.org

          finally, Wendell Berry's standards for technological innovation--truly as relevant now as they were in 1987 #othernetworks

          publius@mastodon.sdf.orgP This user is from outside of this forum
          publius@mastodon.sdf.orgP This user is from outside of this forum
          publius@mastodon.sdf.org
          wrote sidst redigeret af
          #16

          @loriemerson

          How far back do you have to go, to find a time when many people would have agreed that slavery fell in the category of "family and community relationships", and was even among the most important? Technological innovation disrupted that, by separating the processing of chemical energy into mechanical work from the human body. I for one have no desire to go back.

          #atomicpowertothepeople

          dalias@hachyderm.ioD 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • loriemerson@post.lurk.orgL loriemerson@post.lurk.org

            finally, Wendell Berry's standards for technological innovation--truly as relevant now as they were in 1987 #othernetworks

            stairjoke@indieweb.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
            stairjoke@indieweb.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
            stairjoke@indieweb.social
            wrote sidst redigeret af
            #17

            @loriemerson wonderful! Is there a website with more information and some context? Or a book?

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • ah_99@mastodonapp.ukA ah_99@mastodonapp.uk

              @loriemerson
              So EVs are out then? 😉

              zombiecide@polyglot.cityZ This user is from outside of this forum
              zombiecide@polyglot.cityZ This user is from outside of this forum
              zombiecide@polyglot.city
              wrote sidst redigeret af
              #18

              @AH_99 e-SUVs are out, e-bikes very much in

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • publius@mastodon.sdf.orgP publius@mastodon.sdf.org

                @loriemerson

                How far back do you have to go, to find a time when many people would have agreed that slavery fell in the category of "family and community relationships", and was even among the most important? Technological innovation disrupted that, by separating the processing of chemical energy into mechanical work from the human body. I for one have no desire to go back.

                #atomicpowertothepeople

                dalias@hachyderm.ioD This user is from outside of this forum
                dalias@hachyderm.ioD This user is from outside of this forum
                dalias@hachyderm.io
                wrote sidst redigeret af
                #19

                @publius Slavery was recognized at the time it was practiced as an abomination by all decent people.

                History classes just teach the awful people of their times as though they were the only ones whose opinions counted.

                alexandermars@mastodon.socialA 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • earthshine@masto.hackers.townE earthshine@masto.hackers.town

                  @loriemerson Yes 100% to all of this. Though I'm not entirely sure what they mean by "some form of solar energy" in that context... it sounds like they mean generally renewable or naturally abundant in the local environment?

                  admin@mastodon.slightlycyberpunk.comA This user is from outside of this forum
                  admin@mastodon.slightlycyberpunk.comA This user is from outside of this forum
                  admin@mastodon.slightlycyberpunk.com
                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                  #20

                  @earthshine @loriemerson Yeah, powered by burning wood or vegetation, or a combustion engine running pure ethanol..maybe even incinerating mountains of bioplastics... 🙂

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • loriemerson@post.lurk.orgL loriemerson@post.lurk.org

                    finally, Wendell Berry's standards for technological innovation--truly as relevant now as they were in 1987 #othernetworks

                    ai6yr@m.ai6yr.orgA This user is from outside of this forum
                    ai6yr@m.ai6yr.orgA This user is from outside of this forum
                    ai6yr@m.ai6yr.org
                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                    #21

                    @loriemerson This is a great list!!

                    dogfox@kpop.socialD 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • ai6yr@m.ai6yr.orgA ai6yr@m.ai6yr.org

                      @loriemerson This is a great list!!

                      dogfox@kpop.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
                      dogfox@kpop.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
                      dogfox@kpop.social
                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                      #22

                      Wendell Berry rocks.

                      @ai6yr @loriemerson

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • loriemerson@post.lurk.orgL loriemerson@post.lurk.org

                        finally, Wendell Berry's standards for technological innovation--truly as relevant now as they were in 1987 #othernetworks

                        libroraptor@mastodon.nzL This user is from outside of this forum
                        libroraptor@mastodon.nzL This user is from outside of this forum
                        libroraptor@mastodon.nz
                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                        #23

                        @loriemerson I'm not keen on rule 2: often the current tool's problems include being too small to operate well.

                        isocat@tiggi.esI 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • dalias@hachyderm.ioD dalias@hachyderm.io

                          @publius Slavery was recognized at the time it was practiced as an abomination by all decent people.

                          History classes just teach the awful people of their times as though they were the only ones whose opinions counted.

                          alexandermars@mastodon.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                          alexandermars@mastodon.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                          alexandermars@mastodon.social
                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                          #24

                          @dalias that's just a sad little troll, making a pathetic attempt to shit on someone else's post.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • loriemerson@post.lurk.orgL loriemerson@post.lurk.org

                            finally, Wendell Berry's standards for technological innovation--truly as relevant now as they were in 1987 #othernetworks

                            isocat@tiggi.esI This user is from outside of this forum
                            isocat@tiggi.esI This user is from outside of this forum
                            isocat@tiggi.es
                            wrote sidst redigeret af
                            #25

                            @loriemerson Nothing about durability. Point 6 only gets partway there.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • libroraptor@mastodon.nzL libroraptor@mastodon.nz

                              @loriemerson I'm not keen on rule 2: often the current tool's problems include being too small to operate well.

                              isocat@tiggi.esI This user is from outside of this forum
                              isocat@tiggi.esI This user is from outside of this forum
                              isocat@tiggi.es
                              wrote sidst redigeret af
                              #26

                              @libroraptor @loriemerson Yeah, smaller isn't necessarily better.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • aakoskin@bitwoods.duckdns.orgA aakoskin@bitwoods.duckdns.org

                                @loriemerson 10. Never post an image/screenshot if you can type the same in plain text.

                                itsjennotgoblin@goblin.campI This user is from outside of this forum
                                itsjennotgoblin@goblin.campI This user is from outside of this forum
                                itsjennotgoblin@goblin.camp
                                wrote sidst redigeret af
                                #27

                                @aakoskin @loriemerson the text is in the image description you numpty.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • loriemerson@post.lurk.orgL loriemerson@post.lurk.org

                                  finally, Wendell Berry's standards for technological innovation--truly as relevant now as they were in 1987 #othernetworks

                                  nicksilkey@hachyderm.ioN This user is from outside of this forum
                                  nicksilkey@hachyderm.ioN This user is from outside of this forum
                                  nicksilkey@hachyderm.io
                                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                                  #28

                                  @loriemerson amazing - I tracked down the source. Thanks for this! 🙇‍♀️✌️💙

                                  Why I Am Not Going to Buy a Computer
                                  Wendell Berry
                                  New England Review and Bread Loaf Quarterly
                                  Vol. 10, No. 1 (Autumn, 1987), pp. 112-113 (2 pages)
                                  Published By: Middlebury College Publications

                                  https://www.jstor.org/stable/40241890

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • loriemerson@post.lurk.orgL loriemerson@post.lurk.org

                                    finally, Wendell Berry's standards for technological innovation--truly as relevant now as they were in 1987 #othernetworks

                                    scottytrees@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                                    scottytrees@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                                    scottytrees@mastodon.social
                                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                                    #29

                                    @loriemerson yeah that’s a fantasy list that doesn’t exist anymore lol

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • loriemerson@post.lurk.orgL loriemerson@post.lurk.org

                                      finally, Wendell Berry's standards for technological innovation--truly as relevant now as they were in 1987 #othernetworks

                                      perhaps391@mastodon.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                                      perhaps391@mastodon.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                                      perhaps391@mastodon.social
                                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                                      #30

                                      @loriemerson wow, current vibe-coded software tools fail almost every one of these standards.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • loriemerson@post.lurk.orgL loriemerson@post.lurk.org

                                        finally, Wendell Berry's standards for technological innovation--truly as relevant now as they were in 1987 #othernetworks

                                        nickrauchen@c.imN This user is from outside of this forum
                                        nickrauchen@c.imN This user is from outside of this forum
                                        nickrauchen@c.im
                                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                                        #31

                                        @loriemerson

                                        I like to go to original sources, so here's a link via @Kottke.org...

                                        https://classes.matthewjbrown.net/teaching-files/philtech/berry-computer.pdf

                                        https://kottke.org/25/05/nine-rules-for-evaluating-new-technology

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • aakoskin@bitwoods.duckdns.orgA aakoskin@bitwoods.duckdns.org

                                          @loriemerson 10. Never post an image/screenshot if you can type the same in plain text.

                                          nickrauchen@c.imN This user is from outside of this forum
                                          nickrauchen@c.imN This user is from outside of this forum
                                          nickrauchen@c.im
                                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                                          #32

                                          @aakoskin @loriemerson

                                          "Never post an image/screenshot if you can type the same in plain text."

                                          For a simple list like the above. I agree.

                                          I suspect that there is a "plain text penalty" for words/ideas without imagery in social media, but I'm not up on the trends, rules, or research in that domain.

                                          lxskllr@mastodon.worldL garonenur@rollenspiel.socialG 2 Replies Last reply
                                          0
                                          Svar
                                          • Svar som emne
                                          Login for at svare
                                          • Ældste til nyeste
                                          • Nyeste til ældste
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Log ind

                                          • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          Graciously hosted by data.coop
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Hjem
                                          • Seneste
                                          • Etiketter
                                          • Populære
                                          • Verden
                                          • Bruger
                                          • Grupper