And so we find ourselves where we knew we'd end up... the Home Office using AI-generated slop (a document that doesn't;t exist) to refuse an asylum claim.
-
And so we find ourselves where we knew we'd end up... the Home Office using AI-generated slop (a document that doesn't;t exist) to refuse an asylum claim.
AI & its associated technologies are having clear & consequential effects, yet they no doubt will allow Home Office officials to escape censure for lying & misrepresentation;
'it was the machine what done it, M'lud'.
Court's will need to be more sceptical of HO claims from now on!
@ChrisMayLA6 AI used on human matters is not so far removed from getting a psychopath or sociopath to choose. None of these have empathy.
-
And so we find ourselves where we knew we'd end up... the Home Office using AI-generated slop (a document that doesn't;t exist) to refuse an asylum claim.
AI & its associated technologies are having clear & consequential effects, yet they no doubt will allow Home Office officials to escape censure for lying & misrepresentation;
'it was the machine what done it, M'lud'.
Court's will need to be more sceptical of HO claims from now on!
@ChrisMayLA6 "an inmigration court known as the first tier tribunal"
"to a more senior court, the upper tribunal"
that's some very odd writing coming from an authoritative British newspaper... I wonder if HMG is not the only one AI slopping here
-
And so we find ourselves where we knew we'd end up... the Home Office using AI-generated slop (a document that doesn't;t exist) to refuse an asylum claim.
AI & its associated technologies are having clear & consequential effects, yet they no doubt will allow Home Office officials to escape censure for lying & misrepresentation;
'it was the machine what done it, M'lud'.
Court's will need to be more sceptical of HO claims from now on!
@ChrisMayLA6 abhorrent. Heads should (metaphorically) role.
This shit should never be used to inform decisions where lives are made or broken. Disgusting.
-
@ChrisMayLA6 I’m for relatively minimal consequences for this; the home office employee who produced this should be charged with fraud, and the home office lawyer who signed off on it immediately disbarred.
Which would be a LOT less than they deserved.
@ndevenish @ChrisMayLA6 disbarment is extreme for this compared to similar non-AI related unintentional but clearly negligent submissions to the court - a 1 year suspension and a few thousand pounds of fine would be par for the course
-
And so we find ourselves where we knew we'd end up... the Home Office using AI-generated slop (a document that doesn't;t exist) to refuse an asylum claim.
AI & its associated technologies are having clear & consequential effects, yet they no doubt will allow Home Office officials to escape censure for lying & misrepresentation;
'it was the machine what done it, M'lud'.
Court's will need to be more sceptical of HO claims from now on!
@ChrisMayLA6 the temerity to claim they are "restoring control" is a slap in the face to every citizen.
-
And so we find ourselves where we knew we'd end up... the Home Office using AI-generated slop (a document that doesn't;t exist) to refuse an asylum claim.
AI & its associated technologies are having clear & consequential effects, yet they no doubt will allow Home Office officials to escape censure for lying & misrepresentation;
'it was the machine what done it, M'lud'.
Court's will need to be more sceptical of HO claims from now on!
@ChrisMayLA6
️ -
And so we find ourselves where we knew we'd end up... the Home Office using AI-generated slop (a document that doesn't;t exist) to refuse an asylum claim.
AI & its associated technologies are having clear & consequential effects, yet they no doubt will allow Home Office officials to escape censure for lying & misrepresentation;
'it was the machine what done it, M'lud'.
Court's will need to be more sceptical of HO claims from now on!
@ChrisMayLA6 Braverman and Patel must be dying of jealousy.
-
And so we find ourselves where we knew we'd end up... the Home Office using AI-generated slop (a document that doesn't;t exist) to refuse an asylum claim.
AI & its associated technologies are having clear & consequential effects, yet they no doubt will allow Home Office officials to escape censure for lying & misrepresentation;
'it was the machine what done it, M'lud'.
Court's will need to be more sceptical of HO claims from now on!
Maybe I am tired or hallucinating…but is the gist of this story that the Home Office can completely ignore the testimony of a woman fleeing a country where she was made a child bride and raped and feared being killed by her convicted criminal husband if she went back there because they thought they had a a document (that only exists in AI make believe land) which claims everything is hunky dory in said country. Only the real document says it’s not…
-
Maybe I am tired or hallucinating…but is the gist of this story that the Home Office can completely ignore the testimony of a woman fleeing a country where she was made a child bride and raped and feared being killed by her convicted criminal husband if she went back there because they thought they had a a document (that only exists in AI make believe land) which claims everything is hunky dory in said country. Only the real document says it’s not…
‘It states that in 2018 exemptions were made granting 40,000 child marriages, one-fifth of the total marriages that year. It adds that Morocco’s laws do not explicitly criminalise marital rape and that women who report this may be criminalised for engaging in sex outside marriage if they are disbelieved by the authorities.’
Doesn’t sound like even the Tories who were in charge at the time rated Morocco.
-
And so we find ourselves where we knew we'd end up... the Home Office using AI-generated slop (a document that doesn't;t exist) to refuse an asylum claim.
AI & its associated technologies are having clear & consequential effects, yet they no doubt will allow Home Office officials to escape censure for lying & misrepresentation;
'it was the machine what done it, M'lud'.
Court's will need to be more sceptical of HO claims from now on!
@ChrisMayLA6
It isn't analogous. It is congruent.
That should be expensive, as well as the criminal or contempt consequences to whoever sent the evidence.
AIUI there will have been a statement of truth, and some natural person signed it. -
Maybe I am tired or hallucinating…but is the gist of this story that the Home Office can completely ignore the testimony of a woman fleeing a country where she was made a child bride and raped and feared being killed by her convicted criminal husband if she went back there because they thought they had a a document (that only exists in AI make believe land) which claims everything is hunky dory in said country. Only the real document says it’s not…
@JugglingWithEggs @ChrisMayLA6
Theresa May's hostile environment continues...
-
And so we find ourselves where we knew we'd end up... the Home Office using AI-generated slop (a document that doesn't;t exist) to refuse an asylum claim.
AI & its associated technologies are having clear & consequential effects, yet they no doubt will allow Home Office officials to escape censure for lying & misrepresentation;
'it was the machine what done it, M'lud'.
Court's will need to be more sceptical of HO claims from now on!
@ChrisMayLA6 The point of any tech touted by the rich seems to me to be to escape accountability (for the rich and their running dogs).
-
And so we find ourselves where we knew we'd end up... the Home Office using AI-generated slop (a document that doesn't;t exist) to refuse an asylum claim.
AI & its associated technologies are having clear & consequential effects, yet they no doubt will allow Home Office officials to escape censure for lying & misrepresentation;
'it was the machine what done it, M'lud'.
Court's will need to be more sceptical of HO claims from now on!
@ChrisMayLA6
The consequences should be the obvious ones:
Fire the people who worked on that case, and their bosses all the way up.
And the asylum seeker gets a citizenship as a thank you for helping find this deep rot in the system. -
Maybe I am tired or hallucinating…but is the gist of this story that the Home Office can completely ignore the testimony of a woman fleeing a country where she was made a child bride and raped and feared being killed by her convicted criminal husband if she went back there because they thought they had a a document (that only exists in AI make believe land) which claims everything is hunky dory in said country. Only the real document says it’s not…
You got it....
-
J jwcph@helvede.net shared this topic
