If your cookie dialog doesn’t have a “reject all” button at the top level, or worse, doesn't even have the button at all and makes me uncheck 200 options of “legitimate use” manually, I consider you of highly dubious moral character.
-
@jamesthomson My understanding of GDPR is that they’re legally required to have the reject all button be top level and the same size as the accept all button. Unfortunately that’s enforced approximately never
@avakining That sucks even more then, I didn't know it was a requirement.
-
@jamesthomson My understanding of GDPR is that they’re legally required to have the reject all button be top level and the same size as the accept all button. Unfortunately that’s enforced approximately never
@jamesthomson Source:
> Make it as easy for users to withdraw their consent as it was for them to give their consent in the first place. -
If your cookie dialog doesn’t have a “reject all” button at the top level, or worse, doesn't even have the button at all and makes me uncheck 200 options of “legitimate use” manually, I consider you of highly dubious moral character.
@jamesthomson unsure that “reject all” unchecks “«legitimate» use” crap and that it affects anything even when unchecked.
-
If your cookie dialog doesn’t have a “reject all” button at the top level, or worse, doesn't even have the button at all and makes me uncheck 200 options of “legitimate use” manually, I consider you of highly dubious moral character.
@jamesthomson if your site ever uses any cookies that require a cookie dialog, I consider you of highly dubious moral character
-
If your cookie dialog doesn’t have a “reject all” button at the top level, or worse, doesn't even have the button at all and makes me uncheck 200 options of “legitimate use” manually, I consider you of highly dubious moral character.
@jamesthomson This is why I have used a lot of private browsing to read articles on completely legit sites. I simply click on Accept all, read what I need and close it, hoping the browser won’t leave any trail behind on my device. The only downside is that the tracking will be 100 % enabled on their side, in the logs and maybe some database or they will sell my data to third-parties.
So … no, it’s not ideal. I just find it practical if I absolutely want to visit the website.
-
If your cookie dialog doesn’t have a “reject all” button at the top level, or worse, doesn't even have the button at all and makes me uncheck 200 options of “legitimate use” manually, I consider you of highly dubious moral character.
@jamesthomson I will also just press back, aggressively, if I have the opinion
-
If your cookie dialog doesn’t have a “reject all” button at the top level, or worse, doesn't even have the button at all and makes me uncheck 200 options of “legitimate use” manually, I consider you of highly dubious moral character.
@jamesthomson I'm currently in a project where we will be changing the presentation of a cookie banner. It's currently a typical (but compliant) "Allow All" / "Essential Only".
UK law changed and there is no longer a requirement for there to be a "reject all" because "we" are allowed to do some collectiong of data for analytics, A:B testing and some other things.
I'm not sure if we're going to be one of the first, big sites that will be doing this
-
@jamesthomson My understanding of GDPR is that they’re legally required to have the reject all button be top level and the same size as the accept all button. Unfortunately that’s enforced approximately never
@avakining @jamesthomson The ICO are not the most well funded org. I have been part of the process where they put a site under investigation (my understanding is they tend to pick on the top 1,000 most popular UK sites).
They did not bring up the mismatch in size of accept versus reject buttons, but they were absolutely on the ball with checking what cookies / platforms were collecting data without proper consent.
-
If your cookie dialog doesn’t have a “reject all” button at the top level, or worse, doesn't even have the button at all and makes me uncheck 200 options of “legitimate use” manually, I consider you of highly dubious moral character.
@jamesthomson Man this is the first time I see anyone else post about this here.
-
@jamesthomson I'm currently in a project where we will be changing the presentation of a cookie banner. It's currently a typical (but compliant) "Allow All" / "Essential Only".
UK law changed and there is no longer a requirement for there to be a "reject all" because "we" are allowed to do some collectiong of data for analytics, A:B testing and some other things.
I'm not sure if we're going to be one of the first, big sites that will be doing this
@digitalstefan Ugh, why would the UK do that?
-
@jamesthomson Man this is the first time I see anyone else post about this here.
@renardboy Look, maybe not an original thought, but it was annoying me!
-
If your cookie dialog doesn’t have a “reject all” button at the top level, or worse, doesn't even have the button at all and makes me uncheck 200 options of “legitimate use” manually, I consider you of highly dubious moral character.
@jamesthomson man i legitimately though mastodon had some cookie discourse going on like yo ready made cookie dough is great.
-
If your cookie dialog doesn’t have a “reject all” button at the top level, or worse, doesn't even have the button at all and makes me uncheck 200 options of “legitimate use” manually, I consider you of highly dubious moral character.
@jamesthomson In Europe, AFAIK that's a violation of GDPR, yet no one seems to care.
-
@jamesthomson In Europe, AFAIK that's a violation of GDPR, yet no one seems to care.
@bnlandor @jamesthomson it's all gone quiet since #Facebook got away with "pay up or loose your privacy" modal
-
If your cookie dialog doesn’t have a “reject all” button at the top level, or worse, doesn't even have the button at all and makes me uncheck 200 options of “legitimate use” manually, I consider you of highly dubious moral character.
I consider websites and organizations that do not respect or allow consent, the same as people who do the same.
-
If your cookie dialog doesn’t have a “reject all” button at the top level, or worse, doesn't even have the button at all and makes me uncheck 200 options of “legitimate use” manually, I consider you of highly dubious moral character.
@jamesthomson I want to meet the person who sees a cookie dialog and thinks “hm, yes, 110 advertising partners deserve a little treat today”
-
If your cookie dialog doesn’t have a “reject all” button at the top level, or worse, doesn't even have the button at all and makes me uncheck 200 options of “legitimate use” manually, I consider you of highly dubious moral character.
@jamesthomson You and your 943 partners.
-
If your cookie dialog doesn’t have a “reject all” button at the top level, or worse, doesn't even have the button at all and makes me uncheck 200 options of “legitimate use” manually, I consider you of highly dubious moral character.
Chances are good you will not need cookies to navigate the site anyway, as you will not be digging deeper into site content and web map, or changing s thing, only passively reading one article.
-
If your cookie dialog doesn’t have a “reject all” button at the top level, or worse, doesn't even have the button at all and makes me uncheck 200 options of “legitimate use” manually, I consider you of highly dubious moral character.
@jamesthomson close tab works for me.
-
If your cookie dialog doesn’t have a “reject all” button at the top level, or worse, doesn't even have the button at all and makes me uncheck 200 options of “legitimate use” manually, I consider you of highly dubious moral character.
@jamesthomson doesn't seem like a website worth visiting
