SAVE Act would require birth cert or passport that matches voters legal name.
-
SAVE Act would require birth cert or passport that matches voters legal name. 69M women may have a legal name that doesn’t match their birth cert. An estimated 21M would be turned away at polls. This act is an attempt to disenfranchise women voters.
https://www.thepersistent.com/this-bill-in-the-senate-could-disenfranchise-millions-of-women-voters/ -
SAVE Act would require birth cert or passport that matches voters legal name. 69M women may have a legal name that doesn’t match their birth cert. An estimated 21M would be turned away at polls. This act is an attempt to disenfranchise women voters.
https://www.thepersistent.com/this-bill-in-the-senate-could-disenfranchise-millions-of-women-voters/@amydiehl@mstdn.social That could backfire on them. I saw it asserted a day or two ago that without white women voting disproportionately conservative, no conservative would have won election in the last century.
I don't know how true the assertion is.
[UPDATE (see below): Looks like it's not.] -
SAVE Act would require birth cert or passport that matches voters legal name. 69M women may have a legal name that doesn’t match their birth cert. An estimated 21M would be turned away at polls. This act is an attempt to disenfranchise women voters.
https://www.thepersistent.com/this-bill-in-the-senate-could-disenfranchise-millions-of-women-voters/Look out! Chuck Schumer is gonna tell the GOP not to do that and then lean back and hope they don't do it.
-
SAVE Act would require birth cert or passport that matches voters legal name. 69M women may have a legal name that doesn’t match their birth cert. An estimated 21M would be turned away at polls. This act is an attempt to disenfranchise women voters.
https://www.thepersistent.com/this-bill-in-the-senate-could-disenfranchise-millions-of-women-voters/ -
@amydiehl@mstdn.social That could backfire on them. I saw it asserted a day or two ago that without white women voting disproportionately conservative, no conservative would have won election in the last century.
I don't know how true the assertion is.
[UPDATE (see below): Looks like it's not.]@zakalwe @amydiehl It wouldn’t backfire on Republicans.
2024 data: https://vividmaps.com/presidential-election-if-only-white-men-voted/
2018 data: https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/what-if-only-men-voted-only-women-only-nonwhite-voters/
-
SAVE Act would require birth cert or passport that matches voters legal name. 69M women may have a legal name that doesn’t match their birth cert. An estimated 21M would be turned away at polls. This act is an attempt to disenfranchise women voters.
https://www.thepersistent.com/this-bill-in-the-senate-could-disenfranchise-millions-of-women-voters/It's useful to know who has funded a war on women for over 60 years.
The fossil fuel industry.
Koch Network, Heritage Foundation, Federalist Society.
All avatars of the same billionaire bigots.
Charles Koch - abortion criminalization was supposed to be a felony disenfranchisement scheme.
https://slate.com/human-interest/2013/11/koch-brothers-pouring-money-into-anti-abortion-agenda-through-the-center-to-protect-patient-rights-and-freedom-partners.htmlhttps://msmagazine.com/2022/05/06/childcare-koch-women-independent-womens-forum/
Efforts at no sex education, no contraception, deprofessionalization of nursing & teaching, no daycare, ...
1/
-
It's useful to know who has funded a war on women for over 60 years.
The fossil fuel industry.
Koch Network, Heritage Foundation, Federalist Society.
All avatars of the same billionaire bigots.
Charles Koch - abortion criminalization was supposed to be a felony disenfranchisement scheme.
https://slate.com/human-interest/2013/11/koch-brothers-pouring-money-into-anti-abortion-agenda-through-the-center-to-protect-patient-rights-and-freedom-partners.htmlhttps://msmagazine.com/2022/05/06/childcare-koch-women-independent-womens-forum/
Efforts at no sex education, no contraception, deprofessionalization of nursing & teaching, no daycare, ...
1/
-
SAVE Act would require birth cert or passport that matches voters legal name. 69M women may have a legal name that doesn’t match their birth cert. An estimated 21M would be turned away at polls. This act is an attempt to disenfranchise women voters.
https://www.thepersistent.com/this-bill-in-the-senate-could-disenfranchise-millions-of-women-voters/yeah first thing the Backlash administration has to do is re-enfranchise all US voters
-
It's useful to know who has funded a war on women for over 60 years.
The fossil fuel industry.
Koch Network, Heritage Foundation, Federalist Society.
All avatars of the same billionaire bigots.
Charles Koch - abortion criminalization was supposed to be a felony disenfranchisement scheme.
https://slate.com/human-interest/2013/11/koch-brothers-pouring-money-into-anti-abortion-agenda-through-the-center-to-protect-patient-rights-and-freedom-partners.htmlhttps://msmagazine.com/2022/05/06/childcare-koch-women-independent-womens-forum/
Efforts at no sex education, no contraception, deprofessionalization of nursing & teaching, no daycare, ...
1/
2/
... ending no fault divorce, promoting child marriage, no ratification of the ERA, forced AI adoption, book bans & illiteracy, ending independence in institutions & higher education, eroding LGBTQ civil rights, & shielding sexual predators.
They fund disinformation about the "male loneliness epidemic" which is really homophobia & "sudden divorce syndrome" hitting misogynists hard.
They fund efforts at male supremacy
-
SAVE Act would require birth cert or passport that matches voters legal name. 69M women may have a legal name that doesn’t match their birth cert. An estimated 21M would be turned away at polls. This act is an attempt to disenfranchise women voters.
https://www.thepersistent.com/this-bill-in-the-senate-could-disenfranchise-millions-of-women-voters/@amydiehl More absolute ratf*ckery.
-
2/
... ending no fault divorce, promoting child marriage, no ratification of the ERA, forced AI adoption, book bans & illiteracy, ending independence in institutions & higher education, eroding LGBTQ civil rights, & shielding sexual predators.
They fund disinformation about the "male loneliness epidemic" which is really homophobia & "sudden divorce syndrome" hitting misogynists hard.
They fund efforts at male supremacy
3/
https://thefulcrum.us/inclusion-diversity/project-2025-affirmative-action
https://msmagazine.com/2023/02/06/fda-abortion-pills/
Charles Koch & his ilk are unparalleled bullshit artists determined to fry the planet & end democracy.
https://www.benzinga.com/markets/tech/26/02/50321116/charles-koch-says-his-fathers-letter-left-him-a-stark-warning-that-changed-how-he-viewed-inherited-wealth-beware-of-this-cursehttps://msmagazine.com/2023/04/11/anti-abortion-groups-era-equal-rights-amendment/
https://msmagazine.com/2024/02/08/project-2025-conservative-right-wing-trump-woke/
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2023/dec/07/koch-family-stand-together-music
-
3/
https://thefulcrum.us/inclusion-diversity/project-2025-affirmative-action
https://msmagazine.com/2023/02/06/fda-abortion-pills/
Charles Koch & his ilk are unparalleled bullshit artists determined to fry the planet & end democracy.
https://www.benzinga.com/markets/tech/26/02/50321116/charles-koch-says-his-fathers-letter-left-him-a-stark-warning-that-changed-how-he-viewed-inherited-wealth-beware-of-this-cursehttps://msmagazine.com/2023/04/11/anti-abortion-groups-era-equal-rights-amendment/
https://msmagazine.com/2024/02/08/project-2025-conservative-right-wing-trump-woke/
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2023/dec/07/koch-family-stand-together-music
4/
https://progressive.org/magazine/billionaire-kingmaker-still-dividing-the-nation-maclean-graves/
https://www.scotusblog.com/2025/12/morrison-v-olson-and-the-triumph-of-the-unitary-executive-theory/
https://www.citizen.org/news/koch/
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2023/oct/26/charles-koch-us-government-rightwing-supreme-court
https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2025/05/donald-trump-unitary-executive-theory/
https://www.hnn.us/article/despite-aggressive-rebrand-charles-koch-is-still-f
The Koch dynasty wants to rule from beyond the grave, just like the Bradley Foundation & Scaife Foundation & their attacks on voting rights.
https://popular.info/p/charles-kochs-5-billion-tax-loopholehttps://www.nytimes.com/2025/12/20/us/politics/koch-network-2024-election-trump.html
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/jan/27/koch-americans-for-prosperity-trump-tax-breaks
-
4/
https://progressive.org/magazine/billionaire-kingmaker-still-dividing-the-nation-maclean-graves/
https://www.scotusblog.com/2025/12/morrison-v-olson-and-the-triumph-of-the-unitary-executive-theory/
https://www.citizen.org/news/koch/
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2023/oct/26/charles-koch-us-government-rightwing-supreme-court
https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2025/05/donald-trump-unitary-executive-theory/
https://www.hnn.us/article/despite-aggressive-rebrand-charles-koch-is-still-f
The Koch dynasty wants to rule from beyond the grave, just like the Bradley Foundation & Scaife Foundation & their attacks on voting rights.
https://popular.info/p/charles-kochs-5-billion-tax-loopholehttps://www.nytimes.com/2025/12/20/us/politics/koch-network-2024-election-trump.html
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/jan/27/koch-americans-for-prosperity-trump-tax-breaks
5/
https://legal-planet.org/2026/01/30/does-the-unitary-executive-theory-exist-not-really/
Bradley, Koch, Coors, Scaife Mellon, Seid, Uihlein fund public corruption, coup attempts, political 'divide & conquer', and efforts at a White Supremacist Constitution.
People who spent their lives polluting the planet now spend billions on polluting knowledge & information to thwart free & fair elections using AI.
https://www.desmog.com/2025/12/11/the-koch-network-is-pushing-trump-to-accelerate-ai-documents-show/https://washingtonspectator.org/project-2025-the-latest-plot-against-america/
https://www.texasobserver.org/dysfunctional-government-rfk-trump-v-slaughter/
-
@zakalwe @amydiehl It wouldn’t backfire on Republicans.
2024 data: https://vividmaps.com/presidential-election-if-only-white-men-voted/
2018 data: https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/what-if-only-men-voted-only-women-only-nonwhite-voters/
@ridogi@mastodon.social @amydiehl@mstdn.social Thanks for the information! I was a little skeptical about the claim myself but wasn't sure where to look for evidence for or against.
-
SAVE Act would require birth cert or passport that matches voters legal name. 69M women may have a legal name that doesn’t match their birth cert. An estimated 21M would be turned away at polls. This act is an attempt to disenfranchise women voters.
https://www.thepersistent.com/this-bill-in-the-senate-could-disenfranchise-millions-of-women-voters/ -
@anne_twain @amydiehl Not Americans but rather anti-American Republicans.
-
SAVE Act would require birth cert or passport that matches voters legal name. 69M women may have a legal name that doesn’t match their birth cert. An estimated 21M would be turned away at polls. This act is an attempt to disenfranchise women voters.
https://www.thepersistent.com/this-bill-in-the-senate-could-disenfranchise-millions-of-women-voters/For a bunch of fragile patriarchs who are afraid of the world not conforming to their every beliefs, that is one wild way to end the name change tradition.
BTW, did it not occur to them that women could change BACK to their maiden names?
-
SAVE Act would require birth cert or passport that matches voters legal name. 69M women may have a legal name that doesn’t match their birth cert. An estimated 21M would be turned away at polls. This act is an attempt to disenfranchise women voters.
https://www.thepersistent.com/this-bill-in-the-senate-could-disenfranchise-millions-of-women-voters/This Should end the name change on marriage cultural practice, and yay! to that.
-
SAVE Act would require birth cert or passport that matches voters legal name. 69M women may have a legal name that doesn’t match their birth cert. An estimated 21M would be turned away at polls. This act is an attempt to disenfranchise women voters.
https://www.thepersistent.com/this-bill-in-the-senate-could-disenfranchise-millions-of-women-voters/@amydiehl Catholic women keep their name, so it will liberate Protestant woman from the misogyny of male marriage contracts? All the Catholics have to do is recognise that sexism; gender inequality has no place in the 21c; love not war for chauvinism, racism, sexism and ableism is a greater commandment than injustice; inequality of the law favouring paedophilia and rape? #TheVote #DemocraticRights #DiverseInterests #Freedom
-
SAVE Act would require birth cert or passport that matches voters legal name. 69M women may have a legal name that doesn’t match their birth cert. An estimated 21M would be turned away at polls. This act is an attempt to disenfranchise women voters.
https://www.thepersistent.com/this-bill-in-the-senate-could-disenfranchise-millions-of-women-voters/Another way of skewing elections to the right.
Republicans have always hated that women predominately vote more left and in favor of families, communities and mutual benefits.
This is an easy way to cut them off - until women get away and change their names back to their maiden names en masse.
But if I am frank, you'll be lucky if there even are elections in the future of the rogue US. Trump will do his best to ensure a win, and if that's not possible, he'll cut elections.
