Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. The Onion has an AI policy.

The Onion has an AI policy.

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
56 Indlæg 48 Posters 0 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • mle_online@social.afront.orgM mle_online@social.afront.org

    @jalefkowit If only I could get the community theater to adopt a policy like this

    aud@fire.asta.lgbtA This user is from outside of this forum
    aud@fire.asta.lgbtA This user is from outside of this forum
    aud@fire.asta.lgbt
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #46

    @MLE_online@social.afront.org @jalefkowit@hachyderm.io I... a community theater that wants to use generative ML??

    that is... depressing

    mle_online@social.afront.orgM 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • aud@fire.asta.lgbtA aud@fire.asta.lgbt

      @MLE_online@social.afront.org @jalefkowit@hachyderm.io I... a community theater that wants to use generative ML??

      that is... depressing

      mle_online@social.afront.orgM This user is from outside of this forum
      mle_online@social.afront.orgM This user is from outside of this forum
      mle_online@social.afront.org
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #47

      @aud @jalefkowit Unfortunately, we've had some set designers who are very lazy (and lacking in talent) who have used AI in their sets. As a board member, I've been pushing us to come up with a policy. Some of the board members are on my side, but others are just too credulous and are completely wowed by the magic box. They don't want to agree to a policy that would cut off access to a miraculous tool

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • mae@is.badat.devM mae@is.badat.dev
        @jalefkowit ok but the onion should write a secondary funny AI policy because it'd be funny
        argentcorvid@mstdn.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
        argentcorvid@mstdn.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
        argentcorvid@mstdn.social
        wrote sidst redigeret af
        #48

        @Mae @jalefkowit yeah, Roger Rabbit /toon "but only if it's funny"

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • jalefkowit@hachyderm.ioJ jalefkowit@hachyderm.io

          The Onion has an AI policy. It is refreshingly clear

          https://theonion.com/about-us/

          reflex@retrogaming.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
          reflex@retrogaming.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
          reflex@retrogaming.social
          wrote sidst redigeret af
          #49

          @jalefkvowit@hachyderm.io This is how you do an #AI #policy

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • jalefkowit@hachyderm.ioJ jalefkowit@hachyderm.io

            The Onion has an AI policy. It is refreshingly clear

            https://theonion.com/about-us/

            wafflesies@infosec.exchangeW This user is from outside of this forum
            wafflesies@infosec.exchangeW This user is from outside of this forum
            wafflesies@infosec.exchange
            wrote sidst redigeret af
            #50

            @jalefkowit kind of a shame this has to be said in a media website
            Like what's the point of running a media site if you aren't even making the media

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • stardust@fosstodon.orgS stardust@fosstodon.org

              Actually, why shouldn't code belong to that list? Can't code also be creative?

              #LLM #AI @jalefkowit

              sylvie@chitter.xyzS This user is from outside of this forum
              sylvie@chitter.xyzS This user is from outside of this forum
              sylvie@chitter.xyz
              wrote sidst redigeret af
              #51

              @stardust yes it can, there are so many ways to obfuscate control flow and sophisticated patterns of mismanaging memory (including but not limited to: pretending automagical memory management works)

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • david_chisnall@infosec.exchangeD david_chisnall@infosec.exchange

                @jalefkowit I don't really like this because 'an existential threat to the livelihood of creative professionals' can be read to mean that bullshit generators could actually substitute for the writers of The Onion. I'd much rather that they either omitted this part or explained it in a way that doesn't make that implication.

                H This user is from outside of this forum
                H This user is from outside of this forum
                hypolite@friendica.mrpetovan.com
                wrote sidst redigeret af
                #52
                @david_chisnall I think they describe the outcome (displaced workers) rather than the reason for this outcome (greedy bosses rather than output quality). As such, I think it’s fine. As an aside, you aren’t the first to jump to that conclusion this text doesn’t make, but that AI companies readily do in their marketing material.
                david_chisnall@infosec.exchangeD 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • jalefkowit@hachyderm.ioJ jalefkowit@hachyderm.io

                  The Onion has an AI policy. It is refreshingly clear

                  https://theonion.com/about-us/

                  eikaron@chaos.socialE This user is from outside of this forum
                  eikaron@chaos.socialE This user is from outside of this forum
                  eikaron@chaos.social
                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                  #53

                  @jalefkowit It's definitely better not to use it at all for all the ethics & resources reasons but I have to say there is one (1) exception where I'd love them doing it for the bit: Every time they write an article about anything to do with AI

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • H hypolite@friendica.mrpetovan.com
                    @david_chisnall I think they describe the outcome (displaced workers) rather than the reason for this outcome (greedy bosses rather than output quality). As such, I think it’s fine. As an aside, you aren’t the first to jump to that conclusion this text doesn’t make, but that AI companies readily do in their marketing material.
                    david_chisnall@infosec.exchangeD This user is from outside of this forum
                    david_chisnall@infosec.exchangeD This user is from outside of this forum
                    david_chisnall@infosec.exchange
                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                    #54

                    @hypolite The problem is that it can easily be framed by boosters as 'legacy media is avoiding AI because they're scared it can replace them!111eleventyone' as a marketing point. Something unambiguous about 'AI cannot replace our workers but AI salesdroids can often convince managers it can, which harms both workers and the companies that make the poor choices' would be clearer and harder for OpenAI to use as marketing.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • jalefkowit@hachyderm.ioJ jalefkowit@hachyderm.io

                      The Onion has an AI policy. It is refreshingly clear

                      https://theonion.com/about-us/

                      mr_teatime@social.tchncs.deM This user is from outside of this forum
                      mr_teatime@social.tchncs.deM This user is from outside of this forum
                      mr_teatime@social.tchncs.de
                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                      #55

                      @jalefkowit

                      This must be the straightest and least ironic/sarcastic piece of prose written at The Onion in a long time. Amazing.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • jalefkowit@hachyderm.ioJ jalefkowit@hachyderm.io

                        The Onion has an AI policy. It is refreshingly clear

                        https://theonion.com/about-us/

                        oantolin@mathstodon.xyzO This user is from outside of this forum
                        oantolin@mathstodon.xyzO This user is from outside of this forum
                        oantolin@mathstodon.xyz
                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                        #56

                        @jalefkowit Being reluctantly acknowledged made my day!

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • jwcph@helvede.netJ jwcph@helvede.net shared this topic
                        Svar
                        • Svar som emne
                        Login for at svare
                        • Ældste til nyeste
                        • Nyeste til ældste
                        • Most Votes


                        • Log ind

                        • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

                        • Login or register to search.
                        Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                        Graciously hosted by data.coop
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        0
                        • Hjem
                        • Seneste
                        • Etiketter
                        • Populære
                        • Verden
                        • Bruger
                        • Grupper