The question is not whether you can create software using LLMs - you can - most software is just boring CRUD shit.
-
The question is not whether you can create software using LLMs - you can - most software is just boring CRUD shit.
But you do pay a hefty price: In lowering quality (security issues, less maintainable), in skill decay in the people "guiding" the stochastic parrots, etc.It's not "can 'AI's create software" but "are we willing to accept worse software running more and more of our lives?"
-
The question is not whether you can create software using LLMs - you can - most software is just boring CRUD shit.
But you do pay a hefty price: In lowering quality (security issues, less maintainable), in skill decay in the people "guiding" the stochastic parrots, etc.It's not "can 'AI's create software" but "are we willing to accept worse software running more and more of our lives?"
Here's the thing: I believe that you deserve to have access to high quality products and services. You deserve to use products and services that are safe, secure, well-designed and not destroying the ecological, informational or social environment.
-
Here's the thing: I believe that you deserve to have access to high quality products and services. You deserve to use products and services that are safe, secure, well-designed and not destroying the ecological, informational or social environment.
@tante yeah but what if Some Guy's bonus depends on making it all shittier?
-
@tante yeah but what if Some Guy's bonus depends on making it all shittier?
@pikesley *points at everything* then we get this
-
The question is not whether you can create software using LLMs - you can - most software is just boring CRUD shit.
But you do pay a hefty price: In lowering quality (security issues, less maintainable), in skill decay in the people "guiding" the stochastic parrots, etc.It's not "can 'AI's create software" but "are we willing to accept worse software running more and more of our lives?"
@tante LLM means the tyranny of shit.
A very mediocre dystopia indeed. -
T tofticles@helvede.net shared this topic
-
The question is not whether you can create software using LLMs - you can - most software is just boring CRUD shit.
But you do pay a hefty price: In lowering quality (security issues, less maintainable), in skill decay in the people "guiding" the stochastic parrots, etc.It's not "can 'AI's create software" but "are we willing to accept worse software running more and more of our lives?"
@tante Thinking a lot about this. To me it boils down to code ownership. Which is yet another kind of responsibility/liability that is offloaded to machines that by definition can't be.
-
@tante Thinking a lot about this. To me it boils down to code ownership. Which is yet another kind of responsibility/liability that is offloaded to machines that by definition can't be.
@map exactly. In a way accepting responsibility for the code one puts in front of people is accepting the connected care duties towards these people.
-
@tante Thinking a lot about this. To me it boils down to code ownership. Which is yet another kind of responsibility/liability that is offloaded to machines that by definition can't be.
@map @tante even some pro LLM people see that: https://lucumr.pocoo.org/2026/2/13/the-final-bottleneck/
-
J jeppe@uddannelse.social shared this topic
