Coxon: oh shit don't give away how deep in I am with the rationalistsCoxon: I'm totally not a rationalist, I just hung out with them for a decade because I admire their huge swole brains and how right they are about everythingCoxon: nailed it

[tante@tldr.nettime.org]

@davidgerard why is he against "veganism"?

[rogerbw@discordian.social]

@tante @davidgerard Knows his audience, Real Men etc.?

[tante@tldr.nettime.org]

@RogerBW @davidgerard sure, but why oppose? Eat meat and drink milk but why fight people who don't?

[aslakr@mastodon.social]

@tante @davidgerard His «intuition» is against it

[plantagolabs@mastodon.social]

@aegir @davidgerard @Nickiquote that was real good. So much makes sense now (including their "10% AI will kill us"). Thanks for sharing.

[morrick@appdot.net]

@davidgerard Speaking of Coxon, I said this yesterday: https://appdot.net/@morrick/117276043729139797

[rogerbw@discordian.social]

@tante @davidgerard Fascism is all about declaring an Enemy who is Different. I'm sure this is not news to you.

(The practical reason for opposition is "if everyone goes vegan, I won't be able to get meat any more" but I think everyone would agree that that's not a likely thing in the immediate future.)

[davidgerard@circumstances.run]

@CartyBoston the rationalists are not a good advertisement, no

[jackielovescompchem32@scicomm.xyz]

@davidgerard rationalism is neither a coherent philosophy nor is it rational

[dzajew@social.dzajew.xyz]

@gryphonmyers
Thanks, I hate it. Also, per wiki article about this guy: "His fanfiction novel Harry Potter and the Methods of Rationality uses plot elements from J. K. Rowling's Harry Potter series to illustrate topics in science and rationality."
Wtf XD
 @davidgerard

[davidgerard@circumstances.run]

@Dangerous_beans rationalists cover the entire spectrum from libertarian to neoreactionary, all race scientist

[davidgerard@circumstances.run]

@aslakr @tante 10% chance quorn destroys humanity

[nicovel0@mastodon.social]

@davidgerard “I am intuitively opposed to […] consequentialist intuitions” is an amazing self own.

[davidgerard@circumstances.run]

@jackielovescompchem32 they don't themselves call it "rationalism", they call it "rationality" and themselves "rationalists", as in The Cool Smart Guys Who Are Right that's our proper name you should address us by

[wilson6923@veganism.social]

@davidgerard @simon in fact, I learned how to not breathe at all. Ever.

[delafin@climatejustice.social]

@tante He doesn't have any "real" arguments. He admits himself its "intuition", but also just a form of ideological signalling to others, pandering to the fascists,... @davidgerard

[spirit@cybernetic.monster]

@davidgerard every crevice of this guy's navel has been committed to memory.

[jer@chirp.enworld.org]

@davidgerard @Dangerous_beans I actually assume it's because he's distinguishing himself from the "dangerous rationalists" like the Zizians, who are vegan and polyamorous IIRC, and not the "good rationalists" like the fascists who believe that Christian Nationalists in the US are correct about everything practically, they just have the wrong god that they're worshiping

[davidgerard@circumstances.run]

@Jer @Dangerous_beans ah didn't click he meant the zizians

[celeduc@mastodon.social]

@NewtonMark @davidgerard "I am intuitively opposed to polyamory, veganism, and consequentialist intuitions."