Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. hey so about your favorite boy hank green.

hey so about your favorite boy hank green.

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
151 Indlæg 57 Posters 0 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • zzt@mas.toZ zzt@mas.to

    hey so about your favorite boy hank green. it’s such a shame that he went overboard with the LLM stuff, that was impossible to see coming, good on him for realizing he was addicted right? well wishes for the good boy!

    anyway there’s smoking gun evidence that he was paid by effective altruists to do marketing for the “AI is so dangerous but so revolutionary” flavor of critihype. this is alleged by hank green expert hank green in the washington post, as well as an EA in charge of influencer marketing. he was literally being paid by TESCREALs.

    someone in the same community ran a program where TikTokers were required to post an AI critihype video a day in a cult-like environment where they were subjected to “voluntary” waterboarding and other forms of indoctrination. I’m not kidding, this literal thing happened.

    here’s @davidgerard’s pivot to AI with the evidence linked: https://pivot-to-ai.com/2026/08/06/the-ai-doomsday-cult-recruits-social-media-influencers/

    ireneista@adhd.irenes.spaceI This user is from outside of this forum
    ireneista@adhd.irenes.spaceI This user is from outside of this forum
    ireneista@adhd.irenes.space
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #61

    @zzt @davidgerard thanks. we were saying it was like an MLM, but this is more literal than we expected

    noiseician@mastodon.worldN lina@neuromatch.socialL 2 Replies Last reply
    0
    • ireneista@adhd.irenes.spaceI ireneista@adhd.irenes.space

      @zzt @davidgerard thanks. we were saying it was like an MLM, but this is more literal than we expected

      noiseician@mastodon.worldN This user is from outside of this forum
      noiseician@mastodon.worldN This user is from outside of this forum
      noiseician@mastodon.world
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #62

      @ireneista marketing cult
      @zzt @davidgerard

      ireneista@adhd.irenes.spaceI dogfox@kpop.socialD 2 Replies Last reply
      0
      • noiseician@mastodon.worldN noiseician@mastodon.world

        @ireneista marketing cult
        @zzt @davidgerard

        ireneista@adhd.irenes.spaceI This user is from outside of this forum
        ireneista@adhd.irenes.spaceI This user is from outside of this forum
        ireneista@adhd.irenes.space
        wrote sidst redigeret af
        #63

        @noiseician @zzt @davidgerard we personally have a high bar for using that word, because cults are a serious thing that ruin people's lives (we've seen it more than once). this does seem like it might be comparable in severity but we're not at the point where we have enough information to be comfortable saying that, ourselves.

        you're welcome to say it though. we realize most people aren't, uh, like this ^^''''

        noiseician@mastodon.worldN 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • ireneista@adhd.irenes.spaceI ireneista@adhd.irenes.space

          @noiseician @zzt @davidgerard we personally have a high bar for using that word, because cults are a serious thing that ruin people's lives (we've seen it more than once). this does seem like it might be comparable in severity but we're not at the point where we have enough information to be comfortable saying that, ourselves.

          you're welcome to say it though. we realize most people aren't, uh, like this ^^''''

          noiseician@mastodon.worldN This user is from outside of this forum
          noiseician@mastodon.worldN This user is from outside of this forum
          noiseician@mastodon.world
          wrote sidst redigeret af
          #64

          @ireneista yes, there are cults and then there are kvlts...
          @zzt @davidgerard

          davidgerard@circumstances.runD 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • ireneista@adhd.irenes.spaceI ireneista@adhd.irenes.space

            @zzt @davidgerard thanks. we were saying it was like an MLM, but this is more literal than we expected

            lina@neuromatch.socialL This user is from outside of this forum
            lina@neuromatch.socialL This user is from outside of this forum
            lina@neuromatch.social
            wrote sidst redigeret af
            #65

            @ireneista
            @zzt @davidgerard

            LLMMLM

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • noiseician@mastodon.worldN noiseician@mastodon.world

              @ireneista yes, there are cults and then there are kvlts...
              @zzt @davidgerard

              davidgerard@circumstances.runD This user is from outside of this forum
              davidgerard@circumstances.runD This user is from outside of this forum
              davidgerard@circumstances.run
              wrote sidst redigeret af
              #66

              @noiseician @ireneista @zzt I spent the 90s learning far too much about Scientology, which is the Godwin example of a cult

              but I would absolutely put the TESCREAL cluster in the same box

              it's not just a cult! it's a cult incubator!

              everything the way it's set up is high control and abuses people for power over them, it's full of sexual predators, and it has little offshoot cults that try to kill people. also many individuals driven to violent madness by its demands.

              the Zizians are the famous offshoot, but also there's Leverage Research who were sure sufficient study of rationality would grant you actual psychic powers.

              it's pretty awesome!

              also they publicly declared me the #1 enemy of Rationality.

              fortunately, i'm protected by them being the greatest pile of fuckups i can think of

              ireneista@adhd.irenes.spaceI noodlemaz@mstdn.gamesN 2 Replies Last reply
              0
              • davidgerard@circumstances.runD davidgerard@circumstances.run

                @noiseician @ireneista @zzt I spent the 90s learning far too much about Scientology, which is the Godwin example of a cult

                but I would absolutely put the TESCREAL cluster in the same box

                it's not just a cult! it's a cult incubator!

                everything the way it's set up is high control and abuses people for power over them, it's full of sexual predators, and it has little offshoot cults that try to kill people. also many individuals driven to violent madness by its demands.

                the Zizians are the famous offshoot, but also there's Leverage Research who were sure sufficient study of rationality would grant you actual psychic powers.

                it's pretty awesome!

                also they publicly declared me the #1 enemy of Rationality.

                fortunately, i'm protected by them being the greatest pile of fuckups i can think of

                ireneista@adhd.irenes.spaceI This user is from outside of this forum
                ireneista@adhd.irenes.spaceI This user is from outside of this forum
                ireneista@adhd.irenes.space
                wrote sidst redigeret af
                #67

                @davidgerard @noiseician @zzt we agree that there are cults in the strict sense within that broadly-defined cluster, for sure.

                TESCREAL is an umbrella term, which is important when opposing it because the thing being fought is amorphous, but it's also important to not mistake a part for the whole or vice-versa

                ireneista@adhd.irenes.spaceI davidgerard@circumstances.runD 2 Replies Last reply
                0
                • ireneista@adhd.irenes.spaceI ireneista@adhd.irenes.space

                  @davidgerard @noiseician @zzt we agree that there are cults in the strict sense within that broadly-defined cluster, for sure.

                  TESCREAL is an umbrella term, which is important when opposing it because the thing being fought is amorphous, but it's also important to not mistake a part for the whole or vice-versa

                  ireneista@adhd.irenes.spaceI This user is from outside of this forum
                  ireneista@adhd.irenes.spaceI This user is from outside of this forum
                  ireneista@adhd.irenes.space
                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                  #68

                  @davidgerard @noiseician @zzt all we're advocating for is careful thinking. if we get sloppy we can't strategize.

                  davidgerard@circumstances.runD 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • ireneista@adhd.irenes.spaceI ireneista@adhd.irenes.space

                    @davidgerard @noiseician @zzt we agree that there are cults in the strict sense within that broadly-defined cluster, for sure.

                    TESCREAL is an umbrella term, which is important when opposing it because the thing being fought is amorphous, but it's also important to not mistake a part for the whole or vice-versa

                    davidgerard@circumstances.runD This user is from outside of this forum
                    davidgerard@circumstances.runD This user is from outside of this forum
                    davidgerard@circumstances.run
                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                    #69

                    @ireneista @noiseician @zzt it's not that amorphous and it's closer knit than its marketing pretends

                    like I used to say "the LessWrong-originated subculture" but "TESCREAL" is a term that means the same thing

                    do you have particular good bits you're thinking of? cos substantially it's a sea of rancid

                    bms@mastodon.bsd.cafeB jonpsp@mstdn.socialJ 2 Replies Last reply
                    0
                    • xan@xantronix.socialX xan@xantronix.social

                      @cyberquixote you just gotta wear your autism like an albacore around your neck to remind you of the weight of your responsibilities to the world @zzt

                      jmccyoung@mstdn.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                      jmccyoung@mstdn.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                      jmccyoung@mstdn.social
                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                      #70

                      @xan @cyberquixote @zzt Albacore > albatross - good swap for the image.

                      bstacey@icosahedron.websiteB 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • ireneista@adhd.irenes.spaceI ireneista@adhd.irenes.space

                        @davidgerard @noiseician @zzt all we're advocating for is careful thinking. if we get sloppy we can't strategize.

                        davidgerard@circumstances.runD This user is from outside of this forum
                        davidgerard@circumstances.runD This user is from outside of this forum
                        davidgerard@circumstances.run
                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                        #71

                        @ireneista @noiseician @zzt if you can point to a specific objection feel free, but a nonspecific claim I'm being sloppy, that i'm engaging in careless thinking, or that i'm mistaking a part for the whole or vice-versa sort of requires you to actually get specific, else it's a bit less than worthless. i have a large bag of specifics here if you are able to argue those.

                        ireneista@adhd.irenes.spaceI 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • davidgerard@circumstances.runD davidgerard@circumstances.run

                          @ireneista @noiseician @zzt if you can point to a specific objection feel free, but a nonspecific claim I'm being sloppy, that i'm engaging in careless thinking, or that i'm mistaking a part for the whole or vice-versa sort of requires you to actually get specific, else it's a bit less than worthless. i have a large bag of specifics here if you are able to argue those.

                          ireneista@adhd.irenes.spaceI This user is from outside of this forum
                          ireneista@adhd.irenes.spaceI This user is from outside of this forum
                          ireneista@adhd.irenes.space
                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                          #72

                          @davidgerard @noiseician @zzt oh it's all bad. we're not saying any of it is good. we understand how any disagreement is going to come off that way, but we agree strongly with the emotion of what you're saying

                          ireneista@adhd.irenes.spaceI davidgerard@circumstances.runD 2 Replies Last reply
                          0
                          • ireneista@adhd.irenes.spaceI ireneista@adhd.irenes.space

                            @davidgerard @noiseician @zzt oh it's all bad. we're not saying any of it is good. we understand how any disagreement is going to come off that way, but we agree strongly with the emotion of what you're saying

                            ireneista@adhd.irenes.spaceI This user is from outside of this forum
                            ireneista@adhd.irenes.spaceI This user is from outside of this forum
                            ireneista@adhd.irenes.space
                            wrote sidst redigeret af
                            #73

                            @davidgerard @noiseician @zzt
                            it's the substance we take issue with. our point is quite simply that if we can't think precisely, we can't strategize for how to fight effectively. this tendency everyone seems to have to gesture at a feeling and use it as a basis for planning, is, like... bad. self-defeating.

                            ireneista@adhd.irenes.spaceI 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • davidgerard@circumstances.runD davidgerard@circumstances.run

                              @noiseician @ireneista @zzt I spent the 90s learning far too much about Scientology, which is the Godwin example of a cult

                              but I would absolutely put the TESCREAL cluster in the same box

                              it's not just a cult! it's a cult incubator!

                              everything the way it's set up is high control and abuses people for power over them, it's full of sexual predators, and it has little offshoot cults that try to kill people. also many individuals driven to violent madness by its demands.

                              the Zizians are the famous offshoot, but also there's Leverage Research who were sure sufficient study of rationality would grant you actual psychic powers.

                              it's pretty awesome!

                              also they publicly declared me the #1 enemy of Rationality.

                              fortunately, i'm protected by them being the greatest pile of fuckups i can think of

                              noodlemaz@mstdn.gamesN This user is from outside of this forum
                              noodlemaz@mstdn.gamesN This user is from outside of this forum
                              noodlemaz@mstdn.games
                              wrote sidst redigeret af
                              #74

                              @davidgerard @noiseician @ireneista @zzt I don't have a bookmarked piece of writing that's like a tour of why EAs (LessWrong, and the rest) are fkin bananas

                              Especially for people who outright reject the notion of the 'TESCREAL bundle'.
                              I wish I had one.
                              But also I imagine it's just too complicated, messy and bizarre to explain very succinctly 😕

                              ireneista@adhd.irenes.spaceI davidgerard@circumstances.runD crow@pagan.plusC smidgybit@mastodon.socialS 4 Replies Last reply
                              0
                              • ireneista@adhd.irenes.spaceI ireneista@adhd.irenes.space

                                @davidgerard @noiseician @zzt
                                it's the substance we take issue with. our point is quite simply that if we can't think precisely, we can't strategize for how to fight effectively. this tendency everyone seems to have to gesture at a feeling and use it as a basis for planning, is, like... bad. self-defeating.

                                ireneista@adhd.irenes.spaceI This user is from outside of this forum
                                ireneista@adhd.irenes.spaceI This user is from outside of this forum
                                ireneista@adhd.irenes.space
                                wrote sidst redigeret af
                                #75

                                @davidgerard @noiseician @zzt if literally everything is a cult, then nothing is a cult, and we can't plan how to stop cults, because we'll be trying to say "let's identify the costly signals so we can figure out how to interrupt them" or whatever, and somebody will come along and say "it's all a cult!" and that will be the end of the discussion

                                ireneista@adhd.irenes.spaceI davidgerard@circumstances.runD zzt@mas.toZ 3 Replies Last reply
                                0
                                • ireneista@adhd.irenes.spaceI ireneista@adhd.irenes.space

                                  @davidgerard @noiseician @zzt if literally everything is a cult, then nothing is a cult, and we can't plan how to stop cults, because we'll be trying to say "let's identify the costly signals so we can figure out how to interrupt them" or whatever, and somebody will come along and say "it's all a cult!" and that will be the end of the discussion

                                  ireneista@adhd.irenes.spaceI This user is from outside of this forum
                                  ireneista@adhd.irenes.spaceI This user is from outside of this forum
                                  ireneista@adhd.irenes.space
                                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                                  #76

                                  @davidgerard @noiseician @zzt sorry if we're a little worked up about it but we needed to channel some emotion to get our point out. we hope it makes sense at least.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • noodlemaz@mstdn.gamesN noodlemaz@mstdn.games

                                    @davidgerard @noiseician @ireneista @zzt I don't have a bookmarked piece of writing that's like a tour of why EAs (LessWrong, and the rest) are fkin bananas

                                    Especially for people who outright reject the notion of the 'TESCREAL bundle'.
                                    I wish I had one.
                                    But also I imagine it's just too complicated, messy and bizarre to explain very succinctly 😕

                                    ireneista@adhd.irenes.spaceI This user is from outside of this forum
                                    ireneista@adhd.irenes.spaceI This user is from outside of this forum
                                    ireneista@adhd.irenes.space
                                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                                    #77

                                    @noodlemaz @davidgerard @noiseician @zzt we were in the room when the term TESCREAL was coined. we strongly endorse using that term in fighting it.

                                    ireneista@adhd.irenes.spaceI 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • noodlemaz@mstdn.gamesN noodlemaz@mstdn.games

                                      @davidgerard @noiseician @ireneista @zzt I don't have a bookmarked piece of writing that's like a tour of why EAs (LessWrong, and the rest) are fkin bananas

                                      Especially for people who outright reject the notion of the 'TESCREAL bundle'.
                                      I wish I had one.
                                      But also I imagine it's just too complicated, messy and bizarre to explain very succinctly 😕

                                      davidgerard@circumstances.runD This user is from outside of this forum
                                      davidgerard@circumstances.runD This user is from outside of this forum
                                      davidgerard@circumstances.run
                                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                                      #78

                                      @noodlemaz @noiseician @ireneista @zzt I do! It's "More Everything Forever" by Adam Becker and it's the book I was failing to write over 2018-2021!

                                      noodlemaz@mstdn.gamesN peter@thepit.socialP 2 Replies Last reply
                                      0
                                      • ireneista@adhd.irenes.spaceI ireneista@adhd.irenes.space

                                        @noodlemaz @davidgerard @noiseician @zzt we were in the room when the term TESCREAL was coined. we strongly endorse using that term in fighting it.

                                        ireneista@adhd.irenes.spaceI This user is from outside of this forum
                                        ireneista@adhd.irenes.spaceI This user is from outside of this forum
                                        ireneista@adhd.irenes.space
                                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                                        #79

                                        @noodlemaz @davidgerard @noiseician @zzt if your takeaway is that we disagree with your points, you're not reading a word we say.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • ireneista@adhd.irenes.spaceI ireneista@adhd.irenes.space

                                          @davidgerard @noiseician @zzt oh it's all bad. we're not saying any of it is good. we understand how any disagreement is going to come off that way, but we agree strongly with the emotion of what you're saying

                                          davidgerard@circumstances.runD This user is from outside of this forum
                                          davidgerard@circumstances.runD This user is from outside of this forum
                                          davidgerard@circumstances.run
                                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                                          #80

                                          @ireneista @noiseician @zzt that's great! so please do withdraw your claims that you made in direct response to a carefully weighed statement on an area that actually I know a fucking lot about

                                          ireneista@adhd.irenes.spaceI 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Svar
                                          • Svar som emne
                                          Login for at svare
                                          • Ældste til nyeste
                                          • Nyeste til ældste
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Log ind

                                          • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          Graciously hosted by data.coop
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Hjem
                                          • Seneste
                                          • Etiketter
                                          • Populære
                                          • Verden
                                          • Bruger
                                          • Grupper