Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. Google's antonymous taxi company says it won't obey traffic safety laws because its customers want convenience, so screw those bicyclists who don't want to be injured or killed.

Google's antonymous taxi company says it won't obey traffic safety laws because its customers want convenience, so screw those bicyclists who don't want to be injured or killed.

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
30 Indlæg 26 Posters 0 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • dangillmor@mastodon.socialD dangillmor@mastodon.social

    Google's antonymous taxi company says it won't obey traffic safety laws because its customers want convenience, so screw those bicyclists who don't want to be injured or killed.

    https://road.cc/news/driverless-taxis-veering-into-cycle-lanes-normal-practice-says-waymo

    sgail@mastodon.scotS This user is from outside of this forum
    sgail@mastodon.scotS This user is from outside of this forum
    sgail@mastodon.scot
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #19

    @dangillmor I did not know Waymo was Google. I keep seeing their propaganda pushed by YouTube, with the remarkably implausible woman saying something like, "Because I have kids and I worry about their safety on the roads I'm really looking forward to autonomous vehicles driving around in Britain".

    If the 'Sure, Jan' meme was made for anything, it's those 'ads'.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • dangillmor@mastodon.socialD dangillmor@mastodon.social

      Google's antonymous taxi company says it won't obey traffic safety laws because its customers want convenience, so screw those bicyclists who don't want to be injured or killed.

      https://road.cc/news/driverless-taxis-veering-into-cycle-lanes-normal-practice-says-waymo

      nakedgerry@mastodon.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
      nakedgerry@mastodon.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
      nakedgerry@mastodon.social
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #20

      @dangillmor @paulk Grief! These things are going to be so unpredictable that they will be lethal and should just be banned.

      paulk@writing.exchangeP 2 Replies Last reply
      0
      • fenixmaster@mastodon.socialF fenixmaster@mastodon.social

        @dangillmor The tires, it is always the tires, the weakest point of a car.

        peter_slwk@mastodon.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
        peter_slwk@mastodon.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
        peter_slwk@mastodon.social
        wrote sidst redigeret af
        #21

        @fenixmaster @dangillmor Or just some chalk (or salt) ...

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • dangillmor@mastodon.socialD dangillmor@mastodon.social

          Google's antonymous taxi company says it won't obey traffic safety laws because its customers want convenience, so screw those bicyclists who don't want to be injured or killed.

          https://road.cc/news/driverless-taxis-veering-into-cycle-lanes-normal-practice-says-waymo

          newint@todon.nlN This user is from outside of this forum
          newint@todon.nlN This user is from outside of this forum
          newint@todon.nl
          wrote sidst redigeret af
          #22

          @dangillmor Which problem do these self-driving vehicles solve, which issue is so pressing, that we have to dedicate development time and sacrifice existing infrastructure? We don’t need flying taxis and self driving cars. We need separate bicycle lanes, affordable and reliable public transport, clean air, etc. which benefit all, not just some tech companies.

          T 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • dangillmor@mastodon.socialD dangillmor@mastodon.social

            Google's antonymous taxi company says it won't obey traffic safety laws because its customers want convenience, so screw those bicyclists who don't want to be injured or killed.

            https://road.cc/news/driverless-taxis-veering-into-cycle-lanes-normal-practice-says-waymo

            windsheep@infosec.exchangeW This user is from outside of this forum
            windsheep@infosec.exchangeW This user is from outside of this forum
            windsheep@infosec.exchange
            wrote sidst redigeret af
            #23

            @dangillmor finally. A robot takes care of them. Where can I buy the anti cyclist feature

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • dangillmor@mastodon.socialD dangillmor@mastodon.social

              Google's antonymous taxi company says it won't obey traffic safety laws because its customers want convenience, so screw those bicyclists who don't want to be injured or killed.

              https://road.cc/news/driverless-taxis-veering-into-cycle-lanes-normal-practice-says-waymo

              leberschnitzel@existiert.chL This user is from outside of this forum
              leberschnitzel@existiert.chL This user is from outside of this forum
              leberschnitzel@existiert.ch
              wrote sidst redigeret af
              #24

              @dangillmor I'm not surprised about this seeing where they trained...

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • nakedgerry@mastodon.socialN nakedgerry@mastodon.social

                @dangillmor @paulk Grief! These things are going to be so unpredictable that they will be lethal and should just be banned.

                paulk@writing.exchangeP This user is from outside of this forum
                paulk@writing.exchangeP This user is from outside of this forum
                paulk@writing.exchange
                wrote sidst redigeret af
                #25

                @nakedgerry People don't matter, clearly.

                @dangillmor

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • dangillmor@mastodon.socialD dangillmor@mastodon.social

                  Google's antonymous taxi company says it won't obey traffic safety laws because its customers want convenience, so screw those bicyclists who don't want to be injured or killed.

                  https://road.cc/news/driverless-taxis-veering-into-cycle-lanes-normal-practice-says-waymo

                  paulk@writing.exchangeP This user is from outside of this forum
                  paulk@writing.exchangeP This user is from outside of this forum
                  paulk@writing.exchange
                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                  #26

                  @dangillmor "Terminator". It just looks different, but it's coming.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • nakedgerry@mastodon.socialN nakedgerry@mastodon.social

                    @dangillmor @paulk Grief! These things are going to be so unpredictable that they will be lethal and should just be banned.

                    paulk@writing.exchangeP This user is from outside of this forum
                    paulk@writing.exchangeP This user is from outside of this forum
                    paulk@writing.exchange
                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                    #27

                    @nakedgerry It's "Terminator". It just looks different.

                    @dangillmor

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • newint@todon.nlN newint@todon.nl

                      @dangillmor Which problem do these self-driving vehicles solve, which issue is so pressing, that we have to dedicate development time and sacrifice existing infrastructure? We don’t need flying taxis and self driving cars. We need separate bicycle lanes, affordable and reliable public transport, clean air, etc. which benefit all, not just some tech companies.

                      T This user is from outside of this forum
                      T This user is from outside of this forum
                      tkissing@mastodon.social
                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                      #28

                      @newint @dangillmor The "problem" is that humans need to eat and therefore don't act as drivers for free, which means their pay reduces the profits of the broligarchs.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • dangillmor@mastodon.socialD dangillmor@mastodon.social

                        Google's antonymous taxi company says it won't obey traffic safety laws because its customers want convenience, so screw those bicyclists who don't want to be injured or killed.

                        https://road.cc/news/driverless-taxis-veering-into-cycle-lanes-normal-practice-says-waymo

                        kkarhan@jorts.horseK This user is from outside of this forum
                        kkarhan@jorts.horseK This user is from outside of this forum
                        kkarhan@jorts.horse
                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                        #29

                        @dangillmor TBH, I'd consider any Cyclist poppin' 9x19mm +P+ SJHP (regular 9mm.won't go through tires) into any of those shit vehicles' tires an act of "self & mutual defense" against murder by car…

                        • Or just place Calthrops on the markings if not sprinkle them before said cars.

                        #Sarcasm #Commentary #NotLegalAdvice #Waymo #CarBrain #CarCentrism #cycling #safety #RoadSafety

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • dangillmor@mastodon.socialD dangillmor@mastodon.social

                          Google's antonymous taxi company says it won't obey traffic safety laws because its customers want convenience, so screw those bicyclists who don't want to be injured or killed.

                          https://road.cc/news/driverless-taxis-veering-into-cycle-lanes-normal-practice-says-waymo

                          webidebi@mastodon.socialW This user is from outside of this forum
                          webidebi@mastodon.socialW This user is from outside of this forum
                          webidebi@mastodon.social
                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                          #30

                          @dangillmor if this is the future count me out.

                          But also... this makes a stronger argument for separate zones and bike lanes protected by some kind of barrier. I'm also strongly in favour of less space to be given to cars altogether - the emphasis for future planning should be more pedestrian / cycle and public transport.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • jwcph@helvede.netJ jwcph@helvede.net shared this topic
                          Svar
                          • Svar som emne
                          Login for at svare
                          • Ældste til nyeste
                          • Nyeste til ældste
                          • Most Votes


                          • Log ind

                          • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

                          • Login or register to search.
                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                          Graciously hosted by data.coop
                          • First post
                            Last post
                          0
                          • Hjem
                          • Seneste
                          • Etiketter
                          • Populære
                          • Verden
                          • Bruger
                          • Grupper