Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. When illustrating the Fediverse as a network, what should the nodes be?

When illustrating the Fediverse as a network, what should the nodes be?

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
evanpollpoll
64 Indlæg 37 Posters 0 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • evan@cosocial.caE evan@cosocial.ca

    I didn't answer this one. I usually do people as nodes, with some kind of boundary to indicate instances. Thanks all!

    django@social.coopD This user is from outside of this forum
    django@social.coopD This user is from outside of this forum
    django@social.coop
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #61

    @evan this is a good one!

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • evan@cosocial.caE evan@cosocial.ca

      When illustrating the Fediverse as a network, what should the nodes be?

      #EvanPoll #poll

      raucao@kosmos.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
      raucao@kosmos.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
      raucao@kosmos.social
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #62

      @evan https://fiatjaf.com/52a0d652.html

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • evan@cosocial.caE evan@cosocial.ca

        I didn't answer this one. I usually do people as nodes, with some kind of boundary to indicate instances. Thanks all!

        raucao@kosmos.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
        raucao@kosmos.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
        raucao@kosmos.social
        wrote sidst redigeret af
        #63

        @evan Nodes should always be the entities signing posts IMO. If users cannot sign posts with their own keys, then you're not actually following that person and the person is not their own node. You're following a URL/ID on the actual node, which you trust to not lie to you about which person they're posting content for.

        Hopefully, this will improve eventually, so that people have full sovereignty, also for moving between instances. Should be like changing your postal address, not your passport.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • evan@cosocial.caE evan@cosocial.ca

          I didn't answer this one. I usually do people as nodes, with some kind of boundary to indicate instances. Thanks all!

          malte@radikal.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
          malte@radikal.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
          malte@radikal.social
          wrote sidst redigeret af
          #64

          @evan One of the nodes could be a group and another one a bot to illustrate the possible variations. Otherwise I like this illustration much better than the more common impersonal ones.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          Svar
          • Svar som emne
          Login for at svare
          • Ældste til nyeste
          • Nyeste til ældste
          • Most Votes


          • Log ind

          • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

          • Login or register to search.
          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
          Graciously hosted by data.coop
          • First post
            Last post
          0
          • Hjem
          • Seneste
          • Etiketter
          • Populære
          • Verden
          • Bruger
          • Grupper