Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. Maybe "Woke 1.0" wasn't that crazy.

Maybe "Woke 1.0" wasn't that crazy.

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
academiapoliticsracism
4 Indlæg 4 Posters 4 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • alx@mastodon.designA This user is from outside of this forum
    alx@mastodon.designA This user is from outside of this forum
    alx@mastodon.design
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #1

    Maybe "Woke 1.0" wasn't that crazy.
    The results of performative inclusion that never questioned the material realities of hierarchies and the cultural tools they deploy lead us - again - to a world of bullies, also know as Imperial Fascism, where Black lives don't matter but a eugenicist fake "philosopher" is worth a geopolitical feud.

    #Academia #Politics #Racism #US #EU

    koen_hufkens@mastodon.socialK 1 Reply Last reply
    1
    0
    • alx@mastodon.designA alx@mastodon.design

      Maybe "Woke 1.0" wasn't that crazy.
      The results of performative inclusion that never questioned the material realities of hierarchies and the cultural tools they deploy lead us - again - to a world of bullies, also know as Imperial Fascism, where Black lives don't matter but a eugenicist fake "philosopher" is worth a geopolitical feud.

      #Academia #Politics #Racism #US #EU

      koen_hufkens@mastodon.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
      koen_hufkens@mastodon.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
      koen_hufkens@mastodon.social
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #2

      @alx I've posted this elsewhere, but the UGent gave the guy the benefit of the doubt - which in this context was as anti-woke as can be (but most likely naive). He then, surprise, showed his true colours in line with previous behaviour. And now the UGent kicks him out and they are the "bad" guys?

      heidentweet@todon.euH libby_@mstdn.socialL 2 Replies Last reply
      0
      • koen_hufkens@mastodon.socialK koen_hufkens@mastodon.social

        @alx I've posted this elsewhere, but the UGent gave the guy the benefit of the doubt - which in this context was as anti-woke as can be (but most likely naive). He then, surprise, showed his true colours in line with previous behaviour. And now the UGent kicks him out and they are the "bad" guys?

        heidentweet@todon.euH This user is from outside of this forum
        heidentweet@todon.euH This user is from outside of this forum
        heidentweet@todon.eu
        wrote sidst redigeret af
        #3

        @koen_hufkens
        Exactly. This is the same scenario as the "these poor professionals were cancelled" in that Harper's letter.

        A university harbouring a race "scientist" and giving another racist "the benefit of the doubt" goes way beyond being "naive." They actively have given racism a scientific cover. It's just the leopard eating faces again.

        @alx

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • koen_hufkens@mastodon.socialK koen_hufkens@mastodon.social

          @alx I've posted this elsewhere, but the UGent gave the guy the benefit of the doubt - which in this context was as anti-woke as can be (but most likely naive). He then, surprise, showed his true colours in line with previous behaviour. And now the UGent kicks him out and they are the "bad" guys?

          libby_@mstdn.socialL This user is from outside of this forum
          libby_@mstdn.socialL This user is from outside of this forum
          libby_@mstdn.social
          wrote sidst redigeret af
          #4

          @koen_hufkens @alx they said it was to "keep an open mind' then, now they assert it is pseudo-science. Don't tell me they didn't know from the get go.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • jwcph@helvede.netJ jwcph@helvede.net shared this topic
          Svar
          • Svar som emne
          Login for at svare
          • Ældste til nyeste
          • Nyeste til ældste
          • Most Votes


          • Log ind

          • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

          • Login or register to search.
          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
          Graciously hosted by data.coop
          • First post
            Last post
          0
          • Hjem
          • Seneste
          • Etiketter
          • Populære
          • Verden
          • Bruger
          • Grupper