Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. LLMs cannot, by their very nature, lead to AGI.

LLMs cannot, by their very nature, lead to AGI.

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
28 Indlæg 19 Posters 0 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • elizafox@social.treehouse.systemsE elizafox@social.treehouse.systems

    LLMs cannot, by their very nature, lead to AGI. They very badly need people to believe it is AGI though, because their growth model does not work without it.

    (This excludes the financials, which are just straight-up fraud on wheels)

    I would say these claims now border on fraud. It will be fascinating in 20 years when we are looking back on this bubble and wondering how so many smart people were so easily swindled.

    AGI / ASI can't happen without an entirely new paradigm. This ain't it chief.

    fandasin@social.linux.pizzaF This user is from outside of this forum
    fandasin@social.linux.pizzaF This user is from outside of this forum
    fandasin@social.linux.pizza
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #17

    @Elizafox

    Generative "AI" still can't generate "full glass of red wine" and it never will, because there aren't enough pictures to train it on. (because common picture is half of glass of wine)
    It can never produce anything that didn't get as input.

    We won't get AGI from that for sure.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • elizafox@social.treehouse.systemsE elizafox@social.treehouse.systems

      LLMs cannot, by their very nature, lead to AGI. They very badly need people to believe it is AGI though, because their growth model does not work without it.

      (This excludes the financials, which are just straight-up fraud on wheels)

      I would say these claims now border on fraud. It will be fascinating in 20 years when we are looking back on this bubble and wondering how so many smart people were so easily swindled.

      AGI / ASI can't happen without an entirely new paradigm. This ain't it chief.

      tcatinreality@mastodon.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
      tcatinreality@mastodon.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
      tcatinreality@mastodon.social
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #18

      @Elizafox

      "Border on fraud"?

      What techbros are pushing rn is way past the borders.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • elizafox@social.treehouse.systemsE elizafox@social.treehouse.systems

        LLMs cannot, by their very nature, lead to AGI. They very badly need people to believe it is AGI though, because their growth model does not work without it.

        (This excludes the financials, which are just straight-up fraud on wheels)

        I would say these claims now border on fraud. It will be fascinating in 20 years when we are looking back on this bubble and wondering how so many smart people were so easily swindled.

        AGI / ASI can't happen without an entirely new paradigm. This ain't it chief.

        lethe@digitalcourage.socialL This user is from outside of this forum
        lethe@digitalcourage.socialL This user is from outside of this forum
        lethe@digitalcourage.social
        wrote sidst redigeret af
        #19

        @Elizafox As @pluralistic said, hoping AGI will arise out of an LLM is like hoping you will get a locomotive by breeding horses.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • notavi10@critter.cafeN notavi10@critter.cafe

          @Elizafox
          "generative" ai is also not generative, it cant come up with things on its own, it has to take them from other sources (ex. an ai generated movie trailer i remember watching recreated exactly several memes, like the one where leonardo dicaprio is raising a martini glass)

          colman@mastodon.ieC This user is from outside of this forum
          colman@mastodon.ieC This user is from outside of this forum
          colman@mastodon.ie
          wrote sidst redigeret af
          #20

          @notavi10 @Elizafox “interpolative” would be a better word.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • tcatinreality@mastodon.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
            tcatinreality@mastodon.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
            tcatinreality@mastodon.social
            wrote sidst redigeret af
            #21

            @Elizafox

            💯 on the finances

            But if the marketing statements only border on fraud, it's because the "truth in advertising" laws are too weak.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • aatch@mastodon.nzA aatch@mastodon.nz

              @jaystephens @Elizafox unfortunately I suspect that it'll be worse than previous AI Winters. There have been many orders of magnitude more money sunk into it and the exposure is way wider. Previous Winters have been "US Military discovers that it won't be able to replace interpreters and stops funding it", this is so much bigger.

              jaystephens@mastodon.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
              jaystephens@mastodon.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
              jaystephens@mastodon.social
              wrote sidst redigeret af
              #22

              @aatch @Elizafox

              #unpopularopinion
              I also think it's possible that by sheer force of money, power, oligopoly & will, the current BS will make itself the substrate for a bunch of tech for a generation or two, making the current Microsoft/Apple/Meta era of enshittified mainstream and corporate tech look like a comparatively golden age.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • elizafox@social.treehouse.systemsE elizafox@social.treehouse.systems

                LLMs cannot, by their very nature, lead to AGI. They very badly need people to believe it is AGI though, because their growth model does not work without it.

                (This excludes the financials, which are just straight-up fraud on wheels)

                I would say these claims now border on fraud. It will be fascinating in 20 years when we are looking back on this bubble and wondering how so many smart people were so easily swindled.

                AGI / ASI can't happen without an entirely new paradigm. This ain't it chief.

                gimulnautti@mastodon.greenG This user is from outside of this forum
                gimulnautti@mastodon.greenG This user is from outside of this forum
                gimulnautti@mastodon.green
                wrote sidst redigeret af
                #23

                @Elizafox Shifting the definition of AGI seems to be the business model OpenAI as per Sam Altman 🤔

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • elizafox@social.treehouse.systemsE elizafox@social.treehouse.systems

                  LLMs cannot, by their very nature, lead to AGI. They very badly need people to believe it is AGI though, because their growth model does not work without it.

                  (This excludes the financials, which are just straight-up fraud on wheels)

                  I would say these claims now border on fraud. It will be fascinating in 20 years when we are looking back on this bubble and wondering how so many smart people were so easily swindled.

                  AGI / ASI can't happen without an entirely new paradigm. This ain't it chief.

                  lehtimaeki@snapp.socialL This user is from outside of this forum
                  lehtimaeki@snapp.socialL This user is from outside of this forum
                  lehtimaeki@snapp.social
                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                  #24

                  @Elizafox
                  OpenAI's money depends on them building AGI.. As their tech can't actually do it they have to do the next best thing, just claim that it is. 😕
                  sigh.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • elizafox@social.treehouse.systemsE elizafox@social.treehouse.systems

                    LLMs cannot, by their very nature, lead to AGI. They very badly need people to believe it is AGI though, because their growth model does not work without it.

                    (This excludes the financials, which are just straight-up fraud on wheels)

                    I would say these claims now border on fraud. It will be fascinating in 20 years when we are looking back on this bubble and wondering how so many smart people were so easily swindled.

                    AGI / ASI can't happen without an entirely new paradigm. This ain't it chief.

                    zimzat@mastodon.socialZ This user is from outside of this forum
                    zimzat@mastodon.socialZ This user is from outside of this forum
                    zimzat@mastodon.social
                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                    #25

                    @Elizafox

                    > wondering how so many smart people were so easily swindled.

                    The same way the Germans said "We knew nothing about that". It preserves their innocence and pretends they weren't a mark too.

                    The idea that historians will be confused about how so many people are swindled is a weird thing to me; they'd be really bad historians if they don't understand human nature and societal motivations. Then again, maybe it's the same thing as economists now that ignore any motivation beyond money.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • kats@chaosfem.twK This user is from outside of this forum
                      kats@chaosfem.twK This user is from outside of this forum
                      kats@chaosfem.tw
                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                      #26

                      @Elizafox @notavi10
                      That word "knowing" is a load-bearing one, here.

                      elizafox@social.treehouse.systemsE 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • elizafox@social.treehouse.systemsE elizafox@social.treehouse.systems

                        LLMs cannot, by their very nature, lead to AGI. They very badly need people to believe it is AGI though, because their growth model does not work without it.

                        (This excludes the financials, which are just straight-up fraud on wheels)

                        I would say these claims now border on fraud. It will be fascinating in 20 years when we are looking back on this bubble and wondering how so many smart people were so easily swindled.

                        AGI / ASI can't happen without an entirely new paradigm. This ain't it chief.

                        leeloo@c.imL This user is from outside of this forum
                        leeloo@c.imL This user is from outside of this forum
                        leeloo@c.im
                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                        #27

                        @Elizafox
                        AGI is a misnomer. It's really a way of saying "intelligent AI", but the I in AI already stands for intelligence, so calling ig IAI would expose the swindle.

                        Current "AI" is not intelligent. It's artificial, yes, but so is microplastics.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • kats@chaosfem.twK kats@chaosfem.tw

                          @Elizafox @notavi10
                          That word "knowing" is a load-bearing one, here.

                          elizafox@social.treehouse.systemsE This user is from outside of this forum
                          elizafox@social.treehouse.systemsE This user is from outside of this forum
                          elizafox@social.treehouse.systems
                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                          #28

                          @KatS @notavi10 That's philosophical. Computer memory is a form of retention of some sort of knowledge, even if it is transferred. But the ability to reason with that knowledge is another thing entirely.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • jwcph@helvede.netJ jwcph@helvede.net shared this topic
                          Svar
                          • Svar som emne
                          Login for at svare
                          • Ældste til nyeste
                          • Nyeste til ældste
                          • Most Votes


                          • Log ind

                          • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

                          • Login or register to search.
                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                          Graciously hosted by data.coop
                          • First post
                            Last post
                          0
                          • Hjem
                          • Seneste
                          • Etiketter
                          • Populære
                          • Verden
                          • Bruger
                          • Grupper