Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. Archeologists in the future, "It was likely a religious or ritual object."

Archeologists in the future, "It was likely a religious or ritual object."

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
48 Indlæg 45 Posters 0 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • sleepfreeparent@kolektiva.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
    sleepfreeparent@kolektiva.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
    sleepfreeparent@kolektiva.social
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #35

    @crazyeddie @allan @tinker
    https://permies.com/t/235263/Knitting-Glove-Roman-Dodecahedron

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • tinker@infosec.exchangeT tinker@infosec.exchange

      Archeologists in the future, "It was likely a religious or ritual object."

      D This user is from outside of this forum
      D This user is from outside of this forum
      darqchild@hachyderm.io
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #36

      @tinker You place it in your bath simply because baths should have a little boat or duck.

      That is literally a ritual object!

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • tinker@infosec.exchangeT tinker@infosec.exchange

        Archeologists in the future, "It was likely a religious or ritual object."

        gudenau@hachyderm.ioG This user is from outside of this forum
        gudenau@hachyderm.ioG This user is from outside of this forum
        gudenau@hachyderm.io
        wrote sidst redigeret af
        #37

        @tinker I mean that's not wrong.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • tinker@infosec.exchangeT tinker@infosec.exchange

          Archeologists in the future, "It was likely a religious or ritual object."

          tipjip@bonn.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
          tipjip@bonn.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
          tipjip@bonn.social
          wrote sidst redigeret af
          #38

          @tinker
          Would they be wrong, though?

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • tinker@infosec.exchangeT tinker@infosec.exchange

            Archeologists in the future, "It was likely a religious or ritual object."

            cjust@infosec.exchangeC This user is from outside of this forum
            cjust@infosec.exchangeC This user is from outside of this forum
            cjust@infosec.exchange
            wrote sidst redigeret af
            #39

            @tinker

            <archaeologist voice>
            these were built every year and tossed into the shores of Lake Superior in a solumn ceremony in order to appease to their deity named Edmund Fitzgerald.
            </archaeologist voice>

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • tinker@infosec.exchangeT tinker@infosec.exchange

              Archeologists in the future, "It was likely a religious or ritual object."

              stellar@mk.absturztau.beS This user is from outside of this forum
              stellar@mk.absturztau.beS This user is from outside of this forum
              stellar@mk.absturztau.be
              wrote sidst redigeret af
              #40

              @tinker@infosec.exchange ritual yes

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • simonzerafa@infosec.exchangeS simonzerafa@infosec.exchange

                @tinker

                I think you might have just solved the Roman Dodecahedron mystery 😂

                It's a Roman 3D Printer Test!

                https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roman_dodecahedron

                cinebox@masto.hackers.townC This user is from outside of this forum
                cinebox@masto.hackers.townC This user is from outside of this forum
                cinebox@masto.hackers.town
                wrote sidst redigeret af
                #41

                @simonzerafa @tinker one theory is that it was a showpiece for metal workers to show off their abilities so you might not be far off.

                simonzerafa@infosec.exchangeS 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • cinebox@masto.hackers.townC cinebox@masto.hackers.town

                  @simonzerafa @tinker one theory is that it was a showpiece for metal workers to show off their abilities so you might not be far off.

                  simonzerafa@infosec.exchangeS This user is from outside of this forum
                  simonzerafa@infosec.exchangeS This user is from outside of this forum
                  simonzerafa@infosec.exchange
                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                  #42

                  @cinebox @tinker

                  An apprentice piece, possibly for metal casting.
                  Could be! 🙂

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • tinker@infosec.exchangeT tinker@infosec.exchange

                    Archeologists in the future, "It was likely a religious or ritual object."

                    meraord@mastodonsweden.seM This user is from outside of this forum
                    meraord@mastodonsweden.seM This user is from outside of this forum
                    meraord@mastodonsweden.se
                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                    #43

                    @tinker "...but we don't know why. Okay?"

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • tinker@infosec.exchangeT tinker@infosec.exchange

                      Archeologists in the future, "It was likely a religious or ritual object."

                      balu@muenster.imB This user is from outside of this forum
                      balu@muenster.imB This user is from outside of this forum
                      balu@muenster.im
                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                      #44

                      @tinker "likely"?

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • tinker@infosec.exchangeT tinker@infosec.exchange

                        Archeologists in the future, "It was likely a religious or ritual object."

                        canuckduff@mas.toC This user is from outside of this forum
                        canuckduff@mas.toC This user is from outside of this forum
                        canuckduff@mas.to
                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                        #45

                        @tinker Clearly, high-status people were buried with such objects to ensure access to their analogue in the afterlife.

                        Edited to add: In the time before cheap data, one of my waiting for bus activities was guessing what would survive of my belongings & surroundings if we were, say, buried in ash suddenly. What would future archeologists guess?

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • tinker@infosec.exchangeT tinker@infosec.exchange

                          Archeologists in the future, "It was likely a religious or ritual object."

                          stgiga@blahaj.zoneS This user is from outside of this forum
                          stgiga@blahaj.zoneS This user is from outside of this forum
                          stgiga@blahaj.zone
                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                          #46

                          @tinker@infosec.exchange

                          I'd think
                          https://stgiga.github.io/gigaware/mewbust2.stl would in its several copies make my house in 1000 years look holy.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • tinker@infosec.exchangeT tinker@infosec.exchange

                            Archeologists in the future, "It was likely a religious or ritual object."

                            urban_hermit@mstdn.socialU This user is from outside of this forum
                            urban_hermit@mstdn.socialU This user is from outside of this forum
                            urban_hermit@mstdn.social
                            wrote sidst redigeret af
                            #47

                            @tinker
                            Archeologists in the now:

                            (Old archeologists) The people of this archipelago were primitive because we found no interesting rocks.

                            (Young archeologists) Based on this boat we found sunk in deep fresh water they had a complex and refined woodworking culture 100k years earlier than your stone working civilization.

                            (Old archeologists) All these people walked here on a land bridge you know...

                            (Young archeologists) - rolls eyes in a 'racists will soon be dead' way.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • simonzerafa@infosec.exchangeS simonzerafa@infosec.exchange

                              @tinker

                              I think you might have just solved the Roman Dodecahedron mystery 😂

                              It's a Roman 3D Printer Test!

                              https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roman_dodecahedron

                              moira@mastodon.murkworks.netM This user is from outside of this forum
                              moira@mastodon.murkworks.netM This user is from outside of this forum
                              moira@mastodon.murkworks.net
                              wrote sidst redigeret af
                              #48

                              @simonzerafa @tinker dry spaghetti serving count measurement. gotta be.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • jwcph@helvede.netJ jwcph@helvede.net shared this topic
                              Svar
                              • Svar som emne
                              Login for at svare
                              • Ældste til nyeste
                              • Nyeste til ældste
                              • Most Votes


                              • Log ind

                              • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

                              • Login or register to search.
                              Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                              Graciously hosted by data.coop
                              • First post
                                Last post
                              0
                              • Hjem
                              • Seneste
                              • Etiketter
                              • Populære
                              • Verden
                              • Bruger
                              • Grupper