How important is it to call things by their right name?
-
How important is it to call things by their right name?
Depends what those things are. Organs during a surgery? Very important! Background characters in an anime? Not so much.
-
How important is it to call things by their right name?
Politicians and mass media are constantly mis-using words, characterizing people and events using words not appropriate to the situation. Their messages are often in direct conflict with what we can see with our own eyes. If we want news we can trust, I say "very important". Otherwise, we're stuck with whatever the propaganda machines wants us to believe. This is a global issue.
-
How important is it to call things by their right name?
I can't tell if this is accidental Confucianism or subversive Confucianism.
-
I can't tell if this is accidental Confucianism or subversive Confucianism.
@chewey that is an important name to discover!
-
How important is it to call things by their right name?
@evan Very few things, if any, have only one name and names themselves come a variety of types. Sometimes names have overlapping potentially contradictory meanings (I’m looking at you “fruit”). I’d say it’s important to use the right name in the right context for the right purpose but there’s usually a lot of wiggle room in there. The big thing is to avoid confusion.
That said when it comes to proper names of people, the right name is the one they choose to use, period.
-
How important is it to call things by their right name?
@evan what is this "the[ir] right name" (singular) of which you speak? What makes you believe that there is ever only one right name for a thing?
-
@evan what is this "the[ir] right name" (singular) of which you speak? What makes you believe that there is ever only one right name for a thing?
@jdlh well, do we agree that there are better names and worse names for things?
-
@jdlh well, do we agree that there are better names and worse names for things?
@evan only from given political or cultural frames (points of view).
Was the survey worded to call attention to the inherent plural nature of naming, by leaving out that answer on purpose?
-
@evan only from given political or cultural frames (points of view).
Was the survey worded to call attention to the inherent plural nature of naming, by leaving out that answer on purpose?
@jdlh I don't know if I have a heart generous enough or a mind flexible enough to say that calling someone a racial slur is better from a white nationalist point of view. There is an absolute scale on which that kind of name is worse precisely because of the POV it's used from. I realise it's an extreme example, sorry.
-
@jdlh I don't know if I have a heart generous enough or a mind flexible enough to say that calling someone a racial slur is better from a white nationalist point of view. There is an absolute scale on which that kind of name is worse precisely because of the POV it's used from. I realise it's an extreme example, sorry.
@jdlh and, no, the question is not phrased as a gotcha!!
-
@jdlh I don't know if I have a heart generous enough or a mind flexible enough to say that calling someone a racial slur is better from a white nationalist point of view. There is an absolute scale on which that kind of name is worse precisely because of the POV it's used from. I realise it's an extreme example, sorry.
@evan in that example, it seems to be that more important than the rightness of the name, is the wrongness of slurs and of white nationalism. It's a different topic.
-
@evan in that example, it seems to be that more important than the rightness of the name, is the wrongness of slurs and of white nationalism. It's a different topic.
@jdlh a slur is a name, though.
-
@jdlh a slur is a name, though.
@evan true. Many things in this life are related to other things. But IMHO the "slur" aspect of the slur is more relevant than the "name" aspect.
-
@evan true. Many things in this life are related to other things. But IMHO the "slur" aspect of the slur is more relevant than the "name" aspect.
@jdlh OK. I guess I'd just say, answer the question the best you can. If you don't think there's such a thing as a "right name", that may affect how important it is to use the right name for things.
-
@jdlh OK. I guess I'd just say, answer the question the best you can. If you don't think there's such a thing as a "right name", that may affect how important it is to use the right name for things.
@evan actually, I interpreted the question as a reference to the name of Lake Ontario. I don't prefer to engage with that particular act of Trump bullying as a good-faith issue of correct naming.
-
How important is it to call things by their right name?
@evan things? somewhat important.
people? VERY important.
-
How important is it to call things by their right name?
@evan I think the nature of this question comes down entirely to directionality. Who gets to decide what names are right and what names are wrong. I think the state has the least authority to naming. Individuals have a right to naming themselves but not necessarily others. There is also intent inherent in all names. Is the name being proposed with an intent to improve some situation or is the name indented to cause confusion.
-
How important is it to call things by their right name?
@evan Bimodal answer for me. I tend to think of people as a subset of "things", and calling people by their right name (ie, the name they want me to use) is extremely important. But for non-people things, humour and whimsy often triumph over correctness. For instance, the thing on the chocolate box telling you which one is which is the "instructions".
-
How important is it to call things by their right name?
@evan It depends on how important communicating effectively with other people is.
-
How important is it to call things by their right name?
@evan
I went with somewhat important. If what you're calling by name has feelings, very important. If I blank on the name of the freezer, it doesn't have feelings, and I'm inclined to call it "the...uhhh, upper fridge?"
