Meta does not want you to know that you can improve the quality of these AI glasses by just microwaving them for one minute.
-
This would make a great Instagram post.
@jumpingjackrussell @vowe No it wouldn't. Don't copy this post to Instagram. Under no circumstances. Don't even think about doing it. Everybody will hate you.
-
Private #MassSurveillance and the virtual end of #Privacy in public spaces
(2/2)
...fitness spaces, locker rooms, and private businesses. In 2024,
#Harvard researchers were able to run facial recognition software on recorded footage from #Meta’s Ray-Ban glasses to successfully locate the names, addresses, and other personal information of passersby from public databases. 
Morality aside, privacy law also hasn’t kept up... "https://hyperallergic.com/guerrilla-london-bus-ads-mock-kylie-jenners-meta-glasses-campaign/
There's a campaign against these glasses, who have a great sticker, but also a good discussion on proper use cases for people with visual impairments. See:
-
-
Meta does not want you to know that you can improve the quality of these AI glasses by just microwaving them for one minute. Pass it on.
@vowe
I put my Meta Raybans in for a minute and half because it's only 1100 watts rather than 1500.
It's important to know the power of your microwave so you know how long they'll take. -
Gleiche Technik anderer Name PPG
@vowe@lennybacon Bis wir diese Technik zur Verfügung haben, nehme ich diese App , die mir sagt, (habs noch nicht getestet) ob so ein Ding in meiner Nähe ist. @vowe
-
@vowe If you plan on boycotting Ray Ban, know that it's a brand from the Luxottica group, which owns and licenses a lot more brands.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luxottica#Eyewear_brands
[incomplete list]
Armani Exchange
Brooks Brothers
Bulgari
Burberry
Chanel
Coach
Dolce & Gabbana
Emporio Armani
Giorgio Armani
Michael Kors
Miu Miu
Oakley
Oliver Peoples
Persol
Polo Ralph Lauren
Prada
Ralph Eyewear
Ralph Lauren
Scuderia Ferrari
Sferoflex
Starck Biotech Paris
Swarovski
Tiffany & Co.
Tory Burch
Valentino
Versace
Vogue -
-
Meta does not want you to know that you can improve the quality of these AI glasses by just microwaving them for one minute. Pass it on.
@vowe you’re right, the microwave improved the prescription. I didn’t need to go back to the optometrist. You saved me a lot of money.
-
Meta does not want you to know that you can improve the quality of these AI glasses by just microwaving them for one minute. Pass it on.
@vowe Oh here is the clickbait version, designed perfectly to be sexist, insulting and liar just like the real ones :
"Meta Ray-Ban : that easy trick that Meta doesn't want you to know to denude girls"Hope such a honeypot title would break some of these toxic owners "glasses"...
-
Meta does not want you to know that you can improve the quality of these AI glasses by just microwaving them for one minute. Pass it on.
@vowe not every Trump supporter is a racist but every racist is a Trump supporter
not every Meta glasses user is a rapist but every rapist is a Meta glasses user
the rest are just other kinds of stalkers
its the staff too. its their 'masculine' culture. it started out as a webpage for rating women and its grown into stalker tech for a bunch of creepy men who women want nothing to do with
so many lawsuits because the staff read their ex-girlfriend's private messages and such you could paint a huge bridge with them
and we haven't even got to Meta selling your personal information to third parties, or running experiments using certain ads to see if they can influence elections
keep calling them perverts, its sticking and damaging them, despite all their money and attempts to change things
these glasses are less popular than AI as a whole, and that's saying something
-
Meta does not want you to know that you can improve the quality of these AI glasses by just microwaving them for one minute. Pass it on.
@vowe grinn
-
S strit@mastodon.social shared this topic
