Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. 20,000 mail accounts.

20,000 mail accounts.

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
124 Indlæg 50 Posters 2 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • the_wub@mastodon.socialT the_wub@mastodon.social

    @Marloezovic @anneroth @cavallette Ik zou het graag willen luisteren maar op de NRC moet je wel een abonnement hebben.

    Maar het blijkt wel hier toegangelijk te zijn. Al met een minute reklames in het begin van de podcast.

    https://www.radio-nederland.nl/podcasts/nrc-vandaag

    sherbang@chaos.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
    sherbang@chaos.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
    sherbang@chaos.social
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #101

    @the_wub @Marloezovic @anneroth @cavallette ik heb al jaren deze feed gebruikt om gratis te luisteren. Recentelijk heb ik ook abonnee geworden om ze te steunen.

    https://rss.art19.com/vandaag

    Dit zal op iedere podcast app werken.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • anneroth@systemli.socialA anneroth@systemli.social

      20,000 mail accounts.
      20,000 blogs.
      5,000 mailing lists.
      1,500 websites.

      In Europe.

      Run by volunteers of @cavallette, perfectly legal, and decidedly antifascist, feminist, queer.

      Destroyed and shut down by Trump's administration, extra legally.

      It is astonishingly quiet.

      ⁨#Autistici⁩

      laurenz0071@mastodon.socialL This user is from outside of this forum
      laurenz0071@mastodon.socialL This user is from outside of this forum
      laurenz0071@mastodon.social
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #102

      @anneroth @cavallette "First they came for the Communists
      And I did not speak out
      Because I was not a Communist

      Then they came for the Socialists
      And I did not speak out
      Because I was not a Socialist

      Then they came for the trade unionists
      And I did not speak out
      Because I was not a trade unionist

      Then they came for the Jews
      And I did not speak out
      Because I was not a Jew

      Then they came for me
      And there was no one left
      To speak out for me"
      -Martin Niemöller

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • fenixmaster@mastodon.socialF fenixmaster@mastodon.social

        @anneroth @cavallette Europe should put "The Heritage Foundation" on the European terrorlist.

        I This user is from outside of this forum
        I This user is from outside of this forum
        iwoakura@twit.social
        wrote sidst redigeret af
        #103

        @fenixmaster

        All for it. My nomination: how about putting that awful data-replublican, musks most influential one-woman todeslistenersteller, on the list of sanctioned individuals? Doing these lists for political reasons is already a crime in germany, and she made lists w/ individuals in iran, nicaragua, venezuela and germany…

        (just incase some germans still think we aren't a top priority gop/MAGA target or buys the dumb buffoon act they like to put on.)

        @anneroth @cavallette

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • D david42@mastodon.online

          @barbra @anneroth @cavallette An alternate DNS root only helps to the extent that anyone uses it. Since few people use those, it's unlikely to help much. And the challenges are far wider than just losing DNS names: A/I will lose bank accounts, hosting space, and most other services provided by businesses at risk from US secondary sanctions on those doing business with A/I.

          musevg@23.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
          musevg@23.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
          musevg@23.social
          wrote sidst redigeret af
          #104

          @david42
          > Since few people use those, it's unlikely to help much

          Yes. That's the way things were. Back in the day. Before Trump, MAGA, Heritage, Project 2025. There was little use for AlterNIC, back then.
          But the world has changed and will continue to change: 3 weeks ago, 99% of people would still have ignored a new incarnation of AlterNIC. Today, that number may have changed to 98 or even 97% - and that's a lot.

          @barbra @anneroth @cavallette

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • B barbra@social.vivaldi.net

            @Li @hsza @cavallette @david42 @anneroth

            What "sanctions and shit?" The US took over their DNS record. Big fucking deal. The US did that to the pirate bay, didn't stop them, did it?

            I already proposed a workaround that doesn't require DNS at all. And would render future attempts at DNS hijacking impossible. Easy, cheap, fast - for once you CAN pick all 3.

            B This user is from outside of this forum
            B This user is from outside of this forum
            barbra@social.vivaldi.net
            wrote sidst redigeret af
            #105

            @Li @hsza @cavallette @david42 @anneroth

            For anyone questioning whether their domain registration was yanked, read to the bottom of this:

            https://netfuture.ch/2026/09/autistici-inventati-sanctions-status/

            NXDOMAIN means your domain is no longer in the DNS system.

            So yes, it was yanked.

            The DNS system is artificial scarcity. There's no NEED to translate between ipv6 addresses and domain names - just entering the ipv6 address in your browser address bar gets you to the site.

            There are enough ipv6 addresses for every human that ever existed to have a bunch, so it's not a resource that is limited.

            And there's no reason you couldn't bookmark it and label it whatever you want so you can find it by the name you assigned it.

            No more "domainers" squatting on good domain names.

            And no more yanking domains by enemy states.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • the_wub@mastodon.socialT the_wub@mastodon.social

              @su_liam @barbra @david42 @anneroth @cavallette "The US is losing to a penny ante dictatorship in Iran,they can’t begin to cope with the rest of the world saying no."

              But in the mean time they could pull the plugs on most European citizens' internet access and payment systems.

              A continent unable to pay for any of the goods and services that they need on a daily basis.

              NOT because they don't have the money but because the US has trashed the infrastructure.

              Without firing a single missile.

              su_liam@mas.toS This user is from outside of this forum
              su_liam@mas.toS This user is from outside of this forum
              su_liam@mas.to
              wrote sidst redigeret af
              #106

              @the_wub @barbra @david42 @anneroth @cavallette That doesn’t seem like an argument against doing business with the U.S., but the consequences of handing our leaders the keys. It seemed like a good idea when our leaders were only mildly imperialistic and treated you like delightful pets rather than vermin to be exterminated?

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • B barbra@social.vivaldi.net

                @david42 @anneroth @cavallette

                Who cares if domain names overlap?

                A/I could have just asked people to enter their server's ipv6 address into their hosts file. And if you're going to do that, they could have self-hosted their own servers. It's not that expensive. Or that hard.

                As word got out, more people could do it. Then people could have posted clickable links to the ipv6 address all over the place - no need for everyone to edit their own hosts file.

                I was doing this 30 years ago so I could stream my music collection at the office over a crappy 1 mbps cable modem link - multiple connections worked fine.

                siguza@infosec.spaceS This user is from outside of this forum
                siguza@infosec.spaceS This user is from outside of this forum
                siguza@infosec.space
                wrote sidst redigeret af
                #107

                @barbra @david42 @anneroth @cavallette wtf are you talking about? if they're on the sanctions list, who's gonna provide them internet access? they're not gonna have an IP address. and even if they bought their own block, other providers couldn't bridge to them without risking sanctions too. they can't even have bank accounts anymore!

                I think you don't understand what sanctions mean...

                B 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • azur@cyberplace.socialA azur@cyberplace.social

                  @anneroth @cavallette

                  womp womp, USAID money dried up

                  siguza@infosec.spaceS This user is from outside of this forum
                  siguza@infosec.spaceS This user is from outside of this forum
                  siguza@infosec.space
                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                  #108

                  @azur @anneroth @cavallette wtf are you talking about? this isn't about funding, this is about abusing sanctions.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • anneroth@systemli.socialA anneroth@systemli.social

                    20,000 mail accounts.
                    20,000 blogs.
                    5,000 mailing lists.
                    1,500 websites.

                    In Europe.

                    Run by volunteers of @cavallette, perfectly legal, and decidedly antifascist, feminist, queer.

                    Destroyed and shut down by Trump's administration, extra legally.

                    It is astonishingly quiet.

                    ⁨#Autistici⁩

                    paleva@norden.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                    paleva@norden.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                    paleva@norden.social
                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                    #109

                    @anneroth @cavallette we communicated before internet, we’ll do so when internet means control by fascists.
                    It is slower in many cases, but has maybe it’s charm, too. There is no click to check them all at once, u need to open it and read it manually, no profit at all tho any tech-gigant
                    I remember having penpals😃 I loved it. Sharing stickers and zines. With every run to the post-office one can stick some more stickers🙃
                    Let’s connect and network, we even have a Fax🤭

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • siguza@infosec.spaceS siguza@infosec.space

                      @barbra @david42 @anneroth @cavallette wtf are you talking about? if they're on the sanctions list, who's gonna provide them internet access? they're not gonna have an IP address. and even if they bought their own block, other providers couldn't bridge to them without risking sanctions too. they can't even have bank accounts anymore!

                      I think you don't understand what sanctions mean...

                      B This user is from outside of this forum
                      B This user is from outside of this forum
                      barbra@social.vivaldi.net
                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                      #110

                      @siguza @david42 @anneroth @cavallette

                      Obviously you have limited knowledge of how things work.

                      It's easy enough to give an Ethernet adapter ANY up address you want. That's one way to hijack traffic. But it's also a way to set up an independent network outside of any government control, unless they have physical access to the hardware.

                      Not easy to do it the hardware is outside, in this case, the USA.

                      DNS has never been needed for networking. So the government hijacking the DNS and having the record changed to NXDOMAIN, dropping it from resolving, would have no effect on such a system.

                      It wouldn't be all that hard to create a private network that way, using just ipv6 addresses.

                      Who cares if you ignore IANA assigned blocks, as long as itvroutes.

                      And with 340,282,366,920,938,463,463,374,607,431,768,211,456 possible addresses, good luck monitoring and blocking them.

                      Extreme times call for extreme solutions.

                      And that's before we get into Wi-Fi mesh networks, which the chinese, russians, egyptians, etc don't want their citizens having.

                      siguza@infosec.spaceS 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • the_wub@mastodon.socialT the_wub@mastodon.social

                        @su_liam @barbra @david42 @anneroth @cavallette "The US is losing to a penny ante dictatorship in Iran,they can’t begin to cope with the rest of the world saying no."

                        But in the mean time they could pull the plugs on most European citizens' internet access and payment systems.

                        A continent unable to pay for any of the goods and services that they need on a daily basis.

                        NOT because they don't have the money but because the US has trashed the infrastructure.

                        Without firing a single missile.

                        B This user is from outside of this forum
                        B This user is from outside of this forum
                        barbra@social.vivaldi.net
                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                        #111

                        @the_wub @su_liam @david42 @anneroth @cavallette

                        You wrote "But in the mean time they have pulled the plugs on most European citizens' internet access and payment systems."

                        Got any proof of that?

                        the_wub@mastodon.socialT 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • B barbra@social.vivaldi.net

                          @the_wub @su_liam @david42 @anneroth @cavallette

                          You wrote "But in the mean time they have pulled the plugs on most European citizens' internet access and payment systems."

                          Got any proof of that?

                          the_wub@mastodon.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                          the_wub@mastodon.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                          the_wub@mastodon.social
                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                          #112

                          @barbra @su_liam @david42 @anneroth @cavallette

                          I realise that my original toot might not have made it clear that I was talking about a hypothetical future situation.

                          My point is that the US government can cut payment systems and internet services to individuals and organisations simply by executing an executive order declaring those persons and/or organisations as terrorists.

                          As they have already done to Francesca Albanese.

                          So they can do the same for any of us if they wish.

                          su_liam@mas.toS 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • B barbra@social.vivaldi.net

                            @siguza @david42 @anneroth @cavallette

                            Obviously you have limited knowledge of how things work.

                            It's easy enough to give an Ethernet adapter ANY up address you want. That's one way to hijack traffic. But it's also a way to set up an independent network outside of any government control, unless they have physical access to the hardware.

                            Not easy to do it the hardware is outside, in this case, the USA.

                            DNS has never been needed for networking. So the government hijacking the DNS and having the record changed to NXDOMAIN, dropping it from resolving, would have no effect on such a system.

                            It wouldn't be all that hard to create a private network that way, using just ipv6 addresses.

                            Who cares if you ignore IANA assigned blocks, as long as itvroutes.

                            And with 340,282,366,920,938,463,463,374,607,431,768,211,456 possible addresses, good luck monitoring and blocking them.

                            Extreme times call for extreme solutions.

                            And that's before we get into Wi-Fi mesh networks, which the chinese, russians, egyptians, etc don't want their citizens having.

                            siguza@infosec.spaceS This user is from outside of this forum
                            siguza@infosec.spaceS This user is from outside of this forum
                            siguza@infosec.space
                            wrote sidst redigeret af
                            #113

                            @barbra @david42 @anneroth @cavallette wdym "set up an independent network"? how are you gonna link up Italy to Germany without going through backbone providers who need to have bank accounts and can't risk getting on a sanctions list?

                            D B 2 Replies Last reply
                            0
                            • siguza@infosec.spaceS siguza@infosec.space

                              @barbra @david42 @anneroth @cavallette wdym "set up an independent network"? how are you gonna link up Italy to Germany without going through backbone providers who need to have bank accounts and can't risk getting on a sanctions list?

                              D This user is from outside of this forum
                              D This user is from outside of this forum
                              david42@mastodon.online
                              wrote sidst redigeret af
                              #114

                              @siguza @barbra @anneroth @cavallette I expect the A/I people to rebuild as a new, non-sanctioned, org, using tech that is harder to trace, block, and sanction: I2P/Reticulum/darkweb/etc, Moneta or another privacy coin, and the like.

                              siguza@infosec.spaceS 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • D david42@mastodon.online

                                @siguza @barbra @anneroth @cavallette I expect the A/I people to rebuild as a new, non-sanctioned, org, using tech that is harder to trace, block, and sanction: I2P/Reticulum/darkweb/etc, Moneta or another privacy coin, and the like.

                                siguza@infosec.spaceS This user is from outside of this forum
                                siguza@infosec.spaceS This user is from outside of this forum
                                siguza@infosec.space
                                wrote sidst redigeret af
                                #115

                                @david42 @barbra @anneroth @cavallette maybe, but that would come at the loss of interoperability with... the existing internet, basically. So that would make their email servers and blogs much harder to reach for "normies", which... is probably still a success for Trump?

                                B D 2 Replies Last reply
                                0
                                • the_wub@mastodon.socialT the_wub@mastodon.social

                                  @barbra @su_liam @david42 @anneroth @cavallette

                                  I realise that my original toot might not have made it clear that I was talking about a hypothetical future situation.

                                  My point is that the US government can cut payment systems and internet services to individuals and organisations simply by executing an executive order declaring those persons and/or organisations as terrorists.

                                  As they have already done to Francesca Albanese.

                                  So they can do the same for any of us if they wish.

                                  su_liam@mas.toS This user is from outside of this forum
                                  su_liam@mas.toS This user is from outside of this forum
                                  su_liam@mas.to
                                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                                  #116

                                  @the_wub @barbra @david42 @anneroth @cavallette I get that. Francesca Albanese doesn’t seem like an argument against cutting those ties. Correctly pointing out that the US can do the same to anybody only reinforces that.
                                  I feel like we’re largely in agreement, but we’re getting tied up by language. I’m not sure how to fix that, except to try to clarify.

                                  the_wub@mastodon.socialT B 2 Replies Last reply
                                  0
                                  • su_liam@mas.toS su_liam@mas.to

                                    @the_wub @barbra @david42 @anneroth @cavallette I get that. Francesca Albanese doesn’t seem like an argument against cutting those ties. Correctly pointing out that the US can do the same to anybody only reinforces that.
                                    I feel like we’re largely in agreement, but we’re getting tied up by language. I’m not sure how to fix that, except to try to clarify.

                                    the_wub@mastodon.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                                    the_wub@mastodon.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                                    the_wub@mastodon.social
                                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                                    #117

                                    @su_liam @barbra @david42 @anneroth @cavallette
                                    We cannot cut our ties, our tech/financial dependencies with the US.

                                    Here in Europe we do NOT have the alternatives to allow us survive what would be a massive self-inflicted denial of service.

                                    The US, on the other hand CAN cut our ties to them with considerable consequences to all of us in Europe.

                                    I am not suggesting that we cut these ties rather that Europe sets up alternatives to allow us to function should those plugs be pulled by others.

                                    B 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • siguza@infosec.spaceS siguza@infosec.space

                                      @david42 @barbra @anneroth @cavallette maybe, but that would come at the loss of interoperability with... the existing internet, basically. So that would make their email servers and blogs much harder to reach for "normies", which... is probably still a success for Trump?

                                      B This user is from outside of this forum
                                      B This user is from outside of this forum
                                      barbra@social.vivaldi.net
                                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                                      #118

                                      @siguza @david42 @anneroth @cavallette

                                      Have you seen what the "normies" in the US are like? Many are ok with the ongoing civil war in Minnesota, the total grifter paedophile President, the corrupt supreme court, and open fascism.

                                      Cutting off contact with them in online spaces and making small islands of calm where people can share without worrying about the place turning into a Nazi bar is a good thing.

                                      It's like how there is no excuse for using x/twitter. Governments certainly have their own web sites, and they can have anyone who wants to receive government announcements sign up to receive them.

                                      "But we have to be on x/Facebook/Instagram/TikTok" is bullshit pushed by people too lazy to think outside the box. Which is part for the course with governments.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • the_wub@mastodon.socialT the_wub@mastodon.social

                                        @su_liam @barbra @david42 @anneroth @cavallette
                                        We cannot cut our ties, our tech/financial dependencies with the US.

                                        Here in Europe we do NOT have the alternatives to allow us survive what would be a massive self-inflicted denial of service.

                                        The US, on the other hand CAN cut our ties to them with considerable consequences to all of us in Europe.

                                        I am not suggesting that we cut these ties rather that Europe sets up alternatives to allow us to function should those plugs be pulled by others.

                                        B This user is from outside of this forum
                                        B This user is from outside of this forum
                                        barbra@social.vivaldi.net
                                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                                        #119

                                        @the_wub @su_liam @david42 @anneroth @cavallette

                                        "We cannot cut our ties, our tech/financial dependencies with the US.

                                        Here in Europe we do NOT have the alternatives to allow us survive what would be a massive self-inflicted denial of service."

                                        You don't print cash any more? You don't have banks where you can pay your utility bills? You don't have chequing accounts any more?

                                        We had all these things as a normal part of life, and we can return to them when necessary.

                                        Canada has the Interac online banking system, independent of any American ownership.

                                        So alternatives are possible.

                                        Trump complains that IS banks aren't allowed to operate in Canada, which is a lie. There are at least 11 IS banks operating in Canada. It's just hard to qualify for a license, unlike US banks, which go bankrupt on a weekly basis.

                                        There are more US bank failures so far this year than in Canada in the last 100 years. Tougher regulations.

                                        During the great depression, over 9000 US banks failed. None in Canada.

                                        So we don't NEED the US.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • siguza@infosec.spaceS siguza@infosec.space

                                          @barbra @david42 @anneroth @cavallette wdym "set up an independent network"? how are you gonna link up Italy to Germany without going through backbone providers who need to have bank accounts and can't risk getting on a sanctions list?

                                          B This user is from outside of this forum
                                          B This user is from outside of this forum
                                          barbra@social.vivaldi.net
                                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                                          #120

                                          @siguza @david42 @anneroth @cavallette

                                          So do it on a country by country bas. Or better yet, think smaller - community by community. Small is beautiful. And dirt cheap to run. About the same cost as a pizza every two weeks.

                                          Plenty of people self-finance their hobby sites out of pocket, no ads, no patreon, no tip jar. Why not this?

                                          Just paid my hosting bill (yes it's gone up) $156/year. 4 domain registrations is another $100/year. Way less than an extra large pizza and fries every month.

                                          If a couple dozen people aren't willing to collectively chip in $1/month each to do something they're supposed to be passionate about, they're not THAT passionate.

                                          siguza@infosec.spaceS 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Svar
                                          • Svar som emne
                                          Login for at svare
                                          • Ældste til nyeste
                                          • Nyeste til ældste
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Log ind

                                          • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          Graciously hosted by data.coop
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Hjem
                                          • Seneste
                                          • Etiketter
                                          • Populære
                                          • Verden
                                          • Bruger
                                          • Grupper