Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. HEY.

HEY.

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
59 Indlæg 37 Posters 0 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • psychuan@plush.cityP psychuan@plush.city

    HEY.

    whenever someone comes at you, a leftie, about the "tragedy of the commons," just remember:

    - Elinor Ostrom won a goddamn Nobel Prize in Economics for pointing out that it was a bullshit idea.

    - the commons worked as a concept for hundreds of years until the land was Inclosed.

    - the dude that named the concept, Garrett Hardin, was literally a eugenicist and believed that letting people starve to death was a good form of population control.

    aurochs@todon.euA This user is from outside of this forum
    aurochs@todon.euA This user is from outside of this forum
    aurochs@todon.eu
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #19

    @PsyChuan The tragedy of the commons is absolutely real and a real problem. There are milions of exsmples.
    It is the capitalist solution to it that is bulshit.

    whathappened@c.imW 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • dalius_berger@plush.cityD dalius_berger@plush.city

      @PsyChuan I think there are two ways to view that term:
      (A): "you can trust citizens with free stuff"
      (B): "you can't trust corporations with free stuff"

      (A) is used to argue against public transport, welfare, healthcare system, affordable housing and the terrible belief that monetizing everything is a solution to fairly distribute resources.

      But (B) is just the observation of corporate greed.

      davey_cakes@mastodon.ieD This user is from outside of this forum
      davey_cakes@mastodon.ieD This user is from outside of this forum
      davey_cakes@mastodon.ie
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #20

      @dalius_berger @PsyChuan there was a controversy in the Republic of Ireland because water was unmetered and free so OBVIOUSLY people were squandering it.

      A coalition including the Green Party began to roll out metering and set up a utility to charge people. It got massive popular resistance and was ultimately defeated, but the meters did go in.

      When the dust settled it turned out Irish people used less water on average than the metered, privatised. UK.

      Metering did help find leaks though.

      davey_cakes@mastodon.ieD nacly@floss.socialN 2 Replies Last reply
      0
      • davey_cakes@mastodon.ieD davey_cakes@mastodon.ie

        @dalius_berger @PsyChuan there was a controversy in the Republic of Ireland because water was unmetered and free so OBVIOUSLY people were squandering it.

        A coalition including the Green Party began to roll out metering and set up a utility to charge people. It got massive popular resistance and was ultimately defeated, but the meters did go in.

        When the dust settled it turned out Irish people used less water on average than the metered, privatised. UK.

        Metering did help find leaks though.

        davey_cakes@mastodon.ieD This user is from outside of this forum
        davey_cakes@mastodon.ieD This user is from outside of this forum
        davey_cakes@mastodon.ie
        wrote sidst redigeret af
        #21

        @dalius_berger @PsyChuan

        The biggest problem really was that the water infrastructure had been let degrade to the point where about 60% of treated water was leaking into the ground.

        This was happening both sides of domestic boundaries.

        But not only was introducing charges political suicide during austerity, the paternalistic attitude to the public was just that, and people weren't overusing water just because they could.

        The current biggest issue is malfunctioning toilets, I believe.

        ukeleleeric@mstdn.socialU 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • psychuan@plush.cityP psychuan@plush.city

          HEY.

          whenever someone comes at you, a leftie, about the "tragedy of the commons," just remember:

          - Elinor Ostrom won a goddamn Nobel Prize in Economics for pointing out that it was a bullshit idea.

          - the commons worked as a concept for hundreds of years until the land was Inclosed.

          - the dude that named the concept, Garrett Hardin, was literally a eugenicist and believed that letting people starve to death was a good form of population control.

          toerror@mastodon.gamedev.placeT This user is from outside of this forum
          toerror@mastodon.gamedev.placeT This user is from outside of this forum
          toerror@mastodon.gamedev.place
          wrote sidst redigeret af
          #22

          @PsyChuan It's usually cited as an issue with socialised resources where maintenance of that resource has been left up to individuals operating under capitalism, rather than also socialising the maintenance of the shared resource.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • psychuan@plush.cityP psychuan@plush.city

            HEY.

            whenever someone comes at you, a leftie, about the "tragedy of the commons," just remember:

            - Elinor Ostrom won a goddamn Nobel Prize in Economics for pointing out that it was a bullshit idea.

            - the commons worked as a concept for hundreds of years until the land was Inclosed.

            - the dude that named the concept, Garrett Hardin, was literally a eugenicist and believed that letting people starve to death was a good form of population control.

            stellarskylark@solarpunk.moeS This user is from outside of this forum
            stellarskylark@solarpunk.moeS This user is from outside of this forum
            stellarskylark@solarpunk.moe
            wrote sidst redigeret af
            #23

            @PsyChuan there's also two different ways to apply the idea! There's the way it's commonly employed as a "gotcha" for lefties where you say "see it's impossible to hold things in common" and then there's the more abstract application of "small harms which are insignificant at an individual scale can become a big problem when an entire society is doing it"

            stellarskylark@solarpunk.moeS 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • stellarskylark@solarpunk.moeS stellarskylark@solarpunk.moe

              @PsyChuan there's also two different ways to apply the idea! There's the way it's commonly employed as a "gotcha" for lefties where you say "see it's impossible to hold things in common" and then there's the more abstract application of "small harms which are insignificant at an individual scale can become a big problem when an entire society is doing it"

              stellarskylark@solarpunk.moeS This user is from outside of this forum
              stellarskylark@solarpunk.moeS This user is from outside of this forum
              stellarskylark@solarpunk.moe
              wrote sidst redigeret af
              #24

              @PsyChuan in both cases the solution is to coordinate. who knew

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • corbden@defcon.socialC corbden@defcon.social

                @SallyStrange @PsyChuan Yeah, I feel like that's the tragedy itself. Someone DID come along and steal the commons. And then justified it with the theory. But it did happen.

                One of those paradoxical thoughts.

                sabik@rants.auS This user is from outside of this forum
                sabik@rants.auS This user is from outside of this forum
                sabik@rants.au
                wrote sidst redigeret af
                #25

                @corbden @SallyStrange @PsyChuan
                Basically, the tragedy of the commons is elite panic?

                ooze@wirejunkie.netO 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • sabik@rants.auS sabik@rants.au

                  @corbden @SallyStrange @PsyChuan
                  Basically, the tragedy of the commons is elite panic?

                  ooze@wirejunkie.netO This user is from outside of this forum
                  ooze@wirejunkie.netO This user is from outside of this forum
                  ooze@wirejunkie.net
                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                  #26

                  @sabik @corbden @SallyStrange @PsyChuan 100%

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • psychuan@plush.cityP psychuan@plush.city

                    HEY.

                    whenever someone comes at you, a leftie, about the "tragedy of the commons," just remember:

                    - Elinor Ostrom won a goddamn Nobel Prize in Economics for pointing out that it was a bullshit idea.

                    - the commons worked as a concept for hundreds of years until the land was Inclosed.

                    - the dude that named the concept, Garrett Hardin, was literally a eugenicist and believed that letting people starve to death was a good form of population control.

                    konosocio@mastodon.onlineK This user is from outside of this forum
                    konosocio@mastodon.onlineK This user is from outside of this forum
                    konosocio@mastodon.online
                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                    #27

                    @PsyChuan I hereby put forward that we do not differentiate between author and ouvre when it comes to research and science. Assholes breed asshole ideas.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • psychuan@plush.cityP psychuan@plush.city

                      HEY.

                      whenever someone comes at you, a leftie, about the "tragedy of the commons," just remember:

                      - Elinor Ostrom won a goddamn Nobel Prize in Economics for pointing out that it was a bullshit idea.

                      - the commons worked as a concept for hundreds of years until the land was Inclosed.

                      - the dude that named the concept, Garrett Hardin, was literally a eugenicist and believed that letting people starve to death was a good form of population control.

                      bart@todon.euB This user is from outside of this forum
                      bart@todon.euB This user is from outside of this forum
                      bart@todon.eu
                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                      #28

                      @PsyChuan

                      millions of years.
                      Private Property of land is the newest, shortest and most dysfuntional concept in the history of humankind

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • 0x4d6165@transfem.social0 0x4d6165@transfem.social

                        @PsyChuan@plush.city they're telling on themselves

                        alpinefolk@sunbeam.cityA This user is from outside of this forum
                        alpinefolk@sunbeam.cityA This user is from outside of this forum
                        alpinefolk@sunbeam.city
                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                        #29

                        @0x4d6165 @PsyChuan when I read the tragedy of the commons my first thought was ‘letting companies profit from common resources is a bad idea. We should manage them collectively’.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • psychuan@plush.cityP psychuan@plush.city

                          HEY.

                          whenever someone comes at you, a leftie, about the "tragedy of the commons," just remember:

                          - Elinor Ostrom won a goddamn Nobel Prize in Economics for pointing out that it was a bullshit idea.

                          - the commons worked as a concept for hundreds of years until the land was Inclosed.

                          - the dude that named the concept, Garrett Hardin, was literally a eugenicist and believed that letting people starve to death was a good form of population control.

                          marjolica@social.linux.pizzaM This user is from outside of this forum
                          marjolica@social.linux.pizzaM This user is from outside of this forum
                          marjolica@social.linux.pizza
                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                          #30

                          @PsyChuan Common ownership can work, just like you can get an agreed optimal Prisoners Dilemma. However, even without enclosure by some external actor (such as occurred in the Scottish highlands), it can end in a tragegic outcome. A clear example is in our repeated failures in different fisheries to agree to manage fish stocks sustainably.

                          whathappened@c.imW 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • psychuan@plush.cityP psychuan@plush.city

                            HEY.

                            whenever someone comes at you, a leftie, about the "tragedy of the commons," just remember:

                            - Elinor Ostrom won a goddamn Nobel Prize in Economics for pointing out that it was a bullshit idea.

                            - the commons worked as a concept for hundreds of years until the land was Inclosed.

                            - the dude that named the concept, Garrett Hardin, was literally a eugenicist and believed that letting people starve to death was a good form of population control.

                            Q This user is from outside of this forum
                            Q This user is from outside of this forum
                            qybat@batchats.net
                            wrote sidst redigeret af
                            #31

                            @PsyChuan The commons worked because everyone was taking from it as much as they personally needed.

                            It fails when someone builds a factory next to the commons and is obliged to maximise their extraction to meet shareholder targets.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • psychuan@plush.cityP psychuan@plush.city

                              HEY.

                              whenever someone comes at you, a leftie, about the "tragedy of the commons," just remember:

                              - Elinor Ostrom won a goddamn Nobel Prize in Economics for pointing out that it was a bullshit idea.

                              - the commons worked as a concept for hundreds of years until the land was Inclosed.

                              - the dude that named the concept, Garrett Hardin, was literally a eugenicist and believed that letting people starve to death was a good form of population control.

                              witchescauldron@kolektiva.socialW This user is from outside of this forum
                              witchescauldron@kolektiva.socialW This user is from outside of this forum
                              witchescauldron@kolektiva.social
                              wrote sidst redigeret af
                              #32

                              @PsyChuan caverate, its only bullshit if you live outside capitalism. From inside the current mess it is still badly relevant.

                              We need social composting

                              ukeleleeric@mstdn.socialU 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • davey_cakes@mastodon.ieD davey_cakes@mastodon.ie

                                @dalius_berger @PsyChuan

                                The biggest problem really was that the water infrastructure had been let degrade to the point where about 60% of treated water was leaking into the ground.

                                This was happening both sides of domestic boundaries.

                                But not only was introducing charges political suicide during austerity, the paternalistic attitude to the public was just that, and people weren't overusing water just because they could.

                                The current biggest issue is malfunctioning toilets, I believe.

                                ukeleleeric@mstdn.socialU This user is from outside of this forum
                                ukeleleeric@mstdn.socialU This user is from outside of this forum
                                ukeleleeric@mstdn.social
                                wrote sidst redigeret af
                                #33

                                @davey_cakes @dalius_berger @PsyChuan Yes, and many modern toilets have leaky valves that mean you have to replace the entire flush unit because either it's a sealed unit or the particular size and design of valve is no longer available. The older toilets, whilst using more water, tended to be easier to fix

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • davey_cakes@mastodon.ieD davey_cakes@mastodon.ie

                                  @dalius_berger @PsyChuan there was a controversy in the Republic of Ireland because water was unmetered and free so OBVIOUSLY people were squandering it.

                                  A coalition including the Green Party began to roll out metering and set up a utility to charge people. It got massive popular resistance and was ultimately defeated, but the meters did go in.

                                  When the dust settled it turned out Irish people used less water on average than the metered, privatised. UK.

                                  Metering did help find leaks though.

                                  nacly@floss.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                                  nacly@floss.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                                  nacly@floss.social
                                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                                  #34

                                  @davey_cakes @dalius_berger @PsyChuan Amazing story, thank you for sharing!

                                  Can you share some further readings so that I can read more about this?

                                  davey_cakes@mastodon.ieD 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • witchescauldron@kolektiva.socialW witchescauldron@kolektiva.social

                                    @PsyChuan caverate, its only bullshit if you live outside capitalism. From inside the current mess it is still badly relevant.

                                    We need social composting

                                    ukeleleeric@mstdn.socialU This user is from outside of this forum
                                    ukeleleeric@mstdn.socialU This user is from outside of this forum
                                    ukeleleeric@mstdn.social
                                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                                    #35

                                    @witchescauldron @PsyChuan You CAN have some forms of capitalism whilst still regulating the commons for everyone's benefit, I believe. But it does need restraint and legal restriction to do so. Personally, I would probably prefer Capitalism as we have it now to be dismantled, but there doesn't appear to be enough people to agree with me, so we might have to work on the legal and practical regulation.

                                    whathappened@c.imW 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • psychuan@plush.cityP psychuan@plush.city

                                      HEY.

                                      whenever someone comes at you, a leftie, about the "tragedy of the commons," just remember:

                                      - Elinor Ostrom won a goddamn Nobel Prize in Economics for pointing out that it was a bullshit idea.

                                      - the commons worked as a concept for hundreds of years until the land was Inclosed.

                                      - the dude that named the concept, Garrett Hardin, was literally a eugenicist and believed that letting people starve to death was a good form of population control.

                                      bearsong@ravenation.clubB This user is from outside of this forum
                                      bearsong@ravenation.clubB This user is from outside of this forum
                                      bearsong@ravenation.club
                                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                                      #36

                                      @PsyChuan

                                      thank you for this clear & concise summary

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • matildalove@wetdry.worldM matildalove@wetdry.world

                                        @0x4d6165 @PsyChuan "if you let everyone share freely, some jerk will obviously ruin it" —jerk who wants nothing more than to ruin it

                                        nske@ravenation.clubN This user is from outside of this forum
                                        nske@ravenation.clubN This user is from outside of this forum
                                        nske@ravenation.club
                                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                                        #37

                                        @matildalove @0x4d6165 @PsyChuan that's exactly it - it's a threat, not an explanation of any kind.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • matildalove@wetdry.worldM matildalove@wetdry.world

                                          @0x4d6165 @PsyChuan "if you let everyone share freely, some jerk will obviously ruin it" —jerk who wants nothing more than to ruin it

                                          gooba42@mastodon.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
                                          gooba42@mastodon.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
                                          gooba42@mastodon.social
                                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                                          #38

                                          @matildalove @0x4d6165 @PsyChuan This is exactly my takeaway from the lesson.

                                          Don't let assholes ruin the commons. Whether that's by stealing from it, enclosing pieces of it or just general asshattery.

                                          Douchebags are inevitable, knock them down as needed.

                                          psychuan@plush.cityP 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Svar
                                          • Svar som emne
                                          Login for at svare
                                          • Ældste til nyeste
                                          • Nyeste til ældste
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Log ind

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          Graciously hosted by data.coop
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Hjem
                                          • Seneste
                                          • Etiketter
                                          • Populære
                                          • Verden
                                          • Bruger
                                          • Grupper