Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. A bill for the people?

A bill for the people?

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
surveillanceaccprivacyuspolsurveillanceusgov
5 Indlæg 4 Posters 31 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • privacyguides@mastodon.neat.computerP This user is from outside of this forum
    privacyguides@mastodon.neat.computerP This user is from outside of this forum
    privacyguides@mastodon.neat.computer
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #1

    A bill for the people? We nearly forgot the government could do that 👀

    The US government regularly gets around the 4th Amendment by buying data from “third-party” data brokers, to invade your privacy with no oversight.

    Why this is legal? We have no idea, but Rep. Thomas Massie (KY) just introduced the Surveillance Accountability Act (with help drafting from Naomi Brockwell!) which closes this loophole.

    The bill would mandate warrants for all surveillance, including a ban on invasive AI and facial recognition mass surveillance in public spaces 💪

    Check it out here and let us know what you think: https://surveillanceaccountability.com

    #SurveillanceAccountabilityAct #Privacy #USpol #Surveillance #USgov #USA

    grayhaven@ni.hil.istG ericlawton@kolektiva.socialE burtman@mastodon.socialB 3 Replies Last reply
    0
    • privacyguides@mastodon.neat.computerP privacyguides@mastodon.neat.computer

      A bill for the people? We nearly forgot the government could do that 👀

      The US government regularly gets around the 4th Amendment by buying data from “third-party” data brokers, to invade your privacy with no oversight.

      Why this is legal? We have no idea, but Rep. Thomas Massie (KY) just introduced the Surveillance Accountability Act (with help drafting from Naomi Brockwell!) which closes this loophole.

      The bill would mandate warrants for all surveillance, including a ban on invasive AI and facial recognition mass surveillance in public spaces 💪

      Check it out here and let us know what you think: https://surveillanceaccountability.com

      #SurveillanceAccountabilityAct #Privacy #USpol #Surveillance #USgov #USA

      grayhaven@ni.hil.istG This user is from outside of this forum
      grayhaven@ni.hil.istG This user is from outside of this forum
      grayhaven@ni.hil.ist
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #2

      @privacyguides Introduced by two Republicans? The only way you can help is to give them money, according to their "Support" page? Yeah, I'm pressing X to doubt on this one.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • privacyguides@mastodon.neat.computerP privacyguides@mastodon.neat.computer

        A bill for the people? We nearly forgot the government could do that 👀

        The US government regularly gets around the 4th Amendment by buying data from “third-party” data brokers, to invade your privacy with no oversight.

        Why this is legal? We have no idea, but Rep. Thomas Massie (KY) just introduced the Surveillance Accountability Act (with help drafting from Naomi Brockwell!) which closes this loophole.

        The bill would mandate warrants for all surveillance, including a ban on invasive AI and facial recognition mass surveillance in public spaces 💪

        Check it out here and let us know what you think: https://surveillanceaccountability.com

        #SurveillanceAccountabilityAct #Privacy #USpol #Surveillance #USgov #USA

        ericlawton@kolektiva.socialE This user is from outside of this forum
        ericlawton@kolektiva.socialE This user is from outside of this forum
        ericlawton@kolektiva.social
        wrote sidst redigeret af
        #3

        @privacyguides

        If it remains legal for the data brokers, but not the cops, what does that say about corporate power (among other things).

        @blogdiva

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • privacyguides@mastodon.neat.computerP privacyguides@mastodon.neat.computer

          A bill for the people? We nearly forgot the government could do that 👀

          The US government regularly gets around the 4th Amendment by buying data from “third-party” data brokers, to invade your privacy with no oversight.

          Why this is legal? We have no idea, but Rep. Thomas Massie (KY) just introduced the Surveillance Accountability Act (with help drafting from Naomi Brockwell!) which closes this loophole.

          The bill would mandate warrants for all surveillance, including a ban on invasive AI and facial recognition mass surveillance in public spaces 💪

          Check it out here and let us know what you think: https://surveillanceaccountability.com

          #SurveillanceAccountabilityAct #Privacy #USpol #Surveillance #USgov #USA

          burtman@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
          burtman@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
          burtman@mastodon.social
          wrote sidst redigeret af
          #4

          @privacyguides This sounds great. Of course, I haven't read it, so it might just be the usual bullshit. They are politicians, after all. But I'd like to thik it isn't just another trojan horse to extend protection for Monsanto or Pfizer or Bill Gates.

          privacyguides@mastodon.neat.computerP 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • burtman@mastodon.socialB burtman@mastodon.social

            @privacyguides This sounds great. Of course, I haven't read it, so it might just be the usual bullshit. They are politicians, after all. But I'd like to thik it isn't just another trojan horse to extend protection for Monsanto or Pfizer or Bill Gates.

            privacyguides@mastodon.neat.computerP This user is from outside of this forum
            privacyguides@mastodon.neat.computerP This user is from outside of this forum
            privacyguides@mastodon.neat.computer
            wrote sidst redigeret af
            #5

            @burtman if you do read it, it is in fact great. Very short. So great that it does make me wonder how unlikely it is to be passed, but more awareness of it might help.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            Svar
            • Svar som emne
            Login for at svare
            • Ældste til nyeste
            • Nyeste til ældste
            • Most Votes


            • Log ind

            • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

            • Login or register to search.
            Powered by NodeBB Contributors
            Graciously hosted by data.coop
            • First post
              Last post
            0
            • Hjem
            • Seneste
            • Etiketter
            • Populære
            • Verden
            • Bruger
            • Grupper