Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. CONTEXT

CONTEXT

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
petromafiaconsumerism
131 Indlæg 39 Posters 1 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • benroyce@mastodon.socialB benroyce@mastodon.social

    @adriano @GhostOnTheHalfShell @anthropy @blogdiva

    the arguments of toxic perfectionists like GhostOnTheHalfShell are not just foolishness in isolation

    the real problem is how like here they go after EVs

    they have to attack *better* because it's not *perfect*

    !?

    you see this constantly all over the left

    these people are rat poison

    in pursuit of purity, they fight better

    thereby helping the status quo: the fossil fuel industry

    they are an agent provocateur shill or a moron

    cmthiede@social.vivaldi.netC This user is from outside of this forum
    cmthiede@social.vivaldi.netC This user is from outside of this forum
    cmthiede@social.vivaldi.net
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #103

    @benroyce @adriano @GhostOnTheHalfShell @anthropy @blogdiva I think this thread shows that Earth's destruction is a touchy subject. I wish everyone could get along and share the land, but it's not profitable nor convenient. Creating a digital world for everyone to live in, on top of the one they already shit on, certainly isn't good for the planet, convince me otherwise. With so much of what we can't now live without, being something we never needed in the first place, progress seems more like a bait and switch tactic to move the herd than a promise of a bright future. I'll support whatever initiative buys the planet more inhabitable time.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • punissuer@universeodon.comP punissuer@universeodon.com

      @benroyce I don't know about you, but to me, this was new information. If that 2,200g CO2e/kWh is correct – which I don't know yet – and my math checks out, then a BEV powered by hydroelectric energy really isn't better than a smaller ICE car at all.
      @GhostOnTheHalfShell @blogdiva

      benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
      benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
      benroyce@mastodon.social
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #104

      @punissuer @GhostOnTheHalfShell @blogdiva

      But it doesn't change the overall need to get off fossil fuels

      Nevermind you can work to reduce the methane production from hydroelectric

      So this issue you note is absolutely true, but it doesnt change the overall equation

      In the end it only becomes a piece of whataboutism in defense of fossil fuels

      Which I am not accusing you of. I'm just asking you to look at the big picture

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • benroyce@mastodon.socialB benroyce@mastodon.social

        @FrancoisPrague @nikatjef @dnkboston @GhostOnTheHalfShell

        thank you, sincerely, for the laugh

        😆

        endless dreary nihilism and whiny toxic perfectionism from pinheads is a drag

        francoisprague@mastodon.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
        francoisprague@mastodon.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
        francoisprague@mastodon.social
        wrote sidst redigeret af
        #105

        @benroyce @nikatjef @dnkboston @GhostOnTheHalfShell

        Glad I could be of any (un)use 😉
        With love ♥️

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • benroyce@mastodon.socialB benroyce@mastodon.social

          @ChuckMcManis @paneerakbari @GhostOnTheHalfShell @anthropy @blogdiva

          while i generally like breeder reactors you have to admit the teensy tiny problem that this is how we make plutonium for bombs

          this is why breeder reactors are downplayed

          otherwise i agree

          chuckmcmanis@chaos.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
          chuckmcmanis@chaos.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
          chuckmcmanis@chaos.social
          wrote sidst redigeret af
          #106

          @benroyce

          Yeah there is that downside. When my kids were younger we talked about how as technology became more sophisticated, it also becomes more capable. And capability has both good and bad vectors associated with it.

          @paneerakbari @GhostOnTheHalfShell @anthropy @blogdiva

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • mark@mastodon.fixermark.comM mark@mastodon.fixermark.com

            @GhostOnTheHalfShell @benroyce @blogdiva What's your source on permanent destruction and toxicity? I'm pretty sure that isn't true.

            Batteries can renewable capture equipment (wind and solar) can be recycled. Relatively easily, in fact; for batteries, we can grind them and re-extract the useful elements easier than we can pull them out of the ground, and for generators, we can tear them down and refurb them.

            I don't dispute that initial extraction costs money and lives (though I compare it to fossil fuel extraction in that regard). But we can't recapture the output of a fossil fuel reaction and turn it back into fossil fuel; we can grind a battery and make a new battery, over and over, for a very long time before the elements stop cooperating.

            flipper@mastodonapp.ukF This user is from outside of this forum
            flipper@mastodonapp.ukF This user is from outside of this forum
            flipper@mastodonapp.uk
            wrote sidst redigeret af
            #107

            @mark @GhostOnTheHalfShell @benroyce @blogdiva This is my understanding too.

            We can recycle old batteries to make new ones. It is cheaper to do this than digging more materials, once we get enough supply of old batteries.

            Battery tech is also getting better. We are on the cusp of being able to replace lithium with sodium for electricity grid storage, and sodium doesn't require mining in the way lithium does.

            The key here is that all the extraction for EVs is a one-time (mostly) operation that will replace fossil fuel extraction, which is not a one-time operation.

            And before anyone thinks I'm a EV shill: I hate all cars. I think they should be completely outlawed from cities and heavily reduced elsewhere. Am I going to get my wish in my lifetime? I very much doubt it. EVs are an improvement over internal combustion in every material way.

            Once we have EVs, we need to fix the toxic tires and road markings. Then onward.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • ghostonthehalfshell@masto.aiG ghostonthehalfshell@masto.ai

              @benroyce @brad @blogdiva

              OK, it’s only a lie. If what you’ve been told about renewables is true.. let me emphasize that the companies who were gushing over renewables are the worst polluting most environmentally destructive industries in the world which is the mining sector.

              You are going to believe companies that are no different than big oil and no different than big tobacco at face value value.

              How well has that traditionally worked out?

              cy@fedicy.us.toC This user is from outside of this forum
              cy@fedicy.us.toC This user is from outside of this forum
              cy@fedicy.us.to
              wrote sidst redigeret af
              #108
              I don't believe those companies for a second. The one I believe who was gushing over renewables is a Youtuber! 😛

              CC: @benroyce@mastodon.social @brad@1040ste.net @blogdiva@mastodon.social
              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • ghostonthehalfshell@masto.aiG ghostonthehalfshell@masto.ai

                @anthropy @benroyce @blogdiva

                And if you're going to then say oh, but you're gonna leave the disabled to die because they can't move. I want to cut off that argument in advance and saying that the disabled in Amsterdam have no mobility issues the city has solve that problem, so don't even try or if you're beginning to think that way, please go look at how the Dutch handled mobility for the disabled

                benhm3@saint-paul.usB This user is from outside of this forum
                benhm3@saint-paul.usB This user is from outside of this forum
                benhm3@saint-paul.us
                wrote sidst redigeret af
                #109

                @GhostOnTheHalfShell @anthropy @benroyce @blogdiva

                I’m sorry Ghost, you’re wrong. You’ve been mislead by oil companies to confuse things like power and energy.

                Try this video. But stop at the end-credits: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KtQ9nt2ZeGM

                For the rest of my people, watch the post-roll and put it on loop.

                ghostonthehalfshell@masto.aiG 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • benroyce@mastodon.socialB benroyce@mastodon.social

                  @adriano @GhostOnTheHalfShell @anthropy @blogdiva

                  the arguments of toxic perfectionists like GhostOnTheHalfShell are not just foolishness in isolation

                  the real problem is how like here they go after EVs

                  they have to attack *better* because it's not *perfect*

                  !?

                  you see this constantly all over the left

                  these people are rat poison

                  in pursuit of purity, they fight better

                  thereby helping the status quo: the fossil fuel industry

                  they are an agent provocateur shill or a moron

                  c_merriweather@social.linux.pizzaC This user is from outside of this forum
                  c_merriweather@social.linux.pizzaC This user is from outside of this forum
                  c_merriweather@social.linux.pizza
                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                  #110

                  @adriano @GhostOnTheHalfShell @anthropy @blogdiva @benroyce
                  Sadly, the people (in the US) for whom EVs would be an improvement are those least likely to afford them.

                  I am thinking of all the gasoline cars that are owned by low-income people, that are paid off, sometimes barely run, and are, in some cases, actually being held together with duct tape and wire.

                  So all the middle-class+ folks can argue about EVs, while the rest of us just fill up our cars when we can afford to, and buy another roll of duct tape, and/or wire.*

                  * yes, one hose in my 2013 car is held together with duct tape. The parts and labor expense to replace it are out of my price range. I doubt I will ever own an EV, nor will many of my neighbors.

                  anthropy@mastodon.derg.nzA 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • archaeoiain@archaeo.socialA archaeoiain@archaeo.social

                    @jwcph @benroyce @GhostOnTheHalfShell @blogdiva That is not what I said. It is the logic of your statement though. It is clear that government policies or even evil religions which encourage population growth and ban contraception are aiming in the opposite direction partly because the dominant economic models are derived from agrarian societies where more people could produce more so growth arose from growing population. Simple really.

                    blogdiva@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                    blogdiva@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                    blogdiva@mastodon.social
                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                    #111

                    STOP

                    Mama Gaya is enough.

                    the death cult of settler colonialist, extractivist capitalism is the problem.

                    there's a reason LAND REDISTRIBUTION WARS started after the wars of independence across all the Américas.

                    no nation can survive when capitalists control all the land. you cant cash crop ecosystems into profits without genocide and ecocide.

                    kill capalism to save us all.

                    malthusianism is eugenics & racist. deprogram that shit.

                    @ArchaeoIain @jwcph @benroyce @GhostOnTheHalfShell

                    ghostonthehalfshell@masto.aiG 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • blogdiva@mastodon.socialB blogdiva@mastodon.social

                      malthusianism is eugenics which is always founded on racism.

                      if you agree with anything malthusian, i would suggest going into cult deprogramming therapy.

                      malthusianism ―like eugenics, like racism, like capitalism― is a death cult.

                      @mark @anthropy @GhostOnTheHalfShell @benroyce

                      hakona@im.alstadheim.noH This user is from outside of this forum
                      hakona@im.alstadheim.noH This user is from outside of this forum
                      hakona@im.alstadheim.no
                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                      #112

                      @blogdiva I don't usually go for absolutes, but this one I'm fairly certain proves true in practice. @mark @anthropy @GhostOnTheHalfShell @benroyce

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • c_merriweather@social.linux.pizzaC c_merriweather@social.linux.pizza

                        @adriano @GhostOnTheHalfShell @anthropy @blogdiva @benroyce
                        Sadly, the people (in the US) for whom EVs would be an improvement are those least likely to afford them.

                        I am thinking of all the gasoline cars that are owned by low-income people, that are paid off, sometimes barely run, and are, in some cases, actually being held together with duct tape and wire.

                        So all the middle-class+ folks can argue about EVs, while the rest of us just fill up our cars when we can afford to, and buy another roll of duct tape, and/or wire.*

                        * yes, one hose in my 2013 car is held together with duct tape. The parts and labor expense to replace it are out of my price range. I doubt I will ever own an EV, nor will many of my neighbors.

                        anthropy@mastodon.derg.nzA This user is from outside of this forum
                        anthropy@mastodon.derg.nzA This user is from outside of this forum
                        anthropy@mastodon.derg.nz
                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                        #113

                        @c_merriweather @adriano @GhostOnTheHalfShell @blogdiva @benroyce I bought a nissan leaf 2013 about half a year ago. less than 70k km on the odometer, 90% original battery capacity. Cost me 4.5k. Saved me over 1k in gasoline so far

                        I think people aren't looking enough at the second hand EV market tbqh, which I get is scary cuz batteries and all, but that's not nearly as bad as it's been once. I kinda wish battery replacement services were more prevalent, because I know I you can triple the kWh.

                        c_merriweather@social.linux.pizzaC 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • drangnon@hachyderm.ioD drangnon@hachyderm.io

                          @benroyce @GhostOnTheHalfShell @blogdiva there is also the consideration wrt the effects of vehicle exhaust. Unless the power plants are coal, that's a straight up win for the carbon cycle.

                          Of course the batteries have rare chemicals and extractive companies still come into play. But they are there for vehicles regardless.

                          lukefromdc@kolektiva.socialL This user is from outside of this forum
                          lukefromdc@kolektiva.socialL This user is from outside of this forum
                          lukefromdc@kolektiva.social
                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                          #114

                          @draNgNon @benroyce @GhostOnTheHalfShell @blogdiva And cobalt is used for refining gasoline as well as in lithium batteries

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • saxicola@toot.communityS saxicola@toot.community

                            @blogdiva
                            Didn't Maggie Thatcher sell them a significant part of our stake in the North Sea?

                            brad@1040ste.netB This user is from outside of this forum
                            brad@1040ste.netB This user is from outside of this forum
                            brad@1040ste.net
                            wrote sidst redigeret af
                            #115

                            @saxicola @blogdiva There's very little that excrescence and her depraved band of ghoulish bicycle-seat sniffers didn't rip up and sell off cheap. Destruction and exploitation is the only thing Tory bastards know how to do.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • blogdiva@mastodon.socialB blogdiva@mastodon.social

                              malthusianism is eugenics which is always founded on racism.

                              if you agree with anything malthusian, i would suggest going into cult deprogramming therapy.

                              malthusianism ―like eugenics, like racism, like capitalism― is a death cult.

                              @mark @anthropy @GhostOnTheHalfShell @benroyce

                              miguelpergamon@kolektiva.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                              miguelpergamon@kolektiva.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                              miguelpergamon@kolektiva.social
                              wrote sidst redigeret af
                              #116

                              @blogdiva @mark @anthropy @GhostOnTheHalfShell @benroyce

                              Sure "Malthusianism" starts with what everyone thinks is popularly known but then it descends into boring old statistics, economics, efforts to prevent starvation through parliament and conversations with Riccardo.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • blogdiva@mastodon.socialB blogdiva@mastodon.social

                                STOP

                                Mama Gaya is enough.

                                the death cult of settler colonialist, extractivist capitalism is the problem.

                                there's a reason LAND REDISTRIBUTION WARS started after the wars of independence across all the Américas.

                                no nation can survive when capitalists control all the land. you cant cash crop ecosystems into profits without genocide and ecocide.

                                kill capalism to save us all.

                                malthusianism is eugenics & racist. deprogram that shit.

                                @ArchaeoIain @jwcph @benroyce @GhostOnTheHalfShell

                                ghostonthehalfshell@masto.aiG This user is from outside of this forum
                                ghostonthehalfshell@masto.aiG This user is from outside of this forum
                                ghostonthehalfshell@masto.ai
                                wrote sidst redigeret af
                                #117

                                @blogdiva @ArchaeoIain @jwcph @benroyce

                                that’s right. Capitalism is the global supply chain. To break capitalism, de couple from the global supply chain.

                                This is the most important problem to address.

                                jwcph@helvede.netJ 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • anthropy@mastodon.derg.nzA anthropy@mastodon.derg.nz

                                  @c_merriweather @adriano @GhostOnTheHalfShell @blogdiva @benroyce I bought a nissan leaf 2013 about half a year ago. less than 70k km on the odometer, 90% original battery capacity. Cost me 4.5k. Saved me over 1k in gasoline so far

                                  I think people aren't looking enough at the second hand EV market tbqh, which I get is scary cuz batteries and all, but that's not nearly as bad as it's been once. I kinda wish battery replacement services were more prevalent, because I know I you can triple the kWh.

                                  c_merriweather@social.linux.pizzaC This user is from outside of this forum
                                  c_merriweather@social.linux.pizzaC This user is from outside of this forum
                                  c_merriweather@social.linux.pizza
                                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                                  #118

                                  @anthropy

                                  Folks like me don't have $ to buy "new" cars, EV or not. Survivor's benefits are at poverty level.

                                  @adriano @GhostOnTheHalfShell @blogdiva @benroyce

                                  benroyce@mastodon.socialB adriano@lile.clA anthropy@mastodon.derg.nzA 3 Replies Last reply
                                  0
                                  • c_merriweather@social.linux.pizzaC c_merriweather@social.linux.pizza

                                    @anthropy

                                    Folks like me don't have $ to buy "new" cars, EV or not. Survivor's benefits are at poverty level.

                                    @adriano @GhostOnTheHalfShell @blogdiva @benroyce

                                    benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                                    benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                                    benroyce@mastodon.social
                                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                                    #119

                                    @c_merriweather @anthropy @adriano @GhostOnTheHalfShell @blogdiva

                                    sure but that's a different problem

                                    massive subsidies for EV purchase would help

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • c_merriweather@social.linux.pizzaC c_merriweather@social.linux.pizza

                                      @anthropy

                                      Folks like me don't have $ to buy "new" cars, EV or not. Survivor's benefits are at poverty level.

                                      @adriano @GhostOnTheHalfShell @blogdiva @benroyce

                                      adriano@lile.clA This user is from outside of this forum
                                      adriano@lile.clA This user is from outside of this forum
                                      adriano@lile.cl
                                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                                      #120

                                      @c_merriweather At that income level, these problems are best solved through clean public transport. I know it's very hard to achieve in the USA outside large cities, but that's happening right now here in Santiago de Chile: the bus fleet is modernizing with electric vehicles which are also much more comfortable. @anthropy @GhostOnTheHalfShell @blogdiva @benroyce

                                      benroyce@mastodon.socialB 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • benhm3@saint-paul.usB benhm3@saint-paul.us

                                        @GhostOnTheHalfShell @anthropy @benroyce @blogdiva

                                        I’m sorry Ghost, you’re wrong. You’ve been mislead by oil companies to confuse things like power and energy.

                                        Try this video. But stop at the end-credits: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KtQ9nt2ZeGM

                                        For the rest of my people, watch the post-roll and put it on loop.

                                        ghostonthehalfshell@masto.aiG This user is from outside of this forum
                                        ghostonthehalfshell@masto.aiG This user is from outside of this forum
                                        ghostonthehalfshell@masto.ai
                                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                                        #121

                                        @BenHM3

                                        have watched that video. nowhere in it does he actually address the environmental destruction that comes from exponential growth extracting, aluminum, copper, silver, nickel, and lithium.

                                        To extract and purify the resources is necessary to transform power generation requires destroying the planet in the process.

                                        The resource extraction and refinement industry is no different than big oil.

                                        ghostonthehalfshell@masto.aiG 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • adriano@lile.clA adriano@lile.cl

                                          @c_merriweather At that income level, these problems are best solved through clean public transport. I know it's very hard to achieve in the USA outside large cities, but that's happening right now here in Santiago de Chile: the bus fleet is modernizing with electric vehicles which are also much more comfortable. @anthropy @GhostOnTheHalfShell @blogdiva @benroyce

                                          benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                                          benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                                          benroyce@mastodon.social
                                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                                          #122

                                          @adriano @c_merriweather @anthropy @GhostOnTheHalfShell @blogdiva

                                          as an american, i envy the commitment to mass transit in other countries. the usa is really pathetic on this topic

                                          adriano@lile.clA 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Svar
                                          • Svar som emne
                                          Login for at svare
                                          • Ældste til nyeste
                                          • Nyeste til ældste
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Log ind

                                          • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          Graciously hosted by data.coop
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Hjem
                                          • Seneste
                                          • Etiketter
                                          • Populære
                                          • Verden
                                          • Bruger
                                          • Grupper