Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. This is depressing.

This is depressing.

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
artcraftfoss
56 Indlæg 45 Posters 1 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • kyle_pegasus@scalie.clubK kyle_pegasus@scalie.club

    @dr_laemmerbein @dilmandila GIMP is not an appropriate replacement for Photoshop unless your use case for Photoshop is just experimentation. That's what GIMP was made as, that's why GIMP makes no effort to accommodate artists.

    dr_laemmerbein@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
    dr_laemmerbein@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
    dr_laemmerbein@mastodon.social
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #25

    @kyle_pegasus I guess it depends on what you use it for. I'm using darktable and Gimp for photography and I'm perfectly happy with the feature set.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • ditsch42@troet.cafeD ditsch42@troet.cafe

      @dilmandila Oh yes, I was also rolling my eyes very strongly when I first heard about this. Didn't consider the training aspect, but of course the open source codes are right there for everyone to steal...

      isaackuo@spacey.spaceI This user is from outside of this forum
      isaackuo@spacey.spaceI This user is from outside of this forum
      isaackuo@spacey.space
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #26

      @ditsch42 @dilmandila Claude is also trained on all Adobe code as well. Remember that an LLM can "read" object code just as easily as source code.

      Object code isn't so easy for humans to read, but that's really just an incidental side effect of making the code easy for CPUs to read. An LLM doesn't care either way.

      dealiah@mastodon.sdf.orgD 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • dilmandila@mograph.socialD dilmandila@mograph.social

        This is depressing. Perfectly good alternatives to all Adobe have existed for many years and are used at pro level, but someone hallucinates some code with claude (which I hear was trained on code of programs like gimp and inkscape) and suddenly everyone is raving about it being the end of Adobe, though the thing they praise is at best entry level stuff. But like other snake oil sellers, they claim it will get there, though their "in one month" is now "many months" #artcraft #foss

        tyzbit@toot.nowT This user is from outside of this forum
        tyzbit@toot.nowT This user is from outside of this forum
        tyzbit@toot.now
        wrote sidst redigeret af
        #27

        @dilmandila i learned about the existence of Glama.ai today and the thing i gravitated most around is the "maintenance" rating:

        Maintenance health based on commit activity, issue responsiveness, release frequency, and community profile.

        "A" = actively maintained. "F" = abandoned or archived.

        search for anything you want related to something on the internet (suggested searches: google, minecraft, bluesky and finally mastodon). what do you see? a bunch of abandoned shit. this metric isn't just "had an update recently", this is "does anyone who worked on this give a shit?" and the answer is no. no one gives a shit about things they already made and maintaining something a random plagiarism generator made is the absolute worst experience you can have in programming so no one is doing it.

        this is from a group of people who have apparently smart agents that can "just do things" for them without needing involvement, like keeping an app up to date. literally the value proposition of this application of LLMs - the boring stuff no one wants to do.

        even if they did do that extremely well, why would you waste tokens on something you're done with? why do anything to a fragile codebase that does everything you need?

        and finally, look at the duplication ("google" search is good for this). assuming earnest effort, it's "just" massive duplication and solo development that can't be collaborated on. assuming malicious intent, some of those projects must be credential stealers.

        and the slop machine operators are proud of all of this.

        compfu@mograph.socialC 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • isaackuo@spacey.spaceI isaackuo@spacey.space

          @ditsch42 @dilmandila Claude is also trained on all Adobe code as well. Remember that an LLM can "read" object code just as easily as source code.

          Object code isn't so easy for humans to read, but that's really just an incidental side effect of making the code easy for CPUs to read. An LLM doesn't care either way.

          dealiah@mastodon.sdf.orgD This user is from outside of this forum
          dealiah@mastodon.sdf.orgD This user is from outside of this forum
          dealiah@mastodon.sdf.org
          wrote sidst redigeret af
          #28

          @isaackuo @ditsch42 @dilmandila
          So this will pit the "everything AI" side against the "you can use it but never own it/pay us for use forever" side. Hmmmmm. I think I like where this is going. 🤔

          isaackuo@spacey.spaceI 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • dealiah@mastodon.sdf.orgD dealiah@mastodon.sdf.org

            @isaackuo @ditsch42 @dilmandila
            So this will pit the "everything AI" side against the "you can use it but never own it/pay us for use forever" side. Hmmmmm. I think I like where this is going. 🤔

            isaackuo@spacey.spaceI This user is from outside of this forum
            isaackuo@spacey.spaceI This user is from outside of this forum
            isaackuo@spacey.space
            wrote sidst redigeret af
            #29

            @Dealiah @ditsch42 @dilmandila Yeah, the "let them fight" aspect is fun to think about.

            But still ... I feel like they've likely already got some sort of "Copyrights for me but not for thee" backroom deals worked out, designed to screw us over all around.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • naught101@mastodon.socialN naught101@mastodon.social

              @Wifiwits @dilmandila can you link some?

              goulien@mastodon.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
              goulien@mastodon.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
              goulien@mastodon.social
              wrote sidst redigeret af
              #30

              @naught101 @Wifiwits @dilmandila
              I would be interested in those reviews, too!

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • dilmandila@mograph.socialD dilmandila@mograph.social

                This is depressing. Perfectly good alternatives to all Adobe have existed for many years and are used at pro level, but someone hallucinates some code with claude (which I hear was trained on code of programs like gimp and inkscape) and suddenly everyone is raving about it being the end of Adobe, though the thing they praise is at best entry level stuff. But like other snake oil sellers, they claim it will get there, though their "in one month" is now "many months" #artcraft #foss

                tischbein3@mograph.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                tischbein3@mograph.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                tischbein3@mograph.social
                wrote sidst redigeret af
                #31

                @dilmandila I find it ironic, that the company who introduced AI features in their program, experience..just for a second...the same thread artist did.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • dilmandila@mograph.socialD dilmandila@mograph.social

                  This is depressing. Perfectly good alternatives to all Adobe have existed for many years and are used at pro level, but someone hallucinates some code with claude (which I hear was trained on code of programs like gimp and inkscape) and suddenly everyone is raving about it being the end of Adobe, though the thing they praise is at best entry level stuff. But like other snake oil sellers, they claim it will get there, though their "in one month" is now "many months" #artcraft #foss

                  mansr@society.oftrolls.comM This user is from outside of this forum
                  mansr@society.oftrolls.comM This user is from outside of this forum
                  mansr@society.oftrolls.com
                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                  #32

                  @dilmandila Why do they need to make a replacement program? Can't they just ask the clod to do the thing directly?

                  dilmandila@mograph.socialD 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • mansr@society.oftrolls.comM mansr@society.oftrolls.com

                    @dilmandila Why do they need to make a replacement program? Can't they just ask the clod to do the thing directly?

                    dilmandila@mograph.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
                    dilmandila@mograph.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
                    dilmandila@mograph.social
                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                    #33

                    @mansr Perhaps due to copyright issues. Apparently you can copy a likeness or features or something like that but not the actual code.

                    mansr@society.oftrolls.comM 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • dilmandila@mograph.socialD dilmandila@mograph.social

                      @mansr Perhaps due to copyright issues. Apparently you can copy a likeness or features or something like that but not the actual code.

                      mansr@society.oftrolls.comM This user is from outside of this forum
                      mansr@society.oftrolls.comM This user is from outside of this forum
                      mansr@society.oftrolls.com
                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                      #34

                      @dilmandila I mean, instead of telling the bot "write a program that edits the photo," why not simply tell it "edit the photo"?

                      dilmandila@mograph.socialD 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • dilmandila@mograph.socialD dilmandila@mograph.social

                        This is depressing. Perfectly good alternatives to all Adobe have existed for many years and are used at pro level, but someone hallucinates some code with claude (which I hear was trained on code of programs like gimp and inkscape) and suddenly everyone is raving about it being the end of Adobe, though the thing they praise is at best entry level stuff. But like other snake oil sellers, they claim it will get there, though their "in one month" is now "many months" #artcraft #foss

                        david_chisnall@infosec.exchangeD This user is from outside of this forum
                        david_chisnall@infosec.exchangeD This user is from outside of this forum
                        david_chisnall@infosec.exchange
                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                        #35

                        @dilmandila

                        I don’t imagine using these, but I’m happy with a scenario where Microsoft’s desire to maintain its dominance in the office-suite market and its desire to sell everyone bullshit generators provide directly contradictory incentives.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • dilmandila@mograph.socialD dilmandila@mograph.social

                          This is depressing. Perfectly good alternatives to all Adobe have existed for many years and are used at pro level, but someone hallucinates some code with claude (which I hear was trained on code of programs like gimp and inkscape) and suddenly everyone is raving about it being the end of Adobe, though the thing they praise is at best entry level stuff. But like other snake oil sellers, they claim it will get there, though their "in one month" is now "many months" #artcraft #foss

                          loganer@mastodon.socialL This user is from outside of this forum
                          loganer@mastodon.socialL This user is from outside of this forum
                          loganer@mastodon.social
                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                          #36

                          @dilmandila

                          it would only be a good thing if it was the end of adobe, sadly this will not be the case.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • dilmandila@mograph.socialD dilmandila@mograph.social

                            This is depressing. Perfectly good alternatives to all Adobe have existed for many years and are used at pro level, but someone hallucinates some code with claude (which I hear was trained on code of programs like gimp and inkscape) and suddenly everyone is raving about it being the end of Adobe, though the thing they praise is at best entry level stuff. But like other snake oil sellers, they claim it will get there, though their "in one month" is now "many months" #artcraft #foss

                            netzblockierer@tech.lgbtN This user is from outside of this forum
                            netzblockierer@tech.lgbtN This user is from outside of this forum
                            netzblockierer@tech.lgbt
                            wrote sidst redigeret af
                            #37

                            @dilmandila yeah.

                            There was no reason to use #Adobe before #AIslop and there were certainly sufficient alternatives already existing before someone farted out #SlopCode!

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • dilmandila@mograph.socialD dilmandila@mograph.social

                              This is depressing. Perfectly good alternatives to all Adobe have existed for many years and are used at pro level, but someone hallucinates some code with claude (which I hear was trained on code of programs like gimp and inkscape) and suddenly everyone is raving about it being the end of Adobe, though the thing they praise is at best entry level stuff. But like other snake oil sellers, they claim it will get there, though their "in one month" is now "many months" #artcraft #foss

                              maccruiskeen@social.linux.pizzaM This user is from outside of this forum
                              maccruiskeen@social.linux.pizzaM This user is from outside of this forum
                              maccruiskeen@social.linux.pizza
                              wrote sidst redigeret af
                              #38

                              @dilmandila There's not a good FOSS alternative to InDesign either. There's Affinity, which is 'free', but owned by Canva, so not really. And no Linux version. Sure, there's LaTex and its cousins, but good luck getting the designers to work with that. I don't even really want to work with that. Back in the day, I used FrameMaker for everything, but Adobe has ruined that too.

                              howtophil@oldbytes.spaceH 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • diraquel@masto.ptD diraquel@masto.pt

                                @dilmandila @Gargron I love Gimp! Because of it, I don't even know how to work on Photoshop. But, TBF, I'm not a pro user.

                                nieuemma@mastodon.deN This user is from outside of this forum
                                nieuemma@mastodon.deN This user is from outside of this forum
                                nieuemma@mastodon.de
                                wrote sidst redigeret af
                                #39

                                @diraquel @dilmandila @Gargron@mastodon.social I learned about a project called PhotoGIMP a while back and I love it even more than I already did plain GIMP. I've never even used Photoshop, but it configures GIMP in a way I guess to look and act more like Photoshop and its so pretty and nice to use, especially after tweaking some settings and theming it.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • mansr@society.oftrolls.comM mansr@society.oftrolls.com

                                  @dilmandila I mean, instead of telling the bot "write a program that edits the photo," why not simply tell it "edit the photo"?

                                  dilmandila@mograph.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
                                  dilmandila@mograph.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
                                  dilmandila@mograph.social
                                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                                  #40

                                  @mansr I think they were trying to appeal to artists who don't like prompts. Their selling point is something like "use AI with total control over the process" or something like that. They say you can run claude inside these apps so perhaps the prompts is optional to those who want it, but those who don't can still work them without prompts, though claude does things in the background. Not really sure if I got all that right but from the few YT reviews I saw that seemed to be the case.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • dilmandila@mograph.socialD dilmandila@mograph.social

                                    This is depressing. Perfectly good alternatives to all Adobe have existed for many years and are used at pro level, but someone hallucinates some code with claude (which I hear was trained on code of programs like gimp and inkscape) and suddenly everyone is raving about it being the end of Adobe, though the thing they praise is at best entry level stuff. But like other snake oil sellers, they claim it will get there, though their "in one month" is now "many months" #artcraft #foss

                                    argv_minus_one@mastodon.sdf.orgA This user is from outside of this forum
                                    argv_minus_one@mastodon.sdf.orgA This user is from outside of this forum
                                    argv_minus_one@mastodon.sdf.org
                                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                                    #41

                                    @dilmandila

                                    I know right? I've been using Inkscape for ages. Adobe basically doesn't exist as far as I'm concerned.

                                    sb@metroholografix.caS 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • argv_minus_one@mastodon.sdf.orgA argv_minus_one@mastodon.sdf.org

                                      @dilmandila

                                      I know right? I've been using Inkscape for ages. Adobe basically doesn't exist as far as I'm concerned.

                                      sb@metroholografix.caS This user is from outside of this forum
                                      sb@metroholografix.caS This user is from outside of this forum
                                      sb@metroholografix.ca
                                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                                      #42

                                      @argv_minus_one @dilmandila
                                      I haven't touched an adobe product since just before it switch to subscription. I've been able to do EVERYTHING I used to do with adobe and more, using entirely free software.

                                      #Inkscape #gimp #Kdenlive #blender #ffmpeg

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • dilmandila@mograph.socialD dilmandila@mograph.social

                                        This is depressing. Perfectly good alternatives to all Adobe have existed for many years and are used at pro level, but someone hallucinates some code with claude (which I hear was trained on code of programs like gimp and inkscape) and suddenly everyone is raving about it being the end of Adobe, though the thing they praise is at best entry level stuff. But like other snake oil sellers, they claim it will get there, though their "in one month" is now "many months" #artcraft #foss

                                        mikemccaffrey@drupal.communityM This user is from outside of this forum
                                        mikemccaffrey@drupal.communityM This user is from outside of this forum
                                        mikemccaffrey@drupal.community
                                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                                        #43

                                        @dilmandila One bright side is that Adobe might be forced to actually lower their prices now that all their customers think that free versions are a dime a dozen.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • tyzbit@toot.nowT tyzbit@toot.now

                                          @dilmandila i learned about the existence of Glama.ai today and the thing i gravitated most around is the "maintenance" rating:

                                          Maintenance health based on commit activity, issue responsiveness, release frequency, and community profile.

                                          "A" = actively maintained. "F" = abandoned or archived.

                                          search for anything you want related to something on the internet (suggested searches: google, minecraft, bluesky and finally mastodon). what do you see? a bunch of abandoned shit. this metric isn't just "had an update recently", this is "does anyone who worked on this give a shit?" and the answer is no. no one gives a shit about things they already made and maintaining something a random plagiarism generator made is the absolute worst experience you can have in programming so no one is doing it.

                                          this is from a group of people who have apparently smart agents that can "just do things" for them without needing involvement, like keeping an app up to date. literally the value proposition of this application of LLMs - the boring stuff no one wants to do.

                                          even if they did do that extremely well, why would you waste tokens on something you're done with? why do anything to a fragile codebase that does everything you need?

                                          and finally, look at the duplication ("google" search is good for this). assuming earnest effort, it's "just" massive duplication and solo development that can't be collaborated on. assuming malicious intent, some of those projects must be credential stealers.

                                          and the slop machine operators are proud of all of this.

                                          compfu@mograph.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                                          compfu@mograph.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                                          compfu@mograph.social
                                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                                          #44

                                          @tyzbit @dilmandila Thanks for the link. What I also find alarming when it comes to calling this "open source" is that this probably won't result in any well-defined module or library that can be reused by other people. LLM coding tools rely so much on existing frameworks or packages.
                                          But will their output result in a versatile UI toolkit for people who want to make other Adobe/ArtCraft-like programs? Probably not. It's a disastrous dead-end for the open source software ecosystem.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Svar
                                          • Svar som emne
                                          Login for at svare
                                          • Ældste til nyeste
                                          • Nyeste til ældste
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Log ind

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          Graciously hosted by data.coop
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Hjem
                                          • Seneste
                                          • Etiketter
                                          • Populære
                                          • Verden
                                          • Bruger
                                          • Grupper