Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. Imagine something that in 2020 didn't really exist but has so exploded onto our environment that in 2030 it will demand the water of 1.3 billion people and the electricity of 2 billion.

Imagine something that in 2020 didn't really exist but has so exploded onto our environment that in 2030 it will demand the water of 1.3 billion people and the electricity of 2 billion.

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
39 Indlæg 24 Posters 62 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • gerrymcgovern@mastodon.greenG gerrymcgovern@mastodon.green

    Imagine something that in 2020 didn't really exist but has so exploded onto our environment that in 2030 it will demand the water of 1.3 billion people and the electricity of 2 billion.

    In a time when we have a global historic severe drought and when our civilization is about to collapse due to over-consumption of energy.

    This is AI.

    This is Big Tech

    These are the tech bros. Here to burn it all down for greed and ambition.

    https://news.un.org/en/story/2026/06/1167658

    stephan324ppm@mastodon.no2nd.earthS This user is from outside of this forum
    stephan324ppm@mastodon.no2nd.earthS This user is from outside of this forum
    stephan324ppm@mastodon.no2nd.earth
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #8

    @gerrymcgovern Interestingly I read an article in an Austrian newspaper about this topic - and the expert that was interviewed had the view, that one cannot damn AI alltogether because AI "improves the life of billions of people". Which made me wonder: what kind of improvements could this be? Ideas?
    https://www.derstandard.at/story/3000000323330/ki-rechenzentren-duerften-2030-einen-wasserverbrauch-wie-13-milliarden-menschen-haben

    myricagale@mastodon.scotM gerrymcgovern@mastodon.greenG ghostonthehalfshell@masto.aiG 3 Replies Last reply
    0
    • gerrymcgovern@mastodon.greenG gerrymcgovern@mastodon.green

      Imagine something that in 2020 didn't really exist but has so exploded onto our environment that in 2030 it will demand the water of 1.3 billion people and the electricity of 2 billion.

      In a time when we have a global historic severe drought and when our civilization is about to collapse due to over-consumption of energy.

      This is AI.

      This is Big Tech

      These are the tech bros. Here to burn it all down for greed and ambition.

      https://news.un.org/en/story/2026/06/1167658

      annaf@climatejustice.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
      annaf@climatejustice.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
      annaf@climatejustice.social
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #9

      @gerrymcgovern makes me think of this:

      Double it again, keep on doubling…

      https://youtu.be/WSLTsKV2U-4?si=ja_D6QZ1iaAlCdHu

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • stephan324ppm@mastodon.no2nd.earthS stephan324ppm@mastodon.no2nd.earth

        @gerrymcgovern Interestingly I read an article in an Austrian newspaper about this topic - and the expert that was interviewed had the view, that one cannot damn AI alltogether because AI "improves the life of billions of people". Which made me wonder: what kind of improvements could this be? Ideas?
        https://www.derstandard.at/story/3000000323330/ki-rechenzentren-duerften-2030-einen-wasserverbrauch-wie-13-milliarden-menschen-haben

        myricagale@mastodon.scotM This user is from outside of this forum
        myricagale@mastodon.scotM This user is from outside of this forum
        myricagale@mastodon.scot
        wrote sidst redigeret af
        #10

        @stephan324ppm @gerrymcgovern Maybe he was misquoted and it was actually "billionaires and some other people" 😉

        stephan324ppm@mastodon.no2nd.earthS 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • stephan324ppm@mastodon.no2nd.earthS stephan324ppm@mastodon.no2nd.earth

          @gerrymcgovern Interestingly I read an article in an Austrian newspaper about this topic - and the expert that was interviewed had the view, that one cannot damn AI alltogether because AI "improves the life of billions of people". Which made me wonder: what kind of improvements could this be? Ideas?
          https://www.derstandard.at/story/3000000323330/ki-rechenzentren-duerften-2030-einen-wasserverbrauch-wie-13-milliarden-menschen-haben

          gerrymcgovern@mastodon.greenG This user is from outside of this forum
          gerrymcgovern@mastodon.greenG This user is from outside of this forum
          gerrymcgovern@mastodon.green
          wrote sidst redigeret af
          #11

          @stephan324ppm
          "improves the life of billions of people".

          Yeah, the UN report made that sort of evidence free tech optimistic statement as well. When it's more likely to be the very opposite.

          stephan324ppm@mastodon.no2nd.earthS 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • myricagale@mastodon.scotM myricagale@mastodon.scot

            @stephan324ppm @gerrymcgovern Maybe he was misquoted and it was actually "billionaires and some other people" 😉

            stephan324ppm@mastodon.no2nd.earthS This user is from outside of this forum
            stephan324ppm@mastodon.no2nd.earthS This user is from outside of this forum
            stephan324ppm@mastodon.no2nd.earth
            wrote sidst redigeret af
            #12

            @MyricaGale @gerrymcgovern Yes, definitely! 🙃

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • gerrymcgovern@mastodon.greenG gerrymcgovern@mastodon.green

              @stephan324ppm
              "improves the life of billions of people".

              Yeah, the UN report made that sort of evidence free tech optimistic statement as well. When it's more likely to be the very opposite.

              stephan324ppm@mastodon.no2nd.earthS This user is from outside of this forum
              stephan324ppm@mastodon.no2nd.earthS This user is from outside of this forum
              stephan324ppm@mastodon.no2nd.earth
              wrote sidst redigeret af
              #13

              @gerrymcgovern I mean it‘s possible we get some improvements in medical diagnostics for instance - but I guess it’s a long way until billions of people benefit from this.

              nicovel0@mastodon.socialN jeroenbosman@akademienl.socialJ naturemc@mastodon.onlineN 3 Replies Last reply
              0
              • stephan324ppm@mastodon.no2nd.earthS stephan324ppm@mastodon.no2nd.earth

                @gerrymcgovern Interestingly I read an article in an Austrian newspaper about this topic - and the expert that was interviewed had the view, that one cannot damn AI alltogether because AI "improves the life of billions of people". Which made me wonder: what kind of improvements could this be? Ideas?
                https://www.derstandard.at/story/3000000323330/ki-rechenzentren-duerften-2030-einen-wasserverbrauch-wie-13-milliarden-menschen-haben

                ghostonthehalfshell@masto.aiG This user is from outside of this forum
                ghostonthehalfshell@masto.aiG This user is from outside of this forum
                ghostonthehalfshell@masto.ai
                wrote sidst redigeret af
                #14

                @stephan324ppm @gerrymcgovern

                That expert should’ve been fact checked.

                Billions of people? Get real.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • gerrymcgovern@mastodon.greenG gerrymcgovern@mastodon.green

                  Imagine something that in 2020 didn't really exist but has so exploded onto our environment that in 2030 it will demand the water of 1.3 billion people and the electricity of 2 billion.

                  In a time when we have a global historic severe drought and when our civilization is about to collapse due to over-consumption of energy.

                  This is AI.

                  This is Big Tech

                  These are the tech bros. Here to burn it all down for greed and ambition.

                  https://news.un.org/en/story/2026/06/1167658

                  kumarvibe@mastodon.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
                  kumarvibe@mastodon.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
                  kumarvibe@mastodon.social
                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                  #15

                  @gerrymcgovern @patrickhadfield ironically, the Chinese are working hard to reverse engineer and distill all the frontier models into open weight models that everyone can run *locally* on high powered laptops, no data centers needed aside from initial distillation. It’s a weird thing to cheer for but I am.

                  susiarnott@mastodon.greenS 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • stephan324ppm@mastodon.no2nd.earthS stephan324ppm@mastodon.no2nd.earth

                    @gerrymcgovern I mean it‘s possible we get some improvements in medical diagnostics for instance - but I guess it’s a long way until billions of people benefit from this.

                    nicovel0@mastodon.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                    nicovel0@mastodon.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                    nicovel0@mastodon.social
                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                    #16

                    @stephan324ppm @gerrymcgovern it’s also made vapid, content free LinkedIn posts much easier to write, so really no one is losing here.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • gerrymcgovern@mastodon.greenG gerrymcgovern@mastodon.green

                      Imagine something that in 2020 didn't really exist but has so exploded onto our environment that in 2030 it will demand the water of 1.3 billion people and the electricity of 2 billion.

                      In a time when we have a global historic severe drought and when our civilization is about to collapse due to over-consumption of energy.

                      This is AI.

                      This is Big Tech

                      These are the tech bros. Here to burn it all down for greed and ambition.

                      https://news.un.org/en/story/2026/06/1167658

                      jnfrd@berlin.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                      jnfrd@berlin.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                      jnfrd@berlin.social
                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                      #17

                      @gerrymcgovern

                      „Rather, it calls for urgent action to ensure that the technology develops within planetary limits.“

                      And how is this feasible?

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • kumarvibe@mastodon.socialK kumarvibe@mastodon.social

                        @gerrymcgovern @patrickhadfield ironically, the Chinese are working hard to reverse engineer and distill all the frontier models into open weight models that everyone can run *locally* on high powered laptops, no data centers needed aside from initial distillation. It’s a weird thing to cheer for but I am.

                        susiarnott@mastodon.greenS This user is from outside of this forum
                        susiarnott@mastodon.greenS This user is from outside of this forum
                        susiarnott@mastodon.green
                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                        #18

                        @kumarvibe @gerrymcgovern @patrickhadfield
                        Don't fully understand this toot, but find it encouraging nonetheless. (Is this a sign of personal cognitive decline in my late sixties, out of interest?) #hellishdatacentres

                        6502alu@techhub.social6 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • gerrymcgovern@mastodon.greenG gerrymcgovern@mastodon.green

                          Imagine something that in 2020 didn't really exist but has so exploded onto our environment that in 2030 it will demand the water of 1.3 billion people and the electricity of 2 billion.

                          In a time when we have a global historic severe drought and when our civilization is about to collapse due to over-consumption of energy.

                          This is AI.

                          This is Big Tech

                          These are the tech bros. Here to burn it all down for greed and ambition.

                          https://news.un.org/en/story/2026/06/1167658

                          mamalake@beige.partyM This user is from outside of this forum
                          mamalake@beige.partyM This user is from outside of this forum
                          mamalake@beige.party
                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                          #19

                          @gerrymcgovern we are Easter Island

                          gerrymcgovern@mastodon.greenG 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • gerrymcgovern@mastodon.greenG gerrymcgovern@mastodon.green

                            Imagine something that in 2020 didn't really exist but has so exploded onto our environment that in 2030 it will demand the water of 1.3 billion people and the electricity of 2 billion.

                            In a time when we have a global historic severe drought and when our civilization is about to collapse due to over-consumption of energy.

                            This is AI.

                            This is Big Tech

                            These are the tech bros. Here to burn it all down for greed and ambition.

                            https://news.un.org/en/story/2026/06/1167658

                            jeanieburrell@mstdn.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                            jeanieburrell@mstdn.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                            jeanieburrell@mstdn.social
                            wrote sidst redigeret af
                            #20

                            @gerrymcgovern Humanity is no longer the apex predator, supreme in its domination. Big Tech is. And why more aren't conscious that makes us part of the AI's food chain is beyond me.

                            #NoAI

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • mamalake@beige.partyM mamalake@beige.party

                              @gerrymcgovern we are Easter Island

                              gerrymcgovern@mastodon.greenG This user is from outside of this forum
                              gerrymcgovern@mastodon.greenG This user is from outside of this forum
                              gerrymcgovern@mastodon.green
                              wrote sidst redigeret af
                              #21

                              @MamaLake It's the elites who are driving this but we are too passive, we must resist much more.

                              And from what I've read recently about Easter Island, the Indigenous people there managed their resources much better than what was thought. It was later invasions by imperialists that did the real damage.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • stephan324ppm@mastodon.no2nd.earthS stephan324ppm@mastodon.no2nd.earth

                                @gerrymcgovern I mean it‘s possible we get some improvements in medical diagnostics for instance - but I guess it’s a long way until billions of people benefit from this.

                                jeroenbosman@akademienl.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                jeroenbosman@akademienl.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                jeroenbosman@akademienl.social
                                wrote sidst redigeret af
                                #22

                                @stephan324ppm @gerrymcgovern As soon as genAI without any doubt improves either democracy or the environment or knowledge equity I will start doubting my own total genAI abstinence. Of course, if that happens, it will become clear that especially in the mid and long term you cannot foster one without the other two.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • susiarnott@mastodon.greenS susiarnott@mastodon.green

                                  @kumarvibe @gerrymcgovern @patrickhadfield
                                  Don't fully understand this toot, but find it encouraging nonetheless. (Is this a sign of personal cognitive decline in my late sixties, out of interest?) #hellishdatacentres

                                  6502alu@techhub.social6 This user is from outside of this forum
                                  6502alu@techhub.social6 This user is from outside of this forum
                                  6502alu@techhub.social
                                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                                  #23

                                  @SusiArnott @kumarvibe @gerrymcgovern @patrickhadfield

                                  https://www.mindstudio.ai/blog/ai-model-distillation-attacks-explained

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • gerrymcgovern@mastodon.greenG gerrymcgovern@mastodon.green

                                    Imagine something that in 2020 didn't really exist but has so exploded onto our environment that in 2030 it will demand the water of 1.3 billion people and the electricity of 2 billion.

                                    In a time when we have a global historic severe drought and when our civilization is about to collapse due to over-consumption of energy.

                                    This is AI.

                                    This is Big Tech

                                    These are the tech bros. Here to burn it all down for greed and ambition.

                                    https://news.un.org/en/story/2026/06/1167658

                                    gregalotl@c.imG This user is from outside of this forum
                                    gregalotl@c.imG This user is from outside of this forum
                                    gregalotl@c.im
                                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                                    #24

                                    @gerrymcgovern
                                    Can someone please explain to me how data centres will 'consume' so much water? There are plenty of energy intensive industries that have a heat dissipation need. If there's so much energy to dissipate put a fucking big heat exchanger out at sea and think about making them nursaries for fish/coral or something. It seems MAD to keep data centres where shifting the heat means single-use water. Use brine or molten salt or puréed billionaires in a closed loop heat exchanger near a heat sump where heat damage will be containable & acceptable.

                                    OR just say, "the price for that much AI is unsustainable. Sorry, but NO!"

                                    gerrymcgovern@mastodon.greenG ownohmanny@mastodon.ieO ponygirl@mastodon.socialP naturemc@mastodon.onlineN 4 Replies Last reply
                                    0
                                    • gregalotl@c.imG gregalotl@c.im

                                      @gerrymcgovern
                                      Can someone please explain to me how data centres will 'consume' so much water? There are plenty of energy intensive industries that have a heat dissipation need. If there's so much energy to dissipate put a fucking big heat exchanger out at sea and think about making them nursaries for fish/coral or something. It seems MAD to keep data centres where shifting the heat means single-use water. Use brine or molten salt or puréed billionaires in a closed loop heat exchanger near a heat sump where heat damage will be containable & acceptable.

                                      OR just say, "the price for that much AI is unsustainable. Sorry, but NO!"

                                      gerrymcgovern@mastodon.greenG This user is from outside of this forum
                                      gerrymcgovern@mastodon.greenG This user is from outside of this forum
                                      gerrymcgovern@mastodon.green
                                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                                      #25

                                      @gregalotl Up until a couple of years ago, most data centers didn't even meter their water use because they were getting it so cheap. Evaporation is the cheapest way to cool and they will always go for the cheapest unless they are forced not to. They have total contempt for our environment and for the communities in which they locate.

                                      gregalotl@c.imG 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • gregalotl@c.imG gregalotl@c.im

                                        @gerrymcgovern
                                        Can someone please explain to me how data centres will 'consume' so much water? There are plenty of energy intensive industries that have a heat dissipation need. If there's so much energy to dissipate put a fucking big heat exchanger out at sea and think about making them nursaries for fish/coral or something. It seems MAD to keep data centres where shifting the heat means single-use water. Use brine or molten salt or puréed billionaires in a closed loop heat exchanger near a heat sump where heat damage will be containable & acceptable.

                                        OR just say, "the price for that much AI is unsustainable. Sorry, but NO!"

                                        ownohmanny@mastodon.ieO This user is from outside of this forum
                                        ownohmanny@mastodon.ieO This user is from outside of this forum
                                        ownohmanny@mastodon.ie
                                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                                        #26

                                        @gregalotl @gerrymcgovern because capitalists don't care that the factors of their production are also ours. "Does water cool server racks?" X 10000

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • gregalotl@c.imG gregalotl@c.im

                                          @gerrymcgovern
                                          Can someone please explain to me how data centres will 'consume' so much water? There are plenty of energy intensive industries that have a heat dissipation need. If there's so much energy to dissipate put a fucking big heat exchanger out at sea and think about making them nursaries for fish/coral or something. It seems MAD to keep data centres where shifting the heat means single-use water. Use brine or molten salt or puréed billionaires in a closed loop heat exchanger near a heat sump where heat damage will be containable & acceptable.

                                          OR just say, "the price for that much AI is unsustainable. Sorry, but NO!"

                                          ponygirl@mastodon.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                                          ponygirl@mastodon.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                                          ponygirl@mastodon.social
                                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                                          #27

                                          @gregalotl @gerrymcgovern AI is anti-human.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Svar
                                          • Svar som emne
                                          Login for at svare
                                          • Ældste til nyeste
                                          • Nyeste til ældste
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Log ind

                                          • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          Graciously hosted by data.coop
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Hjem
                                          • Seneste
                                          • Etiketter
                                          • Populære
                                          • Verden
                                          • Bruger
                                          • Grupper