Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. Imagine something that in 2020 didn't really exist but has so exploded onto our environment that in 2030 it will demand the water of 1.3 billion people and the electricity of 2 billion.

Imagine something that in 2020 didn't really exist but has so exploded onto our environment that in 2030 it will demand the water of 1.3 billion people and the electricity of 2 billion.

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
39 Indlæg 24 Posters 63 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • myricagale@mastodon.scotM myricagale@mastodon.scot

    @stephan324ppm @gerrymcgovern Maybe he was misquoted and it was actually "billionaires and some other people" 😉

    stephan324ppm@mastodon.no2nd.earthS This user is from outside of this forum
    stephan324ppm@mastodon.no2nd.earthS This user is from outside of this forum
    stephan324ppm@mastodon.no2nd.earth
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #12

    @MyricaGale @gerrymcgovern Yes, definitely! 🙃

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • gerrymcgovern@mastodon.greenG gerrymcgovern@mastodon.green

      @stephan324ppm
      "improves the life of billions of people".

      Yeah, the UN report made that sort of evidence free tech optimistic statement as well. When it's more likely to be the very opposite.

      stephan324ppm@mastodon.no2nd.earthS This user is from outside of this forum
      stephan324ppm@mastodon.no2nd.earthS This user is from outside of this forum
      stephan324ppm@mastodon.no2nd.earth
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #13

      @gerrymcgovern I mean it‘s possible we get some improvements in medical diagnostics for instance - but I guess it’s a long way until billions of people benefit from this.

      nicovel0@mastodon.socialN jeroenbosman@akademienl.socialJ naturemc@mastodon.onlineN 3 Replies Last reply
      0
      • stephan324ppm@mastodon.no2nd.earthS stephan324ppm@mastodon.no2nd.earth

        @gerrymcgovern Interestingly I read an article in an Austrian newspaper about this topic - and the expert that was interviewed had the view, that one cannot damn AI alltogether because AI "improves the life of billions of people". Which made me wonder: what kind of improvements could this be? Ideas?
        https://www.derstandard.at/story/3000000323330/ki-rechenzentren-duerften-2030-einen-wasserverbrauch-wie-13-milliarden-menschen-haben

        ghostonthehalfshell@masto.aiG This user is from outside of this forum
        ghostonthehalfshell@masto.aiG This user is from outside of this forum
        ghostonthehalfshell@masto.ai
        wrote sidst redigeret af
        #14

        @stephan324ppm @gerrymcgovern

        That expert should’ve been fact checked.

        Billions of people? Get real.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • gerrymcgovern@mastodon.greenG gerrymcgovern@mastodon.green

          Imagine something that in 2020 didn't really exist but has so exploded onto our environment that in 2030 it will demand the water of 1.3 billion people and the electricity of 2 billion.

          In a time when we have a global historic severe drought and when our civilization is about to collapse due to over-consumption of energy.

          This is AI.

          This is Big Tech

          These are the tech bros. Here to burn it all down for greed and ambition.

          https://news.un.org/en/story/2026/06/1167658

          kumarvibe@mastodon.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
          kumarvibe@mastodon.socialK This user is from outside of this forum
          kumarvibe@mastodon.social
          wrote sidst redigeret af
          #15

          @gerrymcgovern @patrickhadfield ironically, the Chinese are working hard to reverse engineer and distill all the frontier models into open weight models that everyone can run *locally* on high powered laptops, no data centers needed aside from initial distillation. It’s a weird thing to cheer for but I am.

          susiarnott@mastodon.greenS 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • stephan324ppm@mastodon.no2nd.earthS stephan324ppm@mastodon.no2nd.earth

            @gerrymcgovern I mean it‘s possible we get some improvements in medical diagnostics for instance - but I guess it’s a long way until billions of people benefit from this.

            nicovel0@mastodon.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
            nicovel0@mastodon.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
            nicovel0@mastodon.social
            wrote sidst redigeret af
            #16

            @stephan324ppm @gerrymcgovern it’s also made vapid, content free LinkedIn posts much easier to write, so really no one is losing here.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • gerrymcgovern@mastodon.greenG gerrymcgovern@mastodon.green

              Imagine something that in 2020 didn't really exist but has so exploded onto our environment that in 2030 it will demand the water of 1.3 billion people and the electricity of 2 billion.

              In a time when we have a global historic severe drought and when our civilization is about to collapse due to over-consumption of energy.

              This is AI.

              This is Big Tech

              These are the tech bros. Here to burn it all down for greed and ambition.

              https://news.un.org/en/story/2026/06/1167658

              jnfrd@berlin.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
              jnfrd@berlin.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
              jnfrd@berlin.social
              wrote sidst redigeret af
              #17

              @gerrymcgovern

              „Rather, it calls for urgent action to ensure that the technology develops within planetary limits.“

              And how is this feasible?

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • kumarvibe@mastodon.socialK kumarvibe@mastodon.social

                @gerrymcgovern @patrickhadfield ironically, the Chinese are working hard to reverse engineer and distill all the frontier models into open weight models that everyone can run *locally* on high powered laptops, no data centers needed aside from initial distillation. It’s a weird thing to cheer for but I am.

                susiarnott@mastodon.greenS This user is from outside of this forum
                susiarnott@mastodon.greenS This user is from outside of this forum
                susiarnott@mastodon.green
                wrote sidst redigeret af
                #18

                @kumarvibe @gerrymcgovern @patrickhadfield
                Don't fully understand this toot, but find it encouraging nonetheless. (Is this a sign of personal cognitive decline in my late sixties, out of interest?) #hellishdatacentres

                6502alu@techhub.social6 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • gerrymcgovern@mastodon.greenG gerrymcgovern@mastodon.green

                  Imagine something that in 2020 didn't really exist but has so exploded onto our environment that in 2030 it will demand the water of 1.3 billion people and the electricity of 2 billion.

                  In a time when we have a global historic severe drought and when our civilization is about to collapse due to over-consumption of energy.

                  This is AI.

                  This is Big Tech

                  These are the tech bros. Here to burn it all down for greed and ambition.

                  https://news.un.org/en/story/2026/06/1167658

                  mamalake@beige.partyM This user is from outside of this forum
                  mamalake@beige.partyM This user is from outside of this forum
                  mamalake@beige.party
                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                  #19

                  @gerrymcgovern we are Easter Island

                  gerrymcgovern@mastodon.greenG 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • gerrymcgovern@mastodon.greenG gerrymcgovern@mastodon.green

                    Imagine something that in 2020 didn't really exist but has so exploded onto our environment that in 2030 it will demand the water of 1.3 billion people and the electricity of 2 billion.

                    In a time when we have a global historic severe drought and when our civilization is about to collapse due to over-consumption of energy.

                    This is AI.

                    This is Big Tech

                    These are the tech bros. Here to burn it all down for greed and ambition.

                    https://news.un.org/en/story/2026/06/1167658

                    jeanieburrell@mstdn.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                    jeanieburrell@mstdn.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                    jeanieburrell@mstdn.social
                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                    #20

                    @gerrymcgovern Humanity is no longer the apex predator, supreme in its domination. Big Tech is. And why more aren't conscious that makes us part of the AI's food chain is beyond me.

                    #NoAI

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • mamalake@beige.partyM mamalake@beige.party

                      @gerrymcgovern we are Easter Island

                      gerrymcgovern@mastodon.greenG This user is from outside of this forum
                      gerrymcgovern@mastodon.greenG This user is from outside of this forum
                      gerrymcgovern@mastodon.green
                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                      #21

                      @MamaLake It's the elites who are driving this but we are too passive, we must resist much more.

                      And from what I've read recently about Easter Island, the Indigenous people there managed their resources much better than what was thought. It was later invasions by imperialists that did the real damage.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • stephan324ppm@mastodon.no2nd.earthS stephan324ppm@mastodon.no2nd.earth

                        @gerrymcgovern I mean it‘s possible we get some improvements in medical diagnostics for instance - but I guess it’s a long way until billions of people benefit from this.

                        jeroenbosman@akademienl.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                        jeroenbosman@akademienl.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                        jeroenbosman@akademienl.social
                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                        #22

                        @stephan324ppm @gerrymcgovern As soon as genAI without any doubt improves either democracy or the environment or knowledge equity I will start doubting my own total genAI abstinence. Of course, if that happens, it will become clear that especially in the mid and long term you cannot foster one without the other two.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • susiarnott@mastodon.greenS susiarnott@mastodon.green

                          @kumarvibe @gerrymcgovern @patrickhadfield
                          Don't fully understand this toot, but find it encouraging nonetheless. (Is this a sign of personal cognitive decline in my late sixties, out of interest?) #hellishdatacentres

                          6502alu@techhub.social6 This user is from outside of this forum
                          6502alu@techhub.social6 This user is from outside of this forum
                          6502alu@techhub.social
                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                          #23

                          @SusiArnott @kumarvibe @gerrymcgovern @patrickhadfield

                          https://www.mindstudio.ai/blog/ai-model-distillation-attacks-explained

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • gerrymcgovern@mastodon.greenG gerrymcgovern@mastodon.green

                            Imagine something that in 2020 didn't really exist but has so exploded onto our environment that in 2030 it will demand the water of 1.3 billion people and the electricity of 2 billion.

                            In a time when we have a global historic severe drought and when our civilization is about to collapse due to over-consumption of energy.

                            This is AI.

                            This is Big Tech

                            These are the tech bros. Here to burn it all down for greed and ambition.

                            https://news.un.org/en/story/2026/06/1167658

                            gregalotl@c.imG This user is from outside of this forum
                            gregalotl@c.imG This user is from outside of this forum
                            gregalotl@c.im
                            wrote sidst redigeret af
                            #24

                            @gerrymcgovern
                            Can someone please explain to me how data centres will 'consume' so much water? There are plenty of energy intensive industries that have a heat dissipation need. If there's so much energy to dissipate put a fucking big heat exchanger out at sea and think about making them nursaries for fish/coral or something. It seems MAD to keep data centres where shifting the heat means single-use water. Use brine or molten salt or puréed billionaires in a closed loop heat exchanger near a heat sump where heat damage will be containable & acceptable.

                            OR just say, "the price for that much AI is unsustainable. Sorry, but NO!"

                            gerrymcgovern@mastodon.greenG ownohmanny@mastodon.ieO ponygirl@mastodon.socialP naturemc@mastodon.onlineN 4 Replies Last reply
                            0
                            • gregalotl@c.imG gregalotl@c.im

                              @gerrymcgovern
                              Can someone please explain to me how data centres will 'consume' so much water? There are plenty of energy intensive industries that have a heat dissipation need. If there's so much energy to dissipate put a fucking big heat exchanger out at sea and think about making them nursaries for fish/coral or something. It seems MAD to keep data centres where shifting the heat means single-use water. Use brine or molten salt or puréed billionaires in a closed loop heat exchanger near a heat sump where heat damage will be containable & acceptable.

                              OR just say, "the price for that much AI is unsustainable. Sorry, but NO!"

                              gerrymcgovern@mastodon.greenG This user is from outside of this forum
                              gerrymcgovern@mastodon.greenG This user is from outside of this forum
                              gerrymcgovern@mastodon.green
                              wrote sidst redigeret af
                              #25

                              @gregalotl Up until a couple of years ago, most data centers didn't even meter their water use because they were getting it so cheap. Evaporation is the cheapest way to cool and they will always go for the cheapest unless they are forced not to. They have total contempt for our environment and for the communities in which they locate.

                              gregalotl@c.imG 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • gregalotl@c.imG gregalotl@c.im

                                @gerrymcgovern
                                Can someone please explain to me how data centres will 'consume' so much water? There are plenty of energy intensive industries that have a heat dissipation need. If there's so much energy to dissipate put a fucking big heat exchanger out at sea and think about making them nursaries for fish/coral or something. It seems MAD to keep data centres where shifting the heat means single-use water. Use brine or molten salt or puréed billionaires in a closed loop heat exchanger near a heat sump where heat damage will be containable & acceptable.

                                OR just say, "the price for that much AI is unsustainable. Sorry, but NO!"

                                ownohmanny@mastodon.ieO This user is from outside of this forum
                                ownohmanny@mastodon.ieO This user is from outside of this forum
                                ownohmanny@mastodon.ie
                                wrote sidst redigeret af
                                #26

                                @gregalotl @gerrymcgovern because capitalists don't care that the factors of their production are also ours. "Does water cool server racks?" X 10000

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • gregalotl@c.imG gregalotl@c.im

                                  @gerrymcgovern
                                  Can someone please explain to me how data centres will 'consume' so much water? There are plenty of energy intensive industries that have a heat dissipation need. If there's so much energy to dissipate put a fucking big heat exchanger out at sea and think about making them nursaries for fish/coral or something. It seems MAD to keep data centres where shifting the heat means single-use water. Use brine or molten salt or puréed billionaires in a closed loop heat exchanger near a heat sump where heat damage will be containable & acceptable.

                                  OR just say, "the price for that much AI is unsustainable. Sorry, but NO!"

                                  ponygirl@mastodon.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                                  ponygirl@mastodon.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                                  ponygirl@mastodon.social
                                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                                  #27

                                  @gregalotl @gerrymcgovern AI is anti-human.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • gerrymcgovern@mastodon.greenG gerrymcgovern@mastodon.green

                                    @gregalotl Up until a couple of years ago, most data centers didn't even meter their water use because they were getting it so cheap. Evaporation is the cheapest way to cool and they will always go for the cheapest unless they are forced not to. They have total contempt for our environment and for the communities in which they locate.

                                    gregalotl@c.imG This user is from outside of this forum
                                    gregalotl@c.imG This user is from outside of this forum
                                    gregalotl@c.im
                                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                                    #28

                                    @gerrymcgovern
                                    OR just say...NO!

                                    EU style legislation - freedom, but WITH RESPONSIBILITY

                                    US, run by deluded, selfish zealots

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • gerrymcgovern@mastodon.greenG gerrymcgovern@mastodon.green

                                      Imagine something that in 2020 didn't really exist but has so exploded onto our environment that in 2030 it will demand the water of 1.3 billion people and the electricity of 2 billion.

                                      In a time when we have a global historic severe drought and when our civilization is about to collapse due to over-consumption of energy.

                                      This is AI.

                                      This is Big Tech

                                      These are the tech bros. Here to burn it all down for greed and ambition.

                                      https://news.un.org/en/story/2026/06/1167658

                                      gerrymcgovern@mastodon.greenG This user is from outside of this forum
                                      gerrymcgovern@mastodon.greenG This user is from outside of this forum
                                      gerrymcgovern@mastodon.green
                                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                                      #29

                                      "AI is becoming something much larger. It is becoming one of the most important energy stories of the decade."

                                      So says Big Oil

                                      AI is an energy industry play.

                                      "The scale of demand is extraordinary."

                                      AI is a life destroyer. If you use AI, you are an active participant in the destruction of life--including your own.

                                      naturemc@mastodon.onlineN 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • sebastian@social.itu.dkS sebastian@social.itu.dk shared this topic
                                      • gregalotl@c.imG gregalotl@c.im

                                        @gerrymcgovern
                                        Can someone please explain to me how data centres will 'consume' so much water? There are plenty of energy intensive industries that have a heat dissipation need. If there's so much energy to dissipate put a fucking big heat exchanger out at sea and think about making them nursaries for fish/coral or something. It seems MAD to keep data centres where shifting the heat means single-use water. Use brine or molten salt or puréed billionaires in a closed loop heat exchanger near a heat sump where heat damage will be containable & acceptable.

                                        OR just say, "the price for that much AI is unsustainable. Sorry, but NO!"

                                        naturemc@mastodon.onlineN This user is from outside of this forum
                                        naturemc@mastodon.onlineN This user is from outside of this forum
                                        naturemc@mastodon.online
                                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                                        #30

                                        @gregalotl "out at sea": the ocean life is extremely sensitive to the smallest temperature changes ... but your idea of pureed billionaires has good vibes. 😁
                                        @gerrymcgovern

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • gerrymcgovern@mastodon.greenG gerrymcgovern@mastodon.green

                                          "AI is becoming something much larger. It is becoming one of the most important energy stories of the decade."

                                          So says Big Oil

                                          AI is an energy industry play.

                                          "The scale of demand is extraordinary."

                                          AI is a life destroyer. If you use AI, you are an active participant in the destruction of life--including your own.

                                          naturemc@mastodon.onlineN This user is from outside of this forum
                                          naturemc@mastodon.onlineN This user is from outside of this forum
                                          naturemc@mastodon.online
                                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                                          #31

                                          @gerrymcgovern I would differ between AI and AI, please. These datacenters are mostly for the popular uses of LLMs, GPTs and Diffusion models. This mass crap is the destroyer.

                                          But AI in the form of MLs (Machine learning) is a part of science. We wouldn't have modern climate science, if we had no ML which is part of AI! Would you really want to condemn scientists for doing this work?

                                          markhburton@mstdn.socialM sebastian@mastodon.ccS 2 Replies Last reply
                                          0
                                          Svar
                                          • Svar som emne
                                          Login for at svare
                                          • Ældste til nyeste
                                          • Nyeste til ældste
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Log ind

                                          • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          Graciously hosted by data.coop
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Hjem
                                          • Seneste
                                          • Etiketter
                                          • Populære
                                          • Verden
                                          • Bruger
                                          • Grupper