Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. hey so about your favorite boy hank green.

hey so about your favorite boy hank green.

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
151 Indlæg 57 Posters 0 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • davidgerard@circumstances.runD davidgerard@circumstances.run

    @zzt @pixx pixx is posting without reading

    pixx@merveilles.townP This user is from outside of this forum
    pixx@merveilles.townP This user is from outside of this forum
    pixx@merveilles.town
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #118

    @davidgerard @zzt

    No, I was misreading. The phrasing of OP implied to me that the linked post had evidence for the tiktok cult thing, not the hank green claim.

    *reads linked post*

    and, having read through the linked post and the WaPo article, I don't see anything in there beyond "he did a single video which was a disclosed sponsorship", while also doing other videos where he said he disagrees with it?

    Certainly doesn't look good but this feels very much like "internet people being internet people and turning everything into the worst possible version of reality"

    zzt@mas.toZ 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • michaeltbacon@social.coopM michaeltbacon@social.coop

      @zzt @davidgerard

      Shame on Green, but if I permanently banned everyone on the internet who did something colossally stupid or bought into some terrible narrative before, I would have no one but a couple of totally insufferable arseholes and some teenagers who joined the internet yesterday to talk to. (And folk wouldn’t talk to me either)

      memeticist@jorts.horseM This user is from outside of this forum
      memeticist@jorts.horseM This user is from outside of this forum
      memeticist@jorts.horse
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #119

      @MichaelTBacon @zzt @davidgerard getting the feeling you ought not talk to teenagers

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • emenel@post.lurk.orgE emenel@post.lurk.org

        @davidgerard @noodlemaz @noiseician @ireneista @zzt tescrealism is always inextricable from eugenics. if you believe the entire universe can be calculated and optimized then you also believe that the differences between people can be calculated and optimized.

        iain@kolektiva.socialI This user is from outside of this forum
        iain@kolektiva.socialI This user is from outside of this forum
        iain@kolektiva.social
        wrote sidst redigeret af
        #120

        @emenel @davidgerard @noodlemaz @noiseician @ireneista @zzt the whole of tech is just eugenics. Stanford sort of started as a eugenics project

        iain@kolektiva.socialI 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • iain@kolektiva.socialI iain@kolektiva.social

          @emenel @davidgerard @noodlemaz @noiseician @ireneista @zzt the whole of tech is just eugenics. Stanford sort of started as a eugenics project

          iain@kolektiva.socialI This user is from outside of this forum
          iain@kolektiva.socialI This user is from outside of this forum
          iain@kolektiva.social
          wrote sidst redigeret af
          #121

          @emenel @davidgerard @noodlemaz @noiseician @ireneista @zzt I say “sort of” because each of the three founders had different plans - technical college, psychic university and eugenics science. The eugenics guy won

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • zzt@mas.toZ zzt@mas.to

            @davidgerard and while we’re here: don’t take Green’s apology at face value. he’s paid to influence you. LLM addiction is a convenient out, especially if he suspects the jig is up.

            keep in mind that this guy got paid to get you interested in something that he now says is addictive. that thing is additionally a known vector for misinformation. he has done damage. he has more than enough resources and knowledge to try and undo some of that damage.

            until Hank Green materially fixes some of the damage caused by LLMs, generative AI, and his promotion of them, you shouldn’t accept his current apology or any apology he makes in the future. if he makes vague motions in the direction of fixing some of it, don’t underestimate the severity of the damage. do not forgive this man unless and until he does something real.

            this isn’t a high bar, it’s common decency. I don’t think he’s gonna manage.

            bms@mastodon.bsd.cafeB This user is from outside of this forum
            bms@mastodon.bsd.cafeB This user is from outside of this forum
            bms@mastodon.bsd.cafe
            wrote sidst redigeret af
            #122

            @zzt @davidgerard Solid copy

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • C checkmite@indieweb.social

              @bms @davidgerard @ireneista @noiseician @zzt Operation Clambake! Now that takes me back. First newsgroup I ever subscribed to.

              patrick_h_lauke@mastodon.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
              patrick_h_lauke@mastodon.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
              patrick_h_lauke@mastodon.social
              wrote sidst redigeret af
              #123

              @checkmite @bms @davidgerard @ireneista @noiseician @zzt WHAT ARE YOUR CRIMES...ARE YOU UPSTAT?

              patrick_h_lauke@mastodon.socialP 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • patrick_h_lauke@mastodon.socialP patrick_h_lauke@mastodon.social

                @checkmite @bms @davidgerard @ireneista @noiseician @zzt WHAT ARE YOUR CRIMES...ARE YOU UPSTAT?

                patrick_h_lauke@mastodon.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                patrick_h_lauke@mastodon.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                patrick_h_lauke@mastodon.social
                wrote sidst redigeret af
                #124

                @checkmite @bms @davidgerard @ireneista @noiseician @zzt memories of walking past the scientology building in zurich's lochergut coming back from a night out in town, and seeing some poor suckers sitting at the front reception desk at like 2am

                davidgerard@circumstances.runD 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • emenel@post.lurk.orgE emenel@post.lurk.org

                  @davidgerard @noodlemaz @noiseician @ireneista @zzt tescrealism is always inextricable from eugenics. if you believe the entire universe can be calculated and optimized then you also believe that the differences between people can be calculated and optimized.

                  cstross@wandering.shopC This user is from outside of this forum
                  cstross@wandering.shopC This user is from outside of this forum
                  cstross@wandering.shop
                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                  #125

                  @emenel @davidgerard @noodlemaz @noiseician @ireneista @zzt TESCREAL is also predicated on the same organizing assumptions as post-Nicean Christianity. It's a syncretistic religion following the same design pattern, minus God and Jesus. Conclusion: Christianity gave rise to eugenics and racism (and also animal cruelty via the doctrine of mind/body dualism, animals don't have "souls", but I digress).

                  davidgerard@circumstances.runD 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • cstross@wandering.shopC cstross@wandering.shop

                    @emenel @davidgerard @noodlemaz @noiseician @ireneista @zzt TESCREAL is also predicated on the same organizing assumptions as post-Nicean Christianity. It's a syncretistic religion following the same design pattern, minus God and Jesus. Conclusion: Christianity gave rise to eugenics and racism (and also animal cruelty via the doctrine of mind/body dualism, animals don't have "souls", but I digress).

                    davidgerard@circumstances.runD This user is from outside of this forum
                    davidgerard@circumstances.runD This user is from outside of this forum
                    davidgerard@circumstances.run
                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                    #126

                    @cstross @emenel @noodlemaz @noiseician @ireneista @zzt Roko's basilisk was a good go at a vengeful Yahweh, complete with the detail that the basilisk is the *good* AI torturing you out of ethical necessity

                    cstross@wandering.shopC 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • patrick_h_lauke@mastodon.socialP patrick_h_lauke@mastodon.social

                      @checkmite @bms @davidgerard @ireneista @noiseician @zzt memories of walking past the scientology building in zurich's lochergut coming back from a night out in town, and seeing some poor suckers sitting at the front reception desk at like 2am

                      davidgerard@circumstances.runD This user is from outside of this forum
                      davidgerard@circumstances.runD This user is from outside of this forum
                      davidgerard@circumstances.run
                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                      #127

                      @patrick_h_lauke @checkmite @bms @ireneista @noiseician @zzt my old site is still up https://suburbia.net/~fun/scn/

                      the days when 7MB was a large website, not a large web page

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • davidgerard@circumstances.runD davidgerard@circumstances.run

                        @cstross @emenel @noodlemaz @noiseician @ireneista @zzt Roko's basilisk was a good go at a vengeful Yahweh, complete with the detail that the basilisk is the *good* AI torturing you out of ethical necessity

                        cstross@wandering.shopC This user is from outside of this forum
                        cstross@wandering.shopC This user is from outside of this forum
                        cstross@wandering.shop
                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                        #128

                        @davidgerard Eh? My take was that Roko's Basilisk was Calvinist Satan, punishing people for eternity because they were predestined for punishment for not being one of the Elect who were Saved because [incomprehensible belief-based selection process].

                        davidgerard@circumstances.runD 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • davidgerard@circumstances.runD davidgerard@circumstances.run

                          @noodlemaz @noiseician @ireneista @zzt I do! It's "More Everything Forever" by Adam Becker and it's the book I was failing to write over 2018-2021!

                          peter@thepit.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                          peter@thepit.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                          peter@thepit.social
                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                          #129

                          @davidgerard @noodlemaz @noiseician @ireneista @zzt jumping in to add that if you like listening to podcasts, Behind the Bastards has a great series of episodes on the Zizians that gets into the weeds on Less Wrong and the Bay area rationalists. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9mJAerUL-7w

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • cstross@wandering.shopC cstross@wandering.shop

                            @davidgerard Eh? My take was that Roko's Basilisk was Calvinist Satan, punishing people for eternity because they were predestined for punishment for not being one of the Elect who were Saved because [incomprehensible belief-based selection process].

                            davidgerard@circumstances.runD This user is from outside of this forum
                            davidgerard@circumstances.runD This user is from outside of this forum
                            davidgerard@circumstances.run
                            wrote sidst redigeret af
                            #130

                            @cstross oh no, Roko is very clear that this is the Coherent Extrapolated Volition (CEV), the AI charged with preserving human value, the *good* AI that was Yudkowsky's goal

                            that's why it upset so many rationalists, it was an extrapolation of Yudkowsky's actual goal to disaster

                            rubinjoni@mastodon.socialR passenger@kolektiva.socialP oggie@woof.groupO 3 Replies Last reply
                            0
                            • davidgerard@circumstances.runD davidgerard@circumstances.run

                              @cstross oh no, Roko is very clear that this is the Coherent Extrapolated Volition (CEV), the AI charged with preserving human value, the *good* AI that was Yudkowsky's goal

                              that's why it upset so many rationalists, it was an extrapolation of Yudkowsky's actual goal to disaster

                              rubinjoni@mastodon.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
                              rubinjoni@mastodon.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
                              rubinjoni@mastodon.social
                              wrote sidst redigeret af
                              #131

                              @davidgerard @cstross It's very silly.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • davidgerard@circumstances.runD davidgerard@circumstances.run

                                @cstross oh no, Roko is very clear that this is the Coherent Extrapolated Volition (CEV), the AI charged with preserving human value, the *good* AI that was Yudkowsky's goal

                                that's why it upset so many rationalists, it was an extrapolation of Yudkowsky's actual goal to disaster

                                passenger@kolektiva.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                                passenger@kolektiva.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                                passenger@kolektiva.social
                                wrote sidst redigeret af
                                #132

                                @davidgerard @cstross

                                The basilisk also only punishes believers, which is kind of the opposite of what the god of Reformed Christianity does.

                                Hilariously, this doctrine falls squarely into one of the oldest traps of Christianity: if innocently ignorant nonbelievers aren't damned, then leaving them to their ignorance is the moral thing to do, right? By alleviating their ignorance you'll just create the possibility of their damnation.

                                That means that a faith which wants to spread via missionaries has to either believe that innocent ignorance is damnable, or else suppress this line of thought. Christianity chose the former, and Yudkowsky chose the latter.

                                cstross@wandering.shopC 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • passenger@kolektiva.socialP passenger@kolektiva.social

                                  @davidgerard @cstross

                                  The basilisk also only punishes believers, which is kind of the opposite of what the god of Reformed Christianity does.

                                  Hilariously, this doctrine falls squarely into one of the oldest traps of Christianity: if innocently ignorant nonbelievers aren't damned, then leaving them to their ignorance is the moral thing to do, right? By alleviating their ignorance you'll just create the possibility of their damnation.

                                  That means that a faith which wants to spread via missionaries has to either believe that innocent ignorance is damnable, or else suppress this line of thought. Christianity chose the former, and Yudkowsky chose the latter.

                                  cstross@wandering.shopC This user is from outside of this forum
                                  cstross@wandering.shopC This user is from outside of this forum
                                  cstross@wandering.shop
                                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                                  #133

                                  @passenger @davidgerard And then there are those of us atheists who were born into and grew up in non-Christian religions and think Christian dogma is hilarious wank.

                                  (Except when it's coming with pitchforks and torches to murder your community.)

                                  passenger@kolektiva.socialP 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • cstross@wandering.shopC cstross@wandering.shop

                                    @passenger @davidgerard And then there are those of us atheists who were born into and grew up in non-Christian religions and think Christian dogma is hilarious wank.

                                    (Except when it's coming with pitchforks and torches to murder your community.)

                                    passenger@kolektiva.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                                    passenger@kolektiva.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                                    passenger@kolektiva.social
                                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                                    #134

                                    @cstross @davidgerard

                                    As an atheist who grew up in a churchgoing family, I assure you that you cannot possibly think worse of Christianity than I do.

                                    cstross@wandering.shopC 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • passenger@kolektiva.socialP passenger@kolektiva.social

                                      @cstross @davidgerard

                                      As an atheist who grew up in a churchgoing family, I assure you that you cannot possibly think worse of Christianity than I do.

                                      cstross@wandering.shopC This user is from outside of this forum
                                      cstross@wandering.shopC This user is from outside of this forum
                                      cstross@wandering.shop
                                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                                      #135

                                      @passenger @davidgerard Self-identified Christians murdered most of my extended family two generations ago. (I recognize that not all Christians are murderers by inclination, but it's not the kind of thing you can un-see once you're aware of it.)

                                      passenger@kolektiva.socialP 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • cstross@wandering.shopC cstross@wandering.shop

                                        @passenger @davidgerard Self-identified Christians murdered most of my extended family two generations ago. (I recognize that not all Christians are murderers by inclination, but it's not the kind of thing you can un-see once you're aware of it.)

                                        passenger@kolektiva.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                                        passenger@kolektiva.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                                        passenger@kolektiva.social
                                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                                        #136

                                        @cstross @davidgerard

                                        My ancestors fled from Europe because they were the survivors of the massacres that Christians were carrying on against other Christians in Europe. The survivors were very much a minority.

                                        I don't want to downplay what your family went through. I can feel kinship for it.

                                        Did my ancestors learn from this that massacres are bad? No, they learned that their form of Christianity needed to become equally violent and oppressive, and they taught that violence and oppression to their kids. They became exactly the sort of people who would do the massacres in turn, and they did it in the name of Christ.

                                        Not everyone is a murderer by inclination, as you say. I think a lot of it has to be taught: you are taught to dehumanise the victims, and you are taught ways to manage your conscience. To do that sort of teaching properly takes generations, and having seen it up close I don't want it to remain extant.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • davidgerard@circumstances.runD davidgerard@circumstances.run

                                          @cstross oh no, Roko is very clear that this is the Coherent Extrapolated Volition (CEV), the AI charged with preserving human value, the *good* AI that was Yudkowsky's goal

                                          that's why it upset so many rationalists, it was an extrapolation of Yudkowsky's actual goal to disaster

                                          oggie@woof.groupO This user is from outside of this forum
                                          oggie@woof.groupO This user is from outside of this forum
                                          oggie@woof.group
                                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                                          #137

                                          @davidgerard @cstross

                                          Honestly the practical understanding (since it's actually impressive how little they end up reading of the things they've claimed to read) ends up feeling a whole lot like Maxwell's demon- literally.

                                          Letting the cool people in.

                                          The actual 'you will be tortured otherwise' seems to upset them enough to not dwell on it, and I definitely encountered a few that were simply 'It's just you don't get to hang out with the best' tier.

                                          Edgy pascal's wager, really.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Svar
                                          • Svar som emne
                                          Login for at svare
                                          • Ældste til nyeste
                                          • Nyeste til ældste
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Log ind

                                          • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          Graciously hosted by data.coop
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Hjem
                                          • Seneste
                                          • Etiketter
                                          • Populære
                                          • Verden
                                          • Bruger
                                          • Grupper