Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. One of the top threads on the ClaudeAI subreddit right now: "I am done with this shit" https://www.reddit.com/r/ClaudeAI/comments/1wm5c21/i_am_done_with_this_shit/

One of the top threads on the ClaudeAI subreddit right now: "I am done with this shit" https://www.reddit.com/r/ClaudeAI/comments/1wm5c21/i_am_done_with_this_shit/

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
79 Indlæg 46 Posters 0 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • cwebber@social.coopC cwebber@social.coop

    One of the top threads on the ClaudeAI subreddit right now: "I am done with this shit" https://www.reddit.com/r/ClaudeAI/comments/1wm5c21/i_am_done_with_this_shit/

    Curious to see just how much of the thread on a quite pro-genAI subreddit is people commiserating on the exhaustion of their work turning primarily into tedium and poor engineering.

    Bonus in that the Claude AI summary bot in the thread says:

    > The Rise of the Meat Proxy: You're not an engineer anymore, you're an "organic vessel designed to press enter." Or, as one user so poetically put it, you're just a condom between Claude and your production server getting fucked. Your only real job is to be the warm body they can blame when the AI slop inevitably breaks.

    G This user is from outside of this forum
    G This user is from outside of this forum
    guenther@chaos.social
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #38

    @cwebber i don't know what their problem is, my boss usually lets Claude raw-dog the production server over the weekend.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • emma@orbital.horseE emma@orbital.horse

      @pixelate @cwebber then you have to trust the model, the people hosting the model, the data being used in the model.

      pixelate@tweesecake.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
      pixelate@tweesecake.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
      pixelate@tweesecake.social
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #39

      @emma @cwebber I also have to trust a deterministic screen reader that says all kinds of wrong or unintelligible stuff every day because abled people won't care about accessibility, and I still have to get stuff done. I have to trust sighted people when they say turn left that they didn't actually mean turn right. Do you just simply trust all that you see and hear? Why do you think I also wouldn't?

      For LLM output specifically, I can ask another model, or I can simply enjoy the output of whatever cat picture I have it describe, or whatever meme, or even a continuous description of the view out of a bus window.

      benroyce@mastodon.socialB 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • imeddles@mastodon.eddmil.esI This user is from outside of this forum
        imeddles@mastodon.eddmil.esI This user is from outside of this forum
        imeddles@mastodon.eddmil.es
        wrote sidst redigeret af
        #40

        @Yamakyu @alice @cwebber "has no business going so hard" is also a fantastic review of good condoms, so it works on multiple levels.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • cwebber@social.coopC cwebber@social.coop

          One of the top threads on the ClaudeAI subreddit right now: "I am done with this shit" https://www.reddit.com/r/ClaudeAI/comments/1wm5c21/i_am_done_with_this_shit/

          Curious to see just how much of the thread on a quite pro-genAI subreddit is people commiserating on the exhaustion of their work turning primarily into tedium and poor engineering.

          Bonus in that the Claude AI summary bot in the thread says:

          > The Rise of the Meat Proxy: You're not an engineer anymore, you're an "organic vessel designed to press enter." Or, as one user so poetically put it, you're just a condom between Claude and your production server getting fucked. Your only real job is to be the warm body they can blame when the AI slop inevitably breaks.

          screwlisp@gamerplus.orgS This user is from outside of this forum
          screwlisp@gamerplus.orgS This user is from outside of this forum
          screwlisp@gamerplus.org
          wrote sidst redigeret af
          #41

          @cwebber as an outsider, from what I can tell having looked into it (well, not the reddit you just linked) initially the only way companies knew how to make putatively good chatbots was the extremely consumptive general pre-trained dense, large-model perceptrons of a single hidden layer.

          All these people optimistically jumped onto their bobsleds, not wanting to miss out.

          However once moved behind closed doors, the new multilayer perceptron ("moe") gpts benchmark while increasingly sucking.

          screwlisp@gamerplus.orgS 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • cwebber@social.coopC cwebber@social.coop

            One of the top threads on the ClaudeAI subreddit right now: "I am done with this shit" https://www.reddit.com/r/ClaudeAI/comments/1wm5c21/i_am_done_with_this_shit/

            Curious to see just how much of the thread on a quite pro-genAI subreddit is people commiserating on the exhaustion of their work turning primarily into tedium and poor engineering.

            Bonus in that the Claude AI summary bot in the thread says:

            > The Rise of the Meat Proxy: You're not an engineer anymore, you're an "organic vessel designed to press enter." Or, as one user so poetically put it, you're just a condom between Claude and your production server getting fucked. Your only real job is to be the warm body they can blame when the AI slop inevitably breaks.

            indigoparadox@mastodon.socialI This user is from outside of this forum
            indigoparadox@mastodon.socialI This user is from outside of this forum
            indigoparadox@mastodon.social
            wrote sidst redigeret af
            #42

            @cwebber Someone in that thread mentioned something called "AI 2027" and I found this: https://ai-2027.com/

            Obvious divergence w/ reality... all the fundamental weaknesses of the technology are fantasized away as it takes over the world.

            God this feels like NFTs again. They include "criticism" like "people hate AI because it'll take their jobs." No, people think you look dumb. Like a celeb posting "All my apes gone" on social media. It's at least partially irony-poisoned pity.

            indigoparadox@mastodon.socialI 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • indigoparadox@mastodon.socialI indigoparadox@mastodon.social

              @cwebber Someone in that thread mentioned something called "AI 2027" and I found this: https://ai-2027.com/

              Obvious divergence w/ reality... all the fundamental weaknesses of the technology are fantasized away as it takes over the world.

              God this feels like NFTs again. They include "criticism" like "people hate AI because it'll take their jobs." No, people think you look dumb. Like a celeb posting "All my apes gone" on social media. It's at least partially irony-poisoned pity.

              indigoparadox@mastodon.socialI This user is from outside of this forum
              indigoparadox@mastodon.socialI This user is from outside of this forum
              indigoparadox@mastodon.social
              wrote sidst redigeret af
              #43

              @cwebber I really maintain LLMs are like the microwave. There are some narrow specific uses where it's good, but holy shit we're still in the "True Believers trying to make Thanksgiving dinner with them" phase.

              jrdepriest@infosec.exchangeJ jpaskaruk@growers.socialJ 2 Replies Last reply
              0
              • pixelate@tweesecake.socialP pixelate@tweesecake.social

                @emma @cwebber I also have to trust a deterministic screen reader that says all kinds of wrong or unintelligible stuff every day because abled people won't care about accessibility, and I still have to get stuff done. I have to trust sighted people when they say turn left that they didn't actually mean turn right. Do you just simply trust all that you see and hear? Why do you think I also wouldn't?

                For LLM output specifically, I can ask another model, or I can simply enjoy the output of whatever cat picture I have it describe, or whatever meme, or even a continuous description of the view out of a bus window.

                benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                benroyce@mastodon.social
                wrote sidst redigeret af
                #44

                @pixelate @emma @cwebber

                i heard an interview about people using AI to reconstruct their voices lost to cancer/ injury/ etc with AI

                https://www.npr.org/2025/07/22/nx-s1-5449081/people-who-have-lost-their-voices-are-using-ai-technology-to-regain-them

                i also think things like protein folding/ cosmology/ etc can benefit from AI

                there are valid uses for AI

                there are also *invalid* uses for AI

                and we have a right to voice that, without confusing the topic with valid uses for AI

                ahltorp@mastodon.nuA mrfunkedude@beige.partyM 2 Replies Last reply
                0
                • indigoparadox@mastodon.socialI indigoparadox@mastodon.social

                  @cwebber I really maintain LLMs are like the microwave. There are some narrow specific uses where it's good, but holy shit we're still in the "True Believers trying to make Thanksgiving dinner with them" phase.

                  jrdepriest@infosec.exchangeJ This user is from outside of this forum
                  jrdepriest@infosec.exchangeJ This user is from outside of this forum
                  jrdepriest@infosec.exchange
                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                  #45

                  @indigoparadox @cwebber

                  In the Future All Food Will Be Cooked in a Microwave, and if You Can’t Deal With That Then You Need to Get Out of the Kitchen

                  indigoparadox@mastodon.socialI 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • jrdepriest@infosec.exchangeJ jrdepriest@infosec.exchange

                    @indigoparadox @cwebber

                    In the Future All Food Will Be Cooked in a Microwave, and if You Can’t Deal With That Then You Need to Get Out of the Kitchen

                    indigoparadox@mastodon.socialI This user is from outside of this forum
                    indigoparadox@mastodon.socialI This user is from outside of this forum
                    indigoparadox@mastodon.social
                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                    #46

                    @jrdepriest @cwebber I did a search in my history intending to find the article I stole the microwave idea from, but apparently it was a video. Anyway, yeah, it's a popular idea because it's so darn *apt*. We used to have one of those cookbooks floating around unused until it vanished, so it really hit home.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • screwlisp@gamerplus.orgS screwlisp@gamerplus.org

                      @cwebber as an outsider, from what I can tell having looked into it (well, not the reddit you just linked) initially the only way companies knew how to make putatively good chatbots was the extremely consumptive general pre-trained dense, large-model perceptrons of a single hidden layer.

                      All these people optimistically jumped onto their bobsleds, not wanting to miss out.

                      However once moved behind closed doors, the new multilayer perceptron ("moe") gpts benchmark while increasingly sucking.

                      screwlisp@gamerplus.orgS This user is from outside of this forum
                      screwlisp@gamerplus.orgS This user is from outside of this forum
                      screwlisp@gamerplus.org
                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                      #47

                      @cwebber Similarly, I think a lot of nontechnical people went into business (bought a restaurant) after appraising that closed-source chatbot bobsleds could handle numbers decisions for them, and a large number of those naieve customers futures have been ruined by the closed, proprietary nominally profiteering replacement chatbots they later got stuck with, presented as though it was the one they partnered with while being told the new chatbot "is even better".

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • benroyce@mastodon.socialB benroyce@mastodon.social

                        @pixelate @emma @cwebber

                        i heard an interview about people using AI to reconstruct their voices lost to cancer/ injury/ etc with AI

                        https://www.npr.org/2025/07/22/nx-s1-5449081/people-who-have-lost-their-voices-are-using-ai-technology-to-regain-them

                        i also think things like protein folding/ cosmology/ etc can benefit from AI

                        there are valid uses for AI

                        there are also *invalid* uses for AI

                        and we have a right to voice that, without confusing the topic with valid uses for AI

                        ahltorp@mastodon.nuA This user is from outside of this forum
                        ahltorp@mastodon.nuA This user is from outside of this forum
                        ahltorp@mastodon.nu
                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                        #48

                        @benroyce @pixelate @emma @cwebber The valid uses for AI are very seldom chatbot-based.

                        emma@orbital.horseE 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • ahltorp@mastodon.nuA ahltorp@mastodon.nu

                          @benroyce @pixelate @emma @cwebber The valid uses for AI are very seldom chatbot-based.

                          emma@orbital.horseE This user is from outside of this forum
                          emma@orbital.horseE This user is from outside of this forum
                          emma@orbital.horse
                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                          #49

                          @ahltorp

                          The phrase "valid uses" is doing a lot of heavy lifting in that sentence.

                          @benroyce@mastodon.social @pixelate @cwebber

                          pixelate@tweesecake.socialP 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • npars01@mstdn.socialN npars01@mstdn.social

                            @pinhman

                            AI is not profitable. The companies lose money each time their product is used.

                            The only people making money on this is the financial services sector trading stock & issuing huge loans on "possible, perhaps, maybe" future revenue AND the fossil fuel industry powering gas generators for data centers.

                            The product is loathed and user acceptance doesn't match the hype.

                            What sane business makes itself dependent on a supplier or vendor at high risk of going bankrupt?

                            @cwebber

                            dpflug@hachyderm.ioD This user is from outside of this forum
                            dpflug@hachyderm.ioD This user is from outside of this forum
                            dpflug@hachyderm.io
                            wrote sidst redigeret af
                            #50

                            @Npars01
                            Last I heard, nvidia were making off like bandits, but otherwise...
                            @pinhman @cwebber

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • aequitas@mastodon.gamedev.placeA aequitas@mastodon.gamedev.place

                              @cwebber Yup. The human is now the "accountability sink". Someone to blame when the AI fucks something up.

                              jmax@mastodon.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                              jmax@mastodon.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
                              jmax@mastodon.social
                              wrote sidst redigeret af
                              #51

                              @Aequitas @cwebber I myself am searching for a non-gendered alternative to "whipping boy", because that's the most graphic term for the position.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • benroyce@mastodon.socialB benroyce@mastodon.social

                                @pixelate @emma @cwebber

                                i heard an interview about people using AI to reconstruct their voices lost to cancer/ injury/ etc with AI

                                https://www.npr.org/2025/07/22/nx-s1-5449081/people-who-have-lost-their-voices-are-using-ai-technology-to-regain-them

                                i also think things like protein folding/ cosmology/ etc can benefit from AI

                                there are valid uses for AI

                                there are also *invalid* uses for AI

                                and we have a right to voice that, without confusing the topic with valid uses for AI

                                mrfunkedude@beige.partyM This user is from outside of this forum
                                mrfunkedude@beige.partyM This user is from outside of this forum
                                mrfunkedude@beige.party
                                wrote sidst redigeret af
                                #52

                                @benroyce @pixelate @emma @cwebber i’m not going to be surprised if once the bubble pops all of the useful tools that they tried bundling into one package and call it “AI“, becomes their own individual tools.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • alice@lgbtqia.spaceA alice@lgbtqia.space

                                  @cwebber "you're just a condom between Claude and your production server getting fucked" is the best description of modern software engineering I've read in a while.

                                  c0debabe@masto.hackers.townC This user is from outside of this forum
                                  c0debabe@masto.hackers.townC This user is from outside of this forum
                                  c0debabe@masto.hackers.town
                                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                                  #53

                                  @alice @cwebber omg I just cackled

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • emma@orbital.horseE emma@orbital.horse

                                    @ahltorp

                                    The phrase "valid uses" is doing a lot of heavy lifting in that sentence.

                                    @benroyce@mastodon.social @pixelate @cwebber

                                    pixelate@tweesecake.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                                    pixelate@tweesecake.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                                    pixelate@tweesecake.social
                                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                                    #54

                                    @emma @ahltorp @cwebber The phrase heavy lifting is doing a lot of heavy lifting in that sentence.

                                    benroyce@mastodon.socialB 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • pixelate@tweesecake.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                                      pixelate@tweesecake.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                                      pixelate@tweesecake.social
                                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                                      #55

                                      @Dangerous_beans @thegrumpyenby @cwebber You don't believe the United Nations? What's wrong with *you*? Typical sighted person. Do the work. https://www.un.org/esa/socdev/enable/comp500.htm

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • pixelate@tweesecake.socialP pixelate@tweesecake.social

                                        @emma @ahltorp @cwebber The phrase heavy lifting is doing a lot of heavy lifting in that sentence.

                                        benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                                        benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                                        benroyce@mastodon.social
                                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                                        #56

                                        @pixelate @emma @ahltorp @cwebber

                                        Devin:

                                        nobody has a problem with the disabled community using AI

                                        i celebrate those uses. we celebrate those uses

                                        our complaints are about all the uses of AI that harm society

                                        you know that. you understand that difference

                                        so there is no need to fake a conflict that does not exist

                                        pixelate@tweesecake.socialP 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • pixelate@tweesecake.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                                          pixelate@tweesecake.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                                          pixelate@tweesecake.social
                                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                                          #57

                                          @Dangerous_beans @thegrumpyenby @cwebber My screen reader read it, thank you.

                                          > Whereas the concept of a special regime for certain groups has been developed during the last few years by the UN the human rights and fundamental freedoms of marginalized and vulnerable people remain vastly underserved. Persons with disabilities are often affected by this lack of protection, as many of them suffer double or multiple discrimination, due to their disability, their age and social status, for instance.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Svar
                                          • Svar som emne
                                          Login for at svare
                                          • Ældste til nyeste
                                          • Nyeste til ældste
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Log ind

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          Graciously hosted by data.coop
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Hjem
                                          • Seneste
                                          • Etiketter
                                          • Populære
                                          • Verden
                                          • Bruger
                                          • Grupper