Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. One of the top threads on the ClaudeAI subreddit right now: "I am done with this shit" https://www.reddit.com/r/ClaudeAI/comments/1wm5c21/i_am_done_with_this_shit/

One of the top threads on the ClaudeAI subreddit right now: "I am done with this shit" https://www.reddit.com/r/ClaudeAI/comments/1wm5c21/i_am_done_with_this_shit/

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
79 Indlæg 46 Posters 0 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • jrdepriest@infosec.exchangeJ jrdepriest@infosec.exchange

    @indigoparadox @cwebber

    In the Future All Food Will Be Cooked in a Microwave, and if You Can’t Deal With That Then You Need to Get Out of the Kitchen

    indigoparadox@mastodon.socialI This user is from outside of this forum
    indigoparadox@mastodon.socialI This user is from outside of this forum
    indigoparadox@mastodon.social
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #46

    @jrdepriest @cwebber I did a search in my history intending to find the article I stole the microwave idea from, but apparently it was a video. Anyway, yeah, it's a popular idea because it's so darn *apt*. We used to have one of those cookbooks floating around unused until it vanished, so it really hit home.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • screwlisp@gamerplus.orgS screwlisp@gamerplus.org

      @cwebber as an outsider, from what I can tell having looked into it (well, not the reddit you just linked) initially the only way companies knew how to make putatively good chatbots was the extremely consumptive general pre-trained dense, large-model perceptrons of a single hidden layer.

      All these people optimistically jumped onto their bobsleds, not wanting to miss out.

      However once moved behind closed doors, the new multilayer perceptron ("moe") gpts benchmark while increasingly sucking.

      screwlisp@gamerplus.orgS This user is from outside of this forum
      screwlisp@gamerplus.orgS This user is from outside of this forum
      screwlisp@gamerplus.org
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #47

      @cwebber Similarly, I think a lot of nontechnical people went into business (bought a restaurant) after appraising that closed-source chatbot bobsleds could handle numbers decisions for them, and a large number of those naieve customers futures have been ruined by the closed, proprietary nominally profiteering replacement chatbots they later got stuck with, presented as though it was the one they partnered with while being told the new chatbot "is even better".

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • benroyce@mastodon.socialB benroyce@mastodon.social

        @pixelate @emma @cwebber

        i heard an interview about people using AI to reconstruct their voices lost to cancer/ injury/ etc with AI

        https://www.npr.org/2025/07/22/nx-s1-5449081/people-who-have-lost-their-voices-are-using-ai-technology-to-regain-them

        i also think things like protein folding/ cosmology/ etc can benefit from AI

        there are valid uses for AI

        there are also *invalid* uses for AI

        and we have a right to voice that, without confusing the topic with valid uses for AI

        ahltorp@mastodon.nuA This user is from outside of this forum
        ahltorp@mastodon.nuA This user is from outside of this forum
        ahltorp@mastodon.nu
        wrote sidst redigeret af
        #48

        @benroyce @pixelate @emma @cwebber The valid uses for AI are very seldom chatbot-based.

        emma@orbital.horseE 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • ahltorp@mastodon.nuA ahltorp@mastodon.nu

          @benroyce @pixelate @emma @cwebber The valid uses for AI are very seldom chatbot-based.

          emma@orbital.horseE This user is from outside of this forum
          emma@orbital.horseE This user is from outside of this forum
          emma@orbital.horse
          wrote sidst redigeret af
          #49

          @ahltorp

          The phrase "valid uses" is doing a lot of heavy lifting in that sentence.

          @benroyce@mastodon.social @pixelate @cwebber

          pixelate@tweesecake.socialP 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • npars01@mstdn.socialN npars01@mstdn.social

            @pinhman

            AI is not profitable. The companies lose money each time their product is used.

            The only people making money on this is the financial services sector trading stock & issuing huge loans on "possible, perhaps, maybe" future revenue AND the fossil fuel industry powering gas generators for data centers.

            The product is loathed and user acceptance doesn't match the hype.

            What sane business makes itself dependent on a supplier or vendor at high risk of going bankrupt?

            @cwebber

            dpflug@hachyderm.ioD This user is from outside of this forum
            dpflug@hachyderm.ioD This user is from outside of this forum
            dpflug@hachyderm.io
            wrote sidst redigeret af
            #50

            @Npars01
            Last I heard, nvidia were making off like bandits, but otherwise...
            @pinhman @cwebber

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • aequitas@mastodon.gamedev.placeA aequitas@mastodon.gamedev.place

              @cwebber Yup. The human is now the "accountability sink". Someone to blame when the AI fucks something up.

              jmax@mastodon.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
              jmax@mastodon.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
              jmax@mastodon.social
              wrote sidst redigeret af
              #51

              @Aequitas @cwebber I myself am searching for a non-gendered alternative to "whipping boy", because that's the most graphic term for the position.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • benroyce@mastodon.socialB benroyce@mastodon.social

                @pixelate @emma @cwebber

                i heard an interview about people using AI to reconstruct their voices lost to cancer/ injury/ etc with AI

                https://www.npr.org/2025/07/22/nx-s1-5449081/people-who-have-lost-their-voices-are-using-ai-technology-to-regain-them

                i also think things like protein folding/ cosmology/ etc can benefit from AI

                there are valid uses for AI

                there are also *invalid* uses for AI

                and we have a right to voice that, without confusing the topic with valid uses for AI

                mrfunkedude@beige.partyM This user is from outside of this forum
                mrfunkedude@beige.partyM This user is from outside of this forum
                mrfunkedude@beige.party
                wrote sidst redigeret af
                #52

                @benroyce @pixelate @emma @cwebber i’m not going to be surprised if once the bubble pops all of the useful tools that they tried bundling into one package and call it “AI“, becomes their own individual tools.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • alice@lgbtqia.spaceA alice@lgbtqia.space

                  @cwebber "you're just a condom between Claude and your production server getting fucked" is the best description of modern software engineering I've read in a while.

                  c0debabe@masto.hackers.townC This user is from outside of this forum
                  c0debabe@masto.hackers.townC This user is from outside of this forum
                  c0debabe@masto.hackers.town
                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                  #53

                  @alice @cwebber omg I just cackled

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • emma@orbital.horseE emma@orbital.horse

                    @ahltorp

                    The phrase "valid uses" is doing a lot of heavy lifting in that sentence.

                    @benroyce@mastodon.social @pixelate @cwebber

                    pixelate@tweesecake.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                    pixelate@tweesecake.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                    pixelate@tweesecake.social
                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                    #54

                    @emma @ahltorp @cwebber The phrase heavy lifting is doing a lot of heavy lifting in that sentence.

                    benroyce@mastodon.socialB 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • pixelate@tweesecake.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                      pixelate@tweesecake.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                      pixelate@tweesecake.social
                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                      #55

                      @Dangerous_beans @thegrumpyenby @cwebber You don't believe the United Nations? What's wrong with *you*? Typical sighted person. Do the work. https://www.un.org/esa/socdev/enable/comp500.htm

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • pixelate@tweesecake.socialP pixelate@tweesecake.social

                        @emma @ahltorp @cwebber The phrase heavy lifting is doing a lot of heavy lifting in that sentence.

                        benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                        benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                        benroyce@mastodon.social
                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                        #56

                        @pixelate @emma @ahltorp @cwebber

                        Devin:

                        nobody has a problem with the disabled community using AI

                        i celebrate those uses. we celebrate those uses

                        our complaints are about all the uses of AI that harm society

                        you know that. you understand that difference

                        so there is no need to fake a conflict that does not exist

                        pixelate@tweesecake.socialP 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • pixelate@tweesecake.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                          pixelate@tweesecake.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                          pixelate@tweesecake.social
                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                          #57

                          @Dangerous_beans @thegrumpyenby @cwebber My screen reader read it, thank you.

                          > Whereas the concept of a special regime for certain groups has been developed during the last few years by the UN the human rights and fundamental freedoms of marginalized and vulnerable people remain vastly underserved. Persons with disabilities are often affected by this lack of protection, as many of them suffer double or multiple discrimination, due to their disability, their age and social status, for instance.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • benroyce@mastodon.socialB benroyce@mastodon.social

                            @pixelate @emma @ahltorp @cwebber

                            Devin:

                            nobody has a problem with the disabled community using AI

                            i celebrate those uses. we celebrate those uses

                            our complaints are about all the uses of AI that harm society

                            you know that. you understand that difference

                            so there is no need to fake a conflict that does not exist

                            pixelate@tweesecake.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                            pixelate@tweesecake.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                            pixelate@tweesecake.social
                            wrote sidst redigeret af
                            #58

                            @benroyce @emma @ahltorp @cwebber Did you read the part where I simply commented on how I use AI, and some one came at me for it?

                            benroyce@mastodon.socialB 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • pixelate@tweesecake.socialP pixelate@tweesecake.social

                              @benroyce @emma @ahltorp @cwebber Did you read the part where I simply commented on how I use AI, and some one came at me for it?

                              benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                              benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                              benroyce@mastodon.social
                              wrote sidst redigeret af
                              #59

                              @pixelate @emma @ahltorp @cwebber

                              what i saw was you defending your use of AI, and not indicating that you do that because you are disabled

                              after their remark, *then* you indicated that

                              that's miscommunication, not malice

                              pixelate@tweesecake.socialP 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • benroyce@mastodon.socialB benroyce@mastodon.social

                                @pixelate @emma @ahltorp @cwebber

                                what i saw was you defending your use of AI, and not indicating that you do that because you are disabled

                                after their remark, *then* you indicated that

                                that's miscommunication, not malice

                                pixelate@tweesecake.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                                pixelate@tweesecake.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                                pixelate@tweesecake.social
                                wrote sidst redigeret af
                                #60

                                @benroyce @emma @ahltorp @cwebber Wait, are you not seeing the :blind: in my display name?

                                benroyce@mastodon.socialB 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • pixelate@tweesecake.socialP pixelate@tweesecake.social

                                  @benroyce @emma @ahltorp @cwebber Wait, are you not seeing the :blind: in my display name?

                                  benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                                  benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                                  benroyce@mastodon.social
                                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                                  #61

                                  @pixelate @emma @ahltorp @cwebber

                                  yes

                                  and you did not in your initial remark indicate you being blind was the reason for your AI use

                                  "but that's obvious!"

                                  ok. but can we at least say the initial conflict was about defending AI? and that people dislike that? and that if they put in the effort, they might be able to deduce why you are saying what you are saying. but this means the disagreement is simply about miscommunication and not malice?

                                  pixelate@tweesecake.socialP 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • benroyce@mastodon.socialB benroyce@mastodon.social

                                    @pixelate @emma @ahltorp @cwebber

                                    yes

                                    and you did not in your initial remark indicate you being blind was the reason for your AI use

                                    "but that's obvious!"

                                    ok. but can we at least say the initial conflict was about defending AI? and that people dislike that? and that if they put in the effort, they might be able to deduce why you are saying what you are saying. but this means the disagreement is simply about miscommunication and not malice?

                                    pixelate@tweesecake.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                                    pixelate@tweesecake.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
                                    pixelate@tweesecake.social
                                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                                    #62

                                    @benroyce @emma @ahltorp @cwebber Wait that's not obvious? Okay I think this is enough internet for the day, I'm gonna play Magic the Gathering Arena or something. Thank goodness for accessibility mods.

                                    benroyce@mastodon.socialB 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • alice@lgbtqia.spaceA alice@lgbtqia.space

                                      @cwebber "you're just a condom between Claude and your production server getting fucked" is the best description of modern software engineering I've read in a while.

                                      linuxandyarn@hachyderm.ioL This user is from outside of this forum
                                      linuxandyarn@hachyderm.ioL This user is from outside of this forum
                                      linuxandyarn@hachyderm.io
                                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                                      #63

                                      @alice @cwebber If that ever became my job I would just walk away and and let Claude bareback.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • pixelate@tweesecake.socialP pixelate@tweesecake.social

                                        @benroyce @emma @ahltorp @cwebber Wait that's not obvious? Okay I think this is enough internet for the day, I'm gonna play Magic the Gathering Arena or something. Thank goodness for accessibility mods.

                                        benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                                        benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                                        benroyce@mastodon.social
                                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                                        #64

                                        @pixelate @emma @ahltorp @cwebber

                                        all i am saying is that the world is a nicer place when you first look to see if there is miscommunication involved first, before seeing malice. there is also malice in the world, of course. but again, the point is to avoid agita

                                        pixelate@tweesecake.socialP 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • lrhodes@merveilles.townL lrhodes@merveilles.town

                                          @cwebber Now if they could extrapolate from this to the fact that Reddit has a $60 million deal to let Google train on user submissions…

                                          benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                                          benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                                          benroyce@mastodon.social
                                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                                          #65

                                          @lrhodes @cwebber

                                          it's far worse than that

                                          look at the age of this sub:

                                          https://old.reddit.com/r/SubredditSimulator/

                                          11 years

                                          there are improved models:

                                          https://old.reddit.com/r/SubSimulatorGPT2/

                                          7 years

                                          #reddit is a pioneer in fake #bot engagement

                                          the founders of reddit are on record saying 99% of the first userbase/ comments of reddit were all fakes:

                                          https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/magazines/panache/reddit-faked-its-first-users-resurfaced-video-shows-co-founder-alexis-ohanian-admitting-99-of-early-submissions-were-fabricated/articleshow/119263428.cms

                                          reddit is full of bots. a lot of it is fake

                                          enjoy reddit. i do

                                          but know that you are in a sea of markov chain chatbots -> #GPT

                                          and always have been

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Svar
                                          • Svar som emne
                                          Login for at svare
                                          • Ældste til nyeste
                                          • Nyeste til ældste
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Log ind

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          Graciously hosted by data.coop
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Hjem
                                          • Seneste
                                          • Etiketter
                                          • Populære
                                          • Verden
                                          • Bruger
                                          • Grupper