Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. hm, i thought KDE was trying to make up for platforming the nazi.

hm, i thought KDE was trying to make up for platforming the nazi.

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
64 Indlæg 47 Posters 0 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • benroyce@mastodon.socialB benroyce@mastodon.social

    @davidgerard

    a solid aspect of social existence:

    1. bully bullies someone. observers stand around watching

    2. bullied person fights back. observers go "woah woah! stop!"

    alternatively:

    1. bully bullies someone. people complain. authorities do nothing
    2. bullied person fights back. authorities act. and punish bully and bullied the same, sometimes the bullied worse

    i don't know what it is about sociology, but you see this time and time again

    from school principals to... social media mods

    cyberquixote@infosec.exchangeC This user is from outside of this forum
    cyberquixote@infosec.exchangeC This user is from outside of this forum
    cyberquixote@infosec.exchange
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #23

    @benroyce @davidgerard

    paradox of tolerance and why you cannot be nice with bullies. it doesn't help, especially if you know they are greedy AND stupid. they will always change the goal posts.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • davidgerard@circumstances.runD davidgerard@circumstances.run

      hm, i thought KDE was trying to make up for platforming the nazi. lots of people today saying "let's give KDE a chance!"

      nope, they're now doubling down further.

      this post is a study in the art of nazi apologetics in online discourse - removing the content of the issue and leaving only a description phrased to sound innocent.

      what happened is that the straight-up nazi was posting, someone identified that this person was a straight-up nazi, the nazi admitted they were that nazi, then KDE banned the person calling out the nazi and kept the nazi

      KDE *later* banned the nazi - after public outrage at KDE's behaviour - but the person who called the nazi out is still banned

      the social media person sympathising here with the nazi tries to claim that calling out the nazi is equivalent to real world violence.

      https://archive.ph/dPms4#selection-1304.0-1304.1

      nobody@mastodon.acm.orgN This user is from outside of this forum
      nobody@mastodon.acm.orgN This user is from outside of this forum
      nobody@mastodon.acm.org
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #24

      @davidgerard

      > the correct way to proceed is to alert mods

      On the Enterprise we have the Chain of Command, cadet!

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • benroyce@mastodon.socialB benroyce@mastodon.social

        @davidgerard

        a solid aspect of social existence:

        1. bully bullies someone. observers stand around watching

        2. bullied person fights back. observers go "woah woah! stop!"

        alternatively:

        1. bully bullies someone. people complain. authorities do nothing
        2. bullied person fights back. authorities act. and punish bully and bullied the same, sometimes the bullied worse

        i don't know what it is about sociology, but you see this time and time again

        from school principals to... social media mods

        johnjburnsiii@kzoo.toJ This user is from outside of this forum
        johnjburnsiii@kzoo.toJ This user is from outside of this forum
        johnjburnsiii@kzoo.to
        wrote sidst redigeret af
        #25

        @benroyce @davidgerard

        The story of centuries...

        The "cause" is never punished...

        The "effect" is usually punished.

        ---
        The effect should walk.

        The cause should go to jail (or similar, depending what the cause is...)

        benroyce@mastodon.socialB 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • johnjburnsiii@kzoo.toJ johnjburnsiii@kzoo.to

          @benroyce @davidgerard

          The story of centuries...

          The "cause" is never punished...

          The "effect" is usually punished.

          ---
          The effect should walk.

          The cause should go to jail (or similar, depending what the cause is...)

          benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
          benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
          benroyce@mastodon.social
          wrote sidst redigeret af
          #26

          @JohnJBurnsIII @davidgerard

          it really is the case

          {someone gets victimized}

          statement to victim: "well why were you there? well why did you act like that? well you should have done {X}..." etc., etc.

          statement to offender: {crickets}

          it's something about humanity that is deeply wrong and powers a lot of malice in it

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • davidgerard@circumstances.runD davidgerard@circumstances.run

            hm, i thought KDE was trying to make up for platforming the nazi. lots of people today saying "let's give KDE a chance!"

            nope, they're now doubling down further.

            this post is a study in the art of nazi apologetics in online discourse - removing the content of the issue and leaving only a description phrased to sound innocent.

            what happened is that the straight-up nazi was posting, someone identified that this person was a straight-up nazi, the nazi admitted they were that nazi, then KDE banned the person calling out the nazi and kept the nazi

            KDE *later* banned the nazi - after public outrage at KDE's behaviour - but the person who called the nazi out is still banned

            the social media person sympathising here with the nazi tries to claim that calling out the nazi is equivalent to real world violence.

            https://archive.ph/dPms4#selection-1304.0-1304.1

            jargoggles@kolektiva.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
            jargoggles@kolektiva.socialJ This user is from outside of this forum
            jargoggles@kolektiva.social
            wrote sidst redigeret af
            #27

            @davidgerard
            You can tell they're the good guys by the way they're twisting themselves into knots to justify defending a Nazi.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • womble@infosec.exchangeW womble@infosec.exchange

              @despicable_me @davidgerard I don't trust that narrative, since pointing out someone's prior public statements is in no way "doxing". If the author is willing to misrepresent the situation to that extent, they're not a reliable narrator.

              atax1a@infosec.exchangeA This user is from outside of this forum
              atax1a@infosec.exchangeA This user is from outside of this forum
              atax1a@infosec.exchange
              wrote sidst redigeret af
              #28

              @womble @despicable_me @davidgerard that narrative is additionally simultaneously a paean to slop and a dissembling bothsidesing, it's astounding how terrible it is

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • davidgerard@circumstances.runD davidgerard@circumstances.run

                hm, i thought KDE was trying to make up for platforming the nazi. lots of people today saying "let's give KDE a chance!"

                nope, they're now doubling down further.

                this post is a study in the art of nazi apologetics in online discourse - removing the content of the issue and leaving only a description phrased to sound innocent.

                what happened is that the straight-up nazi was posting, someone identified that this person was a straight-up nazi, the nazi admitted they were that nazi, then KDE banned the person calling out the nazi and kept the nazi

                KDE *later* banned the nazi - after public outrage at KDE's behaviour - but the person who called the nazi out is still banned

                the social media person sympathising here with the nazi tries to claim that calling out the nazi is equivalent to real world violence.

                https://archive.ph/dPms4#selection-1304.0-1304.1

                usagitsukino@kolektiva.socialU This user is from outside of this forum
                usagitsukino@kolektiva.socialU This user is from outside of this forum
                usagitsukino@kolektiva.social
                wrote sidst redigeret af
                #29

                @davidgerard thrown out and hopefully let back in when it turns out they punched a Nazi right?

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • davidgerard@circumstances.runD davidgerard@circumstances.run

                  hm, i thought KDE was trying to make up for platforming the nazi. lots of people today saying "let's give KDE a chance!"

                  nope, they're now doubling down further.

                  this post is a study in the art of nazi apologetics in online discourse - removing the content of the issue and leaving only a description phrased to sound innocent.

                  what happened is that the straight-up nazi was posting, someone identified that this person was a straight-up nazi, the nazi admitted they were that nazi, then KDE banned the person calling out the nazi and kept the nazi

                  KDE *later* banned the nazi - after public outrage at KDE's behaviour - but the person who called the nazi out is still banned

                  the social media person sympathising here with the nazi tries to claim that calling out the nazi is equivalent to real world violence.

                  https://archive.ph/dPms4#selection-1304.0-1304.1

                  perfidia@autistics.lifeP This user is from outside of this forum
                  perfidia@autistics.lifeP This user is from outside of this forum
                  perfidia@autistics.life
                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                  #30

                  @davidgerard I just read KDE's blurb.

                  "KDE is an open community of friendly people who want to create a world in which everyone has control over their digital life and enjoys freedom and privacy"
                  An open community ceases to be a community, when a Nazi enters the neighbourhood.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • davidgerard@circumstances.runD davidgerard@circumstances.run

                    hm, i thought KDE was trying to make up for platforming the nazi. lots of people today saying "let's give KDE a chance!"

                    nope, they're now doubling down further.

                    this post is a study in the art of nazi apologetics in online discourse - removing the content of the issue and leaving only a description phrased to sound innocent.

                    what happened is that the straight-up nazi was posting, someone identified that this person was a straight-up nazi, the nazi admitted they were that nazi, then KDE banned the person calling out the nazi and kept the nazi

                    KDE *later* banned the nazi - after public outrage at KDE's behaviour - but the person who called the nazi out is still banned

                    the social media person sympathising here with the nazi tries to claim that calling out the nazi is equivalent to real world violence.

                    https://archive.ph/dPms4#selection-1304.0-1304.1

                    zm@kolektiva.socialZ This user is from outside of this forum
                    zm@kolektiva.socialZ This user is from outside of this forum
                    zm@kolektiva.social
                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                    #31

                    @admin This is something you should probably be made aware of, if you're not already.

                    While I don't know that KDE has directly violated your rules at this point in time, they have demonstrated that they don't really represent what your server stands for anymore and are exhibiting a lot of disturbing and dishonest behaviors.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • davidgerard@circumstances.runD davidgerard@circumstances.run

                      hm, i thought KDE was trying to make up for platforming the nazi. lots of people today saying "let's give KDE a chance!"

                      nope, they're now doubling down further.

                      this post is a study in the art of nazi apologetics in online discourse - removing the content of the issue and leaving only a description phrased to sound innocent.

                      what happened is that the straight-up nazi was posting, someone identified that this person was a straight-up nazi, the nazi admitted they were that nazi, then KDE banned the person calling out the nazi and kept the nazi

                      KDE *later* banned the nazi - after public outrage at KDE's behaviour - but the person who called the nazi out is still banned

                      the social media person sympathising here with the nazi tries to claim that calling out the nazi is equivalent to real world violence.

                      https://archive.ph/dPms4#selection-1304.0-1304.1

                      skyblitz@ieji.deS This user is from outside of this forum
                      skyblitz@ieji.deS This user is from outside of this forum
                      skyblitz@ieji.de
                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                      #32

                      @davidgerard seem you need glass.

                      They remind people how to report nazi, instead of attacking him / her directly in case he / she's innocent.

                      We need order and rules ..., where nazi are removed properly, not witch hunt.

                      dzwiedziu@mastodon.socialD shnizmuffin@toots.inbutts.lolS 2 Replies Last reply
                      0
                      • davidgerard@circumstances.runD davidgerard@circumstances.run

                        hm, i thought KDE was trying to make up for platforming the nazi. lots of people today saying "let's give KDE a chance!"

                        nope, they're now doubling down further.

                        this post is a study in the art of nazi apologetics in online discourse - removing the content of the issue and leaving only a description phrased to sound innocent.

                        what happened is that the straight-up nazi was posting, someone identified that this person was a straight-up nazi, the nazi admitted they were that nazi, then KDE banned the person calling out the nazi and kept the nazi

                        KDE *later* banned the nazi - after public outrage at KDE's behaviour - but the person who called the nazi out is still banned

                        the social media person sympathising here with the nazi tries to claim that calling out the nazi is equivalent to real world violence.

                        https://archive.ph/dPms4#selection-1304.0-1304.1

                        ck0@tech.lgbtC This user is from outside of this forum
                        ck0@tech.lgbtC This user is from outside of this forum
                        ck0@tech.lgbt
                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                        #33

                        @davidgerard Didn't they ban both ?

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • davidgerard@circumstances.runD davidgerard@circumstances.run

                          @Rhube who the fuck runs that fucking social

                          onepict@chaos.socialO This user is from outside of this forum
                          onepict@chaos.socialO This user is from outside of this forum
                          onepict@chaos.social
                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                          #34

                          @davidgerard @Rhube I have a suspicion that it's Nate, or at least he has posting access.

                          I feel they should have taken a little more time.

                          onepict@chaos.socialO 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • onepict@chaos.socialO onepict@chaos.social

                            @davidgerard @Rhube I have a suspicion that it's Nate, or at least he has posting access.

                            I feel they should have taken a little more time.

                            onepict@chaos.socialO This user is from outside of this forum
                            onepict@chaos.socialO This user is from outside of this forum
                            onepict@chaos.social
                            wrote sidst redigeret af
                            #35

                            @davidgerard @Rhube

                            Like he handles some other public comms.

                            https://pointieststick.com/about/

                            "In his spare time, Nate blogs about newsworthy topics through KDE over at blogs.kde.org, triages KDE bug reports, and helps build the KDE Linux operating system."

                            Perhaps they should budget for a community manager?

                            Perhaps even get someone outside our Eurocentric bubble? That post wasn't conciliatory at all.

                            It's a rugby tackle away the phone moment really.

                            I'm not mad at KDE I'm just disappointed.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • davidgerard@circumstances.runD davidgerard@circumstances.run

                              hm, i thought KDE was trying to make up for platforming the nazi. lots of people today saying "let's give KDE a chance!"

                              nope, they're now doubling down further.

                              this post is a study in the art of nazi apologetics in online discourse - removing the content of the issue and leaving only a description phrased to sound innocent.

                              what happened is that the straight-up nazi was posting, someone identified that this person was a straight-up nazi, the nazi admitted they were that nazi, then KDE banned the person calling out the nazi and kept the nazi

                              KDE *later* banned the nazi - after public outrage at KDE's behaviour - but the person who called the nazi out is still banned

                              the social media person sympathising here with the nazi tries to claim that calling out the nazi is equivalent to real world violence.

                              https://archive.ph/dPms4#selection-1304.0-1304.1

                              drahardja@sfba.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
                              drahardja@sfba.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
                              drahardja@sfba.social
                              wrote sidst redigeret af
                              #36

                              @davidgerard “But they were impolite! We had to ban them!”

                              https://humancode.us/2025/09/25/the-politeness-trap

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • davidgerard@circumstances.runD davidgerard@circumstances.run

                                hm, i thought KDE was trying to make up for platforming the nazi. lots of people today saying "let's give KDE a chance!"

                                nope, they're now doubling down further.

                                this post is a study in the art of nazi apologetics in online discourse - removing the content of the issue and leaving only a description phrased to sound innocent.

                                what happened is that the straight-up nazi was posting, someone identified that this person was a straight-up nazi, the nazi admitted they were that nazi, then KDE banned the person calling out the nazi and kept the nazi

                                KDE *later* banned the nazi - after public outrage at KDE's behaviour - but the person who called the nazi out is still banned

                                the social media person sympathising here with the nazi tries to claim that calling out the nazi is equivalent to real world violence.

                                https://archive.ph/dPms4#selection-1304.0-1304.1

                                rubinjoni@mastodon.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
                                rubinjoni@mastodon.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
                                rubinjoni@mastodon.social
                                wrote sidst redigeret af
                                #37

                                @davidgerard Was the other patron sitting in the restaurant in a tight black Hugo Boss uniform, leather boots and all, with a big red armband with a black swastika in a white circle on it, and was holding the hand in a "Roman salute" at the moment of being punched? We're missing a bit of context for the "a user walks into a restaurant" allegory...

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • davidgerard@circumstances.runD This user is from outside of this forum
                                  davidgerard@circumstances.runD This user is from outside of this forum
                                  davidgerard@circumstances.run
                                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                                  #38

                                  @darkpixel what a disconnected and fatuous comment

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • davidgerard@circumstances.runD davidgerard@circumstances.run

                                    hm, i thought KDE was trying to make up for platforming the nazi. lots of people today saying "let's give KDE a chance!"

                                    nope, they're now doubling down further.

                                    this post is a study in the art of nazi apologetics in online discourse - removing the content of the issue and leaving only a description phrased to sound innocent.

                                    what happened is that the straight-up nazi was posting, someone identified that this person was a straight-up nazi, the nazi admitted they were that nazi, then KDE banned the person calling out the nazi and kept the nazi

                                    KDE *later* banned the nazi - after public outrage at KDE's behaviour - but the person who called the nazi out is still banned

                                    the social media person sympathising here with the nazi tries to claim that calling out the nazi is equivalent to real world violence.

                                    https://archive.ph/dPms4#selection-1304.0-1304.1

                                    toolbear@tech.lgbtT This user is from outside of this forum
                                    toolbear@tech.lgbtT This user is from outside of this forum
                                    toolbear@tech.lgbt
                                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                                    #39

                                    @davidgerard
                                    > doxxing — posting receipts of a nazi spewing nazi rhetoric isn't doxxing. This was later corrected by KDE in as maliciously compliant a manner as possible (using strikeout so that every instance of "doxxing" remains in the text)
                                    >
                                    > brigading — a list of signatories isn't brigading. This claim hasn't been walked back
                                    >
                                    > ad hominem — posting receipts of a nazi spewing nazi rhetoric isn't ad hominem. This claim hasn't been walked back

                                    https://tech.lgbt/@toolbear/117325024766767743

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • davidgerard@circumstances.runD davidgerard@circumstances.run

                                      hm, i thought KDE was trying to make up for platforming the nazi. lots of people today saying "let's give KDE a chance!"

                                      nope, they're now doubling down further.

                                      this post is a study in the art of nazi apologetics in online discourse - removing the content of the issue and leaving only a description phrased to sound innocent.

                                      what happened is that the straight-up nazi was posting, someone identified that this person was a straight-up nazi, the nazi admitted they were that nazi, then KDE banned the person calling out the nazi and kept the nazi

                                      KDE *later* banned the nazi - after public outrage at KDE's behaviour - but the person who called the nazi out is still banned

                                      the social media person sympathising here with the nazi tries to claim that calling out the nazi is equivalent to real world violence.

                                      https://archive.ph/dPms4#selection-1304.0-1304.1

                                      mabande@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                                      mabande@mastodon.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                                      mabande@mastodon.social
                                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                                      #40

                                      @davidgerard fascinating how it's always worse to call someone a Nazi (with receipts) than to actually _be_ a Nazi.

                                      wtrmt@mastodon.socialW 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • coegho@mastodon.galC coegho@mastodon.gal

                                        @davidgerard to be fair, I would be ok with someone walking into a restaurant and randomly punching a nazi

                                        P This user is from outside of this forum
                                        P This user is from outside of this forum
                                        passwordsarehard4@mastodon.social
                                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                                        #41

                                        @coegho @davidgerard I’d definitely tip the waitress if I saw her randomly punch a Nazi (that she was previously serving) in a restaurant. I’d put it on my credit card, she earned it.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • mabande@mastodon.socialM mabande@mastodon.social

                                          @davidgerard fascinating how it's always worse to call someone a Nazi (with receipts) than to actually _be_ a Nazi.

                                          wtrmt@mastodon.socialW This user is from outside of this forum
                                          wtrmt@mastodon.socialW This user is from outside of this forum
                                          wtrmt@mastodon.social
                                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                                          #42

                                          @Mabande @davidgerard you should always call them “phrenology inclined” the first time.

                                          — So and so, seem to be phrenology inclined, given his comments in the forum. I wonder if we need to embrace phrenology in our code base.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Svar
                                          • Svar som emne
                                          Login for at svare
                                          • Ældste til nyeste
                                          • Nyeste til ældste
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Log ind

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          Graciously hosted by data.coop
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Hjem
                                          • Seneste
                                          • Etiketter
                                          • Populære
                                          • Verden
                                          • Bruger
                                          • Grupper