the internet loves grapheneOS, the secure AOSP fork that also makes Android nicely usable without the LLM crap
-
also, here’s how much you can trust that they’re only using it strictly for reviews:
https://circumstances.run/@davidgerard/117235031728518322
> The AGENTS.md talks about the bot writing new code. On the available evidence I don't actually believe they're not coding with it.
not that “only doing using it for reviews” gets good results. you end up programming the way the LLM insists you should anyway. reviewing like this is exhausting and quality goes straight into the toilet. most people just cognitively surrender to the bot after a bit. this is an extremely common methodology in professional code, and it’s the reason why half the software you use right now fucking sucks.
@zzt sad to report the presence of AGENTS.md and CLAUDE.md in the main Rust repo. And it's of course paid for by the some of the biggest LLM peddlers who are also represented on the board.
-
Living in the woods is no longer viable due to enshittificaiton.
-
@ehproque @c0dec0dec0de @zzt The woods are burning.
-
@ehproque @c0dec0dec0de @zzt And then the Techbro's will find a way to install AI on Trees.
-
-
@ehproque @c0dec0dec0de @zzt And then the Techbro's will find a way to install AI on Trees.
-
the internet loves grapheneOS, the secure AOSP fork that also makes Android nicely usable without the LLM crap
<yelling from out of frame>
…ah. this just in, grapheneOS has decided to start codegooning core apps and security fixes and now they’re exhaustingly defending doing that
> Many valid issues are reported in between the hallucinations and other nonsense.
oh I see, what a relief
> Attackers are heavily using AI models to discover vulnerabilities and develop exploits. For example, Cellebrite is heavily using it including developing frameworks for reverse engineering and vulnerability discovery.
gotta use the wrongness machine, no sorry, “frontier models” because the coptech adversary is using them and also mythic’s great at finding vulnerabilities til you find out you can do the same job without it. great! https://grapheneos.social/@GrapheneOS/117226938743085364
@zzt
Their intellectual dishonesty and aggression rubbed me wrong from the first time I saw them communicate, so...I never used nor recommended it.
I was right to, it seems.
-
the internet loves grapheneOS, the secure AOSP fork that also makes Android nicely usable without the LLM crap
<yelling from out of frame>
…ah. this just in, grapheneOS has decided to start codegooning core apps and security fixes and now they’re exhaustingly defending doing that
> Many valid issues are reported in between the hallucinations and other nonsense.
oh I see, what a relief
> Attackers are heavily using AI models to discover vulnerabilities and develop exploits. For example, Cellebrite is heavily using it including developing frameworks for reverse engineering and vulnerability discovery.
gotta use the wrongness machine, no sorry, “frontier models” because the coptech adversary is using them and also mythic’s great at finding vulnerabilities til you find out you can do the same job without it. great! https://grapheneos.social/@GrapheneOS/117226938743085364
just in case you thought graphene was at all on our side, they’ve decided to reply to my threads on this with generic corporate bullshit that has nothing to do with any of the points I raised:
https://grapheneos.social/@GrapheneOS/117235876960852305
this is only technically a better look than their previous behavior of flying off the handle as soon as anyone challenges them, but the bar is in hell
realistically they’re doing this because they’ve just done something incredibly unpopular and are getting a ton of pushback against it that they’re not reading
also, generic corporate shit plays better when you’re in a partnership with motorola, a company lenovo owns
-
just in case you thought graphene was at all on our side, they’ve decided to reply to my threads on this with generic corporate bullshit that has nothing to do with any of the points I raised:
https://grapheneos.social/@GrapheneOS/117235876960852305
this is only technically a better look than their previous behavior of flying off the handle as soon as anyone challenges them, but the bar is in hell
realistically they’re doing this because they’ve just done something incredibly unpopular and are getting a ton of pushback against it that they’re not reading
also, generic corporate shit plays better when you’re in a partnership with motorola, a company lenovo owns
their other reply is so bad that it’s literally just a copy and paste of a summary of their posts in the thread *I was replying to in the OP*: https://grapheneos.social/@GrapheneOS/117235863204199402
this isn’t funny, projects only do this when they fuck up bad
-
their other reply is so bad that it’s literally just a copy and paste of a summary of their posts in the thread *I was replying to in the OP*: https://grapheneos.social/@GrapheneOS/117235863204199402
this isn’t funny, projects only do this when they fuck up bad
@zzt “but everyone ELSE is using the baby mincer clearly it’s fine”
-
@zzt “but everyone ELSE is using the baby mincer clearly it’s fine”
@GroupNebula563 @zzt graphene literally just linked the lineage AI policy as a whataboutery
-
@GroupNebula563 @zzt graphene literally just linked the lineage AI policy as a whataboutery
@davidgerard @GroupNebula563 “but lineageOS is doing it” cool motherfuckers, there’s a reason why I don’t use lineage! and almost all of it is that graphene promised to be better than lineage!
-
@davidgerard @GroupNebula563 “but lineageOS is doing it” cool motherfuckers, there’s a reason why I don’t use lineage! and almost all of it is that graphene promised to be better than lineage!
@davidgerard @GroupNebula563 can’t root your own device or have a web browser that’s worth a damn, that would make us just as bad as lineage
-
@zzt
Their intellectual dishonesty and aggression rubbed me wrong from the first time I saw them communicate, so...I never used nor recommended it.
I was right to, it seems.
@Brett_E_Carlock@mastodon.online @zzt@mas.to as i was researching OSes to install on a Pixel phone long in the tooth, #grapheneos came up as possible solutions. But seeing how they’re going all out on Artificial Idiots, there’s one fewer candidate.
-
their other reply is so bad that it’s literally just a copy and paste of a summary of their posts in the thread *I was replying to in the OP*: https://grapheneos.social/@GrapheneOS/117235863204199402
this isn’t funny, projects only do this when they fuck up bad
@zzt wait...er... are they trying to say the code they use doesn't meet their standards? Like, that just says it like it is, graphene is android with extra security theater on top. Shouldn't be saying the quiet part loud y'all.
-
their other reply is so bad that it’s literally just a copy and paste of a summary of their posts in the thread *I was replying to in the OP*: https://grapheneos.social/@GrapheneOS/117235863204199402
this isn’t funny, projects only do this when they fuck up bad
“but everyone else is doing it!” computer security is where you exact exactly like a child that got caught with cigarettes
-
just in case you thought graphene was at all on our side, they’ve decided to reply to my threads on this with generic corporate bullshit that has nothing to do with any of the points I raised:
https://grapheneos.social/@GrapheneOS/117235876960852305
this is only technically a better look than their previous behavior of flying off the handle as soon as anyone challenges them, but the bar is in hell
realistically they’re doing this because they’ve just done something incredibly unpopular and are getting a ton of pushback against it that they’re not reading
also, generic corporate shit plays better when you’re in a partnership with motorola, a company lenovo owns
@zzt Can we get a definition of "contractor" and contrast that to "employee"? Asking for a friend.
-
@avesbury_rosetta @hazelnot @zzt The very design of Linux is a horrible mess, it's not really about incremental hardening improvements.
It can be secure, yes, since GrapheneOS is secure, but honestly, we really need a better kernel project.
@ariarhythmic @avesbury_rosetta @hazelnot @zzt it's high time to move on from the so-called BDFLs of Torvalds and rms and their projects.. (and probably other projects too)
-
their other reply is so bad that it’s literally just a copy and paste of a summary of their posts in the thread *I was replying to in the OP*: https://grapheneos.social/@GrapheneOS/117235863204199402
this isn’t funny, projects only do this when they fuck up bad
@zzt Can I get another definition for "code review"?
And is this implying that they need to replace Linux as their OS...?
-
@zzt “but everyone ELSE is using the baby mincer clearly it’s fine”
@GroupNebula563 @zzt these babies aren't going to mince themselves
-
P pelle@veganism.social shared this topic
