Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. Age verification ...

Age verification ...

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
privacyprivacymattersageverificationsocialmediasurveillance
45 Indlæg 20 Posters 0 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • gullok@mastodon.socialG gullok@mastodon.social

    @iju @Nawer_Rapter @joho if Meta is behind this, then it is really problematic

    iju@mastodon.socialI This user is from outside of this forum
    iju@mastodon.socialI This user is from outside of this forum
    iju@mastodon.social
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #28

    @gullok @Nawer_Rapter @joho

    It is. This isn't about pedofiles per se, but that kids are using Meta's services before they're of minimum age (iirc 13...16 depending on location). As Meta's services are repeatedly proven to be bad for mental health by design (as happy people don't spend monies), they can't fix the root cause.

    So instead of overhauling their systems to be healthy, they're trying to get everyone to give them their IDs.

    It's essentially the same discussion as with tobacco.

    gullok@mastodon.socialG 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • pecet@f3d1.euP pecet@f3d1.eu

      @joho Scan your face or upload id if you have different political opinions than ruling party.

      elexia@catcatnya.comE This user is from outside of this forum
      elexia@catcatnya.comE This user is from outside of this forum
      elexia@catcatnya.com
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #29

      @pecet @joho actually having non-approved opinions has been banned. -5000 social credit, please check in at the local reeducation center.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • joho@mastodon.onlineJ joho@mastodon.online

        Age verification ...

        #privacy #privacymatters #ageverification #socialmedia #surveillance #dataskydd #dataprotection #gdpr #deepstate

        mrose@universeodon.comM This user is from outside of this forum
        mrose@universeodon.comM This user is from outside of this forum
        mrose@universeodon.com
        wrote sidst redigeret af
        #30

        @joho

        anonymizing money (crypto) = good
        anonymizing people (privacy) = bad

        huh????

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • iju@mastodon.socialI iju@mastodon.social

          @gullok @Nawer_Rapter @joho

          It is. This isn't about pedofiles per se, but that kids are using Meta's services before they're of minimum age (iirc 13...16 depending on location). As Meta's services are repeatedly proven to be bad for mental health by design (as happy people don't spend monies), they can't fix the root cause.

          So instead of overhauling their systems to be healthy, they're trying to get everyone to give them their IDs.

          It's essentially the same discussion as with tobacco.

          gullok@mastodon.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
          gullok@mastodon.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
          gullok@mastodon.social
          wrote sidst redigeret af
          #31

          @iju @Nawer_Rapter @joho argh, but then, if we imagine that they would revamp their system to be healthy, vulnerables would just migrate to another addictive platform. I would like to see this kind of algorithm effect being forbidden for social media somehow

          nawer_rapter@mastodon.socialN 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • gullok@mastodon.socialG gullok@mastodon.social

            @davey_cakes @joho your argument is pretty broad, like this is about having all of your life data somehow being uploaded (fun fact, big tech already does a pretty good job with this for profit).

            but at the same time it is pretty clear that fascism can pop up out of nowhere and then such data could be brutally misused indeed.

            davey_cakes@mastodon.ieD This user is from outside of this forum
            davey_cakes@mastodon.ieD This user is from outside of this forum
            davey_cakes@mastodon.ie
            wrote sidst redigeret af
            #32

            @gullok @joho

            One of the problems the new approach causes is that there are a lot of people, who neither of us would consider criminals, who have gone to great lengths to try and remain safe, and this breaks that for them.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • joho@mastodon.onlineJ joho@mastodon.online

              Age verification ...

              #privacy #privacymatters #ageverification #socialmedia #surveillance #dataskydd #dataprotection #gdpr #deepstate

              happyborg@fosstodon.orgH This user is from outside of this forum
              happyborg@fosstodon.orgH This user is from outside of this forum
              happyborg@fosstodon.org
              wrote sidst redigeret af
              #33

              @joho and let us brick anyone's phone

              ... if the London Met Police get their way.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • joho@mastodon.onlineJ joho@mastodon.online

                Age verification ...

                #privacy #privacymatters #ageverification #socialmedia #surveillance #dataskydd #dataprotection #gdpr #deepstate

                danish_akhtar7@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
                danish_akhtar7@mastodon.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
                danish_akhtar7@mastodon.social
                wrote sidst redigeret af
                #34

                @joho

                We are heading towards a Dystopian Surveillance society with no privacy rights.

                joho@mastodon.onlineJ 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • danish_akhtar7@mastodon.socialD danish_akhtar7@mastodon.social

                  @joho

                  We are heading towards a Dystopian Surveillance society with no privacy rights.

                  joho@mastodon.onlineJ This user is from outside of this forum
                  joho@mastodon.onlineJ This user is from outside of this forum
                  joho@mastodon.online
                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                  #35

                  @danish_akhtar7 I'm afraid we're already there, the rest is just theory (IMHO).

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • gullok@mastodon.socialG gullok@mastodon.social

                    @iju @Nawer_Rapter @joho argh, but then, if we imagine that they would revamp their system to be healthy, vulnerables would just migrate to another addictive platform. I would like to see this kind of algorithm effect being forbidden for social media somehow

                    nawer_rapter@mastodon.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                    nawer_rapter@mastodon.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                    nawer_rapter@mastodon.social
                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                    #36

                    @gullok @iju @joho Probably the most reliable way and correct way to read all this issue is through the lenses of "if it is problematic for children,it can be problematic for everyone, and thus requires a solution to a problem, rather than a vet of the entire topic"
                    The true issue at hand here is: gambling mechanisms to get money, and segregation to get money.
                    The true problem to solve is that the way the world we built pays better for optimizing evil than anything else
                    Sex is it's another story

                    nawer_rapter@mastodon.socialN gullok@mastodon.socialG 2 Replies Last reply
                    0
                    • nawer_rapter@mastodon.socialN nawer_rapter@mastodon.social

                      @gullok @iju @joho Probably the most reliable way and correct way to read all this issue is through the lenses of "if it is problematic for children,it can be problematic for everyone, and thus requires a solution to a problem, rather than a vet of the entire topic"
                      The true issue at hand here is: gambling mechanisms to get money, and segregation to get money.
                      The true problem to solve is that the way the world we built pays better for optimizing evil than anything else
                      Sex is it's another story

                      nawer_rapter@mastodon.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                      nawer_rapter@mastodon.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                      nawer_rapter@mastodon.social
                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                      #37

                      @gullok @iju @joho the excuse of sex, most of the time (if not the entire time) is used to specifically harm two communities: women who have found a kind of work that is safer than it's previous iterations (webcam prostitution vs actual physical prostitution) and queer people. The queers has always been the primary target for saying "kids should never have ever any knowledge about sex or they turn queer and evil and queer and non-christian". Just change "sex" for "queer" and boom, all logical.

                      nawer_rapter@mastodon.socialN 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • joho@mastodon.onlineJ joho@mastodon.online

                        Age verification ...

                        #privacy #privacymatters #ageverification #socialmedia #surveillance #dataskydd #dataprotection #gdpr #deepstate

                        ratsammich@mastodon.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
                        ratsammich@mastodon.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
                        ratsammich@mastodon.social
                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                        #38

                        @joho
                        And then harmful sites suddenly incude anything content that doesnt fit the oppressive christian nationalist worldview or corpo agenda. It is just a dangerous slide into total censorship.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • joho@mastodon.onlineJ joho@mastodon.online

                          Age verification ...

                          #privacy #privacymatters #ageverification #socialmedia #surveillance #dataskydd #dataprotection #gdpr #deepstate

                          crisps@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                          crisps@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                          crisps@mastodon.social
                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                          #39

                          @joho It does make sense for the first two tho. Or am I wrong?

                          joho@mastodon.onlineJ 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • joho@mastodon.onlineJ joho@mastodon.online

                            Age verification ...

                            #privacy #privacymatters #ageverification #socialmedia #surveillance #dataskydd #dataprotection #gdpr #deepstate

                            renardboy@mastodon.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
                            renardboy@mastodon.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
                            renardboy@mastodon.social
                            wrote sidst redigeret af
                            #40

                            @joho Hopefully if this happens tor usage will kick up and people will just start hosting their websites as hidden services.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • crisps@mastodon.socialC crisps@mastodon.social

                              @joho It does make sense for the first two tho. Or am I wrong?

                              joho@mastodon.onlineJ This user is from outside of this forum
                              joho@mastodon.onlineJ This user is from outside of this forum
                              joho@mastodon.online
                              wrote sidst redigeret af
                              #41

                              @crisps I think that's part of the problem. We, as a society, have failed to keep up with the rapid development of privacy intrusive billion dollar corporations (and government agencies) who, at their core, exploit human rights, such as the right to privacy.

                              Now the legislative branches and governments are trying to pretend they have a solution to a very difficult problem.

                              This is a double edged sword, to say the least.

                              (IMHO, of course)

                              crisps@mastodon.socialC 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • nawer_rapter@mastodon.socialN nawer_rapter@mastodon.social

                                @gullok @iju @joho the excuse of sex, most of the time (if not the entire time) is used to specifically harm two communities: women who have found a kind of work that is safer than it's previous iterations (webcam prostitution vs actual physical prostitution) and queer people. The queers has always been the primary target for saying "kids should never have ever any knowledge about sex or they turn queer and evil and queer and non-christian". Just change "sex" for "queer" and boom, all logical.

                                nawer_rapter@mastodon.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                                nawer_rapter@mastodon.socialN This user is from outside of this forum
                                nawer_rapter@mastodon.social
                                wrote sidst redigeret af
                                #42

                                @gullok @iju @joho The duality of sex being both a taboo and a thing that everyone does leads to very confusing nonsensical things.What I would call "mystification" (make it obscure but with a lot of silent rules), akin to religious practices from secretive cults. Just on a global scale.
                                The relationship of children, teenagers and younger people with sex is currently as contradictory as I explained above and only harms them. Demystifying sex is probably the first step to solve that.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • nawer_rapter@mastodon.socialN nawer_rapter@mastodon.social

                                  @gullok @iju @joho Probably the most reliable way and correct way to read all this issue is through the lenses of "if it is problematic for children,it can be problematic for everyone, and thus requires a solution to a problem, rather than a vet of the entire topic"
                                  The true issue at hand here is: gambling mechanisms to get money, and segregation to get money.
                                  The true problem to solve is that the way the world we built pays better for optimizing evil than anything else
                                  Sex is it's another story

                                  gullok@mastodon.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
                                  gullok@mastodon.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
                                  gullok@mastodon.social
                                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                                  #43

                                  @Nawer_Rapter @iju @joho this is a great way to explain the issue!

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • joho@mastodon.onlineJ joho@mastodon.online

                                    @crisps I think that's part of the problem. We, as a society, have failed to keep up with the rapid development of privacy intrusive billion dollar corporations (and government agencies) who, at their core, exploit human rights, such as the right to privacy.

                                    Now the legislative branches and governments are trying to pretend they have a solution to a very difficult problem.

                                    This is a double edged sword, to say the least.

                                    (IMHO, of course)

                                    crisps@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                                    crisps@mastodon.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                                    crisps@mastodon.social
                                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                                    #44

                                    @joho but isn't age verification done for keeping kids away from the harmful stuff? Although I'm not sure about how effective it really is. I think they do it avoid responsibility when kids access those sites.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • joho@mastodon.onlineJ joho@mastodon.online

                                      Age verification ...

                                      #privacy #privacymatters #ageverification #socialmedia #surveillance #dataskydd #dataprotection #gdpr #deepstate

                                      notsle@kzoo.toN This user is from outside of this forum
                                      notsle@kzoo.toN This user is from outside of this forum
                                      notsle@kzoo.to
                                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                                      #45

                                      @joho People cannot even agree on "adult sites"

                                      The Vatican probably has a box of marble penises somewhere after Pope Pius IX (r. 1846-1878) had them removed from statues and replaced with leaves because it was "obscene"

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • pelle@veganism.socialP pelle@veganism.social shared this topic
                                        jwcph@helvede.netJ jwcph@helvede.net shared this topic
                                      Svar
                                      • Svar som emne
                                      Login for at svare
                                      • Ældste til nyeste
                                      • Nyeste til ældste
                                      • Most Votes


                                      • Log ind

                                      • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

                                      • Login or register to search.
                                      Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                      Graciously hosted by data.coop
                                      • First post
                                        Last post
                                      0
                                      • Hjem
                                      • Seneste
                                      • Etiketter
                                      • Populære
                                      • Verden
                                      • Bruger
                                      • Grupper