Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. #WSocial will open up their beta program today… and I have a SCOOP for you: it appears that they have quietly gone closed-source!

#WSocial will open up their beta program today… and I have a SCOOP for you: it appears that they have quietly gone closed-source!

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
wsocialopensourcefossdigitalsovereigbigtech
108 Indlæg 75 Posters 105 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • _elena@mastodon.social_ _elena@mastodon.social

    #WSocial will open up their beta program today… and I have a SCOOP for you: it appears that they have quietly gone closed-source!

    This is ironic, considering that the @EUCommission just unveiled their Tech Sovereignty Package, emphasizing the importance of #OpenSource. And yet they have migrated their main ATproto accounts to W Social - whose code can no longer be inspected!

    My full article - with a great analysis by @aral:

    🔗: https://blog.elenarossini.com/w-social-public-institutions-and-the-theater-of-european-digital-sovereignty/

    #FOSS #DigitalSovereignty #BigTech

    E This user is from outside of this forum
    E This user is from outside of this forum
    ef@mastodon.bsd.cafe
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #84

    @_elena @EUCommission @aral #bigtech is not just related to one country. #Wsocial no thanks despite it being #European

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • t3rcermillenium@mastodon.socialT t3rcermillenium@mastodon.social

      @_elena @themipper When I first heard about #wsocial, I had high hopes of a genuine European, privacy-preserving, open source solution.

      Fool me.

      Definitely won’t be joining.

      davidculley@hachyderm.ioD This user is from outside of this forum
      davidculley@hachyderm.ioD This user is from outside of this forum
      davidculley@hachyderm.io
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #85

      @t3rcermillenium https://hachyderm.io/@davidculley/116766485335101563

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • lefteristrip23@mastodon.socialL lefteristrip23@mastodon.social

        @_elena share what though?

        vitskapsdama@sunny.gardenV This user is from outside of this forum
        vitskapsdama@sunny.gardenV This user is from outside of this forum
        vitskapsdama@sunny.garden
        wrote sidst redigeret af
        #86

        @lefteristrip23 @_elena Share this link to the post on reddit: https://mastodon.social/@_elena/116764267869694589, or the link to the blogpost.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • _elena@mastodon.social_ _elena@mastodon.social

          This was definitely NOT on my bingo card for this year:

          European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen taking a moment between G7 meetings to promote the launch of the closed-source, for-profit network #WSocial.

          🔗 : https://web.archive.org/web/20260617083436/https://www.linkedin.com/posts/rentzhog_kind-of-cool-to-see-ursula-von-der-leyen-ugcPost-7472769475885461504-hwct/

          I fear this may be a harbinger of things to come: MANDATORY AGE VERIFICATION for social media across Europe. I hope I'm wrong on this.

          #privacy #SurveillanceCapitalism #EUBigTech

          davidculley@hachyderm.ioD This user is from outside of this forum
          davidculley@hachyderm.ioD This user is from outside of this forum
          davidculley@hachyderm.io
          wrote sidst redigeret af
          #87

          @_elena @aral Is that even legal for a government official who is supposed to be in service of the people and represent their interests, to advertise for the product of a for-profit company? I'm pretty sure that's against the law.

          Maybe @noybeu can do something?

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • _elena@mastodon.social_ _elena@mastodon.social

            #WSocial will open up their beta program today… and I have a SCOOP for you: it appears that they have quietly gone closed-source!

            This is ironic, considering that the @EUCommission just unveiled their Tech Sovereignty Package, emphasizing the importance of #OpenSource. And yet they have migrated their main ATproto accounts to W Social - whose code can no longer be inspected!

            My full article - with a great analysis by @aral:

            🔗: https://blog.elenarossini.com/w-social-public-institutions-and-the-theater-of-european-digital-sovereignty/

            #FOSS #DigitalSovereignty #BigTech

            leadore@sunny.gardenL This user is from outside of this forum
            leadore@sunny.gardenL This user is from outside of this forum
            leadore@sunny.garden
            wrote sidst redigeret af
            #88

            @_elena
            *dons tin foil hat*

            When something this fishy is going on you can be sure that a lot of money is changing hands and a "not-for-public-knowledge" agenda is being implemented behind the scenes.

            IMO the answers to your top 3 questions are probably something like:
            1) shhh of course but I won't acknowledge that to you.

            2) irrelevant--the image of being "the"
            European alternative is the important thing, and besides (shhh) some components need to be hosted in places where certain inconvenient EU privacy laws don't apply, and

            3) Because we wouldn't be able to manipulate it or any other open source platform to our goals.

            @EUCommission @aral

            aral@mastodon.ar.alA 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • leadore@sunny.gardenL leadore@sunny.garden

              @_elena
              *dons tin foil hat*

              When something this fishy is going on you can be sure that a lot of money is changing hands and a "not-for-public-knowledge" agenda is being implemented behind the scenes.

              IMO the answers to your top 3 questions are probably something like:
              1) shhh of course but I won't acknowledge that to you.

              2) irrelevant--the image of being "the"
              European alternative is the important thing, and besides (shhh) some components need to be hosted in places where certain inconvenient EU privacy laws don't apply, and

              3) Because we wouldn't be able to manipulate it or any other open source platform to our goals.

              @EUCommission @aral

              aral@mastodon.ar.alA This user is from outside of this forum
              aral@mastodon.ar.alA This user is from outside of this forum
              aral@mastodon.ar.al
              wrote sidst redigeret af
              #89

              @leadore @_elena @EUCommission No tin-foil hat necessary. It’s just institutional corruption (lobbying and revolving doors).

              iju@mastodon.socialI 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • _elena@mastodon.social_ _elena@mastodon.social

                #WSocial will open up their beta program today… and I have a SCOOP for you: it appears that they have quietly gone closed-source!

                This is ironic, considering that the @EUCommission just unveiled their Tech Sovereignty Package, emphasizing the importance of #OpenSource. And yet they have migrated their main ATproto accounts to W Social - whose code can no longer be inspected!

                My full article - with a great analysis by @aral:

                🔗: https://blog.elenarossini.com/w-social-public-institutions-and-the-theater-of-european-digital-sovereignty/

                #FOSS #DigitalSovereignty #BigTech

                xavcc@todon.euX This user is from outside of this forum
                xavcc@todon.euX This user is from outside of this forum
                xavcc@todon.eu
                wrote sidst redigeret af
                #90

                @_elena
                And there's more sad news on this trap
                @EUCommission @aral
                @rysiek

                https://journa.host/@occrp/116766567782044882

                rysiek@mstdn.socialR aral@mastodon.ar.alA 2 Replies Last reply
                0
                • kichae@wanderingadventure.partyK kichae@wanderingadventure.party

                  streetcoder
                  If you want to do that, pick (or set up) a single instance to push in a region. One of the primary reasons the Fediverse fails to catch on is that no one will promote a specific website. Most people don’t care about the syndication feature and, in fact, find it confusing. And no ome cares about “Mastodon” any more than they’re really hype about Joomla.

                  Throw up a Mastodon site. Give it a pleasing front end with identifiable branding, and push the site, not the technology and people will show up and stick around.

                  streetcoder@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                  streetcoder@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                  streetcoder@mastodon.social
                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                  #91

                  @kichae We shouldn't push into a specific region. The internet is global and so is the Fediverse. Services are not evil because they are from a specific country.

                  But the whole world would be to much for one instance. Even more if we want to promote the other use cases like video, shorts, photos, podcasts, events, blogs, sport tracks, books and so on too.

                  The EU should help setting up instances as public infrastructure and start promoting the ones they already have, instead of lobby marketing.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • xavcc@todon.euX xavcc@todon.eu

                    @_elena
                    And there's more sad news on this trap
                    @EUCommission @aral
                    @rysiek

                    https://journa.host/@occrp/116766567782044882

                    rysiek@mstdn.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
                    rysiek@mstdn.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
                    rysiek@mstdn.social
                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                    #92

                    @XavCC @_elena @EUCommission @aral sigh.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • aral@mastodon.ar.alA aral@mastodon.ar.al

                      @leadore @_elena @EUCommission No tin-foil hat necessary. It’s just institutional corruption (lobbying and revolving doors).

                      iju@mastodon.socialI This user is from outside of this forum
                      iju@mastodon.socialI This user is from outside of this forum
                      iju@mastodon.social
                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                      #93

                      @aral @leadore @_elena @EUCommission

                      "You don't need a formal conspiracy when interests converge. These people went to the same universities, they're on the same boards of directors, they're in the same country clubs, they have like interests, they don't need to call a meeting, they know what's good for them and they're getting it." - George Carlin

                      Also:

                      "It's a large club, and you're not invited." -George Carlin

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • bjoern@social.sengotta.netB bjoern@social.sengotta.net

                        @_elena oh no, what a surprise. I really try to make a surprised face now. They must have good marketing if the even outrun Eurosky, which obviously has Euro in its name. Honestly van der Leyen was never about independence etc. @EUCommission @aral

                        iju@mastodon.socialI This user is from outside of this forum
                        iju@mastodon.socialI This user is from outside of this forum
                        iju@mastodon.social
                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                        #94

                        @bjoern @_elena @EUCommission @aral

                        On the other hand, "Eurosky" sounds like off-brand Bluesky. I've been intentionally not reading about it for months now, and when I finally did do basic googling today, was surprised by their pitch.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • folfdk@helvede.netF folfdk@helvede.net shared this topic
                        • T thermophilus@mastodon.uno

                          @_elena “for profit” is not the same as “evil.” If we want an open-source future, it has to be economically sustainable. Big Tech gets paid with our personal data; if you want the same level of service without handing over data, someone still has to pay for it. There’s no such thing as a free lunch.

                          kichae@wanderingadventure.partyK This user is from outside of this forum
                          kichae@wanderingadventure.partyK This user is from outside of this forum
                          kichae@wanderingadventure.party
                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                          #95

                          Thermophilus For profit is definitionally exploitative – the profits are labour value withheld from workers – so, whether it’s evil or not depends on whether or not it’s evil to exploit people.

                          You can do commerce without profit. You can invest in your organization without profit. In fact, business expenses are explicitly not counted as profits. Only money kept by the ownership are.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • streetcoder@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                            streetcoder@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                            streetcoder@mastodon.social
                            wrote sidst redigeret af
                            #96

                            @kichae No why should I start another instance when they already have one. For whom?

                            I just want the EU Commission to use it and talk about it https://ec.social-network.europa.eu

                            But Ursula von der Leyen is not active there. Don't know if she even tried and why not?

                            In Germany we already have:

                            For federal authorities https://social.bund.de

                            For the state I'm living https://nrw.social

                            Instances for cities e.g. https://bonn.social

                            VIP accounts with relevance https://netzbegruenung.de/blog/das-ende-der-dominanz-microblogging-wandel-in-deutschland-in-zahlen/

                            streetcoder@mastodon.socialS 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • _elena@mastodon.social_ _elena@mastodon.social

                              #WSocial will open up their beta program today… and I have a SCOOP for you: it appears that they have quietly gone closed-source!

                              This is ironic, considering that the @EUCommission just unveiled their Tech Sovereignty Package, emphasizing the importance of #OpenSource. And yet they have migrated their main ATproto accounts to W Social - whose code can no longer be inspected!

                              My full article - with a great analysis by @aral:

                              🔗: https://blog.elenarossini.com/w-social-public-institutions-and-the-theater-of-european-digital-sovereignty/

                              #FOSS #DigitalSovereignty #BigTech

                              bno@mindly.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                              bno@mindly.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                              bno@mindly.social
                              wrote sidst redigeret af
                              #97

                              @_elena
                              Jesus christ @EUCommission are you guys fucking stupid, incompetent, corrupt or all of the above?.....

                              david@setouchi.socialD 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • streetcoder@mastodon.socialS streetcoder@mastodon.social

                                @kichae No why should I start another instance when they already have one. For whom?

                                I just want the EU Commission to use it and talk about it https://ec.social-network.europa.eu

                                But Ursula von der Leyen is not active there. Don't know if she even tried and why not?

                                In Germany we already have:

                                For federal authorities https://social.bund.de

                                For the state I'm living https://nrw.social

                                Instances for cities e.g. https://bonn.social

                                VIP accounts with relevance https://netzbegruenung.de/blog/das-ende-der-dominanz-microblogging-wandel-in-deutschland-in-zahlen/

                                streetcoder@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                                streetcoder@mastodon.socialS This user is from outside of this forum
                                streetcoder@mastodon.social
                                wrote sidst redigeret af
                                #98

                                @kichae It's not me not talking and not promoting the instances I use.

                                It seems Ursula von der Leyen prefers W Social over Mastodon. I want to know why? Because she could have already used the EU Commission instance she is working for.

                                And why is W Social so important for her that it's announced during G7? She is a representative and her words have a lot of power.

                                I assume she has done her research on alternatives before dropping things on important meetings. Why was Mastodon not an option?

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • T thermophilus@mastodon.uno

                                  @_elena “for profit” is not the same as “evil.” If we want an open-source future, it has to be economically sustainable. Big Tech gets paid with our personal data; if you want the same level of service without handing over data, someone still has to pay for it. There’s no such thing as a free lunch.

                                  giuseppe_aceto@scholar.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
                                  giuseppe_aceto@scholar.socialG This user is from outside of this forum
                                  giuseppe_aceto@scholar.social
                                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                                  #99

                                  @thermophilus @_elena sustainable doesn't mean "for profit". And all public services are not commercial activities, they have to effectively... provide a service, not make money from that.
                                  Even the so-called efficiency is secondary. It is evident that money can be found if politics wants.
                                  Social networks are a direct news channel, with citizen feedback, and a public square for discussion, and possibly education and information. They can also weaponized. An open decentralized tool is needed.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • xavcc@todon.euX xavcc@todon.eu

                                    @_elena
                                    And there's more sad news on this trap
                                    @EUCommission @aral
                                    @rysiek

                                    https://journa.host/@occrp/116766567782044882

                                    aral@mastodon.ar.alA This user is from outside of this forum
                                    aral@mastodon.ar.alA This user is from outside of this forum
                                    aral@mastodon.ar.al
                                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                                    #100

                                    @XavCC @_elena @EUCommission @rysiek Thanks for the heads up. Just unfollowed @occrp. They’re clearly not what I thought they were.

                                    https://blog.elenarossini.com/w-social-public-institutions-and-the-theater-of-european-digital-sovereignty/

                                    rysiek@mstdn.socialR 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • _elena@mastodon.social_ _elena@mastodon.social

                                      #WSocial will open up their beta program today… and I have a SCOOP for you: it appears that they have quietly gone closed-source!

                                      This is ironic, considering that the @EUCommission just unveiled their Tech Sovereignty Package, emphasizing the importance of #OpenSource. And yet they have migrated their main ATproto accounts to W Social - whose code can no longer be inspected!

                                      My full article - with a great analysis by @aral:

                                      🔗: https://blog.elenarossini.com/w-social-public-institutions-and-the-theater-of-european-digital-sovereignty/

                                      #FOSS #DigitalSovereignty #BigTech

                                      anita7@mastodon.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                                      anita7@mastodon.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                                      anita7@mastodon.social
                                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                                      #101

                                      @_elena @EUCommission @aral
                                      Yes it is sad. And they will finance by Advertisement. So the roles seem clear: the payers are the directors, not the directors and not the users.
                                      No one can see inside the code and they connect to bluesky US. At the moment I cannot see too many differences.
                                      Maybe they have to change sth or communicate differently.
                                      Let s have a look.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • aral@mastodon.ar.alA aral@mastodon.ar.al

                                        @XavCC @_elena @EUCommission @rysiek Thanks for the heads up. Just unfollowed @occrp. They’re clearly not what I thought they were.

                                        https://blog.elenarossini.com/w-social-public-institutions-and-the-theater-of-european-digital-sovereignty/

                                        rysiek@mstdn.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
                                        rysiek@mstdn.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
                                        rysiek@mstdn.social
                                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                                        #102

                                        @aral @XavCC @_elena they are a solid investigative journalism outlet, and reporters and journalists working there are wonderful people publishing important stories and working their fingers to the bone.

                                        Top-down decisions, however… are a separate matter.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • f4grx@chaos.socialF f4grx@chaos.social

                                          @hwll @_elena comply with what? A new twitter appears. Oh ok. Anyways.

                                          hwll@sunny.gardenH This user is from outside of this forum
                                          hwll@sunny.gardenH This user is from outside of this forum
                                          hwll@sunny.garden
                                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                                          #103

                                          @f4grx you're good

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Svar
                                          • Svar som emne
                                          Login for at svare
                                          • Ældste til nyeste
                                          • Nyeste til ældste
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Log ind

                                          • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          Graciously hosted by data.coop
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Hjem
                                          • Seneste
                                          • Etiketter
                                          • Populære
                                          • Verden
                                          • Bruger
                                          • Grupper