Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. CONTEXT

CONTEXT

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
petromafiaconsumerism
131 Indlæg 39 Posters 1 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • mark@mastodon.fixermark.comM mark@mastodon.fixermark.com

    @anthropy @GhostOnTheHalfShell @benroyce @blogdiva I've been ruminating as of late on how close Malthusian nihilism is to racism. This is not to cast aspersions or make accusations regarding thread participants; it's just a thought.

    Malthusian math (which is disproven, or at least, claims to prove more than it can because several of its assumptions were upended by new technological breakthroughs) indicates some people have to die or the entire population dies.

    But then you're left with the problem that nobody wants to die, and racism steps in to provide a framework that lets people rank the quality of other human beings to let them square that cognitive dissonance off.

    It may be an interesting dynamic, but I haven't done nearly enough thinking or research on the subject to endorse it as anything more than a thought.

    benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
    benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
    benroyce@mastodon.social
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #82

    @mark @anthropy @GhostOnTheHalfShell @blogdiva

    nihilists on the left are the same as sadists on the right. in the intentional or unintentional effects of their arguments

    if not merely their arguments being slight tweaks on the arguments racist mass murderers make on the right, when you examine the substance of their arguments

    which makes you wonder about such empty turds supposedly "on the left"

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • archaeoiain@archaeo.socialA archaeoiain@archaeo.social

      @jwcph @benroyce @GhostOnTheHalfShell @blogdiva it is one reason why we should not encourage people to have children, and should not discourage contraception.

      jwcph@helvede.netJ This user is from outside of this forum
      jwcph@helvede.netJ This user is from outside of this forum
      jwcph@helvede.net
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #83

      @ArchaeoIain @benroyce @GhostOnTheHalfShell @blogdiva What the fuck are you talking about!?

      You think we can population control ourselves back to a few hundred million people - and do you think handing out condoms will make it happen fast enough to be ANY help at all in the fight for a better environment on Earth?

      archaeoiain@archaeo.socialA 2 Replies Last reply
      0
      • benroyce@mastodon.socialB benroyce@mastodon.social

        @nikatjef @dnkboston @GhostOnTheHalfShell

        so what is your argument? stay on fossil fuels?

        i think you would say no

        and thus do you see the foolishness of this constant insistence on perfectionism?

        obviously EVs result in less fossil fuel use

        that is the point

        we iterate and move to even better, EVs without the problem you describe

        we can't do that until we get off fossil fuels

        that is all we can do: better, then iterate

        stop reading and believing shilled fossil fuel industry arguments

        francoisprague@mastodon.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
        francoisprague@mastodon.socialF This user is from outside of this forum
        francoisprague@mastodon.social
        wrote sidst redigeret af
        #84

        @benroyce @nikatjef @dnkboston @GhostOnTheHalfShell

        I like to think that 185 millions years from now, when a civilization of octopuses rise, they'll use our human remnants as fuel for their vehicles.

        dnkboston@apobangpo.spaceD benroyce@mastodon.socialB 2 Replies Last reply
        0
        • paneerakbari@mas.toP paneerakbari@mas.to

          @ChuckMcManis @benroyce @GhostOnTheHalfShell @anthropy @blogdiva Breeder reactors don't output more uranium than what is fed into the system, they make more *fissible* material than they are supplied with

          "Orange juice from concentrate" isn't more oranges than it took to produce

          Our world's matter-system is all but a closed loop, we're not getting - or making - more of it. But our is bombarded by all the energy we could use and we let it just slip away because there's no gold-pressed latinum

          chuckmcmanis@chaos.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
          chuckmcmanis@chaos.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
          chuckmcmanis@chaos.social
          wrote sidst redigeret af
          #85

          @paneerakbari

          Yes, but the point of the Oak Ridge demonstration was a nuclear fuel cycle that ran "forever." Not trying to divert this wonderful discussion, just noting that 'nuclear' can be 'renewable' 😃. I too rage against folks who just want to go back to living in caves with 99% of the current population gone.

          @benroyce @GhostOnTheHalfShell @anthropy @blogdiva

          benroyce@mastodon.socialB 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • benroyce@mastodon.socialB benroyce@mastodon.social

            @GhostOnTheHalfShell @anthropy @blogdiva

            you're a toxic idealist

            a whiny useless perfectionist

            of course mining for solar and batteries sucks

            *and* a smaller footprint than fossil fuel extraction

            *and* far better for climate change

            you fucking purists are an enemy of the real left as bad as MAGA

            ALL YOU GET IN THIS WORLD IS BETTER

            PERFECT IS NOT ON THE MENU

            are you shilling for the fossil fuel industry or are you just that fucking stupid and blind?

            stop following me, you stupid asshole

            paulc@mstdn.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
            paulc@mstdn.socialP This user is from outside of this forum
            paulc@mstdn.social
            wrote sidst redigeret af
            #86

            @benroyce @GhostOnTheHalfShell @anthropy @blogdiva As to the battery issue, the good news is that lithium batteries are recyclable so over time lithium mining can get greatly reduced once we reach “peak battery.” Recycling batteries could provide a majority of the lithium needed, though there would always be a need for lithium mines.

            Compare to oil which isn't recyclable and always needs to be replaced as we use it.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • benroyce@mastodon.socialB benroyce@mastodon.social

              @tuban_muzuru @GhostOnTheHalfShell @blogdiva

              good

              and thank you

              and now you understand the idiocy of GhostOnTheHalfShell, arguing against that, merely out of toxic idealism

              this marks that account as a shill of the fossil fuel industry or just too fucking stupid to see that the only real world effect of their perfectionist bullshit is to help the fossil fuel industry

              tuban_muzuru@beige.partyT This user is from outside of this forum
              tuban_muzuru@beige.partyT This user is from outside of this forum
              tuban_muzuru@beige.party
              wrote sidst redigeret af
              #87

              @benroyce @GhostOnTheHalfShell @blogdiva

              @GhostOnTheHalfShell looks at the problem from a kinetic energy perspective. Everything has undeniable conseqences - look at Lake Mead,

              benroyce@mastodon.socialB 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • tuban_muzuru@beige.partyT tuban_muzuru@beige.party

                @benroyce @GhostOnTheHalfShell @blogdiva

                @GhostOnTheHalfShell looks at the problem from a kinetic energy perspective. Everything has undeniable conseqences - look at Lake Mead,

                benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                benroyce@mastodon.social
                wrote sidst redigeret af
                #88

                @tuban_muzuru @GhostOnTheHalfShell @blogdiva

                right so we get our energy from the sun rather than digging it up. vast improvement

                tuban_muzuru@beige.partyT 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • francoisprague@mastodon.socialF francoisprague@mastodon.social

                  @benroyce @nikatjef @dnkboston @GhostOnTheHalfShell

                  I like to think that 185 millions years from now, when a civilization of octopuses rise, they'll use our human remnants as fuel for their vehicles.

                  dnkboston@apobangpo.spaceD This user is from outside of this forum
                  dnkboston@apobangpo.spaceD This user is from outside of this forum
                  dnkboston@apobangpo.space
                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                  #89

                  @FrancoisPrague #goals @benroyce @nikatjef @GhostOnTheHalfShell

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • francoisprague@mastodon.socialF francoisprague@mastodon.social

                    @benroyce @nikatjef @dnkboston @GhostOnTheHalfShell

                    I like to think that 185 millions years from now, when a civilization of octopuses rise, they'll use our human remnants as fuel for their vehicles.

                    benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                    benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                    benroyce@mastodon.social
                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                    #90

                    @FrancoisPrague @nikatjef @dnkboston @GhostOnTheHalfShell

                    thank you, sincerely, for the laugh

                    😆

                    endless dreary nihilism and whiny toxic perfectionism from pinheads is a drag

                    francoisprague@mastodon.socialF 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • drangnon@hachyderm.ioD drangnon@hachyderm.io

                      @benroyce @GhostOnTheHalfShell @blogdiva there is also the consideration wrt the effects of vehicle exhaust. Unless the power plants are coal, that's a straight up win for the carbon cycle.

                      Of course the batteries have rare chemicals and extractive companies still come into play. But they are there for vehicles regardless.

                      justinderrick@mstdn.caJ This user is from outside of this forum
                      justinderrick@mstdn.caJ This user is from outside of this forum
                      justinderrick@mstdn.ca
                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                      #91

                      @draNgNon @benroyce @GhostOnTheHalfShell @blogdiva Also, EV batteries degrade far less than predicted, and have a valuable ‘second life’ as battery storage for a grid powered by renewables… and when they’re finally used up, they are up to 96% recyclable…. Reducing the need for more extraction.

                      You cannot re-burn gasoline or diesel.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • benroyce@mastodon.socialB benroyce@mastodon.social

                        @GhostOnTheHalfShell @blogdiva

                        unread

                        uninterested

                        another whiny toxic idealist

                        fighting the real left in service of the fossil fuel industry

                        and too fucking stupid to see it

                        stop following me and fuck you, you pathetic loser

                        punissuer@universeodon.comP This user is from outside of this forum
                        punissuer@universeodon.comP This user is from outside of this forum
                        punissuer@universeodon.com
                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                        #92

                        @benroyce might I suggest they may have a point there?
                        https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20240326-how-hydroelectric-dams-are-a-hidden-source-of-carbon-emissions
                        @GhostOnTheHalfShell @blogdiva

                        benroyce@mastodon.socialB 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • punissuer@universeodon.comP punissuer@universeodon.com

                          @benroyce might I suggest they may have a point there?
                          https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20240326-how-hydroelectric-dams-are-a-hidden-source-of-carbon-emissions
                          @GhostOnTheHalfShell @blogdiva

                          benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                          benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                          benroyce@mastodon.social
                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                          #93

                          @punissuer @GhostOnTheHalfShell @blogdiva

                          i don't deny that point in the least

                          what i deny is this "well it's better, but it's not perfect, so let's just sit around and whine about being perfect, and thereby only help the status quo of terrible"

                          punissuer@universeodon.comP 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • jwcph@helvede.netJ jwcph@helvede.net

                            @ArchaeoIain @benroyce @GhostOnTheHalfShell @blogdiva What the fuck are you talking about!?

                            You think we can population control ourselves back to a few hundred million people - and do you think handing out condoms will make it happen fast enough to be ANY help at all in the fight for a better environment on Earth?

                            archaeoiain@archaeo.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                            archaeoiain@archaeo.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                            archaeoiain@archaeo.social
                            wrote sidst redigeret af
                            #94

                            @jwcph @benroyce @GhostOnTheHalfShell @blogdiva That is not what I said. It is the logic of your statement though. It is clear that government policies or even evil religions which encourage population growth and ban contraception are aiming in the opposite direction partly because the dominant economic models are derived from agrarian societies where more people could produce more so growth arose from growing population. Simple really.

                            blogdiva@mastodon.socialB 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • blogdiva@mastodon.socialB blogdiva@mastodon.social

                              RE: https://mastodon.social/@kottke/116013120934445460

                              CONTEXT

                              the Government Pension Fund of Norway is the largest sovereign-wealth fund in the planet; investing over a real, EU trillion in businesses worldwide.

                              where did they get the money to start the fund? FROM SURPLUS PETROLEUM & FOSSIL FUEL REVENUES. Norway nationalized key sectors of their economy, starting with oil & gas.

                              so the Norwegian government uses oil & gas money to rid the country of #petromafia #consumerism thru investments not taxes.

                              take that, neoliberal capitalists.

                              robo105@mastodon.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
                              robo105@mastodon.socialR This user is from outside of this forum
                              robo105@mastodon.social
                              wrote sidst redigeret af
                              #95

                              @blogdiva Canada had an oil boom at the same time and all the funds raise were wasted by giving it to oil & gas companies

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • jwcph@helvede.netJ jwcph@helvede.net

                                @ArchaeoIain @benroyce @GhostOnTheHalfShell @blogdiva What the fuck are you talking about!?

                                You think we can population control ourselves back to a few hundred million people - and do you think handing out condoms will make it happen fast enough to be ANY help at all in the fight for a better environment on Earth?

                                archaeoiain@archaeo.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                                archaeoiain@archaeo.socialA This user is from outside of this forum
                                archaeoiain@archaeo.social
                                wrote sidst redigeret af
                                #96

                                @jwcph @benroyce @GhostOnTheHalfShell @blogdiva and unlike you I am not envisaging people dying, just not being born

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • benroyce@mastodon.socialB benroyce@mastodon.social

                                  @tuban_muzuru @GhostOnTheHalfShell @blogdiva

                                  right so we get our energy from the sun rather than digging it up. vast improvement

                                  tuban_muzuru@beige.partyT This user is from outside of this forum
                                  tuban_muzuru@beige.partyT This user is from outside of this forum
                                  tuban_muzuru@beige.party
                                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                                  #97

                                  @benroyce @GhostOnTheHalfShell @blogdiva

                                  Global warming melted the glaciers and snowmass which filled Lake Mead. They'll never let it disappear completely, but hydro power will soon be gone

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • chuckmcmanis@chaos.socialC chuckmcmanis@chaos.social

                                    @paneerakbari

                                    Yes, but the point of the Oak Ridge demonstration was a nuclear fuel cycle that ran "forever." Not trying to divert this wonderful discussion, just noting that 'nuclear' can be 'renewable' 😃. I too rage against folks who just want to go back to living in caves with 99% of the current population gone.

                                    @benroyce @GhostOnTheHalfShell @anthropy @blogdiva

                                    benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                                    benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                                    benroyce@mastodon.social
                                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                                    #98

                                    @ChuckMcManis @paneerakbari @GhostOnTheHalfShell @anthropy @blogdiva

                                    while i generally like breeder reactors you have to admit the teensy tiny problem that this is how we make plutonium for bombs

                                    this is why breeder reactors are downplayed

                                    otherwise i agree

                                    chuckmcmanis@chaos.socialC 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • mark@mastodon.fixermark.comM mark@mastodon.fixermark.com

                                      @anthropy @GhostOnTheHalfShell @benroyce @blogdiva I've been ruminating as of late on how close Malthusian nihilism is to racism. This is not to cast aspersions or make accusations regarding thread participants; it's just a thought.

                                      Malthusian math (which is disproven, or at least, claims to prove more than it can because several of its assumptions were upended by new technological breakthroughs) indicates some people have to die or the entire population dies.

                                      But then you're left with the problem that nobody wants to die, and racism steps in to provide a framework that lets people rank the quality of other human beings to let them square that cognitive dissonance off.

                                      It may be an interesting dynamic, but I haven't done nearly enough thinking or research on the subject to endorse it as anything more than a thought.

                                      blogdiva@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                                      blogdiva@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                                      blogdiva@mastodon.social
                                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                                      #99

                                      malthusianism is eugenics which is always founded on racism.

                                      if you agree with anything malthusian, i would suggest going into cult deprogramming therapy.

                                      malthusianism ―like eugenics, like racism, like capitalism― is a death cult.

                                      @mark @anthropy @GhostOnTheHalfShell @benroyce

                                      hakona@im.alstadheim.noH miguelpergamon@kolektiva.socialM 2 Replies Last reply
                                      0
                                      • brad@1040ste.netB brad@1040ste.net

                                        @benroyce @GhostOnTheHalfShell @blogdiva No argument there; my only quibble was the "get everyone an EV" bit. We can do even better at the same time is all I'm saying.

                                        benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                                        benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                                        benroyce@mastodon.social
                                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                                        #100

                                        @brad @GhostOnTheHalfShell @blogdiva

                                        but never in a million years did i make this

                                        "get everyone an EV"

                                        argument

                                        replace all ICE with EV

                                        *and* reduce cars in general

                                        this is the ideal argument

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • benroyce@mastodon.socialB benroyce@mastodon.social

                                          @punissuer @GhostOnTheHalfShell @blogdiva

                                          i don't deny that point in the least

                                          what i deny is this "well it's better, but it's not perfect, so let's just sit around and whine about being perfect, and thereby only help the status quo of terrible"

                                          punissuer@universeodon.comP This user is from outside of this forum
                                          punissuer@universeodon.comP This user is from outside of this forum
                                          punissuer@universeodon.com
                                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                                          #101

                                          @benroyce I don't know about you, but to me, this was new information. If that 2,200g CO2e/kWh is correct – which I don't know yet – and my math checks out, then a BEV powered by hydroelectric energy really isn't better than a smaller ICE car at all.
                                          @GhostOnTheHalfShell @blogdiva

                                          benroyce@mastodon.socialB 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Svar
                                          • Svar som emne
                                          Login for at svare
                                          • Ældste til nyeste
                                          • Nyeste til ældste
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Log ind

                                          • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          Graciously hosted by data.coop
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Hjem
                                          • Seneste
                                          • Etiketter
                                          • Populære
                                          • Verden
                                          • Bruger
                                          • Grupper