Scan your passport to join our social network.

[mjdxp@labyrinth.zone]

@aral @lain every single online service i can think of has said that your identification materials ever leave your device, then was later exposed for just completely lying about it because it turns out you can just lie about that and face zero consequences. this one's almost certainly no different.

[hsza@social.tudbut.de]

@vonKordke @lain @aral This should not be implemented at all

there’s no excuse for fascist age discrimination tooling that denies anonymity to every user. “privacy” my ass, the core premise is unacceptable

[yassie_j@labyrinth.zone]

@aral@mastodon.ar.al privacy concerns aside, there is no way that anyone is going to sincerely say “follow me on W”

[vonkordke@social.vivaldi.net]

@hsza @lain @aral
You can still be anonymous with that solution, why do you find it hard to grasp? It's really simple. It just has to be verified by the people.
Social media is bad for kids and something must be done.

[amy@sk.girlthi.ng]

@aral@mastodon.ar.al @lain@lain.com also loving the "you can use your full real name or just appear as 'a person'" aspect, very awesome stuff

also love calling your shit decentralised because it uses atproto. good job everyone

[hsza@social.tudbut.de]

@vonKordke @lain @aral i will not install some stupid phone spyware and give it an ID to use some grifters’ social media site

this ignorance on your part is just pathetic, like get yourself a grip, the fascists doing this do not have your best interests in mind

[hsza@social.tudbut.de]

@vonKordke @lain @aral lmao “social media is bad for kids”

sorry you are a fucking part of the problem and you know it

[causeofbsod@wetdry.world]

@EregLoch @aral @lain@lain.com if the verification is entirely on-device then it is likely trivial to spoof with some work in ghidra.

rule 1 of computer security: the client is untrustworthy

[vonkordke@social.vivaldi.net]

@hsza @lain @aral

When it's confirmed it's not Spyware, it's not Spyware.
Clearly social media is bad also for some adults.

[vonkordke@social.vivaldi.net]

@hsza @lain @aral it is confirmed by many scientific studies. You cannot deny it. It's a fact.

[hsza@social.tudbut.de]

@vonKordke @lain @aral you are naive and oblivious. if social media is bad for some adults, you’re one of those.

[hsza@social.tudbut.de]

@vonKordke @lain @aral lol you can’t “it’s a fact” your fascist delusion into being true

[vonkordke@social.vivaldi.net]

@hsza @lain @aral

You need to grow up

[hsza@social.tudbut.de]

@vonKordke @lain @aral you know who this response paints you as? A geniune Nazi

Only fascists whine “oh you call everyone a fascist” when called out as what they are

[causeofbsod@wetdry.world]

@EregLoch @aral this is of course assuming they arent just lying and doing the verification remotely anyway

[vonkordke@social.vivaldi.net]

@hsza @lain @aral
Do you care what monkeys screams when you go near their cage in the zoo? Me neither

[crv@akkoma.kruhlovo.xyz]

@goog @aral @mynameistillian report za tumulca

[frawst@fedi.fraw.st]

@EregLoch@mastodon.coffee @aral@mastodon.ar.al @lain@lain.com if the verification is truly fully on device, then in theory someone can just spoof the results that get sent back to the server and pretend theyre a real person, which completely defeats the point

the only way ID verification truly works is when there is some external server doing the verification, which of course has its own even worse problems

there is no way to make ID verification both private and trustworthy, the two are fundamentally interlinked, so theres no point even entertaining the idea either way

[hsza@social.tudbut.de]

@vonKordke @lain @aral pspspspspspsps monkey

[hsza@social.tudbut.de]

@vonKordke @aral @lain thats right i dont actually care youve proven you’re not worth listening to heh

just trolling for the entertainment value now