Firefox uses on-device downloaded-on-demand ML models for privacy-preserving translation.
-
@firefoxwebdevs @heptapodEnthusiast @nuintari No, do not bullshit me, you said yourself that what you "interpret" that "the vast majority of people feel" comes from the poll!
The poll which you doctored by specifically making it only pro-LLM-in-firefox, because you are an asshole.
Your assholeness is further demonstrated by you "not seeing the point" of hearing things you don't want to hear, because you'll just do this LLM shit regardless how much it's hated.
@kyle_pegasus @heptapodEnthusiast @nuintari yes, my interpretation of the poll results is that, given the translation engine as it currently is, people feel it should be disabled if the kill switch is activated.
I really don't think that's a mad interpretation of the results.
-
@kyle_pegasus @heptapodEnthusiast @nuintari yes, my interpretation of the poll results is that, given the translation engine as it currently is, people feel it should be disabled if the kill switch is activated.
I really don't think that's a mad interpretation of the results.
@firefoxwebdevs @heptapodEnthusiast @nuintari
"I really don't think that letting him walk free from the murder trial is a mad interpretation of the evidence"
you had forbidden the prosecution from submitting the CCTV footage of him staving some guys head in with a candlestick as evidence. he's also your best friend IRL
"justice was served today"
-
@firefoxwebdevs @heptapodEnthusiast @nuintari
"I really don't think that letting him walk free from the murder trial is a mad interpretation of the evidence"
you had forbidden the prosecution from submitting the CCTV footage of him staving some guys head in with a candlestick as evidence. he's also your best friend IRL
"justice was served today"
@firefoxwebdevs @heptapodEnthusiast @nuintari I have to wonder if you even understand how dishonest you are
-
@davidgerard @zzt @firefoxwebdevs It's telling that you can't admit that you (deliberately?) misrepresented me to stir outrage.
@jaffathecake @davidgerard @zzt @firefoxwebdevs
brother what the hell are you even fighting for here lmfao
-
@240185 I've already used the results of this poll to push for change in the AI kill switch. The feedback was massively appreciated.
@firefoxwebdevs @240185 Did you mention the overall dim view that users express at the prospect of losing their favorite browser to AI hype? Mozilla's problem here is far greater than "how should we implement a kill switch." How is Mozilla planning to restore the trust they've lost by employing deceptive patterns against their user base?
-
@duke_of_germany @firefoxwebdevs @davidgerard @tante Am I a firefox user if I use a derivative like waterfox?
@OliviaVespera @duke_of_germany @firefoxwebdevs @davidgerard @tante Waterfox has pledged no AI and won't be accepting those bits. So has Zen.
-
Let's ask the real question:
Firefox users,
do you want any AI directly built into Firefox, or separated out into extensions?
"I want something
I can call my own,
that ain't a Ford Cortina
or a mortgage on a home!" -
@sibrosan @duke_of_germany @firefoxwebdevs @tante
Your trust in corporations will put you in harm's way as fascism worsens.
@crowgirl @duke_of_germany @firefoxwebdevs @tante
Yes I know I'm doomed
-
@firefoxwebdevs The frame of this question is risible.
I am begging you to just make a web browser.
Make it the best browser for the open web. Make it a browser that empowers individuals. Make it a browser that defends users against threats.
Do not make a search engine. Do not make a translation engine. Do not make a webpage summariser. Do not make a front-end for an LLM. Do not make a client-side LLM.
Just. Make. A. Web. Browser.
Please.
I think it's OK if they make *some* of those things... provided they aren't baked into the browser or installed with it by default.
(A search engine and a translator plugin seem fine. LLM stuff can eff right off.)
-
@firefoxwebdevs I disagree with the premise.
@rowmyboat @firefoxwebdevs Yep. It's exactly what the parents of a toddler do when they want the child to feel like it has control. "You can have ANYTHING you want, so what's it gonna be, apple or banana?"
It's insulting
-
@OliviaVespera @duke_of_germany @firefoxwebdevs @davidgerard @tante Waterfox has pledged no AI and won't be accepting those bits. So has Zen.
@reflex @duke_of_germany @firefoxwebdevs @davidgerard @tante I meant can I respond to the poll. But i guess now I see the OP I see what I should do.
-
@firefoxwebdevs @sotolf @m Dark patterns aren't aligned with the principles of informed consent. I think most would agree that facebook preinstalled on a phone isn't opt-in.
It is insane to believe that your users would believe you when you say that a feature is "opt-in" because "you don't have to click on it."
I used to be a defender of firefox/mozilla (including efforts like the translations and common voice) but this saga has been souring me on all of it.
Please consider splitting things into addons.
The recent thunderbird mobile changes (and mozilla's response to feedback there) have been awful and leave me wanting to stay away from all things mozilla going forward.
-
@fmasy @Rycochet @firefoxwebdevs @zzt You can look at the discussions on Mozilla Connect if you want commentary from community members.
Mozilla does occasionally run surveys, but results are never public.
@yoasif @Rycochet @firefoxwebdevs @zzt Ok, Thanks. Interesting, I will do my search here
-
@jaffathecake @davidgerard @zzt @firefoxwebdevs
brother what the hell are you even fighting for here lmfao
@TheEntity it's fair to say I dislike things being attributed to me that I didn't say & aren't true.
-
@fasterandworse @heptapodEnthusiast @nuintari @davidgerard @zzt I don't think taking you at your word is playing word games. You meant what you said.
That aside, rearchitecting multiple large features to be plugins won't be possible for Firefox 148, and imo we need that kill switch _yesterday_.
Anyway, it's the end of the day for me now. I appreciate the robust discussion.
@firefoxwebdevs @heptapodEnthusiast @nuintari @davidgerard @zzt I'd actually like to have a discussion about what it would entail to convert features, ones which are not contributing to the rendering of web pages, into add-ons, regardless of how quickly it could be done.
It would be good to know more detail around what you mean when you say "we need the kill switch yesterday" compared to the about:config and preferences page options we have now? Is there more invasive AI we aren't aware of?
-
@firefoxwebdevs It would also be compelling if a team at Mozilla were dedicated to building the best browser translation add-on on the market, for all browsers. To promote the power of add-ons and, at the same time, the Mozilla brand.
@fasterandworse @firefoxwebdevs this exactly
-
Firefox uses on-device downloaded-on-demand ML models for privacy-preserving translation.
They're not LLMs. They're trained on open data.
Should translation be disabled if the AI 'kill switch' is active?
@firefoxwebdevs While I understand some people actually appreciate translations, this part should be an extension. I don’t understand why you have to build it either.
To me, the translation part is just annoying. If I don’t understand a language I’ll find the content in a language I do. The translations are horrible (seriously) anyway. This also brings jobs to proper translators who know what they are doing (and understand context and culture).
-
@TheEntity it's fair to say I dislike things being attributed to me that I didn't say & aren't true.
@jaffathecake Have you defended your e-bushido on the term killswitch yet
-
Let's ask the real question:
Firefox users,
do you want any AI directly built into Firefox, or separated out into extensions?
@duke_of_germany Das nenne ich mal eindeutiges Feedback
-
@rose_alibi
i like the #firefox #translation because it helps make the web less US-centric by making international web more accssible.#firefox #translations actually respect privacy, as opposed to #googletranslate, so i can use them for the government websites that i don't always understand, because i'm not swedish speaker.
i don't get why this feature is lumped in with the privacy nightmare chat bots?
@pelle @rose_alibi because they're trying to launder the chatbots by equating them with long pre-existing uses of ML that don't need an ever expanding slop machine to work.
