Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. CONTEXT

CONTEXT

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
petromafiaconsumerism
131 Indlæg 39 Posters 1 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • benroyce@mastodon.socialB benroyce@mastodon.social

    @ChuckMcManis @paneerakbari @GhostOnTheHalfShell @anthropy @blogdiva

    while i generally like breeder reactors you have to admit the teensy tiny problem that this is how we make plutonium for bombs

    this is why breeder reactors are downplayed

    otherwise i agree

    chuckmcmanis@chaos.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
    chuckmcmanis@chaos.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
    chuckmcmanis@chaos.social
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #106

    @benroyce

    Yeah there is that downside. When my kids were younger we talked about how as technology became more sophisticated, it also becomes more capable. And capability has both good and bad vectors associated with it.

    @paneerakbari @GhostOnTheHalfShell @anthropy @blogdiva

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • mark@mastodon.fixermark.comM mark@mastodon.fixermark.com

      @GhostOnTheHalfShell @benroyce @blogdiva What's your source on permanent destruction and toxicity? I'm pretty sure that isn't true.

      Batteries can renewable capture equipment (wind and solar) can be recycled. Relatively easily, in fact; for batteries, we can grind them and re-extract the useful elements easier than we can pull them out of the ground, and for generators, we can tear them down and refurb them.

      I don't dispute that initial extraction costs money and lives (though I compare it to fossil fuel extraction in that regard). But we can't recapture the output of a fossil fuel reaction and turn it back into fossil fuel; we can grind a battery and make a new battery, over and over, for a very long time before the elements stop cooperating.

      flipper@mastodonapp.ukF This user is from outside of this forum
      flipper@mastodonapp.ukF This user is from outside of this forum
      flipper@mastodonapp.uk
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #107

      @mark @GhostOnTheHalfShell @benroyce @blogdiva This is my understanding too.

      We can recycle old batteries to make new ones. It is cheaper to do this than digging more materials, once we get enough supply of old batteries.

      Battery tech is also getting better. We are on the cusp of being able to replace lithium with sodium for electricity grid storage, and sodium doesn't require mining in the way lithium does.

      The key here is that all the extraction for EVs is a one-time (mostly) operation that will replace fossil fuel extraction, which is not a one-time operation.

      And before anyone thinks I'm a EV shill: I hate all cars. I think they should be completely outlawed from cities and heavily reduced elsewhere. Am I going to get my wish in my lifetime? I very much doubt it. EVs are an improvement over internal combustion in every material way.

      Once we have EVs, we need to fix the toxic tires and road markings. Then onward.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • ghostonthehalfshell@masto.aiG ghostonthehalfshell@masto.ai

        @benroyce @brad @blogdiva

        OK, it’s only a lie. If what you’ve been told about renewables is true.. let me emphasize that the companies who were gushing over renewables are the worst polluting most environmentally destructive industries in the world which is the mining sector.

        You are going to believe companies that are no different than big oil and no different than big tobacco at face value value.

        How well has that traditionally worked out?

        cy@fedicy.us.toC This user is from outside of this forum
        cy@fedicy.us.toC This user is from outside of this forum
        cy@fedicy.us.to
        wrote sidst redigeret af
        #108
        I don't believe those companies for a second. The one I believe who was gushing over renewables is a Youtuber! 😛

        CC: @benroyce@mastodon.social @brad@1040ste.net @blogdiva@mastodon.social
        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • ghostonthehalfshell@masto.aiG ghostonthehalfshell@masto.ai

          @anthropy @benroyce @blogdiva

          And if you're going to then say oh, but you're gonna leave the disabled to die because they can't move. I want to cut off that argument in advance and saying that the disabled in Amsterdam have no mobility issues the city has solve that problem, so don't even try or if you're beginning to think that way, please go look at how the Dutch handled mobility for the disabled

          benhm3@saint-paul.usB This user is from outside of this forum
          benhm3@saint-paul.usB This user is from outside of this forum
          benhm3@saint-paul.us
          wrote sidst redigeret af
          #109

          @GhostOnTheHalfShell @anthropy @benroyce @blogdiva

          I’m sorry Ghost, you’re wrong. You’ve been mislead by oil companies to confuse things like power and energy.

          Try this video. But stop at the end-credits: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KtQ9nt2ZeGM

          For the rest of my people, watch the post-roll and put it on loop.

          ghostonthehalfshell@masto.aiG 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • benroyce@mastodon.socialB benroyce@mastodon.social

            @adriano @GhostOnTheHalfShell @anthropy @blogdiva

            the arguments of toxic perfectionists like GhostOnTheHalfShell are not just foolishness in isolation

            the real problem is how like here they go after EVs

            they have to attack *better* because it's not *perfect*

            !?

            you see this constantly all over the left

            these people are rat poison

            in pursuit of purity, they fight better

            thereby helping the status quo: the fossil fuel industry

            they are an agent provocateur shill or a moron

            c_merriweather@social.linux.pizzaC This user is from outside of this forum
            c_merriweather@social.linux.pizzaC This user is from outside of this forum
            c_merriweather@social.linux.pizza
            wrote sidst redigeret af
            #110

            @adriano @GhostOnTheHalfShell @anthropy @blogdiva @benroyce
            Sadly, the people (in the US) for whom EVs would be an improvement are those least likely to afford them.

            I am thinking of all the gasoline cars that are owned by low-income people, that are paid off, sometimes barely run, and are, in some cases, actually being held together with duct tape and wire.

            So all the middle-class+ folks can argue about EVs, while the rest of us just fill up our cars when we can afford to, and buy another roll of duct tape, and/or wire.*

            * yes, one hose in my 2013 car is held together with duct tape. The parts and labor expense to replace it are out of my price range. I doubt I will ever own an EV, nor will many of my neighbors.

            anthropy@mastodon.derg.nzA 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • archaeoiain@archaeo.socialA archaeoiain@archaeo.social

              @jwcph @benroyce @GhostOnTheHalfShell @blogdiva That is not what I said. It is the logic of your statement though. It is clear that government policies or even evil religions which encourage population growth and ban contraception are aiming in the opposite direction partly because the dominant economic models are derived from agrarian societies where more people could produce more so growth arose from growing population. Simple really.

              blogdiva@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
              blogdiva@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
              blogdiva@mastodon.social
              wrote sidst redigeret af
              #111

              STOP

              Mama Gaya is enough.

              the death cult of settler colonialist, extractivist capitalism is the problem.

              there's a reason LAND REDISTRIBUTION WARS started after the wars of independence across all the Américas.

              no nation can survive when capitalists control all the land. you cant cash crop ecosystems into profits without genocide and ecocide.

              kill capalism to save us all.

              malthusianism is eugenics & racist. deprogram that shit.

              @ArchaeoIain @jwcph @benroyce @GhostOnTheHalfShell

              ghostonthehalfshell@masto.aiG 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • blogdiva@mastodon.socialB blogdiva@mastodon.social

                malthusianism is eugenics which is always founded on racism.

                if you agree with anything malthusian, i would suggest going into cult deprogramming therapy.

                malthusianism ―like eugenics, like racism, like capitalism― is a death cult.

                @mark @anthropy @GhostOnTheHalfShell @benroyce

                hakona@im.alstadheim.noH This user is from outside of this forum
                hakona@im.alstadheim.noH This user is from outside of this forum
                hakona@im.alstadheim.no
                wrote sidst redigeret af
                #112

                @blogdiva I don't usually go for absolutes, but this one I'm fairly certain proves true in practice. @mark @anthropy @GhostOnTheHalfShell @benroyce

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • c_merriweather@social.linux.pizzaC c_merriweather@social.linux.pizza

                  @adriano @GhostOnTheHalfShell @anthropy @blogdiva @benroyce
                  Sadly, the people (in the US) for whom EVs would be an improvement are those least likely to afford them.

                  I am thinking of all the gasoline cars that are owned by low-income people, that are paid off, sometimes barely run, and are, in some cases, actually being held together with duct tape and wire.

                  So all the middle-class+ folks can argue about EVs, while the rest of us just fill up our cars when we can afford to, and buy another roll of duct tape, and/or wire.*

                  * yes, one hose in my 2013 car is held together with duct tape. The parts and labor expense to replace it are out of my price range. I doubt I will ever own an EV, nor will many of my neighbors.

                  anthropy@mastodon.derg.nzA This user is from outside of this forum
                  anthropy@mastodon.derg.nzA This user is from outside of this forum
                  anthropy@mastodon.derg.nz
                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                  #113

                  @c_merriweather @adriano @GhostOnTheHalfShell @blogdiva @benroyce I bought a nissan leaf 2013 about half a year ago. less than 70k km on the odometer, 90% original battery capacity. Cost me 4.5k. Saved me over 1k in gasoline so far

                  I think people aren't looking enough at the second hand EV market tbqh, which I get is scary cuz batteries and all, but that's not nearly as bad as it's been once. I kinda wish battery replacement services were more prevalent, because I know I you can triple the kWh.

                  c_merriweather@social.linux.pizzaC 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • drangnon@hachyderm.ioD drangnon@hachyderm.io

                    @benroyce @GhostOnTheHalfShell @blogdiva there is also the consideration wrt the effects of vehicle exhaust. Unless the power plants are coal, that's a straight up win for the carbon cycle.

                    Of course the batteries have rare chemicals and extractive companies still come into play. But they are there for vehicles regardless.

                    lukefromdc@kolektiva.socialL This user is from outside of this forum
                    lukefromdc@kolektiva.socialL This user is from outside of this forum
                    lukefromdc@kolektiva.social
                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                    #114

                    @draNgNon @benroyce @GhostOnTheHalfShell @blogdiva And cobalt is used for refining gasoline as well as in lithium batteries

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • saxicola@toot.communityS saxicola@toot.community

                      @blogdiva
                      Didn't Maggie Thatcher sell them a significant part of our stake in the North Sea?

                      brad@1040ste.netB This user is from outside of this forum
                      brad@1040ste.netB This user is from outside of this forum
                      brad@1040ste.net
                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                      #115

                      @saxicola @blogdiva There's very little that excrescence and her depraved band of ghoulish bicycle-seat sniffers didn't rip up and sell off cheap. Destruction and exploitation is the only thing Tory bastards know how to do.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • blogdiva@mastodon.socialB blogdiva@mastodon.social

                        malthusianism is eugenics which is always founded on racism.

                        if you agree with anything malthusian, i would suggest going into cult deprogramming therapy.

                        malthusianism ―like eugenics, like racism, like capitalism― is a death cult.

                        @mark @anthropy @GhostOnTheHalfShell @benroyce

                        miguelpergamon@kolektiva.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                        miguelpergamon@kolektiva.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                        miguelpergamon@kolektiva.social
                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                        #116

                        @blogdiva @mark @anthropy @GhostOnTheHalfShell @benroyce

                        Sure "Malthusianism" starts with what everyone thinks is popularly known but then it descends into boring old statistics, economics, efforts to prevent starvation through parliament and conversations with Riccardo.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • blogdiva@mastodon.socialB blogdiva@mastodon.social

                          STOP

                          Mama Gaya is enough.

                          the death cult of settler colonialist, extractivist capitalism is the problem.

                          there's a reason LAND REDISTRIBUTION WARS started after the wars of independence across all the Américas.

                          no nation can survive when capitalists control all the land. you cant cash crop ecosystems into profits without genocide and ecocide.

                          kill capalism to save us all.

                          malthusianism is eugenics & racist. deprogram that shit.

                          @ArchaeoIain @jwcph @benroyce @GhostOnTheHalfShell

                          ghostonthehalfshell@masto.aiG This user is from outside of this forum
                          ghostonthehalfshell@masto.aiG This user is from outside of this forum
                          ghostonthehalfshell@masto.ai
                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                          #117

                          @blogdiva @ArchaeoIain @jwcph @benroyce

                          that’s right. Capitalism is the global supply chain. To break capitalism, de couple from the global supply chain.

                          This is the most important problem to address.

                          jwcph@helvede.netJ 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • anthropy@mastodon.derg.nzA anthropy@mastodon.derg.nz

                            @c_merriweather @adriano @GhostOnTheHalfShell @blogdiva @benroyce I bought a nissan leaf 2013 about half a year ago. less than 70k km on the odometer, 90% original battery capacity. Cost me 4.5k. Saved me over 1k in gasoline so far

                            I think people aren't looking enough at the second hand EV market tbqh, which I get is scary cuz batteries and all, but that's not nearly as bad as it's been once. I kinda wish battery replacement services were more prevalent, because I know I you can triple the kWh.

                            c_merriweather@social.linux.pizzaC This user is from outside of this forum
                            c_merriweather@social.linux.pizzaC This user is from outside of this forum
                            c_merriweather@social.linux.pizza
                            wrote sidst redigeret af
                            #118

                            @anthropy

                            Folks like me don't have $ to buy "new" cars, EV or not. Survivor's benefits are at poverty level.

                            @adriano @GhostOnTheHalfShell @blogdiva @benroyce

                            benroyce@mastodon.socialB adriano@lile.clA anthropy@mastodon.derg.nzA 3 Replies Last reply
                            0
                            • c_merriweather@social.linux.pizzaC c_merriweather@social.linux.pizza

                              @anthropy

                              Folks like me don't have $ to buy "new" cars, EV or not. Survivor's benefits are at poverty level.

                              @adriano @GhostOnTheHalfShell @blogdiva @benroyce

                              benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                              benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                              benroyce@mastodon.social
                              wrote sidst redigeret af
                              #119

                              @c_merriweather @anthropy @adriano @GhostOnTheHalfShell @blogdiva

                              sure but that's a different problem

                              massive subsidies for EV purchase would help

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • c_merriweather@social.linux.pizzaC c_merriweather@social.linux.pizza

                                @anthropy

                                Folks like me don't have $ to buy "new" cars, EV or not. Survivor's benefits are at poverty level.

                                @adriano @GhostOnTheHalfShell @blogdiva @benroyce

                                adriano@lile.clA This user is from outside of this forum
                                adriano@lile.clA This user is from outside of this forum
                                adriano@lile.cl
                                wrote sidst redigeret af
                                #120

                                @c_merriweather At that income level, these problems are best solved through clean public transport. I know it's very hard to achieve in the USA outside large cities, but that's happening right now here in Santiago de Chile: the bus fleet is modernizing with electric vehicles which are also much more comfortable. @anthropy @GhostOnTheHalfShell @blogdiva @benroyce

                                benroyce@mastodon.socialB 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • benhm3@saint-paul.usB benhm3@saint-paul.us

                                  @GhostOnTheHalfShell @anthropy @benroyce @blogdiva

                                  I’m sorry Ghost, you’re wrong. You’ve been mislead by oil companies to confuse things like power and energy.

                                  Try this video. But stop at the end-credits: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KtQ9nt2ZeGM

                                  For the rest of my people, watch the post-roll and put it on loop.

                                  ghostonthehalfshell@masto.aiG This user is from outside of this forum
                                  ghostonthehalfshell@masto.aiG This user is from outside of this forum
                                  ghostonthehalfshell@masto.ai
                                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                                  #121

                                  @BenHM3

                                  have watched that video. nowhere in it does he actually address the environmental destruction that comes from exponential growth extracting, aluminum, copper, silver, nickel, and lithium.

                                  To extract and purify the resources is necessary to transform power generation requires destroying the planet in the process.

                                  The resource extraction and refinement industry is no different than big oil.

                                  ghostonthehalfshell@masto.aiG 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • adriano@lile.clA adriano@lile.cl

                                    @c_merriweather At that income level, these problems are best solved through clean public transport. I know it's very hard to achieve in the USA outside large cities, but that's happening right now here in Santiago de Chile: the bus fleet is modernizing with electric vehicles which are also much more comfortable. @anthropy @GhostOnTheHalfShell @blogdiva @benroyce

                                    benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                                    benroyce@mastodon.socialB This user is from outside of this forum
                                    benroyce@mastodon.social
                                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                                    #122

                                    @adriano @c_merriweather @anthropy @GhostOnTheHalfShell @blogdiva

                                    as an american, i envy the commitment to mass transit in other countries. the usa is really pathetic on this topic

                                    adriano@lile.clA 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • ghostonthehalfshell@masto.aiG ghostonthehalfshell@masto.ai

                                      @BenHM3

                                      have watched that video. nowhere in it does he actually address the environmental destruction that comes from exponential growth extracting, aluminum, copper, silver, nickel, and lithium.

                                      To extract and purify the resources is necessary to transform power generation requires destroying the planet in the process.

                                      The resource extraction and refinement industry is no different than big oil.

                                      ghostonthehalfshell@masto.aiG This user is from outside of this forum
                                      ghostonthehalfshell@masto.aiG This user is from outside of this forum
                                      ghostonthehalfshell@masto.ai
                                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                                      #123

                                      @BenHM3

                                      Furthermore, he uses a false equivalence between lead recycling in lead acid batteries other technologies like PV or wind turbines.

                                      These are not equivalent artifacts in terms of recycling. Building panels or turbines from new resources is less expensive than using recycled resources.

                                      Extracting one material from these devices, usually precludes extracting other materials from these devices.

                                      ghostonthehalfshell@masto.aiG 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • c_merriweather@social.linux.pizzaC c_merriweather@social.linux.pizza

                                        @anthropy

                                        Folks like me don't have $ to buy "new" cars, EV or not. Survivor's benefits are at poverty level.

                                        @adriano @GhostOnTheHalfShell @blogdiva @benroyce

                                        anthropy@mastodon.derg.nzA This user is from outside of this forum
                                        anthropy@mastodon.derg.nzA This user is from outside of this forum
                                        anthropy@mastodon.derg.nz
                                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                                        #124

                                        @c_merriweather @adriano @GhostOnTheHalfShell @blogdiva @benroyce I 100% get how tough that is, I've been there too. But these days second hand EVs are as cheap as normal cars, with less maintenance and fuel costs. only issue is range on those older models but if you don't need more than 100km between charges they're more than fine. And for less than 500 you can build an offgrid solar setup to charge it a bit with (2.5kw panels + offgrid inverter + 500Wh battery). I wish I had this back then tbh

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • benroyce@mastodon.socialB benroyce@mastodon.social

                                          @adriano @c_merriweather @anthropy @GhostOnTheHalfShell @blogdiva

                                          as an american, i envy the commitment to mass transit in other countries. the usa is really pathetic on this topic

                                          adriano@lile.clA This user is from outside of this forum
                                          adriano@lile.clA This user is from outside of this forum
                                          adriano@lile.cl
                                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                                          #125

                                          @benroyce On the other hand, if they get it done in large metropolises like NYC, it will do *a lot*, I think. @c_merriweather @anthropy @GhostOnTheHalfShell @blogdiva

                                          benroyce@mastodon.socialB 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Svar
                                          • Svar som emne
                                          Login for at svare
                                          • Ældste til nyeste
                                          • Nyeste til ældste
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Log ind

                                          • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          Graciously hosted by data.coop
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Hjem
                                          • Seneste
                                          • Etiketter
                                          • Populære
                                          • Verden
                                          • Bruger
                                          • Grupper