Skip to content
  • Hjem
  • Seneste
  • Etiketter
  • Populære
  • Verden
  • Bruger
  • Grupper
Temaer
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Kollaps
FARVEL BIG TECH
  1. Forside
  2. Ikke-kategoriseret
  3. I love how this waxes poetically how "The exact words we choose when writing matter.

I love how this waxes poetically how "The exact words we choose when writing matter.

Planlagt Fastgjort Låst Flyttet Ikke-kategoriseret
59 Indlæg 45 Posters 1 Visninger
  • Ældste til nyeste
  • Nyeste til ældste
  • Most Votes
Svar
  • Svar som emne
Login for at svare
Denne tråd er blevet slettet. Kun brugere med emne behandlings privilegier kan se den.
  • tante@tldr.nettime.orgT tante@tldr.nettime.org

    RE: https://mastodon.social/@daringfireball/117106850045916140

    I love how this waxes poetically how "The exact words we choose when writing matter. I want any LLM I use to choose the very best, most precise words at every single decision point."

    My brother in christ: Then you shouldn't be using a stochastic text extruder.

    naturemc@mastodon.onlineN This user is from outside of this forum
    naturemc@mastodon.onlineN This user is from outside of this forum
    naturemc@mastodon.online
    wrote sidst redigeret af
    #37

    @tante 🎯
    Reading texts is part of my profession.

    As I tried to read that extreme tl;dr I asked myself, if my brain had lost too many synapses by the heatwave.

    If the future are such texts, 🥶 I want to retire straight away!

    bms@mastodon.bsd.cafeB 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • tante@tldr.nettime.orgT tante@tldr.nettime.org

      RE: https://mastodon.social/@daringfireball/117106850045916140

      I love how this waxes poetically how "The exact words we choose when writing matter. I want any LLM I use to choose the very best, most precise words at every single decision point."

      My brother in christ: Then you shouldn't be using a stochastic text extruder.

      pablobm@metalhead.clubP This user is from outside of this forum
      pablobm@metalhead.clubP This user is from outside of this forum
      pablobm@metalhead.club
      wrote sidst redigeret af
      #38

      @tante I'm particularly bewildered at the part about proofreading: so how do people use this stuff for proofreading exactly? Does Gruber accept el Claudillo's decree's^Wedits willy-nilly? "Oh the parrot likes this word better, I guess I'll use it then". Well, then you do deserve being flagged as AI-generated!

      db@magrathea.spaceD ben@mastodon.bentasker.co.ukB 2 Replies Last reply
      0
      • annika@xoxo.zoneA annika@xoxo.zone

        @tante "The idea that anything other than *my* needs should factor into the generation of text for *me* is patently offensive."

        That's the most direct "I don't care about externalities" I've read in a while.

        bms@mastodon.bsd.cafeB This user is from outside of this forum
        bms@mastodon.bsd.cafeB This user is from outside of this forum
        bms@mastodon.bsd.cafe
        wrote sidst redigeret af
        #39

        @annika @tante This attitude is more prevalent than one might think, and it extends into the domain of even those who, one might think, should know better.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • naturemc@mastodon.onlineN naturemc@mastodon.online

          @tante 🎯
          Reading texts is part of my profession.

          As I tried to read that extreme tl;dr I asked myself, if my brain had lost too many synapses by the heatwave.

          If the future are such texts, 🥶 I want to retire straight away!

          bms@mastodon.bsd.cafeB This user is from outside of this forum
          bms@mastodon.bsd.cafeB This user is from outside of this forum
          bms@mastodon.bsd.cafe
          wrote sidst redigeret af
          #40

          @NatureMC @tante thank you Petra for reminding me of my massive IETF RFC "to review" queue. 😞

          naturemc@mastodon.onlineN 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • europlus@social.europlus.zoneE europlus@social.europlus.zone

            @tante @daringfireball oh dog, it’s sooo looooong, I almost caved and got an AI to summarise it for me!

            naturemc@mastodon.onlineN This user is from outside of this forum
            naturemc@mastodon.onlineN This user is from outside of this forum
            naturemc@mastodon.online
            wrote sidst redigeret af
            #41

            @europlus 🤣 @tante @daringfireball

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • bms@mastodon.bsd.cafeB bms@mastodon.bsd.cafe

              @NatureMC @tante thank you Petra for reminding me of my massive IETF RFC "to review" queue. 😞

              naturemc@mastodon.onlineN This user is from outside of this forum
              naturemc@mastodon.onlineN This user is from outside of this forum
              naturemc@mastodon.online
              wrote sidst redigeret af
              #42

              @bms My condolences. 😎 @tante

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • frog_reborn@mstdn.socialF frog_reborn@mstdn.social

                @tante

                His brain is truly cooked

                "LLMs are, in their popular incarnations, non-deterministic. Ask the same question of the same model and you often get at least slightly different answers. Maybe the same meaning, but different phrasing"

                "One of my fundamental problems with [watermarking] is that no two synonyms carry the exact same meaning. “He leaped at the chance” and “He jumped at the opportunity” are very similar sentences expressing the same general sentiment, but they are not the same

                greg@icosahedron.websiteG This user is from outside of this forum
                greg@icosahedron.websiteG This user is from outside of this forum
                greg@icosahedron.website
                wrote sidst redigeret af
                #43

                @frog_reborn @tante lmaooo. words only mean things sometimes, when it's convenient for my argument

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • G gerardthornley@hachyderm.io

                  @tymwol @danielaKay @tante Was going to say this also — patterns are likely to transfer from llm to natural writing as people get exposed to the former.

                  patrys@mastodon.onlineP This user is from outside of this forum
                  patrys@mastodon.onlineP This user is from outside of this forum
                  patrys@mastodon.online
                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                  #44

                  @GerardThornley @tymwol @danielaKay @tante

                  The watermarking is about *how* you choose the next token, not *which* word that ends up being. So the patterns are not something you can recognize or subconsciously learn and repeat.

                  For a gross oversimplification, imagine you always choose the second most likely candidate exactly eight times in a row, followed by selecting the fourth candidate exactly once, followed by exactly five more second candidates.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • tante@tldr.nettime.orgT tante@tldr.nettime.org

                    RE: https://mastodon.social/@daringfireball/117106850045916140

                    I love how this waxes poetically how "The exact words we choose when writing matter. I want any LLM I use to choose the very best, most precise words at every single decision point."

                    My brother in christ: Then you shouldn't be using a stochastic text extruder.

                    vorsos@beige.partyV This user is from outside of this forum
                    vorsos@beige.partyV This user is from outside of this forum
                    vorsos@beige.party
                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                    #45

                    @tante Yes, the genocide fan who denies trans voices and looks down on most of humanity is also a botlicker.

                    Anyone non-critically linking to independent Fox News dipshit John Gruber is dangerous.

                    https://beige.party/@Vorsos/115499360647025445

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • tante@tldr.nettime.orgT tante@tldr.nettime.org

                      RE: https://mastodon.social/@daringfireball/117106850045916140

                      I love how this waxes poetically how "The exact words we choose when writing matter. I want any LLM I use to choose the very best, most precise words at every single decision point."

                      My brother in christ: Then you shouldn't be using a stochastic text extruder.

                      unchartedworlds@scicomm.xyzU This user is from outside of this forum
                      unchartedworlds@scicomm.xyzU This user is from outside of this forum
                      unchartedworlds@scicomm.xyz
                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                      #46

                      @tante

                      Yes, silly to claim outrage about a non-deterministic thing being non-deterministic in a very slightly different way. It's a bit like giving an output in millimetres to a sum where one of the inputs was "about a mile".

                      But I feel I must give the writer credit for the phrase "the saccharine Claude personality stink"!

                      #LLMs

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • pablobm@metalhead.clubP pablobm@metalhead.club

                        @tante I'm particularly bewildered at the part about proofreading: so how do people use this stuff for proofreading exactly? Does Gruber accept el Claudillo's decree's^Wedits willy-nilly? "Oh the parrot likes this word better, I guess I'll use it then". Well, then you do deserve being flagged as AI-generated!

                        db@magrathea.spaceD This user is from outside of this forum
                        db@magrathea.spaceD This user is from outside of this forum
                        db@magrathea.space
                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                        #47
                        @pablobm @tante It’s baffling to me that someone who makes a living from his writing is taking this stance.
                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • pablobm@metalhead.clubP pablobm@metalhead.club

                          @tante I'm particularly bewildered at the part about proofreading: so how do people use this stuff for proofreading exactly? Does Gruber accept el Claudillo's decree's^Wedits willy-nilly? "Oh the parrot likes this word better, I guess I'll use it then". Well, then you do deserve being flagged as AI-generated!

                          ben@mastodon.bentasker.co.ukB This user is from outside of this forum
                          ben@mastodon.bentasker.co.ukB This user is from outside of this forum
                          ben@mastodon.bentasker.co.uk
                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                          #48

                          @pablobm @tante I made it to here before rolling my eyes

                          > serves to show just how little regard the people behind these generated-text fingerprinting schemes have for the actual craft of writing

                          I'm not sure it counts as a craft if you outsource it all to a machine

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • tante@tldr.nettime.orgT tante@tldr.nettime.org

                            RE: https://mastodon.social/@daringfireball/117106850045916140

                            I love how this waxes poetically how "The exact words we choose when writing matter. I want any LLM I use to choose the very best, most precise words at every single decision point."

                            My brother in christ: Then you shouldn't be using a stochastic text extruder.

                            munin@mastoart.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                            munin@mastoart.socialM This user is from outside of this forum
                            munin@mastoart.social
                            wrote sidst redigeret af
                            #49

                            @tante Also, you want the "best" word? What an unsolvable philosophical predicament to put onto a computer. Saying such things makes it obvious that they do not care about writing, language, or intent.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • krnlg@mastodon.socialK krnlg@mastodon.social

                              @tante
                              To me it's also like, not everything has to be perfectly optimised. How you write *doesn't* have to be perfect. How you live life doesn't have to be optimised.

                              caracabe@mastoart.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                              caracabe@mastoart.socialC This user is from outside of this forum
                              caracabe@mastoart.social
                              wrote sidst redigeret af
                              #50

                              @krnlg @tante As I like to say, “Be 80% of all you can be. Over-optimized systems are fragile.”

                              billseitz@mastodon.socialB 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • tante@tldr.nettime.orgT tante@tldr.nettime.org

                                RE: https://mastodon.social/@daringfireball/117106850045916140

                                I love how this waxes poetically how "The exact words we choose when writing matter. I want any LLM I use to choose the very best, most precise words at every single decision point."

                                My brother in christ: Then you shouldn't be using a stochastic text extruder.

                                ferrix@mastodon.onlineF This user is from outside of this forum
                                ferrix@mastodon.onlineF This user is from outside of this forum
                                ferrix@mastodon.online
                                wrote sidst redigeret af
                                #51

                                @tante a perversion of writing? By the perversion of writing machine?

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • tante@tldr.nettime.orgT tante@tldr.nettime.org

                                  RE: https://mastodon.social/@daringfireball/117106850045916140

                                  I love how this waxes poetically how "The exact words we choose when writing matter. I want any LLM I use to choose the very best, most precise words at every single decision point."

                                  My brother in christ: Then you shouldn't be using a stochastic text extruder.

                                  lrhodes@merveilles.townL This user is from outside of this forum
                                  lrhodes@merveilles.townL This user is from outside of this forum
                                  lrhodes@merveilles.town
                                  wrote sidst redigeret af
                                  #52

                                  @tante I totally identify with the sentiment. When I write, I want to result to reflect my intended meaning as faithfully as possible. I just don't get how you ever expect that from a LLM, even before it starts using acrostic poetry to thread its own copyright through what is ostensibly your writing.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • tymwol@hachyderm.ioT tymwol@hachyderm.io

                                    @danielaKay @tante you cannot watermark spelling, so it you used it only for spelling, it's a non issue...

                                    To be honest, I'd rather be worried it'd be the other way around: they watermark it by using specific words, etc, so it is a bit like people were treating em-dashes as a sign of AI usage, just now it is done on purpose. So same as before you could get accused of using AI because you used an em-dash, now it could be something else. So yeah, it would likely lead to some new problems we never needed.

                                    androcat@toot.catA This user is from outside of this forum
                                    androcat@toot.catA This user is from outside of this forum
                                    androcat@toot.cat
                                    wrote sidst redigeret af
                                    #53

                                    @tymwol

                                    In general, there is a massive amount of harm being done by normal numbnuts going "this is clearly AI, look at the [random shit]".

                                    Because most of the "telltales" of AI are due not to some "watermark" but to theft.

                                    The AI company stole some people's work, and now those people are being accused of using "AI".

                                    There are at least two artists on here having to deal with that on the regular, and it must be so infuriating and awful and disspiriting.

                                    @danielaKay @tante

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • tante@tldr.nettime.orgT tante@tldr.nettime.org

                                      RE: https://mastodon.social/@daringfireball/117106850045916140

                                      I love how this waxes poetically how "The exact words we choose when writing matter. I want any LLM I use to choose the very best, most precise words at every single decision point."

                                      My brother in christ: Then you shouldn't be using a stochastic text extruder.

                                      F This user is from outside of this forum
                                      F This user is from outside of this forum
                                      failedlyndonlarouchite@mas.to
                                      wrote sidst redigeret af
                                      #54

                                      @tante
                                      I would submit that if you consider the mythical average person and their writing, that an LLM would almost certainly improve that writing

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • landa@graz.socialL landa@graz.social

                                        @tante

                                        > The idea that anything other than my needs should factor into the generation of text for me is patently offensive.

                                        and here I thought he writes for his audience. 😉

                                        trashpanda@m.alittlenook.netT This user is from outside of this forum
                                        trashpanda@m.alittlenook.netT This user is from outside of this forum
                                        trashpanda@m.alittlenook.net
                                        wrote sidst redigeret af
                                        #55

                                        @Landa @tante I think that may be the most telling line in the whole piece.

                                        landa@graz.socialL 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • tante@tldr.nettime.orgT tante@tldr.nettime.org

                                          RE: https://mastodon.social/@daringfireball/117106850045916140

                                          I love how this waxes poetically how "The exact words we choose when writing matter. I want any LLM I use to choose the very best, most precise words at every single decision point."

                                          My brother in christ: Then you shouldn't be using a stochastic text extruder.

                                          R This user is from outside of this forum
                                          R This user is from outside of this forum
                                          robtrew@mathstodon.xyz
                                          wrote sidst redigeret af
                                          #56

                                          @tante
                                          > the very best most precise words

                                          Chasing the wrong performance indicator ?

                                          ( Watch postgrad thinking skills decline over 3 years, as they master the idiom of the journals )

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Svar
                                          • Svar som emne
                                          Login for at svare
                                          • Ældste til nyeste
                                          • Nyeste til ældste
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Log ind

                                          • Har du ikke en konto? Tilmeld

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          Powered by NodeBB Contributors
                                          Graciously hosted by data.coop
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Hjem
                                          • Seneste
                                          • Etiketter
                                          • Populære
                                          • Verden
                                          • Bruger
                                          • Grupper