"And the beast's number was 666"
The Monster drink logo is Hebrew numbers 666.
The number of the beast literally flies in front of the US seat of power
Yet #evangelical Muppets are still kissing the feet of their #antichrist
"And the beast's number was 666"
The Monster drink logo is Hebrew numbers 666.
The number of the beast literally flies in front of the US seat of power
Yet #evangelical Muppets are still kissing the feet of their #antichrist
Oh yeah, let's fucking (your word) insult folks who don't huff your ideology
That's going to end well.
Marinate in honey
@pdcawley @iris_meredith @Daojoan
I think some prog Euros are bringing in 3 day work weeks.
I would like to retain you for your prescience powers, what do you charge per second.
Not sure if you are following #climatecatastrophe
Humanity is fucked even without Ai.
We breached 6 of the nine indicators necessary for humanity to survive. Howling at data centres is a distraction and performance art.
Worse than
The ovens?
Rap* of Nanjing?
Unit 731?
Russian invaders using 30mm canon to shoot fleeing civilians in Irpin?
Burning witches?
Genocide of first nations?
Hell, any Genocide.
No. Ai is not the worst thing to happen to humanity.
Not even in the top 10.
The internet.
You know, the nuclear resilient comms network.
You must have heard if it.
I have old print mags with "Internet" mastheads.
That'd pretty much what's inside.
Carnivores trying to monetise it
The Internet was losing money for at least 20 years.
"Put me through to legal"
Only because you asked nicely 
The "GenAI is Failing" Narrative: Let's Unpack This 
In today's rapidly evolving AI landscape, it's easy to fall into common interpretive traps. Let me share some powerful insights on two "examples" being circulated as evidence that businesses are souring on GenAI.
Example #1: The Insurance Ad
"We still have humans" in an insurance commercial isn't evidence GenAI is failing — it's actually evidence GenAI is everywhere. Here's why this matters:
You don't pay for differentiation against something nobody is doing
The ad presupposes the saturation it claims to refute
Think of it like a "no GMO" sticker — it only exists because the alternative is mainstream
Example #2: The Job Ad
A job ad requesting "ability to develop software without AI assistance" is a competence floor, not a policy ban. Let's break this down:
It's not about prohibiting tools — it's about ensuring fundamentals 
Same principle as asking a cashier to do mental arithmetic 🧮
Here's the kicker: the shops writing that line are often the very same ones running Cursor and Claude Code internally 🤯
The Real Issue: Sample Size
Sample n=2. That's not a trend — that's two anecdotes wearing a trenchcoat.
Key Takeaway
Two of the most anti-AI possible readings of ambiguous evidence isn't trendspotting — it's confirmation-bias mining. Full stop. 
What are your thoughts? Have you noticed similar patterns in your industry? Drop a comment below 
#AI #GenAI #FutureOfWork #Innovation #ThoughtLeadership #TechTrends
"We still have humans" in an insurance ad is evidence GenAI is everywhere, not failing.
You don't pay for differentiation against something nobody is doing.
A job ad asking for "ability to develop software without AI assistance" is a competence floor, not a policy ban. Same as asking a cashier to do mental arithmetic. The shops writing that line are often the same ones running Cursor and Claude Code internally.
Sample n=2.
Two of the most anti-AI possible readings, ain't a trend it's confirmation-bias mining.
Its truly atrocious what horrible obscenities they have inflicted on artillery targeting computers (the first practical, large scale computer use) 
Lions taking villagers in Africa is a thing...
...there is probably a scientific corpus on the subject